hearing in which brett kavanaugh cried his way of a hearing in america.thing about which event - white vigilantism and white tears particularly male white tears. >> what do you make of that? >> joy reed, i really mean this, is a shameless race baiting buffoon. it has nothing to do with her race or gender but do you remember the dollars a kid that if you pulled the string and it can only say three things, that's joy reed. she can only say racism, sexism and white supremacy. she's like racism me elmo, like a children's doll the calls you names all the time because when she goes in and tries to tell us brett kavanaugh got off because of weight tears isn't she omitting that it was a 35-year-old charge with 0 corroborating evidence including christine ford's best friend, there were people out there consuming this, yeah, joy, the white tears, that is nothing but the legal system - the legal system works on the facts. >> he said brett cavanagh became a supreme court justice because of his weight tears meant more than christine ford's who is also white. can't com

. >> the kyle rittenhouse trial reminds a lot of people of the brett kavanaugh hearing in which brett kavanaugh cries his way through the hearing, his tears turned out to be more powerful. in america there is a theme about white vigilantes and white tears particularly male white tears. laura: coming back to race once again when there is 0 racial element in all of this, tying this with brett kavanaugh, they are really desperate to hold this together with wire and masking tape. >> a defining aspect of kyle rittenhouse is not his tears but his bravery. if i were on the jury i wouldn't just acquit him but give a metal, because the prosecutor himself said was too dangerous. i didn't want to go there. the cops were in retreat. think of the male population of kenosha, they were cowering in their homes while people were burning things in setting things on fire and attacking people so kyle rittenhouse was one of the few guys who had the gets to get out there when no one else did. in a society you don't have will of law and people keep saying vigilante justice but when you don't have will apply

the brett kavanaugh hearings. brett kavanaugh cried his way through the hearings.a there is a thing about white vine land iism and white tears, particularly male white tears. >> of course. if you watch the actual trial you probably think he was guilty. but they have to talk about the only thing they have. they have to talk about race and white privilege and all these things that have nothing to do with the case. but it gives joy read. i don't think she is disturbed about it verdict. i think she just wants attention. judge jeanine: with the oj case, a lot of people didn't think that was legitimate. but you didn't see them protesting. >> all the commentators i heard today said this will only inspire vigilantism. what i have seen is riotism. last flight in portland they destroyed buildings and breaking glabs and they tried to burn down a jail. so the vigilantism hasn't quite panned out. but the racial division of america and repeating it and echoing it. we as americans have to come together. i'm from a place in norms where black, white, brown, yellow. we are close tog

same-sex marriage, religious rights, whatever you don't like, go ahead. >> reporter: justice brett kavanaugh said a state could allow private lawsuits against the guns it wanted to ban. >> say everyone who sells an ar-15 is liable for a million dollars to any citizen. >> reporter: today's case was not about abortion itself. the court will take that up a month from today when it hears mississippi's challenge to roe v. wade. >> so, pete, in the meantime as all this plays out, what becomes of sb-8? can it remain in effect for now >> yes, it can it remains in effect until the supreme court rules. and normally that would take several months but because the court took these cases on a fast track, it will probably be quicker. and then the abortion providers can try again in texas to get the law blocked. lester >> all right pete williams, thank you. in scotland today, president biden told climate change is an existential threat to human existence as we know it. peter alexander is with the president in edinburgh tonight. peter, there is new resistance back home to the president's spending plan. >> re

brett kavanaugh has been careful not to express an opinion.r him from maine she said "he believes in precedent. i believe he will not overturn roe v. wade." he allowed the texas law to go into effect, which suggests a hostility to abortion rights. he seems like the only hope for roe v. wade to survive. >> whatever happens in texas, the mississippi case is a forward challenge to roe. >> what makes today's argument a little weird it is mostly it seems about the procedural aspect of who has the right to challenge the law, not about the law ititself. the mississippi case is a 15-week abortion ban, that will be heard december 1st and that will really decide the fate of roe v. wade even if the texas case doesn't. >> where can we watch the arguments on tv? are you listening? >> nowhere. there nor cameras in the supreme court. however, there is live video, go to supremecourt.gov, it's not satisfactory to you and to me, but it's certainly better than it used to be where you couldn't listen to live audio the aul aat all. >> can i talk to him about john

