and we discussed the issue with brenda o'neill, chief political advisor at spiked. he disagrees with francis hargrove's arguments and thinks that the new proposals should be reconsidered. i disagree with a lot of what frances hagan said. i think she's pushing a problematic argument. this idea that social media platforms are very dangerous. they need to be firmly controlled, that people are at risk. and one of the most problematic arguments i think, is the idea that we should ban online anonymity. so people would not be allowed to be anonymous on line. i have a real issue with because lots of people need to be anonymous. they need to be anonymous because they could lose their jobs with. they expressed their opinion because we know that it's become much more difficult to express controversial views about transgender ism, for example, or about many other issues. and people prefer to do that behind an anonymous account. so i think we're going down a dangerous road and i think if we don't pull back and have a think about what we're doing, we will end up regretting it. me