your response that, brent wisner? >> there are really three points worth mentioning. the first is this idea that there i is 800 studies that test roundupp and sega to save is jut a fabrication. the studies he is talking about are largely not related to cancer. we're talking about skin irriritation, eye irritation. sore talking about 20 or studies. six or seven of them are in humans and the rest are in animals. those studies are almost completely positive. onehat is just fact number incorrect. the second thing that is really important is this idea it hahasa 40 year historory of safety. almost absbsent from t the conversation i is that for the fifirst 20 yearsrs, roundup was asked approved babased on fraud. it was coming from a laboratory that has been known -- people were indicteted, people went to jail. thatat was a a former momonsanto employee. his idea t that it has a 40 year record of safety, glosses over 20 years of fraud. the last thing is, and this is importrtant, mr. partrididge dos not say roundndup does not cause cancncer, he says glyphosate. he knows that gl