itself britain. united states, as a country that responsible for the whole world, always overwhelmed, you know, with these many arrangements and contacts around the world, trying to solve everything at once. great britain has allowed itself to concentrate on security and peace on the european continent. ukraine is currently the most difficult and difficult moment, the most conflict zone, without resolving which it is impossible to dream of security in europe. from this we'. let's go, i want to remind, for example, also that boris johnson, as the prime minister of great britain, came to ukraine on february 8, actually two weeks before the start of the full-scale invasion, but all the years since the 14th, since the 14th, aid has been coming, diluted aid, great britain has been training our soldiers and so on, and so on and so forth, that is, it has been for some time. mr. vadim, we have already mentioned brexit, so today it is four years since britain left the european union. well, there are often tho

so, rishi sunak is in kyiv today, and the security agreement between great britain and ukraine has been signed. president zelenskyi says that this is a historic agreement, and that if such an agreement had been signed in 1991, then there would obviously have been a war. the current one did not exist, after the signing of the agreement, president volodymyr zelenskyi and the prime minister of great britain briefly outlined the main provisions of this document. let's listen. that is why the provided guarantees will be valid for a time until ours. joining nato, if it happens earlier than the term of the agreement created by us the security architecture will be effectively incorporated into the security system of the entire alliance. we have now agreed with britain on security in all areas, on land, in the air, at sea in cyberspace. this means more prosperity, more tanks, more missiles, hundreds of thousands of new artillery shells, training for thousands of ukrainian soldiers. £200 million will be allocated to the production of hundreds of thousands of new drones, the biggest aid of any cou

, maybe tehran will not have missiles for russia. just a moment you can now hear that the usa and britain have shown determination when there is a threat to navigation in the red sea, but they would act so decisively when russia threatens navigation in the black sea. there is logic here, but the reality is that the hussites are an armed group. vyks, and russia is an aggressive, but state, violator of international norms, but a permanent member of the un security council. the work in the black sea to clear it of russian ships and encroachments is done by the armed forces, destroying the black sea fleet of russia and pushing it out of sevastopol. by the way, restored by ukraine without russia, the grain corridor, precisely in the export routes, relies on the swedish canal and the red sea for delivery. of ukrainian grain to africa and asia, therefore the actions of the houthis, as well as russia, harm the program of grain from ukraine. there is another argument, they say, operations against the hussites divert the attention of the usa and britain from the war in ukraine. but is it so? just t

the term of this agreement with britain is 10 years. the term may be extended by analogy with other similar security treaties concluded by global leaders. i particularly appreciate the united kingdom's support for entry. of ukraine in nato and recognizes that our security, ukraine's security is part of the entire euro-atlantic security. that is why the guarantees provided will be valid until our accession to nato. if this happens earlier than the term of the agreement, the security architecture we have created will actually be incorporated into the security system of the entire alliance. we have now agreed with britain on security in all spheres: on land, in the air, at sea, in cyberspace. in broad political interaction , in detail in the agreement, regarding weapons, absolutely clearly regarding our state border, fundamentally, regarding sanctions, fairly, regarding compensating russia for the damages caused by its aggression, reliably, regarding post-war reconstruction, of course, as needed by ukraine and britain will be able to concl

britain regarding nato, isn't it, oleksiy? no, not like that, because if great britain gives some other country that is not a member, not a nato member, guarantees such as are in the washington treaty on the establishment of nato, this will mean the entry of this country, the actual entry of this country into the circle of nato countries, because if an automatic attack on these on this country would mean an attack on britain, then according to the washington treaty, an attack on britain is an attack on all countries. nato, this is precisely the main problem of these interim guarantees. of course, this is an unprecedented step for ukraine, perhaps even for europe, this is an unprecedented step, but let me remind you that a similar agreement was also concluded with finland and sweden. with finland , it effectively ceased its operation with finland's accession to nato. sweden is in a very similar situation, it still hasn't become a member of nato and e. it still has agreements signed with boris johnson , an agreement, more precis

