jess bravin, do we know what the implications are? guest: the supreme court has laid down the guidelines of what they can and cannot do. federal immigration law does the -- cooperation between federal and state employees. if a local officer once to check somebody's immigration status, there is a 24-hour federal center to answer the questions, a federal data base. so, there is an expectation, as it is with almost every law, but different levels of government will call are free with each other in enforcing the law. if other states want to pass similar status check provisions as arizona or similar employer sanctions the way arizona passed, the supreme court has indicated those would be all right because they are foreseen by the federal immigration law. the question is, what happens if the state wants to emphasize one aspect of immigration policy more than others? arizona, for instance, putting all its efforts on the enforcement side and not looking at the other values that the federal law that tends to balance, that is something they can

let us look back jess bravin's story in "the wall street journal" this morning. with this make it to the supreme court? guest: there was a case filed in arizona by the aclu challenging the entire statute or most of the statute, including this provision during but i think the supreme court opinion has a prescriptive quality as well. arizona officials -- the judges, city attorneys and so forth who have to enforce their state law and remaining provision, they can read the supreme court opinion and could see the regarding interpretation. p so, the arizona law says that reasonable effort to check immigration status but it does not define what reasonable is. the supreme court indicated what reasonable is, and that means not holding someone solely to check the immigration status. the court gave examples. if a cop stops someone for jaywalking and has reason to check immigration status, they cannot hold them for another couple of hours if they would not hold them anyway for jaywalking. no one would be held in jail for jaywalking. so in that instance, it would not be reaso

we look at the process as it relates to the intentional control of the bravin. we look at the accuracy as to how the brain receives information. is schematically approved by training. we can speed up the brain almost always by two to three-fold in an old animal or human not so far away from the end of life. we look at an animal and dealing with complex information occurring across time, and it has improved. we look to the processes that relate to the flexibility of the operation of the brain and their dramatically improved. we look to the processes that relate to memory or recording information in the brain. everything is approved. physically, functionally, and chemically improved. this is an asset we should use. but how can we use it? before describe that, i want to say -- you know, how do you turn an old brain that appears to be deteriorating into a physically and functioning younger one? the answer is, you train it. you have to train inappropriately. there are certain strategies that have to be applied, obviously. another question is, why does the brain deter

our guests include "wall street journal" supreme court correspondent jess bravin, and

our guest includes jess bravin and paul gosar and silvestre reyes. we will also talk to brian sigritz. "washington journal" is live every day at 7:00 a.m. eastern. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] >> it could be that the republicans look feeble. there would be a nominee, and the republicans would then rally around that nominee. it is going to be close. i would have told you that the media would eat that up. this is a race. and i tell you what the next phase is going to be. the next phase is going to be that the media is going to be more alert to the fact that mitt romney has been completely evasive about his positions. he has been all over on many of them, and he has tried to play a game of hide and seek with the american people, and i think the news media will be challenged to challenge him to b more forthcoming, and then the story is going to be that for a while. that is the nature of this business. >> look beyond the process when you want on line with the c-span video

our guests include jess bravin, and rep paul gosar and democrats silvestre reyes. it will also look at the fiscal health of states with the national association of state budget officers. boston journal is live on c-span every day -- washington journal is live on c-span every day. sunday, david pietrusza is our guest. his passion for u.s. presidents and baseball has resulted in a dozen books, including, "lbj vs jfk vs nixon." and join us live with your calls, e-mails and tweets for sunday at noon eastern on "book and that. the supreme court struck down most of arizona's immigration law but of how the provision that requires police officers to review a person's immigration status if they suspect the person is in the country illegally. arizona governor says because the heart of the bill was upheld, the legislation was vindicated. she spoke with reporters for about 10 minutes. good morning. to all of you and thank you for being here. let me begin by saying from the moment i signed into law centile arizona has preparing for this year -- this day. let's reflect on what h