private citizens they allowed to sue abortion provideror people helping them to get an abortion brett kavanaughte other parts of the constitution by using the same enforcement mechanism. >> it could be free speech rights it could be free exercise of religion rights. it could be second amendment rights if this position is accepted here. the theory of the amicus brief is that it can be easily replicated in other states that disfavor other constitutional rights and there is justice clarence thomas. just because those private citizens may be outraged over abortions, does not give them grounds to sue justice amy coney barrett, supreme court's reporter, amy howell is with us now. thanks so much, the conservative activist were active in question today. did they in europe estimation at all tipped their hands >> i think they did. as many of your viewers may remember, there were four votes back in september to put it on hold three liberal justices and so abortion providers, the plaintiffs in this case only needed to pick up one vote and it looks like they may have picked up two or possibly even three of

oh, the brett kavanaugh hearings.vigilantism and white tears. stuart: i think i need someone to explain this. i think i found the right guy, charles hurt. i'm not sure he can make that objection flickable or not. the power of white tears, charles, go at it, please. >> it is just full-blown racial bigotry is what it is. that is what it comes down to. what is so interesting about it, not the fact that she is hung up on the race of these two people but the fact that they're capable of tears. of course a powerful, important part of this kind of racial bigotry to dehuman eyes the people that you're trying the people you're trying to set aside, the idea of people you're trying to dehumanize would produce tears that is almost human-like. she seems absolutely astonished like this. people like joy reid and her ilk, they're losing power and influence. i think they're frightened by the fact they're losing relevancy and influence and this is what they're reduced to. and their trueselves are coming out. and as disturbing as it is,

it reminded a lot of people of something -- the brett kavanaugh hearings, it was brett kavanaugh who had been accused by a high school friend of committing sexual abuse of her, pries his way through the hearings. in america, there's a thing about both white vigilanteism and white tears, particularly male white peers. white peers in general, because that's what they care now, right? they care now and then when they get caught, the waterworks. >> wow. how does she still have a job? >> she's gone full on racist. and i think the ceo or whoever owns this network doesn't watch msnbc. because reverse racism is racism. but she is, i think because she's getting shellacked in the ratings, she's turned it up a notch. she's a full left wing crank. if you had the right wing equivalent of that mocking, weeping blacks -- mocking the black tears, you would be out the door before you got to that second word "tears." so, this is insane. but you can't just go after msnbc. you have to throw cnn into the mix. we're realizing that the american media lied to us to protect the rioters. kenosha was never a p

it was brett kavanaugh who had been accused of committing sexual abuse.ed his way through the hearings to make him a permanent member and associate justice of the united states supreme court. and his tears turned out to be more powerful than the tears of christine ford which where the tears of the alleged victim. but in america, there is a thing about white vigilantism and white tears particularly male white tears. >> tucker: that is a currently employed msnbc anchor and harvard graduate, not an employee of a radio world went up. she's telling us what she thinks an ape tiktok video. she mocks the very idea. they don't have human emotions because they're not really human. you don't have to care about them, they don't qualify for your compassion. you can laugh as they weep and feel good about it. you often hear the word "dehumanized." what does that mean? that's what it looks like. what happens before something really important breaks. we've been thinking about this topic recently, happy to have them on the show now, jason. i'm starting to worry not about t

brett kavanaugh cried his way through the hearings in america there is a thing about both white villagetlantaism and white tears particularly male white tears. >> jesse: i didn't know tears had a sex or gender. >> consider the source. joy reid woman wrote in blog how much she disliked homosexuals didn't want to see brokeback mountain didn't want to see mental kissing. claimed she was hacked. nbc did forensic investigation. found out she wasn't hacked and then she said she doesn't really realize that she was writing these things. and i apologize. consider the source. this is a race card player. there is one million of them on msnbc haw and one of a bunch of them. that's what they do how they roll. pathetic. racism has never been a. after obama got elected with higher pfeffer sen damage of white voted than john kerry did four years earlier, i kind of thought this was done. they are pulling out the race cards because donald trump got 12% of the black vote, that's 50% increase of what he got in 2016 and scared to death. they are doubling down on stuff like critical race theory and reparatio

