as is jimmy breslin, a writer and columnist for newspapers in new york city. each of these journalists was prominent in some fashion, in print or broadcast media. and as we shall see, all of them were suspicious as about election polling, even hostile, even vehement. hostile about election polling. all of them can be called pull bashers, vigorous or even harsh critics of election surveys. in considering poll bashing journalists will touch on presidential elections of 1948, 1952, 1980, 2008, 2016 and 2020. the polls in each of those elections were off target in some fashion in some way and as we've discussed, polling doesn't always happen the same way. in any case, these cases that we'll touch on sparked confusion, surprise, even disillusionment and no small, embarrassed for pollsters. so let's get going. let's step back. 70 years to the election of 1952. it was the first presidential election after polling debacle of 1948. pollsters then in 1948 had confidently predicted the victory of republican thomas dewey, then governor of new york, in election with harry

on election day, 2004, breslin writes best. i am not even going to bother to watch the results on television. i'm going to bet early. besides, he wrote, with typical lost air, if i was up, so many people upon seen every word i said at this election coming true, would because he my hands and embarrassing me with outlandish praise. jimmy wrestling. and election day call, in 2004. john kerry -- by a 2.5 percentage point. it was a close election. pivoted on the outcome of ohio. this narrowly went to george bush. amid some dispute, amid some dispute about that. so, why all of this periodic poll bashing amongst journalists? what explains this tendency that we've seen in the years in the past? edward r. murrow is a legendary, a legendary broadcast journalist. 40s, 50s, 60s. haynes johnson, mike boyko, jimmy breslin, all of these were hollow to prize winners one-time next career. they were respected journalist. so what factors explain cross generational full bashing. i'll offer three factors. one is that polling is record of unreliabil

jimmy breslin, an election day column. 24. john kerry lost to george bush. george w bush by 2.5 percentage points was a close election pivot on the outcome of ohio that year, which narrowly, to george bush amid some dispute, amid some dispute about that outcome. so why all this periodic poll bashing among journalists? what explains this tendency that we've seen in the years past? edward murrow is a legendary was a legendary broadcast journalist, forties, fifties and sixties sixties. haynes johnson, mike royko, jimmy breslin. were pulitzer prize winners at one time in their career. they were all respected journalists. so what factors explain cross generation noel paul bashing. i'll offer three three factors. one is that pollings record of unreliability and inaccuracy see made it an easy target. journalists prominent journalists picking the polls, if you will, calling them out for their mistakes, their misfires, their errors. another factor, which we've seen from murrow to haynes johnson, is a dislike of the presumption is presumptive of polling. by that i mea

>> aye. >> commissioner breslin? >> aye. >> commissioner canning? >> aye. >> commissioner follansbee? >> aye. >> and commissioner zvanski? >> aye. >> the item no. 3, resolution passes unanimously. [gavel] item no. 4. general public comment - an opportunity for members of the public to comment on any matter within the board's jurisdiction that is not on the agenda, including requesting that the board place a matter on a future agenda. this will be presented by president scott. >> thank you. this item is open for public comment at this time. >> i'll be reading the public comment procedures aloud. in person public comment is first and virtual. anyone waiting in person, you can approach the podium. you have three minutes unless deemed otherwise by the president. a caller may ask questions of the policy wouldy but no obligation to engage in dialogue with caller. when i welcome you on call, state your name although you may remain anonymous. i'll give you a warning when you have 30 seconds remaining, when your three minutes have ended, i'll thank you for y

that's right and ted and jimmy breslin know ted and. chris dodd. you know where this story is going. oh, we'll tell the end of it. it was ted chris dodd. there's a party somewhere. well, ted rented a scooter and i mean, rome is not the place to ride a scooter unless you've lived there all your life and and he was drunk a good deal at the time. and you know, you looked at this man and you thought, you know, he's he doesn't want live or he's gambling he's he's gambling he's saying if i stay alive after getting drunk and riding a scooter through the streets of, rome, then i deserve to be alive. someone's saying let him live. well, patrick said that that ted believed that with each successive escapade that he emerged from with his political career intact, that he was more and more invulnerable and there was a president of abc news, david burke early in his career was ted administrative assistant and he was analyzed that he's and he said it was this way work work work work work. if i'm working nobody can criticize me doing the right thing and so press t