he said britain is the root cause of pain and miseries. britain is the prime enemy of the arabs. he revolted in 1935 and was martered shortly after. following the martterdom. of izsam, the first resistance movement is carried out. there will be a six-month general strike. this does not reduce tensions. britain gets to work, on the one hand, london brings in military forces and on the other calls for negotiations. charles ord wingate, veteran british officer, converts to zionism as soon as he arrives in palestine. while educating jews, he implements a day. plan, the formation of armed groups, brutal repression and widespread punishment of palestinians. the jews take an aggressive stance. two years later, with a combination of british and jewish forces, night squads are formed. cruel and scary people, they torture the muslims. they whip them and poured dirt into the villager's mouths. violence against muslims becomes normal, at the same time. britain starts demolishing palestinian homes. their excuse is reconstruction. 240 houses are destroyed in java's city, displacing some 600 pa

, would you like to become the prime minister of great britain?hat's another story it's strange, it's the first time i see a woman who doesn't want to be, you don't want to be a member of the verkhovna rada, but the prime minister of great britain if she became a member of the european parliament. we don't mind either, right? oh, but anyway, so in that regard, i have to say that it 's quite like that, no, i just thought that after margaret thatcher, every opportunity to show femininity and political ability, why not goldameyer, maybe it my collar, after all, is more elegant margaret techin, no, well, it's already a delicacy, you know, well, really, we have it another conversation, in any case, just become goal. mayor, you have to be, become a grandmother , buy yourself accordingly avosko, i just don’t see you like that, well, let me live to this moment, i have a goal to live to this moment, in any case, if we are serious, then eh, this is also a huge step forward, the very fact that we are candidates for membership of the european union, so many c

in the agreement between great britain and ukraine, nothing is written about anything in common.ut nato is common infrastructure. therefore, by the way, for example, russia is very afraid of approaching, as they say, the infrastructure of nato, even if finland joins the north atlantic alliance, because they understand that everything that is on the territory of finland can be used by other nato countries. that's nato. we need such agreements that allow the common use of common infrastructure with those countries with which we sign agreements and for this to be digitized and shown in the date, and if there is already an understanding that ukraine has to become a member of nato, and this is the only reliable guarantee of security, then i would very much like that when signing agreements with other countries, this provision would also be somehow fixed, it would also be desirable with a date when ukraine can join the north atlantic alliance of the real international. the people's guarantor of ukrainian security, but together with common infrastructure, obviously, the countries with w

and what is britain for ukraine?l, in fact , in recent days we have been living under the pressure of the transfer of nuclear ammunition to belarus, which essentially meant the final and... irreversible burial of the budapest memorandum, so this very timely and very strong gesture of great britain is, in fact, the beginning of the process that was announced at the vilnius summit, about the signing of bilateral guarantees with the g7 countries , for the period until ukraine became a full member of nato. and it was richy sonak who spoke in kyiv about the fact that britain is putting a shoulder, and if ukraine ends up in nato as soon as possible, then this agreement will exhaust itself. actually, it seems to me that... great britain, with this act, started such a wider process of preparing ukraine for nato. there are high hopes for the summit, the nato anniversary summit in washington, but this is the first of a series of these bilateral security agreements, the first such agreement, and we can say that the next couple

the great britain-usa alliance will be implemented. strikes against the houthis in yemen.s was aimed at destroying sites from which drones and missiles were launched. hussy we are against merchant ships in the red sea, it brought destruction and trouble, it led to a threat to maritime shipping, after repeated warnings about the need to stop these attacks, after the un spoke out, nothing happened, which is why britain today, in particular , has taken limited steps to ... self-defence, and in the face of this aggression we will always uphold the rule of law. colonel, how is it possible that the conflict with the houthis in yemen could turn into something more, with iran supporting the houthis, with turkey supporting the houthis, with the arab world treating this as a... strike on its entire territory, that is, whether the world has other safeguards in order to maintain the situation in yemen and in general in the region. yes , it's very interesting from many angles, because we know that from yemen there were missiles at american... and military bases, and again, the attacks

