but today, brazil isn't just respected for, so but for lots of things. >> reporter: brazil's growing maturity has come at a price, perhaps, for its soccer game. its team traded in the risk-taking, offense-driven style of old for a cautious , strategic-minded game. to those who complain about style, one of the top players said recently, i say nothing's more beautiful than winning. winning and style were what the fans were look for today . fans like ivone and william sabona. >> what matters is to win and play beautifully. that's what brazil know knows how to do. >> reporter: but today's work man-like effort was neither as the team ground out a goalless 0-0 tie against portugal. brazil's world cup prospects aren't dimmed. monday is the next game that counts, and maybe that explains the calm look on the faces of these rio fans as they streamed home from the arena, or maybe it's the -- that these days they and their country have a lot of other endeavors they're playing to win. >> brown: i talked with margaret a short time ago right after she filed that report from rio. well, margaret othe

turkey and brazil voted against sanctions. they negotiated a deal last month to ship low-enriched uranium out of iran in exchange for medical reactor fuel. both countries criticized today's action. >> the concerns regarding the nuclear program raise today will not be resolved until dialogue begins by adopting sanctions. this council is actually opting for one of the two traction that were supposed to run in parallel. in our opinion, the wrong one. >> suarez: the u.s. and others dismissed the fuel swap with brazil and turkey because iran would be allowed to keep enough material for a nuclear weapon and continue enriching uraniumed. in washington, president obama spoke after the u.n. vote. he said this day was not inevitable. >> we know the iranian government will not change its behavior overnight, but today's vote demonstrates the growing cost that will come with iranian intransigence. now, i want to be clear-- these

the current brazil team has sacrificed flare in favor of

other favorites include brazil, spain, the netherlands, serbia and portugal. throughout the tournament, fans won't just follow the teams-- a number of global superstars like portugal's cristiano ronaldo will carry their country's hopes for a shot at the cup final, july 11. more now about the beautiful game, and what people will be watching for here and around the world. david hirshey is the co-author of "the espn world cup companion: everything you need to know about the world's biggest sporting event." he's a former soccer reporter for the "new york daily news." and christine brennan is a sportswriter and columnist for abc and "usa today" who has covered previous cups. david hirshey, let me start with you. these guys play constantly, in continental championships, national championships. they play for professional clubs. they play for the international team. they're always playing. why does the world cup stand head and shoulders above that constant round of championship play ? >> because for four years these players are trying to qualify for the tournament tha

we think that there is an opportunity perhaps for brazil and for others to be acquainted with the change that is are have been made to determine whether or not that satisfies the concerns that have been raised. in the meantime, in order to avoid some very serious imposition imfringement on intellectual property that would have severely compromised agriculture, we made a destoigs make some interim steps to protect agriculture as much as we could. >> on a domestic subsidy issue as well. the administration is twice attempted to curtail subdi payments to the wealthiest farmers. capitol hill doesn't seem too interested in that. what are you going to do differently in the 2012 farm bill to address your concerns about the richest farmers getting subsidies? >> well, i think chairman peterson again is engaged in a listening sessions and has indicated the need for us to take a look at the way in which those payments are struct trd to determine whether or not we can use risk management principles and technologies to be able to provide a broader safety net at the same time making sure that it's fair

the american taxpayers will be paying $147 million a year to brazil because the agriculture department was ruled illegal by the trade organization. what are you going to do about that? >> we have to educate people about what has been done about the credit export program that may be responsive to the concerns raised by brazil and the world trade auk -- world trade organization. it has been substantially less than the penalties that were assessed a would have compromised agribusiness in a very significant way. not only would we had terraces sensed -- tariffs assessed against them, but we would have intellectual property compromised as a result of that decision. >> would not be cheaper to revise the underlying cotton program that cost taxpayers between $2,000,000,000.- 1294967773 dollars a year? >> the reality is that changes have been made -- between $2 billion and $3 billion a year. >> there is an opportunity for brazil and others to determine whether or not that satisfies the concerns that have been raised. in order to avoid some very serious imposition infringement on intellectual pro

turkey and brazil have worked hard to make progress on he research reactor proposal.efforts that reflect the leaders good intentions to address the irania people's humaitarian needs while building more international confidence about the nature of iran's nuclr program. my governmt will continue o discuss iranians revised proposal and concerns about it as appropriate. but the tehran reactor then and now does notespond to the fundamental well-founded and unanswered concerns about iran's nuclear program. this resolution does. until the world's concerns with iran's nuclear defiance are fully resolved, we must work together to insure that the sanctions in the resolution are fully and firmly implemented. we must ensure that the development of the most devastating weapons ever devised by uman science is prescribed by the most responsible controlled ever produced. la month 189 countries can together to strengthen the nuear non-proliferation treaty as a cornerstone of global security. today's resoluton is an important part of that. the nnpt must remain at the center of the glob

