neil: i did when it gets her thoughts as well on the dustup over brian rolston reported suspended forplan was talking to russian operatives before the election turns out he was talking to them after the election with a world of difference. abc acknowledges as much. it did change what has been a fairly good-looking marketing to a 350-point falloff with you have grounds to sue abc. i'm not asking to be a legal expert on grounds of the lawsuit. would you think of the reaction to that and whether that was a clearly biased report that harmed a lot of people? >> it seems to me that the man of the experience that brian ross has had in with all the different stations he's been with, he should have done a much better job at making sure why he put on other than the public market was absolutely true and correct. he didn't obviously do that job. he relied on some information that kind of went with what he personally was thinking. that's the wrong thing to do in the organization you are in in the press has done a great job of double sourcing things. it appears to be brian stepped over the line and