britain gets to work. on the one hand, london brings in military forces and on the other calls for negotiations. charles or... wingate, veteran british officer, converts to zianism as soon as he arrives in palestine. while educating jews, he implements a dangerous plan, the formation of armed groups. brutal repression and wise spread punishment of palestinians. the jews take an aggressive stance. two years later, with a combination of british and jewish forces. night squads are formed. cruel and scary people. they torture the muslims, they whip them and pour dirt into the villagers mouths. violence against muslims becomes normal. at the same time, britain starts demolishing palestinian homes. their excuse is reconstruction. 240 houses are destroyed in java city, displacing some 6,00 palestinians. by the year 1939, 5,00 houses will be destroyed. any movement is nipped in the bud. in the 1930s, when the united states suffered economic crisis, the zionis reached an important agreement with nazi germany. in th

britain concluded a security treaty. rishi sunok in kyiv promised thousands of state-of-the-art drones and other aid worth $3 billion. 12 downed planes per day. zelensky was impressed by the effectiveness of ukrainian air defense. what miracle weapon did the event provide? the usa and britain struck yemen, 16 were destroyed objects. will the attack on the yemeni kushites turn into a new war? we will talk about this and other things during the next program with our guests, the director of the center for military and legal research oleksandr musienko, the retired colonel of the great british army glen grant, and the political expert volodymyr tsibulko. in the second part of our program, we will have a journalist club, tetyana vysotska, olga musafirova and oleksiy mustafin. however, before starting our big conversation, i suggest you see how the verkhovna rada is doing prime minister of great britain rishi sunak was met by ukrainians today, and how he was applauded by the hall. for those who are currently watching us on you

there is an experience in egypt when it expelled britain, in algeria when it expelled... france, in libya when it expelled italy, and also when britain was expelled from south yemen in 1967, so it is the idea of eternal struggle with these colonial powers that want to dominate the entire world, its resources and its straights. this has been part of a global concern for thousands of years. alexander the great reached the shores of eden and sokotra island with his forces, but was defeated. he tried to occupy the capital of the historic state of shabah. and failed history gives us lessons and we should study it very carefully and then proceed to develop our capabilities. in 2015 our capabilities were zero, a disunited army with multiple loyalties, and here was the role of abdul malik al-huthi in leadership, rearranging the situation and liberating what could be liberated from yemani lands in the north and south, especially after the american, british and french embassies extended their influence over parts of our country, we entered into this great battle against 17 countrie

was always ahead, britain was the first to give us tanks, britain was the first to give us lethal weapons, and if britain... is the first to somehow give permission to ukraine to use its long-range weapons, for example, on the territory of russia, there in the hinterland on the same airfields from which fighter jets take off to bomb us , then i think that after this , other states will start to change their point of view, just like before, germany itself, we will see, and i would also like to add that the agreement that was signed today still has a certain number of secret applications, and... it is possible that there are also written some next steps, how ukraine will receive new weapons, how it will use them, so we will really see everything in practice very soon. oleksiy, in recent weeks, even in the last few months, leaders, european leaders have been talking about the fact that europe needs to prepare for a confrontation with russia, german defense minister pistorius talked about it. the former commander-in-chief of the swedish armed forces says that sweden needs to prepare, the balt

bohdan, many already call the agreement between ukraine and great britain historic. can you give details about this agreement and how it may affect the security cooperation of these two countries? i simply will not be able to tell all the details, it is a very large document, but... the most important thing in it is that it actually formalizes what britain is already doing for ukraine, i.e. britain undertakes to help ukraine to defend itself against the aggressor, and the large document very clearly outlines this in various fields, and it actually establishes this cooperation, these obligations. great britain to help ukraine to defend itself on a long-term basis, what is not there, is the obligation to fight directly, to defend ukraine, that is , there is no such peculiar fifth article as there is in the nato treaty. instead, the treaty emphasizes that it will be in effect for at least 10 years, and until the time when ukraine. little beats like her wants to join nato and receive precisely such guarantees of protection from allies that nato members have. bohdan, and