. >> three days of rain bring about deadly flooding in brazil. >> fire in the southwest. wild fire troubles increased. >> some lane closures still in effect on the j.f.x. we'llll >> and welcome back. it is 77 degrees downtown at the maryland science center. a beautiful monday morning. we're waiting for summer to kick in. we are officially now turning into the summer season. we'll keep the heat in the forecast. the humidity has come down in the forecast. 72 degrees at the airport. the dew points are running in the boer end of the 60's. most people feel uncomfortable when the dew point reaches 70. we're still forecasting temperatures close to 90. clear skies with a few high, thin clouds will likely moved in this afternoon. we're watching some thunderstorms off to our west. some of the clouds will travel westbound into the mid atlantic region. i think all of the rain will stay out there until we get to tomorrow and wednesday. high pressure in control right now. high pressure moving through new england will keep things quiet today. this front will dissipate over the next 24 h

didn't say which country had been plunged into darkness by computer hackers, but we found out it was brazil. we also found out that hackers had been infiltrating everything from our defense networks to the financial system. bank robbers are now stealing more money with computers than they are with guns. >> there are thousands of attempted attacks every single day, tens of thousands of attacks. >> we turned the corner and it was... there it was right in front of us. >> logan: right there? >> right there. >> logan: when bob ballard discovered the "titanic" two miles down, there was a lot he couldn't talk about because it was top secret. but he has since opened up, and he opened up his film vault to us. >> all that's left of human signature are their shoes, and all around the "titanic" are pairs of shoes. okay, on the rise. welcome aboard. >> logan: thank you, dr. ballard. >> logan: he is, by any measure, the greatest explorer of our times. he's taken deep sea exploration to a new level, designing equipment that allows him to go deeper and see more detail than ever before. in just the time we

host: officially joining iran in support is brazil and turkey. why? guest: somewhat unexpected in the sense that brazil and tuukey, eeks before this resolution was passed, made a diplomatic gambit to tehran. they tried to resuscitate a deal that had been offered last october. i think that there was certainly some kind of disagreement or miscommunication between the united states, turkey, and brazil. personally i do not think of the united states bought the this? it would succeed. certainly the iranians would sign off on this deal. having to honor the efforts of its some leadership to make a good-faith gesture. host: this is a news analysis from "the new york times" this morning. "why have the two countries been openly defying the united states by voting against new sanctions? for the united states it was a slap in the face from a close ally prompting some soul- searching about turkey. robert gates made a note that turkey was moving eastward, a shiff that he attributed to their turned down response to join. turkey the east-west bridge, siding with the

this week, that is something for brazil and turkey to explain. why did we announce that tuesday that we had reached agreement with the p-5-plus-1? because we'd reached agreement with the p-5- plus-1 in advance of the resolution process. it is perfectly reflective of our dual-track approach in terms of both advancing and engaging and being open to diplomacy. and even as we stand here, we continue to be open to any diplomacy that countries like brazil and turkey are willing to engage in. and we appreciate their efforts or any diplomacy that iran is prepared to engage in. and we are still open to that. and iran, you know, even following the tehran declaration and -- has yet to pick up the phone and call, you know, the p-5-plus-1 and say, we're ready to talk about our nuclear program. that is something we've been waiting months and years for iran to do. we -- we have a -- the same strategic goal that turkey and brazil have in preventing the emergence of a nucllar iran. we do disagree on -- on tactics. we do have a disagreemenn about -- about whether

