we will speak to the editor of breitbart after the break. x300 series mower. seasons may change... ♪ ...but true character doesn't. ♪ wow, you've outdone yourself this time. hey, what're neighbors for? it's beautiful. nothing runs like a deere™. run with us. save $300 on x330 and x350 select series lawn tractors. at participating john deere dealers. >> tucker: so the people who run big journalism are always telling you we need to get a handle on fake news, fake news, interest in the public, we need to get fake news off our screens. do you know that really means? it is clear what it really mean, enforcing an official narrative in stamping out all the sand. cnn and msnbc for example spent circle full years perpetuating the russia hoax. "the new york times" and "washington post" won a pulitzer prize for it be the whole story was a complete sham and they were not held to account. there are still considered reliable news by the big tech companies. meanwhile, the federalist from a pretty small website, got the russia story right from day one, and yet "usa today" rec

up ahead, breitbart and a number of other news outlets on the right are being suppresseds by powerfulanies because they aren't reliable. interesting, waiting for that same standard to be applied to the perpetrators of the russia hoax. will be waiting a while. we will speak to the editor of breitbart after the break. ♪ >> tucker: so the people who run big journalism are always telling you we need to get a fake news,ake news, interest in the public, we need to get fake news off our screens. do you know that really means? it is clear what it really meann enforcing anan official narratie in stamping out all the sand. cnn and msnbc for example spent circle full years perpetuating the russia hoax. "the new york times" and "washington post" won a pulitzer prize for it be the whole story was a complete sham and they were not held to account. there are still considered reliable news by the big tech companies. meanwhile, "the federalist," a pretty small website, got the russia story right from day one, and yet "usa today" recently blacklisted "the federalist" as an unreliable source, because th

number two the, if they can't use the rules, then they can't stop people like breitbart getting access conversation in america. and that's what they don't want. they don't want alternative points of view, they most especiallies don't v want conservative points of view, they don't want to empower breitbart or drudge or anybody else. and more importantly than that, they don't want anyone to have the ability to communicate their message directly. they want it to be filter ld through this network of propaganda organizations that are dominated by one political ideology and deliver their message. so, you know, all this stuff about jim acosta is masking something much more sinister and really threatening to me as a journalist. because what it effectively means is that we don't want a democracy, we don't want freedom of thought and freedom of discussion. mark: is journalism dead? >> no. it'll never die. mark: are there great journalists still out there? >>al yes. mark: they're just outnumbered? >> yes. they're outnumbered and they're bullied and they're silenced. and some of them, you know, ar

they don't want to empower website like breitbart or anyone else.they don't want anyone to have the ability to communicate their message directly, they wanted to be filtered. they are dominated by one political ideology. and deliver their message, all this stuff about jim acosta is masks something more sinister and threatening to me as a journalist. it means we don't want a democracy or freedom of thousand and discussion. mark: is journalism dead. >> no. >> it will never die. mark: there are journalists doubt there. >> yes. mark: just out numbers. >> yes, and bullyed and silenced. some of them maybe -- they are doing it in a more subtle way than i am. the way they was trying to do it. that have been trying for years. you have amazing journalists, cacarlata at "new york times" ad rich at network i new york time. i don't say this because i'm trying to ill va toggle vate one in-- trying to elevate one institution. but these are great journalists that i know. there are a lot. mark: he runs cnn. he got a first amendment award for a real, out there is a w

breitbart news reporting the department of homeland security released more than 12,000 illegal immigrants into the nation, bringing the total so far this year to 146,000. think of that. almost 150,000 released into the country. most of the immigrants never to appear for their court dates. new mexico has declared a state of emergency demanding national guard troops be deployed for their help. the county says they need their help, will consider suing the state government if nothing happens within the week. and an armed malitia in new mexico this week holding nearly 200 illegal immigrant as they waited for the border patrol to arrive. customs and border protections saying it quote does not endorse private groups or organizations taking enforcement matters into their own hands. really? we'll take up the issue here tonight. >>> joining us tonight, tom homan, former acting director of border and customs enforcement. it is great to have you with us tonight. let's start with. >> good to be with you, lou. lou: thank you were sir. let's start be the border crisis. in all of this people are right no