the usa and britain struck yemen, 16 objects were destroyed.attack on the yemeni kushites turn into a new war? we will talk about this and other things during the next program with our guests, this is the director of the center. of military and legal studies oleksandr musienko, retired colonel of the great british army, glen grant and political expert volodymyr tsibulko. in the second part of our program we will have journalist club, tetyana vysotska, ulha musafirova and oleksiy mustafin. however, before starting our big conversation, i suggest you see how the prime minister of great britain rishi was met in the verkhovna rada of ukraine today. sunak and how the hall applauded him? for those who are currently watching us on youtube and facebook, please like this video and leave a comment under this video to help it trend on youtube. in addition, you can take part in our voting, today we are you we ask about this, does the office of the president exceed its powers? yes, no, on youtube. everything is quite simple, choose either yes or no, if you

he’s britain since linford christie. he's really talented. _ britain since linford christie.lowing at times. i think in two years' time we should be standing here hopefully preparing ourselves to go to milan with high confidence and i believe that he can meddour.— with high confidence and i believe that he can meddour. milan coach bill sims that he can meddour. milan coach billy sims is _ that he can meddour. milan coach billy sims is referring _ that he can meddour. milan coach billy sims is referring to - that he can meddour. milan coach billy sims is referring to is - that he can meddour. milan coach billy sims is referring to is the - billy sims is referring to is the milan winter olympics. i billy sims is referring to is the milan winter olympics.- billy sims is referring to is the milan winter olympics. i feel like at that stage _ milan winter olympics. i feel like at that stage i — milan winter olympics. i feel like at that stage i will _ milan winter olympics. i feel like at that stage i will be _ milan winter olympics. i feel like at that stage i will be 25 - milan w

here we are talking about how great britain helps us by itself, says: oh, how good, great britain lefteuropean union and can help us independently without all these agreements? well, of course, it's just a geometric progression that works in the other direction. it is not a very big country that can help us, taking into account also the economic situation in which it found itself as a result of brexit, if it were part of the european union, the european union would not help us with 50 billion dollars, but... because it would one of the flagships, it would be one of the and in order to keep it, you understand, in order to keep hungary in the trend, but simply to tell viktor orbán how to give more money than putin or, to give more money than putin, and in order to get great britain, because the prime minister is great, listen, you do not want to help ukraine, you are against values, and we will leave you altogether, go nafig, well, and this immediately causes, you remember, while great britain... they were telling everyone that it would come out, everyone was ready to fulfill any of thei

, can the example of britain push other countries to sign some similar documents? i think so, and it is expected that the rest of the group of seven countries, they will sign similar documents, and that this will formalize the level of support that is already there, that is, there is nothing new in this document, but finally... it is legally established that countries undertake to further support ukraine, it is very important that despite political changes, elections, it is clear that the question remains, why, for example, this document was not it was not ratified by the british parliament or the verkhovna rada, it was simply signed by volodymyr zelenskyi rishi sunak, but i think that this document, it uh... consolidates the level of cooperation that exists, it is very important, because it is clear what is happening there meetings in the format ramstein, meetings of the ukraine-nato council are taking place, various international meetings are taking place, but nowhere has it been established that each of the countries says that we will support ukraine, because ru

prime minister, do you believe that america and britain would maybe take rickless tape and attempt to invade the west coast of yemen militarily? we anticipate all possibilities and have all calculations for this day, but how many countries have tried throughout history to occupy the western coast of yemen and failed, including britain. britain tried after it occupied eden and then occupied parts ofida, then failed and emerged defeated. the turks, although we are of the same religion, also failed to occupy the yemenese, saying these countries are major countries capable of occupying our country, and if the people thought in this way, no country in the entire world would be liberated. countries are liberated by the strength of the will of their people, their organizations, and the strength of their ideas carried by the leadership of these people. there is an experience in egypt in algeria when it expelled france, in libya when it expelled italy, and also when britain was expelled from south yemen in 1967, so it is the idea of eternal struggle with these colonial powers that want to domi

