able to find the original documents so she just had it retype, and that was sort of classic brenden sullivan which we saw a lot in the ted stevens case when he was able to prove that once again prosecutors had failed to provide all the exculpatory evidence that they are usually required to do. and in the broad, case that just concluded again in sort of the same result. so why do always find it kind of interesting to me that a lot of conservative politicians who rail against the awesome power of the federal government especially in the last couple of months -- brenden sullivan has been a foot soldier in the fight against the power, misuse of power by the federal government for 35 to 40 years, and a lot of these other people are perfectly willing to give -- to create new laws to meet federal crimes out of everything they can and give more power to prosecutors and don't see any inconsistency in the two positions. i don't mind which won they take but it just seems a little bit inconsistent. so i had taken all this, and i was able to convince st. martin's press to let me write a book about the wo