brezinski, what could or should we do now? >> i think we have to be concerned about what follows what has happened. putin in this speech has laid out a case that can be used for certain force directly against ukraine. might it disintegrate? my part of ukraine secede? and then what happens? suppose violence breaks out, what choices do we have? how can we react? i think we have to try to anticipate that possibility and consider it seriously. one way to anticipate it is to still try to somehow convey to putin that it is not our intent to seduce ukraine, to drive into yet -- into nato, to turn it into a state that is openly, overtly hostile to russia. we have to work together in consolidating the recovery of ukraine economically and otherwise, because russia also has an interest in that, and so do we. and we and say to them, we will do it jointly. and of course, ukraine has a right to be european in spirit, but it is not going to be a member of the eu for years and years. and we can reassure you that it will not be a member of nat

brezinski, what could or should we do now? we have to be concerned about what follows what has happened. in this speech has laid out a case that can be used for certain force directly against ukraine. might it disintegrate? secede?of ukraine and then what happens? suppose violence breaks out, what choices do we have? how can we react? i think we have to try to anticipate that possibility and consider it seriously. one way to anticipate it is to still try to somehow convey to putin that it is not our intent to seduce ukraine, to drive into yet -- into nato, to turn it into a state that is openly, overtly hostile to russia. we have to work together in consolidating the recovery of ukraine economically and otherwise, because russia also has an interest in that, and so do we. and we and say to them, we will do it jointly. and of course, ukraine has a right to be european in spirit, but it is not going to be a member of the eu for years and years. and we can reassure you that it will not be a member of nato. but at the same time, w

we do not have a potential partner. >> doctor brezinski, what could or should we do now? >> i think we have to be concerned about what follows that has happened. and in the speech he has laid out a case that could be used for certain force directed against ukraine and see how it reacts. and then what happens t is supposed a breakout and what choices do we have how can we react? i think that we've often try to anticipate that possibility and to consider it seriously. one way to anticipate it is to still try to somehow or another can they do that it is not our intent to seduce ukraine and georgia into nato and turn it into a state that is openly hostile to russia and work to wk together in consolidating the recovery of ukraine economically and otherwise because russia also has an interest in it and so do we. we will do it jointly and of course the ukraine has a right to be european and spirit but it's not going to be a member of the eu for years and we can reassure you it will not be a member of nato. but at the same time we have to convey our concern that those words spoke

." >>> good morning, i'm mika brezinski in for thomas roberts. this is "way too early."ack in the air this morning looking for possible pieces of debris from the missing jet in the southern indian ocean. it's been 14 days since the malaysian plane last communicated with air traffic control. these satellite images gave officials a renewed sense of hope that the mystery surrounding flight 370 would be solved. crews are currently looking for two objects about 14 miles apart. one is 79 feet long. the other about 16 feet

." >>> good morning, i'm mika brezinski in for thomas roberts. this is "way too early." planes are back in the air this morning looking for possible pieces of debris from the missing jet in the southern indian ocean. it's been 14 days since the malaysian plane last communicated with air traffic control. these satellite images gave officials a renewed sense of hope that the mystery surrounding flight 370 would be solved. crews are currently looking for two objects about 14 miles apart. one is 79 feet long. the other about 16 feet long. but yesterday poor weather conditions, including strong winds, heavy cloud coverage, and rain made it too difficult to locate any of that debris. so today the search continues as officials still consider their best lead to be this. three australian p-3 orions, a p-8. the chinese are sending three warships to assist in the search. tony abbott defended his decision to release the satellite images out of respect to the families of the missing. >> we owe it to the families and the friends and the loved ones of the almost 240 people on flight mh

apply at camp david agreements, that don't , thate the peace treaty don't violate what nixon and brezinskind i, and george w. bush, have all pursued. don't violate the international law. all the nations in the world have agreed with the basic laws that prevails from an repose -- unopposed yuan resolutions. there are some that ought not be violated. i think that the 1967 borders are basically inviolate. they can be modified back and forth. sharon, who was my , we were both farmers and firmly. the last time i met with him, the last day of his prime minister ship, he had a wonderful idea that he showed me. israel would take over the area of palestine near jerusalem. in addition, -- stateusalem would be the capital for both. >> but israel would give palestinians and amount of territory. 36would provide a core door miles long between gaza and the west bank. in the core door, there will be a highway in a railroad. his farm is south of that. will dig a tunnel under the highway or a bridge over. he had that all worked out. that is the kind of thing that could be put into effect in the future. .> i

brezinski is a former u.s.national security advisor to president jimmy carter, counselor and trustee with s, served at the state department and many other prestigious foreign policy divisions. also generalv security provider -- security advisor. he is also a counselor here at csis. fordeputy assistant national security affairs during the ford administration's. and holds the medal of freedom in 1993. queen elizabeth made him an the knight ofr of the british empire. and was editor for the times and now writes a column for the times. he is the author of several books on foreign policy and also biography of general norman sports copy -- norman schwarzkopf. it is hard to know where to start this discussion. let me start with this question. is this the new cold war? let's start with you, dr. brezinski. >> obviously, we don't know for sure but it is beginning to look that way. it may not end up that way but it is beginning to look that way. in fact, if i can take two minutes, i would like to do something that probably

so, i think brezinski is perhaps incorrect in using the term "soviet union." a more specific term would be what penult things of as natural allies or the natural zone of influence of the russian zone of empire. to many average russians and putin, it's a perfectly natural and reasonable thing to do. and it's simply making normal what they think exists de facto anyway. >> i want to go to you and talk about sanctions. u.s. and canada are talking a big game on sanctions. they have announced sanctions. the eu is being more shaugs. dav cautious. david cal ron says 28 countries have to agree on what they want to do. is there any chance that the west will the have one voice on russia? >> i think it is amazing what we saw coming out of the e.u. summer yesterday was a three-staged. the first stage is basically to give diplomacy and the political solution of the crisis yet another chance but within days and with a very limited time frame, this is now the time for the russian side, also, to move in the direction of political solution. should that fail, the second stage wo

brezinski, you suggested that mre's are not quite enough. we can provide nonlethal equipment him a lethal equipment, and air cover. there is the escalation. what should we do? >> in any case, we should have contingency planning for all of that post up but we should couple that with a serious communication to the russians in which we would like an alternative outcome in which we would like to be partners. but we need to let ukraine know that if they resist, they will not be alone. we do not need to let the russians know exactly what we are going to do. but the death of the pudding is also in the ukrainians. they need to demonstrate that they value their territorial integrity and are prepared to make sacrifices to protect it. i think the russians, the way they have operated in crimea, what -- as i said before, where they are operating on a contingent basis. if there is a lot of resistance, we pull back. the same may happen in ukraine as well, particularly those district where there are some russian people living and they are demonstrating and