gb news is britain's election channelin news is britain's election channel in 2024, gb news is britain's come and join me this thursday in scunthorpe live by scanning the qr code or going on gb news. com to get your ticket for the event, we'll be discussing things like why the green agenda is risking jobs in places like scunthorpe . places like scunthorpe. >> welcome back. it's 325. you're watching or listening to martin daubney on gb news. now later this hour we'll cover the extraordinary scenes in paris, where french farmers have besieged the country's capital. and i'll be asking a british farmer, could british farmers do the same thing over here? vive la revolution! now to northern ireland, where the democratic unionist party has finally backed a deal aimed at addressing its concerns over post—brexit trade barriers . it post—brexit trade barriers. it means power sharing should resume. finally, within a few days. but the question is this has the dup betrayed brexit? well, i'm going to ask our northern ireland reporter dougie beattie , that precise question. beattie, that precise questi

the colonies, in fact, the various leaders in britain, keeping the various leaders in britain excuse me. apprized events in the colonies was one of the most important jobs that a colonial governor had. simultaneously, colonial deliberative body. so legislative bodies in particular learned to rely on their own agents in london for information about events, their colonial agents who were usually merchants or or just a well-connected individual who would lobby on behalf of colonial interests. and they would transmit accounts of britain back to the colonies. and so, in effect, governors were london's representatives in the colonies, just as agents were, the colonies representatives in london. ideally, governors and agents helped to bring the british world together by providing a reliable stream of information that would make one side of the atlantic intelligence more to those on the other side. and know the system sort of worked, at least for a while. colonial colonial governors. shared news about the colonies because it would take, you know, often four months or more for them to getting

great britain, in case something threatens it, and this is also important, well , at least great britain opened this big negotiation process with countries about bilateral security agreements, gentlemen, what do you think about this agreement and the following agreements, because both romania and canada are already going to consider the possibility of signing such agreements with ukraine. whether it will allow ukraine, before joining the north atlantic alliance , to solve some of its security issues, in particular, regarding the supply of weapons. mr. igor, please. well, i think that this agreement is absolutely, well, a precedent in the sense that it really opens up opportunities for signing similar agreements with other countries. and it is indicative that it will most likely be canada, as it is a british commonwealth country. and i hope that other countries will also join this , well, will such an agreement, or similar agreements, help us to hold back, for example, until the time we join nato, well, of course, this is a fairly significant strengthening of capabilities of ukraine, desp

, that britain needs change, wants change, is out _ britain needs change, wants change, is out for— britainafter the sex scandals, the expenses scandals. — the sex scandals, the expenses scandals, the waste scandals, the contracts— scandals, the waste scandals, the contracts for friends, even in a crisis _ contracts for friends, even in a crisis like _ contracts for friends, even in a crisis like the pandemic, some people — crisis like the pandemic, some people have looked at us and concluded we are alljust in it for ourselves — concluded we are alljust in it for ourselves. a nation that is so exhausted, tired, despairing, even, that they— exhausted, tired, despairing, even, that they have given up on hope. a national— that they have given up on hope. a national mood which if we are not successful— national mood which if we are not successful with our project hope, the tories — successful with our project hope, the tories will subtly seek to ekploit, _ the tories will subtly seek to exploit, and seriously, after failing — exploit, and seriously, after failing to _ exploit, and seriously, af

the colonies, in fact, the various leaders in britain, keeping the various leaders in britain excuse me. apprized events in the colonies was one of the most important jobs that a colonial governor had. simultaneously, colonial deliberative body. so legislative bodies in particular learned to rely on their own agents in london for information about events, their colonial agents who were usually merchants or or just a well-connected individual who would lobby on behalf of colonial interests. and they would transmit accounts of britain back to the colonies. and so, in effect, governors were london's representatives in the colonies, just as agents were, the colonies representatives in london. ideally, governors and agents helped to bring the british world together by providing a reliable stream of information that would make one side of the atlantic intelligence more to those on the other side. and know the system sort of worked, at least for a while. colonial colonial governors. shared news about the colonies because it would take, you know, often four months or more for them to getting