though don't we i mean gateway pundit is a horrid right news outlet right alongside outfits like breitbart of course and that alone mandates some skepticism of their deporting just like we're skeptical of some of the reporting by the u.k.'s guardian now of course that newspaper has a much wider and more mainstream audience but some of the deporting on bikie leaks in a songe has ranged from inaccurate to just outright malicious what's changed in the relationship between a sanch and the ecuadorian government that government granted him asylum back in two thousand and twelve in a sense that he feared being extradited to the u.s. is this just the result of the arrival of a new government. in quito well that's a significant factor certainly now in two thousand and twelve the president of ecuador was in a file called area leftist deeply critical of the united states in two thousand and seven he was succeeded by lenin moreno who described himself as a centrist and has publicly called julian a songe he is in headed to a problem now what seems to have triggered the crackdown on a sunday is internet

be breitbart lady daca. forced resignation of a cabinet official who was trying to do her job in difficult circumstances. >> that's exactly right. what you're seeing from publications like breitbart is the skepticism that we've seen from trump loyalists this whole time. they have you nielsen as a bush person who came into the trump administration. never trusted her fully, too liberal and seek her getting attacked from both sides and nielsen's allies have tried to craft her narrative as well saying she was, you know, in an impossible job but a we'll see her continue to be as a punch bag from both sides. >> as we continue the conversation, up next, why the soon-to-be acting homeland security chief seeing resistance from what traini was just talking about, the president's base. it was here. i couldn't catch my breath. it was the last song of the night. it felt like my heart was skipping beats. they said i had afib. what's afib? i knew that meant i was at a greater risk of stroke. i needed answers. my doctor and

"the new york post" is trash, they're breitbart without the courage to be breitbart. people should stop pretending this is a legitimate paper. twitt twitter if i came after a country like trump is omar ill l ilhan, i would be in jail. so twitter needs to at some point stop the -- do what they can do to stop these bigoted, violent threats against actual american congress people, right? the third thing, i thought warren's statement was good. i thought bernie sanders' statement was okay. but this goes to the democratic institutional response where you have a lot of people coming out and saying oh, we can't stand for this violence against congress person, but few are of them are coming out and saying, you know what, she's exactly right. you played the full clip and i thank you for that. what -- when you put her in her full context, what she said is some people did something and the rest of us got blamed. any person of color has lived that experience. any person of color has sat at home and seemed like a crime report on the local news and thought oh, my god, i hope they're

they first met when bannon ran the ultra conservative breitbart news website. bannon is untrue z. asked dick about hard wells project i'm just honored he's asked me to help out and you know what i'm trying to do is add maybe a little organizational ability and and in bring in donors faculty people i would know throughout the world they can teach. bannan wants to bring together populist and identity tarion forces in italy and other european countries a patronage by conservative catholics suits his cause very well he also has a zion next month's european parliament elections. that's really serious because the populist nationalist sovereignty movement has great politicians a great message and now it is trash and that's what it's going to cause maybe it's the momentum peace through space in other nations a stunning victory. for bannon the academy should become an ideal breeding ground for his crusaders among its backers are all true conservative circles within the vatican who reject pope francis's liberal calls for inclusion and support of immigrants. the american cardinal raymond leo

in what would probably be the worst crossover since aliens vs predator in a recent interview with breitbart when asked the prince of ministration is considering designating drug cartels as terrorist groups u.s. president donald trump declared we are we are in fact we've been thinking about it for a long time it's psychological but it's also economic as terrorists as as terrorist organizations the answer is.

in what would probably be the worst crossover since aliens vs predator in a recent interview with breitbart when asked the presumed ministration is considering designating drug cartels as terrorist groups u.s. president donald trump declared we are we are in fact we've been thinking about it for a long time it's psychological but it's also economic as terrorists as as terrorist organizations the answer is yes they are except the president's dreams of justifying his u.s. southern border locked down as fighting cartels as fighting terrorism might face a roadblock in of all things the government's own rather vague definition of what is or is not a terrorist and what is terrorism. and the official irony is running fake my friends which means we had better start watching honkers. at the.

