the other item was the brent walker litigated claims. i have noted before with this board, and bill note again, this is yet another settlement for a former employee. i do not know the nature of the claim. i do recall that as one of her final acts as acting director, i believe that ms. johnson approved a change in organizational structure that resulted in eliminating the position that ms. walker was in. i recall seeing an e-mail from last summer. i do not recall the details around this. as i understand it, this person was serving in an at will position, and it is those that will positions that cannot be used for organizational restructuring in a way that one just decides we do not want that person any more. if the city has to pay these kinds of claims in damages for this and other past actions, it has ultimately cost us a lot of money. i would hope that you would look carefully again at these kinds of employee settlements, how much this costs, and what we can do in future to avoid these costs. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> motion to conv