womewho werender 14 years d when they werexposed to ddare at mh higherisk obeinindiagnosed with bret cacer under the agof 50. about 5-ld higr r risknn thse women who had been exposed to d as girl we c look the lab and see what emicals e doing biolocally and thenene can lolook in our bodies and in our homes and see which ones we're exexposed to, wherere they're cg from in the products or pollution, then we have the opportunity to reduce exposure to these suspect chemicals, uh, now. >> the emerging science on endocrine disrupting chemicals really means that we have to haveve a completete overhaul of our chemical safety system. >> you k know, we're dealing with chemicals for which t there is no safe level of exposure. >> it's the tiny, repeated exposure that more adequately mimics our ownwn hormone system that is really concerning. >> the hormones in our bodies are operating at parts per billion and parts per trillion concentrations. >> the onone thing that's clears that our current system isn't working, and it doesn't take these low chchronic doses into account. >> i think it's very importan