what guarantees did great britain provide and what is being discussed in the negotiations with romanialization by all means. the government is finalizing the withdrawn draft law. military and political aspects of the problem. we work on live tv, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are currently watching us on these platforms. please like this video and subscribe to our channel page, and also take part in our survey. today we ask you the following question: will ukraine be able to win the war without western aid? if you are watching. us on youtube, everything is quite simple: yes, no, or write your comment under this broadcast, if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote. if you believe that ukraine can win the war without western aid, 0800-211-381, no, 0800-211-382, all calls to these numbers are free, please call us it is important to know your opinion. i would like to introduce the guests of today's program, they are political experts, ihor reiterovych, political scientist, head of political and legal programs of the ukrainian center f

briefly, good morning britain _ number of years. back— number of years. briefly, good morning britain back on - number of years. briefly, good morning britain back on air - number of years. briefly, good morning britain back on air for| number of years. briefly, good i morning britain back on air for the first time since his death. there were other tributes on the programme?— were other tributes on the ro . ramme? , were other tributes on the rouramme? , ., programme? yes, there were. the two hosts richard — programme? yes, there were. the two hosts richard madeley _ programme? yes, there were. the two hosts richard madeley and _ programme? yes, there were. the two hosts richard madeley and susanna - hosts richard madeley and susanna reid tops the programme with 20 minutes worth of tributes to derek and of kate's support as well for derek and we heard some of what kate had to say, read out by susanna reid but one of the other things that she said was they are taking the time to heal ourselves now, let darcy and billy know that daddy

britain and the children of britain and the children of britain is not an answer. >> britain and them. >> no no no and the >> no no no no no no and the slaves sold the slave slaves are sold to the slave traders in the countries in which they originate. >> gordon is out in >> when gordon is out in khartoum, why is he there ? he's khartoum, why is he there? he's there to stop sudanese slave trade. >> very interesting. >> very interesting. >> this is a very interesting point. the point that people always say, oh, well, look, africans their people. africans sold their own people. africans sold their own people. you're to have some you're always going to have some collaborators in oppressed you're always going to have some collaboeven; in oppressed you're always going to have some collabo even today, )ressed you're always going to have some collaboeven today, whilst whilst people even today, whilst whilst , british , whilst whilst british companies africa, you companies pillage africa, you have people on ground have some people on the ground collaborating have some people on the ground co

britain is in debt. the losses are, real colonial losses we it's not like we didn't lose people over here. british losses diverging views of what happened. if you're somebody who lives in massachusetts sits and you were fighting up the lake champlain and going to it you have a sense of the way in which you were contribute you were fighting for the british. that's really different from the view in london where they're saying the key parts of this are the iroquois and army. what this person did fighting over here not really in the field vision so competing of even the experiences that we just went through. so the seven years war is something that like the great awakening affected the entire set of colonies. it's a common experi. all of the colonies fighting against the french were fearing what was going happen on the frontier with native american. so it's bringing us together, but also setting up a little bit of a divide between our perceptions of even how the war was being fought and who was contributing.

britain we _ the voices who say, we cannot change britain.same _ listen when they say we are all the same we — listen when they say we are all the same. we are not and we never will be. same. we are not and we never will be and _ same. we are not and we never will be and don't — same. we are not and we never will be. and don't listen when they say politics— be. and don't listen when they say politics makes no difference, because _ politics makes no difference, because it does. if you cannot get an affordable home in your town, but with labour— an affordable home in your town, but with labour you can, that is a difference _ with labour you can, that is a difference worth fighting for. if you cannot get a job with regular hours _ you cannot get a job with regular hours that— you cannot get a job with regular hours that will let you look after your _ hours that will let you look after your family, hours that will let you look after yourfamily, but hours that will let you look after your family, but with labour you can _ your family, but with lab

britain is in debt. the losses are, real colonial losses we it's not like we didn't lose people over here. british losses diverging views of what happened. if you're somebody who lives in massachusetts sits and you were fighting up the lake champlain and going to it you have a sense of the way in which you were contribute you were fighting for the british. that's really different from the view in london where they're saying the key parts of this are the iroquois and army. what this person did fighting over here not really in the field vision so competing of even the experiences that we just went through. so the seven years war is something that like the great awakening affected the entire set of colonies. it's a common experi. all of the colonies fighting against the french were fearing what was going happen on the frontier with native american. so it's bringing us together, but also setting up a little bit of a divide between our perceptions of even how the war was being fought and who was contributing.