probably the most consequential were ones initiated by justices brett kavanaugh and amy comey parrottke effect and empower citizens to go after anyone who helps someone have an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. and we'll listen to brett kavanaugh express concerns first about if states can actually insulate themselves from bans on apportion, what about any other kind of bans on other constitutional rights? let's hear what he had to say. >> could be free speech rights. could be free exercise of religion rights. could be second amendment rights if this position is accept epied here. the theory of the brief is it could be replicated in other states that favor other constitutional rights. >> he is concerned about the domino effect here, and i think that was a good, good sign. that, likely, he, and possibly justice barrett, might now be willing to actually vote against texas, at least at this initial stage, and put the law temporarily on hold while lower court proceedings look at the merits of this law, this unconventional law. elena kagan, one of the three remaining liberals on the be

especially one of them, brett kavanaugh, a nominee from donald trump who raised a question about what this means beyond abortions. if this can be done for abortions, may be next up is a liberal state like california. they could write a similar law blocking gun rights and allowing private citizens to challenge anyone who tries to get a gun in the united states. conservatives are extremely precise on what they're looking for in this case. >> the world health organization has called on eight agencies to send medical aid to afghanistan. that is where the health care sector is in growing turmoil. things were difficult before the taliban took over. hospital staff are accusing -- are complaini of acute power outages and staff have not seen their salaries in months in some cases. >> this man is the new supervisor of a small district hospital outside kabul. >> he always wanted to be a doctor but he could not afford medical school. he is delighted that the taliban has rewarded his service on the battlefield with a hospital to run. but it is not in a good way. there are critical shortages of foo

then justice brett kavanaugh with the slippery slope argument. law to go into effect, they'll be busy, more laws to come. what about liberal states? what if they pass a law that restricts gun rights or first amendments? listen to what he had to say making that case. >> could be free speech rights, free exercise of religion rights, second amendment rights if this position is accepted here, the theory of the amicus brief is that it can be easily replicated in other states that disfavor other constitutional rights. >> so, you listen to that here. do you sense a majority forming not just to allow the challenge but perhaps to overrule the essential essence of this texas law, right? which lets vigilantes in effect enforce and therefore shields the state government from lawsuits. >> let me preface everything by reading tea leaves in oral arguments, very difficult. >> with that proviso. >> here's what i think we could see as early as today, could take weeks, we don't know. there are two cases, right. the abortion providers case. they want to get into cou

c brett kavanaugh seemed concerned about that. that may give the mr. chance to win this procedural case. it's important to point out, even if the biden administration and the abortion providers win, b that doesn't mean they will succeed in striking down the law. >> that's exactly right. >> they'll get a ruling on the merits. >> so then talk to me about the mississippi law that's coming before this same court next month. it is, as opposed to what we're talking about with texas, the mississippi law is a direct challenge to the constitutional right to abortion. >> that case is not a procedural morass. that case is very clear, what's gone on. basically, mississippi has said we are prohibiting abortions after the 15th week. roe v. wade and then the casey decision in 1992 said no state can impose an undue burden on the right to abortion before viability, which is around 24 weeks. so this 15-week law that mississippi passed and is going to be argued on december 1st, is a clear challenge to roe v. wade. and mississippi has filed a brief with the court saying w

everybody from brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett to sotomayor.eally just doesn't work. what it does is allows any state to come up with a law, to thwart constitutional rights. that state just doesn't like, and especially justices like kavanaugh could see how it could be used to restrict access to services or goods or activities that the state has decided is not appropriate. that is probably the best hope that people who support the idea of abortion who want access to abortion in the state of texas have in thwarting this law. >> there was another moment that stuck out where clarence thomas asked stone about what would be considered an injury under sb-8. this is important. listen to this. >> what would that injury be in this under sb-8, if it's an injury, in fact? >> one example would be a injure suffered in the tort of outrage where an individual becomes aware of an abortion and suffers the same emotional harm that would ground an article 3 injury for purposes of texas law. >> that seemed like sort of a weak argument, did it not? how would you go