this is before steve became breitbart and the video became something to report about fox news and ended up out of a job. there's still people who still believe people hear something and they stick with what they believe. they don't want to hear something else. i think it woul but if it is gog away but these are some of the big ones. i'm wondering if you can go back to how your life changed when we went to 24/7 because there used to be a reset and you could think again but now there is a standardization of language. my first few jobs you could do a story or two and have until 6:00 or 7:00. i never worked at an afternoon paper when there were they were timely and then about the effect on me if they didn't come until i was an editor and publisher of the weekly magazine that he slowly went online and slowly had to have online news and then they cut off our print edition to monthly so they went around from 2004 they wanted us to die and we didn't we gained a lot from the web and like i said earlier having this reporting where if something breaks, you get it out to make the story. my favorite

in what would probably be the worst crossover since aliens vs predator in a recent interview with breitbart when asked the prince of ministration is considering designating drug cartels as terrorist groups u.s. president donald trump declared we are we are in fact we've been thinking about it for a long time it's psychological but it's also economic as terrorists as as terrorist organizations the answer is yes they are. except the president's dreams of justifying his u.s. southern border locked down as fighting cartels as fighting terrorism might they say road block in of all things the government's own rather vague definition of what is or is not a terrorist and what is terrorism. and the official irony is running fake my friends which means we had better start watching all this. to. get the. real thing. as it were to just sit. there like you know that i got. the. welcomer on watching the hawks i am tired but in time to have a fellow. we are going to combine the drug war with the war on terror and because now we can like donald trump and the gang are hoping to call drug cartels drug dealer

supporters tend to live in a media bubble and they are much fonder of media outlets such as fox news and breitbart which has been good research on that so i'm wondering if the coverage of russia is different on those outlets in some way that might be driving these changes so that the research project for me. >> it might not have changed that much necessarily on the left leaning i this more negatie and more prominent. >> thank you very much. fascinating conversation. i did work on surveys and i apologize for the question since you did the exclusive survey how much is controlled for exact language to be the questionnaire following each other, open-ended questions and things like that, how imperative -- [inaudible] i don't know if you had this kind of question. >> we started out with topics we wanted to cover and sometimes they started with one of ours and we definitely have to adjust some of the language. we tried to mirror each other's questions as much as possible so that they could be direct comparisons but some only had russian data or american because it's a different context and different ques

. >> what's the connection between the alt right, the breitbarts, the steve bannons?it's the same tactics, if not the same people. these kind of relentless campaigns against people that just don't let up. >> father martin is often on the receiving end of those attacks, but says he is not the real target. >> people feel that they can't attack pope francis. they attack me instead. >> after 49 party goers were massacred at a gay nightclub in orlando, father martin wrote a book calling for the church to start building bridges to the lgbt community. >> and then the pushback happened. and that was primarily online, sort of personal vilification, name calling, heretic, pansy, faggot, false pooriest, et cete, itself. and then these are promoted by websites like church militant. >> so we went to see church militant. it's run from a small building outside detroit. >> this is our chapel. >> michael booras, a former television reporter is the editor of this catholic website and has strong views on francis. >> pope francis, holy father for the salvation of your own soul, you must

ifs th ifs that -- that if that was against the charge that could be against cnn and breitbart or whoever regardless of political views. if there was something such as conspiracy to hack, that was different. that takes it outside of the range. outside of the scope of what journalists are trained to do. journalists are trained not to pay sources. not to help sources hack into systems. that is not something that is protected as a journalistic endeavor. >> no, hack a system and try to cover it up. what about the fact that wikileaks was thought to be one of the centerpieces of whole mueller investigation. so why do you think the special counsel didn't go after julian assange? >> my speculation, and obviously i know nothing more than what i've seen in the media, he didn't have enough to demonstrate any type of conspiracy beyond what we've already seen in the roger stone indictment. we know that roger stone was trying to coordinate with wikileaks. that there was a belief in the trump campaign that roger stone had a link, had behind the scenes knowledge from wikileaks. but a lot of it appeared t

obama administration about children being in cages, those were from 2014 and we at town hall and at breitbartme of the only reporters in the entire media who were publishing those photos and warning about the crisis that was coming. mcaleenan has seen this from the beginning. he knows what needs to be done and hopefully can work with committees like the senate judiciary committee where the attorneys there are working on immigration then they know what needs to be fixed so they connection, was something to change it. one more thing, these democrats talking about how horrible kirstjen nielsen was, that she was a terrible person for separating parents and children. if you break the law in america and break -- go to prison, you are separated from your children. they are not putting any legislation on the table does solve the problem which sets up the talking point for them for years to come when you are saying these children were brought here by their parents illegally. should we have a dream or program for them as well? a whole nother system they are setting up. >> dana: jesse, and the time have

here's what he said in a recent interview with the "breitbart."ow, the left plays a tougher game. it's very funny. i actually think that the people on the right are tougher, but they don't play it tougher. okay? i can tell you i have the support of the police, the support of the military, the support of the bikers for trump. i have the tough people, but they don't play it tough-- until they go to a certain point, and then it would be very bad, very bad." okay, no big deal. i just want to point out the president of the united states just threatened to terrorize his opponents with the police, a military junta, and roving biker gangs. ( laughter ) it's all part of his new slogan: "make america great again, and if you don't, spider here will whip you with a bike chain." at times like these-- at times like these, i think about the president we could have had, hillary clinton. not perfect, obviously, but, you know, not publicly threatening "the purge." earlier this week, secretary clinton appeared at the launch of a new organization whose goal is to hel

