director brinkman? >> commissioner brinkman: thank you. the other time that you talk about the residential parking permit program, it just makes my blood boil that we can only charge what it costs to cover that program. if we do need to look at layoffs in the future, and if we do need to look where we can cut costs, will we take a look at that program and see what it does to our bottom line if we completely get rid of the r.p.p. program and just say, great, go wild, try it. see what happens. and we save money in a lot of ways on that. we save money on enforcing, we save money on running the program. or maybe we get rid of it in some areas to cut costs. it seems like if we're going to be looking at cutting costs, then the pain sort of needs to be shared equally. and although i know that getting rid of r.d.p. causes way more pain for the drivers, maybe we throw it out and we come up with something new -- something that -- that doesn't -- that isn't covered by state law. maybe we have license plate recognition where every curb space is consid

brinkman says today, that $90 a share.onathan: calling tesla " dramatically overvalued and the data strongly is suggestive of the idea that something apart from the fundamentals, might be driving the shares higher." lisa: you do not say. notom's point about bravery, wants to get on the bad side mag capital quickly and busily. how do you give an accurate call of a company when it seems to be endless demand regardless of fundamentals? at some point that is a story of 2020. jonathan: are you saying that maybe mr. brinkman not be invited for tea anytime soon at tesla, is that what you are suggesting? lisa: maybe they like contentious t, -- tea. is: i know mr. diamond always watching surveillance, we want to get ryan on to talk about this call. us, our chief washington correspondent. i read the first two or three of the 40 page brief as mr. trump and attorney generals go to the supreme court, what does a senator from texas to when he gets up in front of the supreme court to represent his president? what does he do? his 2024 lau

. >> commissioner brinkman: we would certainly have a lot of people clearing out their garages so they could park their cars in them, instead of just storing things in them. yeah, it's definitely worth considering. you know, if we could actually charge sort of fair market value based on where you live for storing your car on the street. >> to that point is it possible to charge a street license? so, say, you wanted -- some people want to park in front of their house. could you charge a specific license or fee or permit that you got the spot in front of your house, right? it would be a significant upcharge, because you're basically renting the street on an annual basis kind of thing. but i how does that work in the context of the current law? >> so i would -- i would ask the city attorney to look again about whether we can actually rent chawrchgs o chunks of streo specific individuals. >> do that in white zones and -- >> but the white zones are available to all people dropping off passengers. it's not just, you know, who can afford is the only person allowed to park there at the curb. >

cheryl brinkman. >> yes. first, i want to say thank you to staff who i know are just working flat out on projects. they are working a lot of overtime, they have so many competing demands on their time, and in such uncertain times during this time. i just want to remind the public that staff is working so hard to not only keep the system going but to work on all of our emergency transit projects that are going to keep this city moving, so be sure to keep that in mind this time of year. and the other thing i wanted to talk about, we have a lot of new measures enacted during the emergency, and i would just ask us all to remember our strategic plan goals when it comes time for considering those projects to be made permanent. i know sometimes competing criteria can get caught up with the flood of e-mails and the flood of feedback that we get from our constituents, but let's just remember we have strategic plan goals, and we need to keep those in mind as we talk about making a lot of those projects permanent. thank

then i know that drict director brinkman made a proposal. did anyone second, so a second to her motion? i'm sorry, is there no second to director brinkman's motion? >> so if there's no second to that motion, what -- what is the alternative here, colleagues? >> someone needs to make an alternative motion. >> or the item gets continued, i guess. >> okay. maybe the question that i would like to ask, what is it that people feel like they need to make a decision about how this should proceed? and then i will -- i see director heminger has his hand and up and i know that director lai was about to speak. director heminger you can go, and miss lai was willing to rescind the motion so maybe you could tell us what you're thinking. >> commissioner hamasaki: i agree with director brinkman that we're spending far too much time on this item. and, frankly, part of the reason is that it was confusingly presented to us. i think we need better work to proceed through these items in a more rapid matter. with every question, we got more questions. look, the wor

director brinkman? >> commissioner brinkman: thank you. the other time that you talk about the residential parking permit program, it just makes my blood boil that we can only charge what it costs to cover that program. if we do need to look at layoffs in the future, and if we do need to look where we can cut costs, will we take a look at that program and see what it does to our bottom line if we completely get rid of the r.p.p. program and just say, great, go wild, try it. see what happens. and we save money in a lot of ways on that. we save money on enforcing, we save money on running the program. or maybe we get rid of it in some areas to cut costs. it seems like if we're going to be looking at cutting costs, then the pain sort of needs to be shared equally. and although i know that getting rid of r.d.p. causes way more pain for the drivers, maybe we throw it out and we come up with something new -- something that -- that doesn't -- that isn't covered by state law. maybe we have license plate recognition where every curb space is consid

and, senator, my suspicion about this that it does feel like the ordinary brinkman ship of, oh, we'reire, it's about to end, i don't know if we're going to make a deal, i hope we do. even with people hungry in the streets all over america we're playing the same game? >> let me say this, chris. it's always good to be with you and to keep people apprised with the transparency they should have. see this bill? this bill that we worked on in a bipartisan bicameral way was delivered on monday. this is a template of what should be put together and how we take care of the emergency needs of america. it's just an emergency till april 1. well, it's turned over to the four corners. now when the four corners get it, that's the leadership in both the house and the senate. and then you have them regurgitating everything. maybe what they didn't want in or what they wanted in or what someone else has encouraged them to do. and they start finnicing with it, if you will. you've got four different staffs going at it. these staffs haven't gotten along well over that period of time because always comes to

. >> chair borden: thank you director brinkman. directors this matter is before us to make a motion using the amended motion that was in our packet. >> i think we have to vote on amending it first. >> chair borden: let me double check with the city attorney. because the original motion was noted and even though it's updated, do we have to vote to amend the original motion? >> yes, that's correct. first or the amendment and then on the motion. >> okay, i'll read the amended portion. it reads to delete reference to northbound church street in item 13d, delete reference to westbound 15th street in item 13e. delete item 13f with regard to establishing an left turn on eastbound 15th street and clarify which of the decisions can be reviewed by board of supervisors. that's the amendment to the resolution. >> chair borden: is there a motion to make this an amendment? >> motion to amend. >> second. >> chair borden: great. on that motion, can you please call the roll? [roll call vote] that passes. >> chair borden: now i need a motion on the