[laughter] >> did the president's letters to brazil and turkey come up in the meeting? beyond that, there seems to be miscommunication at least on the surface about how much the u.s. understood what turkey and brazil were doing. >> i do not think there was a miscommunication at all. the issue that was discussed during the meeting was not so much what was in the trr proposal but what iran has chosen to do and continue o do outside of the trr proposal. i think from our standpoint, the statements by the foreign minister both in new york and also back in tehran that the trr deal in essence does not matter. iran is prepared to continue to enrich, which means that iran is stating that it is prepared to continue to function outside of international obligations, its responsibilities to the iaea, and its response of delays on a multiple united nations security council resolutions. the secretary made that point, which is that we deeply appreciate what turkey did and continues to do in terms of seeking a diplomatic solution. we think that the diplomatic track and pressure track wo

2 i wouldo fuels made from sugar conttin ethanol through a $12 million joint venture proposed for brazil. up investment and technologies such as these are creating jobs. one out of every $5 pent some the u.s. supporting new energy jobs comes by investments made in our industry which already supports more than 9.2 million american jobs. we need to retain these jobs and create new ones to fuel the economy of the future. society, government and business must all do their part. absence of a robust energy policy has been a disadvantage of to this nation. shell supports legislating a solution to energy and climate issues as a means to create a secure u.s. energy future, to reduce dependence on imported oil and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. this requires setting a price for carbon. shying away from oil and gas development, during the transition is not the answer. oil and gas development is too important to the u.s. energy supplies and economy to move forward. shell stands ready with skilled people in state-of-the-art technology to continue meeting american's needs. thank you for your time

wh-- coming to brazil, and also finding its way to north america. we were developing our own capacities for the first time. we were trying to bring together these regional operations focused on i.p. crime. that was the focus of our activity in the border area. it was focused on this area. we provided the leadership. we brought the public together. we worked with our regional bureau buenos aires. we have participation from those agencies. for the very first time we did this, we had supporters of the program. we were trying to focus the attention of police and customs to seek to what extent we could coordinate simultaneous activity on either side of the border. we got much more sophisticated. we started to look at the ports used to import products mainly for originating from southeast asia into south america. we looked at the distribution networks. worked with the country's down there. we worked with other countries, including uruguay and chile. these were the deployments. we spent a lot of time on the ground working with our colleagues. our role was

and brazil are the world's largest ethanol producers and i'm glad to hear from brazil's private ethanol producers that they have no plan to supply ethanol to iran, bbending it to gasoline, as they prefer to build a global export market an cord by the u.s. and european markets. that's why this bill is so important. we must continue to monitor this area, the ethanol imports could undermine energy sanctions on iran. it has been recognized that a nuclear armed iran would be a danger not only to israel but also to the entire middle east and the nuclear non-proliferation regime and is sun acceptable, when ahmadinejad says he wants to wipe israel off the face of the earth, he means it. when he calls the u.s. the great state, he means it. we need this bill to hit them where it hurts and i urge my colleagues to vote for this bill today. i yield back. ms. ros-lehtinen: thankkyou, mr. speaker. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from florida. ms. ros-lehtinen: i'm proud to yield to mr. garrett, the ranking member on government sponsored enterprises as well as a house conferee on this measure.

a couple of weeks ago with iran and brazil holding hands and the air in opposition to u.s. policy to iran. when we had the last war in iraq, they refused to let us use the territory. we had to go all the way around it. they are supposed to be our france. -- supposedly are friends. it used to be a good friend of israel for years, but now because they are becoming more islamist -- was a beautiful country, the people of great. change the country -- but i saw the pictures, almost all women now are being covered and they are going back. turkey, please do something about your government. don't let them bring you back to the point of being one of those backward countries in the middle east. host: from "the new york times" -- the israeli prime minister cancelled as plans to come to washington to meet with the present. the two men did speak by phone within hours and the white house recently released an account -- the li anne had this comment -- brad is joining us from annandale, virginia. caller: how are you this morning? i just wanted to make a couple of quick points. the situation

i went to brazil earlier this year for the first international trip of my lifetime.most people in this room have probably traveled outside this country many times. i cannot wait for the next trip. you embrace foreign policy where as most voters don't. &éawhill we both agree that jobs and the economy will be number one, i think there'll be overriding issues and jobs will probably be the biggest there are many other issues that voters care about, you are absolutely right. you cannot assume that every millennial will be a supporter of gay rights or abortion rights or interested in foreign policy or be progressive. >> i would add to that and say that when you're talking to the rest of progress of mullen males -- millennial, when you talk about those issues like the economy and health care, you make sure you explain the pieces of that issue that impacted them. when you talk about education and you talk about investments and national service. your making sure that even though you may be talking about the same issues led everyone cares about, and young people traditionally

