the next person is brendan rogers. >> hello, good afternoon. i'm brendan rogers. i'm from san francisco. i grew up in the mission in the excelsior district. i currently live in soma. like many veterans i spent some time homeless. i live in hospitality house. for me joining the military and serving my country was a way out of poverty and a way to access higher education. i spent 16 years in the coast guard as an enlisted member, rank of chief petty officer now an officer currently serving as the training officer for port security at 312 which is an expeditionery warfare unit out of san francisco airport. so, the only expedition warfare unit in san francisco city limits. i have served as a training officer and education service officer, serving junior personnel, helping them access and training through the military. i hold an m.b.a. from yada business school in barcelona, i'm currently a masters student at university of san francisco. i also volunteered to see stand down in 2012 and veterans wheelchair ragata. i served as [speaker not understood] in san francisco ba

what of brendan rogers?the opinion of steven gerrard that his side are title contend senators. >> listen, we will just folks on the next game. as cardiff. if you think we have a chance then, right it. it's obviously a big win against two of the biggest british clubs. but to dominate the game like that was pleasing. >> he knows just how big that was. contesting the premier league title are arsenal, who beat tottenham 1-0, to move third in the table. they are four points off the leaders and have a game in hand. thunderbolt from rosicky after 22 seconds. it was the only goal in the game and proved diseasie i decisive second half. the first victory at white hart lane since 2007. news of a lionel messi hat trick in a moment. but first real madrid remain league leaders. elche and real betis goalless. barcelona 7-0 over osasuna. and it was messi who got three goals making him the club's all time top scorer in all forms of the game. the record stood at 369. his second goal 370. his third taking his tally to 371 barc

the chairman of the various committees and mike rogers, senses that and they with beginning to put back and hopefully you will see it on the floor. >> brendan: you are opposed to more government regulation on so many issues. what is different about online privacy where the government would tell google how to handle this? >> guest: i don't consider the government protecting your individual rights to be intrusive. i think google and facebook are intrusive when they capture information without your permission and use it in ways you might not approve of if you anyhow how they were using it. -- knew -- i think an individual has rights. i think if the constitution were passed today, the 4th amendment would include a specific right to privacy. and i think the only reason you didn't have it back in the 1700s is you didn't have the technology. it was automatically assumed your privacy was yours and people couldn't invade it unless you let them in or gave them a letter or whatever it was. so concept it is the data collector's right is wrong. it is my right if i chose to be a facebook address or website i should be able to set the parameters on what f

mike rogers who chairs the intelligence committee, they sense that, and they're beginning to put packages together. hopefully, you'll see on the floor sometime this summer. >> host: go ahead, brendan. >> on some of the issues you're opposed to more government regulation. what's, you know, what's different about online privacy where you'd be having a situation where the government would be telling google or facebook how they can handle your information? >> guest: well, i would turn that question around a little bit. i don't consider the government protecting your individual rights to be intrusive. i think google and facebook are intrusive when they capture information without your permission and use it in ways that you might not approve of if you knew how they were using it. so i think that an individual has rights, i think if the constitution were passed today, the fourth amendment against unreasonable search and seizure would include a specific right to privacy. and i think the only reason you didn't have it back in the 1700s is you didn't have the technology, and it was automatically assumed that your privacy was yours, and people could not invade it. physicals you opened the do