. >> i think this is what happens when you're governed by youtube commenters and breitbart columnists. this is engineering a kind of racist fantasy land. whether it ends upcoming to fruition or not, this is all about keeping president trump's base in a permanent state of furious arousal. whether it happens or not, trump validate that this is the right way to do it, every day goods and services and people going to school and people going to work come across. and then engineering a situation where they are intentionally -- this has been reported. they're intentionally not providing services for the folks who have made it across the border, who are living under bridges and at bus stations, they're engineering a crisis in order to validate xenophobia. there are serious human rights concerns that cutting off aid, closing the border and enabling people to -- excuse me -- not creating the resources on the ground for people on the ground coming in, it's intentionally creating a crisis. to then come in and say i will fix it. >> i hear you, but do you think the system truly is overwhelmed? >> i

because rupert murdoch, the man from breitbart are billionaires. at the end of the day it is a divide and conquer strategy to ensure that nobody comes together. the american people don't come together to tax them. >> you are telling a big story here about a specific event that happened this week. >> yeah. >> you are saying it is about a larger political motivation? >> exactly. it is common sense why people on top in society want people on the bottom to be divided so they can survive. there is a second reason this is happening which is that the right wing media machine know omar, talib, ocasio cortez have been targets because it is a divide and conquer strategy because they know the democratic leadership will be slow in their response or sometimes dismisof of these leaders because of their significant disagreements with the three progressive women of color on medicare for all -- >> on the issues. >> youia, on the issues. this he know that nancy pelosi and hoyer and schumer will not come out swinging for hymn them and fighting and advocating for them

there was generated by a "breitbart" story he had seen. that's where the origins are, the things you see coming out of bill barr's mouth. >> there's a lot to unpack there. but first, jeff sessions when he went before congress, it was jim jordan that pressed whether a second special counsel was necessary, and jeff sessions said it was not. any time anyone says origins, i wonder if they mean oranges. by the origins have been investigated, defended by trump's own appointees at the justice department. so what is the what that is being examined? >> rod rosenstein has been a big defender of this process and the republicans on capitol hill have demanded a lot of documentation about this. a lot of it has been handed over. we saw the stuff that went on with devin nunes and the memo and the stuff about the origins of the investigation. the refuting of the notion that the dossier was the reason for opening the investigation. so this is all in the same caldron of things that the president has tried to kick up. here he has the wind at his back a bit. h

and their much father of media outlets such as fox news and breitbart and there's good research on that so i'm wondering if the coverage of russia is different on those outlets in some way that might be driving these exchanges that the research project forme . >> it may not have changed that much , but in those outlets on the left winning outlets, they become more negativeand more prominent . >>. >> we have got time for maybe two more questions so the here and then back here. >> you very much, fascinating conversation. i did work on ice is surveys a lot so i apologize for the methodology of my question. since you do parallel into countries such as exquisite survey, how much is controlled for exact language to get a questionnaire, pulling each other open-ended, closed ended questions like that. i know the sentiments, i don't know if you had trends, thank you very much. >> so we started out with some of the topics we wanted to cover and sometimes we started with one of our trends and we started one of the other trends and we had to adjust the language around annexation but reunification o

where do you get that except for breitbart? >> no, i -- chris, i'm going to disagree with you on this one. if you look at the inspector general reports on the leadership of the fbi, including what the inspector general, i didn't like the inspector general when i was at the bureau or the agency, they're tough. what the inspector general said, for example, about comey's handling of the clinton investigation was not positive. if you go back and review it -- >> true. >> -- comey got hammered. >> and a fair assessment. >> that's right. so my point -- but going back -- >> but he never mentioned anything about spying and saying that it was attributable to the fbi heads. >> that is exactly right. if you're barr, you have an option for how you present this. you can say, well, you should have suspicions about the leadership of the bureau and i think spying might have been going on. or mistakes at the bureau already exposed by the inspector general. if i find out things went wrong, i'll fix those, too. big deal. it's on page a-18 of the "