though brazil beat out the u.s. for the side of the olympics, i think that this kind of personal friendship and personal interaction and sense of confidence and trust that is built up in these summits is actually a real plus for the united states. and i think what obama and the secretary are both trying to convey to leaders is we are not keen on being the super power in the world. but we are still interested in maintaining american involve dwrmt and -- involvement and leadership as an effort goes forward in working out a sense of direction for the world in terms of the global economy, in terms of global energy problems, in terms of global climate change, in terms of global poverty and development, in terms of global health, in terms of the oceans and all the other global problems that we have that we certainly cannot deal with by ourselves. so thank you for your question. host: col in bradford, thank you for being here talking to us. host: in just a few minutes we will be talking about general petraeus and strategy

otherwise these jobs will lead the country, go to brazil and indonesia and never return. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. mr. poe: and that's just the way it is. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: ms. woolsey of california. for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan rise? >> unanimous consent to claim her time. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for five minutes.%- mr. schauer: mr. speaker, two years -- two weeks ago, two weeks ago the secretary of nt congressional district, michigan, in our country lost a hero. on june 9, first lieutenant joel of grass lake, east of jackson, was killed while compleeing a helicopter rescue mission in southern afghanistan. he was 245 years old. the -- 25 years old. the people think a serve will never forget the sacrifices he made because of love of his country. i'd like to share his story with you. joel ran cross country at chelsea high school where he graduated in 2002. he attended purdue university and graduated with honors in aerospace engineering in 2007. in june

ahmadinejad urged the international community to support his country's agreement brokered with turkey and brazil to swap nuclear fuel. he said it would resolve the nuclear issue. but he warned it is a one-time opportunities, and that imposing more sanctions on iran would be a mistake. the u.n. security council is scheduled to vote on a new round of sanctions tomorrow morning. in washington, a state department spokesman said iran has had more than enough time to change its course. >> iran wants to portray itself as the victim here. iran is not the victim. iran is an actor in this play. it's iran that has failed to come forward and meet its international obligations. what we are saying is that failure has consequences. we are not closing the door to any step beyond, you know, the sanctions vote tomorrow. >> holman: in london u.s. defense secretary robert gates insisted it's not too late to stop the iranians from developing a nuclear weapon. he said the clock is ticking. >> voters in 12 states headed to the polls this primary tuesday to determine the fates of senators, house members, and governors.

and brazil are the world's largest ethanol producers and i'm glad to hear from brazil's private ethanol producers that they have no plan to supply ethanol to iran, bbending it to gasoline, as they prefer to build a global export market an cord by the u.s. and european markets. that's why this bill is so important. we must continue to monitor thi% area, the ethanol imports could undermine energy sanctions on iran. it has been recognized that a nuclear armed iran would be a danger not only to israel but also to the entire middle east and the nuclear non-proliferation regime and is sun acceptable, when ahmadinejad says he wants to wipe israel off the face of the earth, he means it. when he calls the u.s. the great state, he means it. we need this bill to hit them where it hurts and i urge my colleagues to vote for this bill today. i yield back. ms. ros-lehtinen: thankkyou, mr. speaker. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from florida. ms. ros-lehtinen: i'm proud to yield to mr. garrett, the ranking member on government sponsored enterprises as well as a house conferee on this measure.

margaret warner filed a blog from rio de janiero about reactions to the gulf oil spill as brazil racesvelop its own oil resources. paul solman responds to viewer emails criticizing a recent report showing a man chasing a chicken. that's on his "making sense" page. and on "art beat," jeff talks to dance company directors about the state of ballet in america. all that and more is on our web site, newshour.pbs.org. jeff? >> brown: and that's the "newshour" for tonight. i'm jeffrey brown. >> woodruff: and i'm judy woodruff. we'll see you on-line and again here tomorrow evening with mark shields and david brooks, among others. thank you and good night. major funding for the pbs newshour has been provided by: and by the alfred p. sloan foundation. supporting science, technology, and improved economic performance and financial literacy in the 21st century. and with the ongoing support of these institutions and foundations. and... this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting. and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. captioning spon

