brendan marshaled the only one who stepped forward to question the talent. mel tucker said yesterday he will never threw a player under the bus. a lot of guys would like to see him on a bus out of town. saying he is not focusing on alps has called for his head. after giving up 106 points in two games no plans to change his style. >> right now talking to guys, it's not one of those times where i am angry. however, we all get angry at times, how do we turn them into production? >> how is melton tucker handling this? angry? >> i don't know if angry is the right word but he is fired up. he should be. i think everybody is fired up. we don't like where we are. especially after the last two performances. everybody should be fired up. >> moving ford that's what we have to do in life and in the scheme. if we keep looking back at everything, things will get worse and we can't afford for that happen. >> the coach is as down as i have seen him. he is like a prizefighter who had been pulp pummeled in the rain. >> when we got back to work today, we worked and were focused

marshalling the expert evidence necessary to bring or to defend against a voting rights lawsuit. so i do think that something important was lost by the elimination effectively of pre clearance. brendan and i may disagree on that point but i do think that we agree that that's for better or for worse the main work that the section 5 preclearance requirement was doing before shelby county. and i think what's interesting is the burden of proof almost always is on the plaintiff in an election case. so i think in most of the countries that we work around the world the person filing the complaint has to prove the claim by the standard of evidence. and as we've all known, how does that plaintiff get access to the evidence they need to prove their case? and in the election situation the timeline can be so short that it can be really difficult to gather that evidence. and so there's an interesting election issue here in regards to how a plaintiff can actually prove their case and move it to the next level. as a litigator, how long did it take the shelby county litigation? >> we did not have 48 hours. this was a facial challenge to the act, though. and so this was not a challenge to a particul

marshalling expert evidence necessary to bring or to defend against a voting rights lawsuit. so i do think something important was lost by the elimination effectively of preclearance. brendan and i may disagree on that point. i do think we agree that that's for better or for worse the main work that the section 5 preclearance requirement was doing before shelby county. >> i think what's interesting is the burden of proof almost always is on the. >> in an election case. i think in most of the countries we work around the world, the person filing the complaint has to prove the claim by the standard of evidence. as we've all known, how does that. >> get access to the evidence they they'd to prove their case. and in an election situation the time line can be so short, it can be really difficult to gather that evidence. so there's an interesting election issue here in regards to how a. >> can actually prove their case and move it to the next level. as a litigator, brendan, i wonder how long did it take to bring shelby county litigation. you didn't have 48 hours. >> we did not have 48 hours. it was a facial challenge to the act. this was not a challenge to a practice in shelby c

a detroit lions fan said something disparaging about marshall's mother so brendan marshall challenged him to a $5,000 boxing match. the fan said make it 25 we can do it in detroit. marshall said if i win do apologize to my mom. if i when you volunteer at an orphanage as well. if you when i will give you the $25,000. the fan said let's do it. but later marshall said looks like people took it too serious. so it's not actually going to happen. but another thing in a very odd bears season. >> that may be described as a highlight of the bears season. >> i kind of feel like a lion stands right now. books like he is telling everybody to come down that he was joking. we will see what happens. take a look at this video. this is the world's tallest man meeting the world's shortest man. on the left, she is 21 and a half inches tall. on the right you have 8 ft. 3 in. tall. the 10th annual guinness world record, they met in london for a photo op. how about that. >> was the guy in the middle? >> that's the world average man. he's telling them to keep apart here he is the referee. >> just giving som