the term of this agreement with britain is 10 years. the term can be extended by analogy with other similar treaties on... security, which are concluded by global leaders. i especially appreciate the fact that the united kingdom supports ukraine's accession to nato and recognizes that our security, the security of ukraine, is part of the entire euro-atlantic security. that is why the guarantees provided will be valid until our accession to nato. at the same time, rishi sunok noted that the security agreement confirms if russia again attacks ukraine, great britain will stand by ukraine, providing security. help during a speech in the ukrainian parliament , richunok emphasized that it is necessary to be ready for a long war. i will add that the agreements are not security guarantees in the literal sense, that is, in the event of an escalation of hostilities , the british military will not directly participate in the war in ukraine. deputy prime minister for european and euro-atlantic integration of ukraine olga stefanishyna reported that

we will talk about several important topics here, well , first of all, the prime minister of great britain rishi sunak came to ukraine for a visit, which is interesting , this happened precisely after the american-british coalition carried out airstrikes on the territory of the country on the territory of yemen, and with what risha sunak came to ukraine, what he promised and what will come, i... help and not only about this volodymyryan, congratulations you, mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, vasyl, i am glad to see you, good evening, to each other, well, actually , let's start with the visit of rish sunak, this is a very significant visit right now, and again it is important that, like his predecessor boris johnson, he came not only with words, but also with some help, appreciate this visit, please, and again, who was the initiator here in your opinion, the british side, that this could be a joint arrangement, and about ... help, which, which britain will provide ukraine, the key thing in this visit, which the event once again emphasizes, is ukraine not alone in this fight with russia, an

you. the speech of the british minister of defense, who interpreted britain's security guarantees forukraine, was simply phenomenal. there was also a phrase that i just remembered: great britain said: "our union with ukraine is for 100 years, we will not withdraw from ukraine, russia, forget about the fact that great britain will leave ukraine, that's how phrase, extremely expensive. great britain has always been. there are and how many f-16s are behind this phrase, i understand what you are talking about, miroslav, but on the other hand, we remember that the republic of poland, the polish-lithuanian commonwealth, had extremely powerful treaties with france and the united kingdom, when we talk about the year 1939, yes, but help was given, but the so-called strange war was going on, well, and accordingly now we understand that our european union... is demonstrating its readiness, but here the question is, so to speak, in the little things, well if we are talking about aviation, for example, this is not a small thing, of course i am being ironic, but the decision is still on the table,

will keir starmer's green policies bankrupt britain .7 will policies bankrupt britain? will hear from both sides on that one. and in my take a ten. looking forward to this, nigel farage friend of mine and farage is a friend of mine and a colleague, but he threatens his great handing the keys great legacy by handing the keys of number 10 to keir starmer. we why? | of number 10 to keir starmer. we why? i think the reform uk project is a huge risk for britain . two hours of big britain. two hours of big opinion, big debate and big entertainment. a special show tonight. don't miss a second. first news headlines and sam francis . francis. >> mark thank you very much. good evening . >> mark thank you very much. good evening. i'm sam >> mark thank you very much. good evening . i'm sam francis in good evening. i'm sam francis in the gb newsroom . the headlines the gb newsroom. the headlines at nine. this week's planned tube strikes in london have been suspended. however tfl is warning that there will still be disruption tomorrow because the walkouts were called off so late. mem

britain's news channel michael portillo, gb news britain's news channel .345. you're watching or listening to martin daubney on gb news now. in a couple of minutes i'll speak to the voice of darts ahead of tonight's mega darts final. but before that , a final. but before that, a motorist has been killed by a falling tree after storm hank brought flooding and disruption across southern england and wales. gloucestershire constabulary said a man in his 50s died while driving there. campbell hundreds of flood warnings are still in place and let's speak now to gb news east midlands reporter will hollis , midlands reporter will hollis, who's at billing aquadrome in northampton. good afternoon will, what's the latest with storm hank ? storm hank? >> yes, well, the good news is that a lot of those flood warnings, a lot of those flood alerts have started to be removed by the environment agency. there's still around 50 or so across the uk here in northampton at billing aquadrome around a thousand homes were evacuated yesterday and the local resilience forum , which i