countries that we've been working the cooperatively with on some of these issues, mexico, south africa, brazil, india. we will participate in public awareness campaigns. it is true that we will absolutely not prosecute our way out of this problem. i think education, any effective enforcement effort, has to be done side-by-side with public awareness campaigns, like the ones that icc has done, to get the message out there. we have had defendants as part of plea agreements go to a i schools to talk about the consequences of these problems -- a two high schools to talk about the consequences of these problems, consequences of engaging in these. that has been fairly successful. we are also looking for opportunities to engaging in public awareness through the doj public task force. those are some of the things we are working on, some of the things we are doing. i think it is a growing problem. i hope that these efforts will have growing effectiveness as well. thank you very much but i appreciate the opportunity to be here. -- thank you very much. i appreciate the opportunity to be here. [applause] >

anada, brazil and ofoue u, mr. blumenauer, have introdud or will soon introduce legislation to repeal the oil and gas tax loopholes and direct the funds to cln energy we'vgo theltimate solution, t off ssil fuel depend and look to, in a megfulay, those alteative sourceof energy that coulreallyelss our dependence, if not wean us entirely of the depeence of foren oil. in my home state of virginia, e tential offshore wind power i enormous. arng pot tension for offshore oil -- the potential for offshore oi whether we should drill,aby, drill off the ores of virginia, the entire estimated reserves, maximum, offhe shore of virnia, with thelargest coast line on the eastst is the equivalef no more than six days of oil supply. do we really want to risk the tourism industry, our vironment, perhaps permantl and thpresence of e vy in state thahas alrebeen home to the united states navy for six days'th of supply? ihink not. and so, the democrats ins house have in fact introduced legislaonhat wi address and remedy this situation a

wouldn't it be wise to say, ok, let's pump the brakes on the sanctions and let turkey and brazil try their mediation track and see what happens because the sanctions regime clearly seems to be in the eyes of iran to be counterproductive. >> first of all, october, november, december, january, february, march, april, may, june, for nine months iran has had the opportunity to engage the international community following up on the meeting of october 1. it has failed to do so. no one has prevented iran from picking up the phone, calling the e.u. or iaea and coming forward, only recently when they understood that a sanctions resolution was clearly going to be put on the table, did they even bother to respond formally on the proposal that they had in their hands from october 1. so the rett sense is not about the international community but about iran and its failure to engage significancely. in terms of mediation, we aren't ruling out mediation, but this isn't an either/or situation. these two tracks run in parallel. we would like to see iran engage constructively and we believe putting add

brazil understands that.nd when this is put to a vote, turkey, brazil, other countries will have to judge how to proceed. >> can i go back to the human rights council, though, for a second? >> yeah. >> you said there was a rush to judgment. it didn't agree with the initial findings. i'm wondering, in light of that, what you make of the fact that only the dutch and the italians voted against this with you, and that some of your closest allies, including the french, the belgians, the japanese, the brits, and the south koreans abstained. >> well, i mean, we understand that. one of the reasons why we joined the human rights council was that we hope that over time that it would take a more balanced and appropriate response to urgent situations. >> right. >> and as our statement indicated, we believe that this particular resolution is a rushed judgment. it risks further politicizing a sensitive and volatile situation. so we made our judgment that this was not the right vehicle to advance the understanding of what h

brazil understands that. and when this is put to a vote, turkey, brazil, other countries will have to judge how to proceed. >> can i go back to the human rights council, though, for a second? >> yeah. >> you said there was a rush to judgment. it didn't agree with the initial findings. i'm wondering, in light of that, what you make of the fact that only the dutch and the italians voted against this with you, and that some of your closest allies, including the french, the belgians, the japanese, the brits, and the south koreans abstained. >> well, i mean, we understand that. one of the reasons why we joined the human rights council was that we hope that over time that it would take a more balanced and appropriate response to urgent situations. >> right. >> and as our statement indicated, we believe that this particular resolution is a rushed judgment. it risks further politicizing a sensitive and volatile situation. so we made our judgment that this was not the right vehicle to advance the understanding of what

