bresler was in the u.s. in the summer of 2012 when he received an urgent message to his yahoo! marine officers in afghanistan's turbulent hellman province. >> the subject of the e-mail said, in all capital letters, three exclamation marks, important. sawar john is back. >> reporter: he had a history with john. >> when jason was serving in afghanistan, he caused john, a police official, to be fired because he was raping children. >> reporter: bresler responded attaching a classified document, warning the marines that john was a threat. cnn has repeatedly tried to get an official account of what happened next. but every major military agency involved has declined to comment. the marine corps has only said that due to the mishandling of classified information, major bresler has been ordered to show cause for retention in the u.s. marine corps. they say his use of an unsecure yahoo! account breached security, but others say the warning could have saved lives. what do you think would have happened if the commanders had listened to the advice of major brezler? >> i would have my son.

lila rose, and tara bresler, the editor of think progress, who has been covering this for a while. and antoinette, a professor in albuquerque. and is this the first time about watching ajam stream, we're all about access. we use google and i'm going to start with you, as mentioned in july, texas joined 12 other states that approved a ban on abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy, and what does the vote in albuquerque mean for the statewide legislation? >> well, albuquerque is the only city that has a clinic that will do these midterm abortions at 20 weeks, and if they're successful, the clinics would have to move elsewhere within the state, or move to another county in the state. but what i think will happen, there will probably be an immediate motion for an injunction to stop the implementation of this ordinance. >> when looking for a federal law, a lot of people say roe v. wade, supreme court decision, a woman has a fund me fundamentalo have an dortion, and isn't this a debate? >> it's a 7-2 decision, and what roe v. wade said, it's a paramount interest in protecting a potential fo