what actions he is taking in britain, whatever he is doing in britain is britain's problem.nothing to do with india? i do you accept it as nothing to do with india?— do you accept it as nothing to do with india?_ with india? i do not know the secifics with india? i do not know the specifics of — with india? i do not know the specifics of the _ with india? i do not know the specifics of the case - with india? i do not know the specifics of the case but - with india? i do not know the specifics of the case but are l with india? i do not know the - specifics of the case but are there examples — specifics of the case but are there examples of transnational threats taking _ examples of transnational threats taking place? of course. we had the case in _ taking place? of course. we had the case in canada of course what justin trudeau _ case in canada of course what justin trudeau said that there was indian state _ trudeau said that there was indian state involvement sell transnational oppression is such a priority that the security minister tom tugendhat has launched a task force w

actions, because britain is not just some sort of neutral player, britain is actively now aiding and abetting in my view the genocide against the people of gaza and britain and the british government should also be held to account ' and a correspondent who went to that pr press briefing uh communicate to to to me a lot of the journalists that were there were asking speculating about the future of gaza, the post bombardment gaza, which is if i were to use the word ridiculous, ludicrous to be talking about that in the middle of a genocide in in progress, your thoughts, definitely, definitely, i think i think it's it's almost surreal to see people um people in the... us and israel believing they not only do they that they should decide for gaza what what it should look like in the future and and and the you know it's as if palestinian self-determination is isn't even something on the table um and i think it's the same mentality that's led us to where we are today um it's a mentality where palestinians don't have a right to decide for themselves where they you know how how they are gover

this is britain's news channel . this is britain's news channel. this is britain's news channel.stys tonight. >> it's only on gb news and it's time now to deliver the first of my two part interview with former immigration minister robert , who resigned robert jenrick, who resigned from government last month over his that the his insistence that the government's controversial rwanda far rwanda plan didn't go far enough. now, in our revealing and at times scathing chat, mr jenrick dramatically claimed that britain's current uncontrolled mass migration policy was damaging the nation both culturally and economically . and he said that the pace of change to the uk was too hard and too fast. here's what he had to say when i kicked off the interview by asking you about the current net migration levels, especially in relation to people coming from muslim african countries and india as well. net migration levels of around 700,000 a year, illegal migration is a matter of great pubuc migration is a matter of great public concern. >> i think in many respects this is more important because th

the united states of america and britain are aggressive countries against all of humanity, not against yemen alone or any country seeking liber. from western colonialism, therefore these two countries have their own old and new colonial projects. britain and america are the ones who established the israeli state in 1949, and therefore they seek to protect this entity by all means and capabilities. whoever stands against this entity, whether groups, people or countries, washington and london will seek to destroy them. going back to history, we remember when in the 1950s, britain, france and israel attacked the arab states of egypt. which was then called the united arab republic, this was attempt to control the suez canal, had it not been for the circumstances at the time, and the assistance of the soviet union, which was at the height of its power, the arabs would not have been able to deter this triportite aggression, and before that, in 1947, who sponsored the presence of the hagana gangs that began the occupation of palestine, certainly the colonial countries, and these are the resul

two star of great britain. germany needed.e germans concluded they would need to sink 700,000 tons of shipping a month between 50 and 100 average sized convoy vessels. they only achieved that once. only one month of the entire war. november 1942. and at that juncture, war was already going against the germans. almost every front, as we we've seen now, i want to provide some arguments about why the allies won the axis lost here. one of the key factors was obviously strategy and leadership the germans lacked the number of they needed to overwhelm the british at the start of the war, in part because of choices made by the german navy in the interwar period, particularly by admiral rader. in addition, the strategy at the of the war did not necessarily align with the means that germany had to carry it out. and it took some time for germany to adjust. this technological innovation that i presented is also a one, a very important one that we see in explaining allied victory darwin in his origins of the species, has made an argument t