wouldn't it be wise to say, okay, let's pump the brakes on the sanctions and let turkey and brazil try their mediation track and see what happens because the sanctions regime clearly seems to be, you know, in the eyes of iran counterproductive. >> first of all, october, november, december, january, february, march, april, may, june. for nine months iran has had the opportunity to engage the international community following up on the meeting of october one and has failed do so. nobody prevents iran from calling the eu or the i.e.a and coming forward. only recently when they understood that a sanctions resolution was clearly going to be put on the table, they even bothered to respond formally to the i.e.a on the proposal that they had in their hands from october one. the read sense is not the responsible of the independent i want community. this is about iran's failure to engage significantly. we're not ruling out mediation but this is not an either/or situation. these two tracks work in parallel. we'd like to see iran work and engage constructively. we believe putting additional pressu

brazil understand that. and when this is put for a vote, turkey, brazil, and other countries will have to judge how to proceed. >> can i go back to the human- rights council? >> yes. >> you said there was a rush to judgment. it did not agree with the initial finding. i am wondering what you make of the fact that only the dutch and the italians voted against what this with you, and that some of your closest allies including the french, belgian, the japanese, the brits, and the south koreans abstained. >> we understand that. one of the reasons why we joined the human rights council was that we hope that over time it would take a more balanced and appropriate response to urgent situation. >> right. >> as our statement indicated, we believe that this particular resolution is a rush to judgment. it risks further politicizing a sensitive and volatile situation. we made our judgment that this was not the writer vehicle to advance the -- the right vehicle to advance the understanding of what happened on these ships.

quickly on this, and other parts of the world, the world bank is supporting cash transfer programs and brazil program in haiti? to make this is something we discussed regularly. with cash transfer context, i talked about the school program is not a cash transfer as such but gives incentives for families to send their kids to school it would benefit so that we can implement in haiti. with the community coming together with the individual community comes with their own project they would benefit from the program so to build social capital to have balance our people living in the community or outside of the community but i think the answer your expecting is well you provide cash to famils on the condition that they do something, but in haiti the conditions that if we word to do that in haiti, which wemight the beneficiary size would be so large and brazil you can do it because the group is sizable but in haiti -- you'd have to do is 70% of the population. i am not saying we will not do it by that will work better. >> monica, perhaps i could see you commenting on the trends of the framework we ha

countries want these drilling rigs to drill off shore, brazil, africa.going for half a million a day. we're talking tremendous amounts of money in the oil industry. and those are all write-offs. so i don't know -- you know, they're the cost of doing business. it's a really good point that there's so much in terms of cents, a quarter here, nickel there, 30 cents there. there's so much volatility in the market that i really don't understand why americans have seized on this cheap oil and the price varies so much from place to place, even in a town. there's no stability in the price of oil or the price of gasoline. and we're talking cents. but if there's, you know, a problem in the middle east, it could be, as we saw a couple of summers ago, dollars. host: so you don't understand why americans seize on it-to-it? guest: it just matters so much. the caller observed that there are these variations. and they're somewhat annoyed at the market because it happens all the time from week to week, day to day, from parts of town, around the country. you know, if you f

brazil owns % and all of the other countries combined own 18. you see growth well. i want you to walk back to another situation. the dollar was not always the world currency. prior to world war ii the pound was the world currency. there are a lot of reasons why the pound switched to the dollar. but there is also a story right after world war ii britain was in a situation. they spent a lot of money on the war. they had been in the battle longer than we had. their financial house was in disarray. they needed a loan. who were their best friends during the war? america. who did they shed blood and die with? america. they asked us for $5 billion for 0 interest. that is not unusual in that time. we told them no. we went back and said we would lone you some money, $2.5 billion. but we had other concerns. a lot of the concerns were where they were in india and the idea of the dollar not being the world currency. there were other factors involved. but you have to accept other terms. why would we ever put ourselves in a position as americans to accept terms we would never wan

brazil is blamed portugal. -- is play in portugal. -- playing against portugal.re are all sorts of brazilian-born players that portugal is able to bring over to brazil. phe story continues. host: the first call if the independent line. caller: i am a big d.c. united supporter. i got my first taste of football when i was stationed in germany. we got playing with some mexican friends of mine. i am a rabid supporter. go manchester united. i cannot wait to see what i cannot wait to see what happens between the u.s. and england. it will be a full-on war. to you think that soccer or football, excuse me, will ever catch on in america like it has in the european countries? my son is 10. he plays. i see a lot more of that. 10 years ago, you did not see that around here. this is in west virginia. it is starting to catch on. do you think it will surpass baseball or even get to the status of american football? i also saw you on the bbc world news. i cannot wait for it. u.s.-england. guest: thank you. i think it is interesting what he is saying about west virginia and the way

