been appear before and said that we have six businesses, two that make money, to the brick money -- breakeven, and two that lose money. -- two that break even, and two that lose money. we can support them now. this amendment would cost us $200,000 a year, which we cannot afford. as a consequence, we would lose 40 jobs. i don't see that being good for anybody. it is not a health care issue. i would like to emphasize that the amendment is thoughtful, deals with abuses without destroying the economic fiber of the city. thank you. supervisor campos: next speaker. >> supervisors, i am david, the owner of ameba music in san francisco. i agree about the fact that you are vilifying businesses. we have been taking care of our people for many years now. we have been open for 14 years. we have had health care all those years. we use the san francisco healthy program as a supplement to our blue shield program. blue shield would not be easily economical for it to be that. most of our staff are covered that way. this program, you talk about the loophole like it is bringing in cocaine from salt america. it