wade and so i think here, we might see a very different take from amy coney barrett and brett kavanaughed hostility to the idea of reproductive rights throughout the years and i think this could be the moment we see that overturn of roe vs. wade. >> that's astounding to think about, joyce, and we talk about what this case is really about, which is the standard of fetal viability. right now, at 24 weeks, under roe v. wade, that could be reduced, obviously, under this case in mississippi down to 15 weeks as the threshold we know at least 95% of abortions are performed before that 24-week mark. if this ban at abortion at 15 weeks happens, how likely is it that we could see the argument to draw the line even sooner? >> i think that's precisely the question that dobbs poses here because ever since justice blackman wrote the decision in roe vs. wade, which establishes the viability standard, the complaint has been, viability is a moving target. is it 24 weeks? is it 22 weeks? could medical science advance further? in dobbs, though, the argument is a little bit different, and the state of miss

but i don't think we expected to hear it from brett kavanaugh.es in addition to the more liberal justices are hostile to this law. and so i think we could see this struck down, although as julia has said, we still have that dobbs case on the docket for december, which is probably the more likely vehicle to reconsider the continuing validity of roe v. wade. >> amy, your life's work is on the line. even if the supreme court knocks down the law, how long would it take for you to get your clinic back to normal? you've said that this law has forced you to turn away 80% of the women you serve. >> right. we are? critical condition in the state of texas. the clinics that have been open can only serve people up to six weeks of pregnancy, because this law is so extreme and it's so damaging. and so we've got to get some help as soon as possible from the supreme court. they've got to weigh in. you can't just take away the rights of 10% of this country's people of reproductive age who live in texas and not answer for it. they've got to step in. we're at day 6

conservative justice brett kavanaugh signaled concern on that front. >> free exercise, free speech rights, could be targeting. >> reporter: whatever the court decide could be a key indicator for upcoming cases that may determine the future of reproductive rights in this country. in washington, alice barr, nbc news >>> up next, bill's got your tuesday forecast >>> plus, crypto crash how scammers crashed in on the squid game craze ♪why do you build me up (build me up)♪ butter... cup... baby... up would be the operative word there pal. oh, yeah, yeah. sorry, have a good day! if you ride, you get it. - come on in! oh wow, we're really backed up. geico motorcycle. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. i'm jimmy dean and uh, isn't that sunrise somthin'? i honestly feel that way about jimmy dean sausage. get yourself a large chunk of that good morning feeling. boy, that smells good. mmm. did you know that your fabrics trap more than just odors? they also trap bacteria. better get new febreze fabric antimicrobial. its water-based formula penetrates fabrics to kill 99.9% of bacte

>> amy cone knee barrett, brett kavanaugh. joining me is former texas state senator, wendy davis.o have you back so soon again, wendy. you just heard two of the court's conservative justices, they were expressing doubts about the constitutionality of the texas law. chief justice john roberts also expressed some concerns, so how about you? what was your takeaway from what they were saying and is the texas law now on shaky ground? >> i think it's definitely on shaky ground, alex, and certainly we were feeling a lot more hopeful after the hearing on monday than we were prior to the hearing, but i think it needs to be understood that these justices are bringing forward concerns about the constitutionality of this law, not through a concern for abortion but because if states are allowed to override constitutional precedence by simply putting enforcement authority in the hands of private citizens as texas did here, this could extend to overreaching and overriding other constitutional protections, second and first amendment as well. >> yeah, and to that point, let's take a listen to bret

donald trump was a russian agent, brett kavanaugh was a rapist, nick sandman, remember him the kid fromas a privileged white races. biden's laptop was a russian plot. on and on it goes media puts out misinformation far more extensively in far more damaging way than any right wing conspiracy website. this is a primary source of corruption international conversation pretty thank goodness we can still find ways of getting at the truth. that is it for us this week i'll be back next week at more in-depth interviews right on the wall street journal at large. thank you so much for joining us. ♪ ♪ >> barron's roundtable sponsored by invesco qqq. ♪ ♪ welcome to barron's roundtable will be get behind the headlines and prepare you for the week ahead i am jack otter. coming up inflation, stock prices and corporate profits all soaring what comes next question at veteran ceo has seen it all. he will tells how to ride it out. and later more americans are planning to do their shopping in-store this holiday season. brick-and-mortar retail is