structure, economic structure and why somebody like robert mercer, who actually funds the islamic , breitbart, why would somebody of that stature, want -- you always have to follow the dollar and the interest attached to it. we have been able to be susceptible to these, what i consider to be massive advertisement campaigns that we begin to understand and think this is islamophobia. you bought avw. rather than thinking they cheated testing on the emissions, you think it is a muslim in -- rather than getting the ceo standing to say why did you illegally cheat on the test? i think what we need is to be very smart in how we understand these dynamics and what is being deployed on a daily basis. [applause] i saw you nodding a lot, so i did not know if that was in relation to something. really satt question with me. i had a chance to teach this case, which you might know as the internment case. we talk about tropes and tropes that are mobilize a bull -- mobilizable to affect other folks. juxtaposition between japanese-americans and catholic americans, a way in which your phenotype enables you to eff

but now, you know, we're into the fox news, rush limbaugh, breitbart conspiracy theorists, uranium 1 which he was talking about, that we backed away from that. now he is talking about spying. he is a good example of how the republican party has moved dramatically and in some cases irrationally to the right. >> again, the idea that barr is going to investigate the origins of the russia investigation, as jeff said, there is an inspector general already looking into some of that. >> not only that it's not the time for it. this is the time for the american people and the congress of the united states to receive mr. mueller's report and to learn everything that mr. mueller found out. it might be able to exonerate the president. so be it. we need to know what's in there, not anything from the attorney general of the united states that gratuitously feeds the deep state conspiratorial notions of a president of the united states who is running around calling his enemies treasonous. this is unprecedented, actually. we have not seen this kind of conduct, again, whether intentional or not. the a

who actually funded the islamophobic adds, creates or funds the cambridge analytical, funds the breitbart, why would somebody of that stature use their resources? you have to always follow the dollars and the interest attached to it. but we have been able to be these -- what i consider to be massive advertisement campaigns -- that we begin to understand and think this is a islamophobia. a vw rather than thinking that vw cheated the testing. you think it is a muslim that is in the engine and you begin to run to think about the amount saved rather than saying why did the test iny cheat order to sell cars to people and then get a slap on the hand, pay a fine, and then do it again? what have to be very smart and how we understand these dynamics and what is being deployed on a daily basis. >> did he want to say something about the global aspect and this idea of not just displacement of white bodies in the united states, but muslim immigration as part of a foreign conspiracy? i saw you nodding a lot. i did not know if that was in relation to something. khaled: i'm glad to answer that question,

mercer who actually funds the islamophobia ads, creates or funds the cambridge analytica, funds the breitbart. why would someone of that stature post their resources? my sense is you always have to follow the dollar and follow the interest attached to it. but we have been able to be susceptible to these what i consider to be massive advertisement campaigns that we begin to understand and think, is this islamophobia? you bought a vw. rather than thinking vw cheated the testing on the vw, you almost think it's the engine, and therefore you begin to run to the mass to cheat people, take a slap on the skmaand do i again. i think we need to understand what is being deployed on a daily basis. [ applause ] >> hatem, did you want to say something about the global aspect and this idea of not just displacement of white bodies in the united states but, you know, muslim immigration as part of the foreign conspiracy? i saw you nodding a lot, so i didn't know if that was in relation to something. >> i'm glad to answer that question, but the first question really sat with me. i just taught this case in cons

though don't we i mean gateway pundit is a horrid right news outlet right alongside outfits like breitbart of course and that alone mandates some skepticism of their deporting just like we're skeptical of some of the reporting by the u.k.'s guardian now of course that newspaper has a much wider and more mainstream audience but some of the deporting on bikie leaks in a songe has ranged from inaccurate to just outright malicious what's changed in the relationship between a sanch and the ecuadorian government that government granted him asylum back in two thousand and twelve in a sense that he feared being extradited to the u.s. is this just the result of the arrival of a new government. in quito well that's a significant factor certainly now in two thousand and twelve the president of ecuador was a file korea leftist deeply critical of the united states in two thousand and seven he was succeeded by lenin moreno who described himself as a centrist and has publicly called julian a songe his inherited problems now what seems to have triggered the crackdown on a songes internet connection and th

or the daily caller and breitbart. what is journalism today in the current era? what about the involvement of foreign governments in the information intelligence? --ould like to ask you how or rt, for example. russian tv. how would you give space to those outlets here? >> i think you have a lot of different things there. the intercept is that, the publication i read i admire. they are journalism and some of them have been really impressive. thanis vastly different talking about foreign governments or foreign operations. it is night and day in my view. we have seen what happened in 2016 and how easily the current media environment can be manipulated. i think that is only going to get worse. i think people will learn from what the russians did, not only other foreign governments, but i am increasingly in fear that domestic actors will also start use these tactics in political campaigns. then you run smack into the first amendment, of her politics could just become more and more our politics could just become more and more poisonous. i just would not put the paragra