a six-month moratorium will in effect send these expensive rigs to brazil and indonesia. it will cause about $500,000 a day to operate one of these deep water offshore drilling rigs. these rigs are not going to sit there and wait for the federal government to make a decision. and just like what happened in the 1970's and 1980's with the american manufacturing industry when it left america, it has never returned. and these oil rigs in the deet water, when -- deep water when they leave american waters they will not return ever. they will find some other safe haven to drill for crude oil. the loss of our domestic source of oil in the gulf of mexico will make us further dependent on foreign oil. it means the united states will now have to import more oil from countries that don't like us, like the middle east, like those good friends in venezuela. it will increase the cost to all americans and that will increase tanker traffic bringing oil through the gulf of mexico. there is a greater risk from leakage of oil tankers than there is from any leakage of an offshore rig but we w

we can envisage that, but in haiti, the conditions are not the same as in brazil.eneficiary would be so large that you will create injustice if you select some group as opposed to others. in brazil, you can do it because the group of beneficiaries is quite limited, identifiable. in haiti, my assumption is if we were to do it, we would have to do it for 78% of the population, basically everybody living below $2 a day. i'm not saying we are not going to do it, but in haiti, we are looking for alternative forms that were better for the conditions in haiti. >> thank you. monica, perhaps i could ask you to comment onnhow you see the trends so far on the international aid framework that we have heard about. >> as i said, there are some very positive things that we are seeing. most of the donors that we met with understand and accept the various principles and a new level of voter accountability. -- is being accepted. there is a lot of support for the idea of partnering with the government. i think that we have yet to see what that is going to look like once the money sta

china is not going to do it, and he is not going to do it, indonesia, russia brazil, no country is going to impose it so that is why economic unilateral disarmament. as i write my book, what washington can learn from the world of sports, in the days of ronald reagan who is my hero and i have pictures of ronald reagan when he was governor and came to practices and that is what got me interested in politics. here is a great governor. he knows what is important, football. i liked his ideas as well but in the days of ronald reagan when he turned our country around, our competition for america, for a few western european countries and japan. our competition now is all of the countries of europe, japan, south korea, china, malaysia, india, singapore, australia, brazil. the rest of the world. if we can have a government as i write in this book, while other countries are going pedal to the metal and starting to lap us so we need to have that competitive spirit and they do have a winning energy game plan in here. another thing about sports, no one ever goes to a game, no one pays to watch officia

was really about tehran, brazil, turkey deal.also the fact because they're both coming up in u.n. security council and the turk are probably going to vote against the sanctions. and for the united states, i don't want to go in to what really happened in terms of who's right and who's wrong in terms of the brazil turkey toronto, but it is probable, anger with u.s. administration, turkey's efforts and especially upcoming vote. so in this mood and in this, if the turks vote no now or managed to scuttle one what or the other, t whole vote at u.n. security council, the damage to u.s. turkish relations is going to be long lasting. by that i mean, and in some ways it may actually be lack of better word, good. in what way? at me, i think we also need to change our policy. we have always been, because we have always tried to satisfy them and all the issues whether pp k., armenian quest, cyprus. we've gone out of the way even though they don't miss a thing a to be that w, we have diverging interest. we have common interest i think we shoul

we are bringing in shuttle tankers from the north sea and brazil and other places. they are capable of dynamic positioning where they can provide the stability they need to transfer that oil. if we can get that in place, we can have multiple things in place to have better ability as we move into hurricane season. it is not going to protect us from a hurricane. we can stay out there longer, and it will give us redundancy so if one side goes to maintenance, we can keep producing with the other. this is important because the revised flow rates were able to set rates with a high of 60, but we think it is around mid 30's. we will not know that until we are able to actually assess the flow rate, but in the long run, the final solution is the relief wells. the first relief well as between 8000 and 9,000 feet. it will pass within 10 feet of the well board and then turn and go about 1,000 feet down. that allows them to do the exact measurements to know where to come in. the last 1,000 feet will take a significant amount of time. the original time frame was for the second wee