during oral arguments monday, brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett said they may be allowing abortionhe law. >>> a sheriff said he believes that brian laundrie died by suicide in that nature preserve not far from his parents' home. a cause of death has not been released. laundrie was a person of interest in the mud of his fian fiancee. >>> rain around the eastern great lakes. and in the plains and the midwest, snow in the rockies. >>> finally, something millions of people are doing incorrectly every day. >> talk about washing your hair. will ganss explains. >> reporter: the beauty influencer as a background in hair care and says many of us are using shampoo completely wrong. she posted this video on tiktok, wracking up 1.2 million views in four days. not to just rub in shampoo and hope for the best. >> for some people, it's laziness. my arms are tired. yeah. get that workout in. >> reporter: the tiktok tips say to wash two to three times until everything is clean. step one, know which areas to target. >> normally wash up here. you know. but it's like, this and this is the dirtiest par

well, in their questioning, a majority of the justices including brett kavanaugh and chief justice johnhink the new york law may be too restrictive of second amendment rights. all right, a dramatic ending now to a parent's worst nightmare. police in australia released this video moments after raiding a house and finding four-year- old cleo smith. she vanished from her parents' camping tent 18 days ago triggering a massive search. cleo was checked out at a hospital and reunited with her parents. a 36-year-old man has been arrested in her abduction. all right, up next, we want to meet some of the candidates who made history on election day. y. with the only vitamin c that lasts 24 hours. more restful sleep. with the first-ever triple action sleep supplement. we put more of our brains into helping your heart. we give you more wellness solutions backed by rigorous science than we ever have before. nature's bounty gives you more, so you can live bountifully. fries or salad? nature's bounty gives you more, salad! good choice! it is. so is screening for colon cancer. when caught in early stage

not the state, but that defense met some resistance from even the conservative justices like brett kavanaugh. there's a loophole that's been exploited >> were used here. something mark herring with the center for reproductive rights says he was happy to hear we confident we're pleased with, as i said, several of the had serious concerns with what texas is doing here. >> and the texas law will remain in effect until the supreme court issues, its decision for now in washington. i'm anna wiernicki. back to you. >> california senator alex padilla tweeted out this message about the texas law saying, quote, texas is extreme abortion ban is cruel, dangerous and blatantly unconstitutional. that's why supreme court must block it and let's be clear. roe v wade is the law of the land and we must ensure it stays that way by passing the women's health protection act. >> at the same time, president joe biden announced new initiatives. he wants the united states to take in order to combat climate change. the president said his build back better framework would mean more investment in clean energy. he says

. >> reporter: conservative justices brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett, who weeks ago refused to block the law, today questioned whether that loophole should be closed. liberal justice elena kagan saying the law invites other states to deprive citizens of constitutional rights they object to. >> essentially we would be like, you know, we are open, you are open for business. there's nothing the supreme court can do about it. guns, same-sex marriage, religious rights, whatever you don't like, go ahead. >> reporter: david, it's unclear tonight how soon the supreme court will hand down a decision, but a majority of the justices on the bench today signaled that abortion providers have a strong case to ask federal courts to put that texas law on hold. david? >> all right, rachel scott at the court tonight. rachel, thank you. >>> now to the travel chaos across the u.s. more than 2,000 flights canceled over the weekend. hundreds more grounded today. american airlines hit especially hard, and it comes after the mess with southwest airlines weeks ago. so, what's going on with the thanksgiv

she tweeted about brett kavanaugh, angry white man issue not a good look, brett kavanaugh. >> bill: who> that tweet is nasty, she is normally not that nasty. i have found her personable, but in terms of views, this is a concern for people who have enjoyed the freedom of the internet and what it has given and it is really a basically the big issue here, couple big issues, one big one is regulating telecom companies like the old phone system, are we going to have that or have what we've had, growth and vitality and creativity? big users like youtube, netflix, do not want to pay market rates, they do not want to pay for the traffic they are pushing over the network. they got the obama administration to try and change the rules and regulate and tell telecom companies what to charge, investment went down. she is saying she's not going back to that, but i think you got to be concerned. >> bill: james in a sentence, what do these nominations suggest about this administration? >> this is, i would say, pushing forward ignores recent lessons of the election. if people in different places of the c