. >> i just want to ask about journalism and the role of outright media, breitbart -- alt-right. what is journalism today in the current era? what about "the intercept" or the involvement of foreign governments in the information intelligence? i would like to ask you how, rt, for example, russian tv, how would you give space to those outlets here? >> i think you have a lot of different things there. i mean, "the intercept" is a a publication i read, i admire, and they are journalism and some of it has been really impressive. but that's vastly different than talking about foreign governments or foreign operations. it's night and day, in my view. we've seen what happened in 2016 and out easily the current media environment can be manipulated. i think that's only going to get worse, unfortunately. i think people will learn from what the russians did, not only of the foreign governments, but i am increasingly afraid the domestic actors will start to use these tactics, political campaigns, and then you run smack into the first amendment and our politics could just become more and more

some saturday a couple years ago now, the president of the united states woke up, read something on breitbart and tweeted out that president obama had bugged the trump tower. no evidence ever came forth on that. and i suspect no evidence will ever come forth about spying on the campaign from mr. barr or anyone else hell bent on attaching themselves to this administration. >> let's talk about trump's taxes because sarah sanders talked about that this morning. >> the only reason the oversight committee has the ability to request someone's taxes are for the purpose of determining policy. this is all about political partisanship. this is a dangerous, dangerous particularly not this group of congressmen and women are smart enough to look through the thousands of pages that i would assume president trump's taxes will be. >> representative quigley, do you think you're smart enough to understand the president's tax returns? >> i'm not an accountant, but i understand transparency, and the fact that the american public has a right to know who is attempting to influence the president. there is a policy

breitbart news with a couple of tweets, barr, i have no objection to mueller testifying.hat will they do after mueller testifies and they still do not have the goods? kellyanne conway's news conference yesterday, conway to the press, the big lie you let fly for two years is over. you can see that news conference, all of that on our website at c-span.org. all of our coverage from yesterday, type in mueller and you will find it. host: george conway has an opinion piece in the washington post and he has been publishing several as of late. if you want to check it out for yourself, there is a cancer in the presidency responding to the release of the report. in louisiana, republican line, brian, hello. brian in golden meadow, louisiana. go ahead, please. caller: here i am, hello. host: you are on, go ahead. caller: they did not find any collusion and if you do not have any collusion, you do not have a crime, so there is no obstruction of justice. we have had corruption in politics for years and years. they got rid of kennedy, the government got rid of kennedy because they did n

i was listening to jessica last night on breitbart news on sirius xm patriot, and she spelled it outt right. host: when it comes to the actual reason, you thought it was the right decision. specifically why did you think that? caller: i think she is a little -- myself. host: we go to that you lie in the democrat line. good morning. hello? is, thisy concern president has been allowed to get away with a lot. one will it stop. and men,graded women women still support him, and i cannot understand that. he has degraded the presidency. he doesn't make good decisions at all, and i believe that all his success are flukes, because he keeps putting people in place to make his, whatever he is trying to do, successful. evidence atblock every degree. .o me, he is a crook which has been proven. host: that is a viewer from new orleans given comments on these final moments of the program today. we have said it before and i will say it again, on c-span3, that is ready attorney general is, offering comments on questions. can't hear him from our perspective, but if you go to c-span3, you can follow alo

we've dealt with breitbart-like videos before.royed clearly with a doctorate video that was really a hit job. here we see the same thing, a black muslim woman who has been subject to enormous opposition research and attacks, who has experienced death threats. and this is the thing, david. the country is shocked when violence actually happens. if something happened to her, they would be shocked and they would say, this is some crazy figure who is alone and singular in his or her behavior. not understanding that the context has been set for harm to potentially happen to her. and i come out of a tradition where there isn't a question we can just deal with, this is something that's real. so for the president of the united states, the most powerful man in the world, to set the stage for potential harm to happen to a congressperson who has been singled out even though she has said some things she has, in fact, apologized for but was singled out simply because she wears a hujab, is an anethema to the ones on the right, and he is in deepe