. >> with me now is katie phang, msnbc legal contributor and brant williams. katie, there was a break in the case before the prosecutor was allowed to ask that question about the use of force and when use of force should have ended. the defense objected to that. can you explain why the defense might object to something that seems like an elemental question. >> it's kind of a two-fold answer for you. one, it was whether or not it was within the ability of this witness to be able to testify and whether or not it was something that this particular officer would be able to speak to, number one. and then number two, any chance the defense is going to get to be able to slow down this freight train of emotion coupled with the idea that there was a failure to adhere to policies and procedures, the defense is going to seize upon that. the ability for this particular witness to not be able to tell the jury, especially being his former shift supervisor, that it was unacceptable, it was incorrect for chauvin to continue to restrain george floyd when he had stopped, quote