it reminded a lot of people of something, the brett kavanaugh hearings. in america, there's a thing about -- a saying about both white vigilanteism and white tears. >> hmm, white tears. you guys better shut up. while we can get more in your face than nancy pelosi's team of surgeons, step back and let's look at everything, right? manipulating i haved crow to attack covington catholic school kids, targeting of parents, the imprisoning of january 6 rioters for years, the extortion of the rittenhouse case and targeting judge and jury. and the story where the democrats attempted to lower a border cross by whipping migrants. it was nothing but hot air. where the hell did that story go, light? it's harder to find than mitch mcconnell's chin. why are we letting the mob off of the hook? republicans, grow some balls. whose side are you on anyway? and there's this hoax to undermine the election because the media not only hate the winner but the voters more. >> much of the dossier has been corroborated. >> if you look at what has become public, some of the public inf

that was brett kavanaugh's concern. then she went to amy coney barrett's concern which is people cannot effectuate their rights in texas state courts if this law is about to stand. so she just absolutely masterfully, i think -- it was a magisterial kind of palling in all of the doubts of the three justices. she really only needed two of them, but i think what you saw and heard right there was her being so attuned to the weak spot and then saying come sit by me, justice kavanaugh, come sit by me, justice barrett. i think we can break down this law. it was really a tour deforce. >> what do you make of the fact that this was heard so quickly by the justices? does that tell us anything about how they are inclined? why do you think they made the decision that they would hear this so quickly? i mean, a ten-day turnaround in terms of oral arguments, that's just unheard of. >> i have been calling the law a shadow dog law that goes into effect in september being a totally unnecessary self ownby the conservatives on the court. th

. >> kyle rittenhouse testified like a mini brett kavanaugh. >> they're making him out to be acquire boy, if a black kid did that, how would america feel about that? >> if he is freed, it's a message to others like him that prison won't be in their future. >> if he's in free, he will end up in congress. >> and he could end up in congress. >> jesse: the comment, greg, joy reed, that said that these were fake tears just like kavanaugh's tears were fake just shows an inability of humanity to recognize real emotion in another human being. >> greg: when you look at the face of his mother, all you see is the suffering that she's been going through. it's interesting to listen to the media defend what they would have done if a pedophile and a serial abuser, one of the pedophiles, one of the guys wanted to die, comes after you. what would they have wanted him to do? rittenhouse? don't shoot them. let them beat you with a skateboard. the media is priming the outcome by injecting race into it. so even though it's a white guy, white kid that killed two white goons, there's something racial about

. >> conservative justices brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett today questioned whether that loophole should be closed. >> kavanaugh theorized that a left-leaning state could offer a $1 million bounty against those who sell an assault rifle, like an ar-15, then claim it wasn't using state power because only private parties could bring the suits. >> trevor: uh-oh, looks like the conservative justices have to choose what they care about more: guns or fetuses? this is tough. unless... what if women gave birth to guns? that's it! we just make women give birth to guns. then everyone wins. >> i will say, this really shows you how bullshit this law is, because banning abortion has been the goal for conservatives for over four decades now, but even they aren't willing to do it like this. it would be like a lonely guy finally losing his virginity, but only because he fell into the gorilla pit at the zoo. it's not what he wanted-- it's what he wanted but not what he wanted. but the justices are right: this law could lead to a future where everyone is just suing each other all the time. let's be

well, in their questioning, a majority of the justices, including brett kavanaugh and chief justice johnerts hinted they think the new york law may be too restrictive of second amendment rights. >>> all right. a dramatic ending now to a parent's worst nightmare. police in australia released this video moments after raiding a house and finding 4-year-old cleo smith. she actually vanished from her family's camping tent 18 days ago, triggering a massive search. cleo was checked out at a hospital and reunited with her parents. a 36-year-old man has been arrested in her abduction. >>> all right. up next, we want to meet some of the candida s who made history when you humble yourself under the mighty hand of god, in due time he will exalt you. hi, i'm joel osteen. i'm excited about being with you every week. i hope you'll tune in. you'll be inspired, you'll be encouraged. i'm looking forward to seeing you right here. you are fully loaded and completely equipped for the race that's been designed for you. >>> it was an emotional celebration as democrat ed gainey became the first black mayor of p