whether it is west africa or brazil or russia or the united states, one standard is applied by the majoranies. host: what about dealing with the different governments, doesn't that change it? guest: you have to follow the laws of that country, but within the safety and health environmental considerations, governments generally, if you want to go > the standard, they will not stop you. for some local companies, local oil companies within those various parts of the world, they may adhere to a lower standard. host: deer park, washington, on our independent line. caller: what we have here is delusion. this federal government has spent trillions of dollars building agencies to give us the illusion that they can handle anything instantly. they cannot. the second point is that we have a vacuum of leadership. this administration can blame bush all they want. i am a leader of men. i leaped and every day. day two of this crisis, i called every oil expert into my office to say we have a crisis and what do we do. why do have a malfunction calling british petroleum british petroleum? it is not be pai

if thisororium extends, they will float those rigs to brazil or the coast of africa or elsewhere, andegin job there. jobs are not just lost for six months they are lost in perpetuity. host: are you hearingrom these companies all over this issue? gues i have learned in this job to say what i have been ld, not wh know. but morgan stanl has saithat only one in 20 chance moratorium will end in six months a moratoriumis instituted. if you're a persont( that works or $500,000 per day and it only you two weeks to flow to the coast of africa with a one in 20 chance, would you decide? host: why not step back and given the outcome of this oi spill, the impact on the shoreline, which is also jobs the fherman, e shrimpers who cannot do because of the oil spill, why not take a step back and wait? guest: there is a plan for increasing safety. it is from the national academy of engineering, i believe. and they mention these experts t tey peerying tha reviewed the recomndatn. but experts came out yesterday with a skating revival of that, saying that theyoot agree scathin buttal of that saying that they d

multimillion dollar rigs, will be moved to other parts of the world, perhaps including south america, brazilybe off of africa. and they will never come back. when they leave, we lose the jobs that are now held by americans that work on the rigs. we lose the jobs of all the people that work on the supply chips -- the supply ships and all of the steel manufacturing and everything associated with that industry. your point about mr. soros an illustrates the point that we have a lot at stake. we have american jobs, the american economy at stake, and if we act irrationally, if we enact an overly broad moratorium, not based on things like the weather -- not based on things like whether or not a given oil well is safe, there are long-term consequences for jobs and america and the economy as a whole. host: representative john shadegg, thank you for being here. when we come back, we'll talk with ed schultz, msnbc anchor and the author of this book called "killer politics." we will be back to talk to him, but first, a news update from c- span radio. , coming upon 9:15 here in pashington, d.c. stanley m

oeart torge extnt david gldman n ceased being visible to reclaim s son, seanfrom a child abductor brazil because bill handleman deit his passion to insre and challenge e community, including and especially lawmakers to join david's struggle for justice. for four years, this is a quote, for four years no one ould hear m. he was shouting in the rk, vid's fathe bry, told mr. handleman one column. in the 16 months sincer. handleman began teing story, dideminglyent from near on security to near rominenc public officials at every level respond to thel. ea of bill handleman's approximately 24 clus not onlyonveyed to readers ti and criticallimportant nformation about the golan case but m handleman went deep side the scene to flush out details of uncommon courage, sacrifican compassi. bill handlegave the community rare insight into the raw emotion, the fleeting successesllowed b frustrated setbas and then of david and sean's permant reunion. in a ca of reporting fnd nowrelse in the print media, we got to knowavid in his own woas he was thinking it. he went with david on countless trs to reeo, was

they are required for offsthore oil riggs in norway and brazil and they cost about a half a million dollarsit would be a bargain at twice the price. they are not required in this country and again, under the bush-cheney herea, those rules were voluntary not mandatory, so that's why i say this is cheney's katrina. host: how much of a presence to they have in the united states versus around the world? guest: that's a good question. i don't know the exact figures. but in terms of the big five oil companies, in materials of profits, they were about four out of five in making profits in the u.s. i believe b.p. is the fourlt largest publicly- -- fourth largest publicly-owned company that did so. caller: greta, i'm a little confused this morning. i agree with mr. weis, i believe this is dick cheney's thing, when he made the statement that dick cheney and his company will profit from these oil restrictions and you said you can't blame republicans for it, that's not what he was saying. he was saying dick cheney's company and his company. it was nothing to do with saying republicans and democrats. al

economically, as you noted, is in the asian pacific realm and then including china, india, russia and brazil. it is critically important that we deal with the ises that we address but at the same time that we