it reminded a lot of people of something, the brett kavanaugh hearings. in america, there's a thing about -- a saying about both white vigilanteism and white tears. >> hmm, white tears. you guys better shut up. while we can get more in your face than nancy pelosi's team of surgeons, step back and let's look at everything, right? manipulating i haved crow to attack covington catholic school kids, targeting of parents, the imprisoning of january 6 rioters for years, the extortion of the rittenhouse case and targeting judge and jury. and the story where the democrats attempted to lower a border cross by whipping migrants. it was nothing but hot air. where the hell did that story go, light? it's harder to find than mitch mcconnell's chin. why are we letting the mob off of the hook? republicans, grow some balls. whose side are you on anyway? and there's this hoax to undermine the election because the media not only hate the winner but the voters more. >> much of the dossier has been corroborated. >> if you look at what has become public, some of the public inf

various venues, this is a picture from "the new york times," headline, texas abortion law, with brett kavanaughfocusing on that pivotal role he could play. showing a picture of an abortion-rights sign at the home of justice kavanaugh in suburban washington as police stand guard and watch outside the house of the justice. joseph, washington, d.c., democratic mine, you are next. caller: i grew up catholic and am listening to people calling in talking about the religious justification for why they go and try to change the minds outside of abortion clinics as these women attempt to make the most difficult decision of their lives. i have friends who tell me, you know, joe, how can you be a child of adoption and say that you support women's right to choose? of course, i'm grateful for the second chance at life i was given by my birth mother, but i would never use that or my religious up ringing or anything else too, you know, use that to justify trying to tell a woman what to do with her body. as a man i will never have to face that decision and i agree with a woman who called in earlier who said tha

brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett. that essentially puts a bounty on doctors. to reproductive medical care to that of the first and second amendments. listen to this. >> free speech rights. free exercise of religion rights. free second amendment rights. the fear of the brief is that it can be favored in other state that disfavor other constitutional rights. >> mark herron was making the argument for the responses. what did you make? >> i thought it was a spot-on question. we've been saying all along. it's an abortion restriction and the most extreme that we have ever seen. the questions on the supreme court, were not just about abortion. everyone seems to agree this is an unconstitutional law. can a state decide the supreme court's precedence and the bill of rights just don't apply in our state. and the state can nullify a right that's been recognized by the supreme court for 15 years. a mondaymental right by allowing anyone to sue who exercises a right or provides care to allow someone to exercise that right. that doesn't apply just for abortion. it can apply

is the rare vaccine that prevents a since the manic or a mildly systematic infection present brett kavanaugh was fully vaccinated that is carried as a breakthrough in the word breakthrough implies a failure. so it damns this vaccine unfairly. the second major communication error and really both of those occurred at the same time thousands get together, celebrate july 480% are vaccinated. nonetheless it's involving three to 46 people most of whom which was sadly termed a breakthrough hospitalization rate one point to percent that is excellent that is as good as you are going to do with the vaccine. none the less was carried as breakthrough. hospitalizations is a breakthrough illness. the third communication error wasn't president biden stood up at the podium in august and said we are going to have a booster dose available for all americans over 18 years of age on september 20. spinning the message people gotten to doses or one dose of j&j are not fully immunized. we have an excellent vaccine that continues to have excellent protection including a delta variant including all age groups right u

wade but today two key conservative justices brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett seemed open to argumentsders that they should be able to challenge this ban in federal court. joining me now to discuss all of the elements of this is the president and ceo of planned parenthood, federation of america, alexis mcgill johnson. thank you so much for being here. did you hear anything in the arguments or in the questions from the justices that gave you hope that this texas abortion ban would be suspended? >> yeah, look, i mean, i think we were encouraged that the court seemed genuinely troubled by texas's blatant attempt to enact an unconstitutional law and evade judicial review while doing so. i believe that, you know, hearing the arguments this morning in both cases, you know, some of the questions around, you know, impact, right, which we should remember, we are now 60 days into this law. a thousand percent increase from patients to our health centers from texas, you know, you could see the very alarming impact, and we certainly heard that concern come out, and we also heard that no right is es