seen that have some very long inquiries in britis seen to that have some very long inquiries in britisun. have some very long inquiries in britis seen to overrun. bute some very long inquiries in britis seen to overrun. but if you been seen to overrun. but if you look at some of the recent ones, covid, 230,000 dead sunday that went on for many years. child sex abuse, i think was sex abuse, which i think was established by theresa may and set up when she was home secretary. these are matters of huge importance about whether it's social health, sexual crisis . so it's right that the crisis. so it's right that the state looks into it. >> i know. but you know , things >> i know. but you know, things seem to take such a long time in the public sector. this is not it's not covid. i'm not suggesting it's covid like i saw the other day, the inquiry into the other day, the inquiry into the suicide bomber in manchester that popped up the other day on my on my timeline of news. and i thought, well, that was years ago. and it was this ruling that actually the fella was determined to be a suicide b

i know the briti law this problem gripped. i know the briti law to this problem gripped. this problem gripped. i know the briti law to pass so we cans problem gripped. i know the briti law to pass so we can get new law to pass so we can get flights rwanda. so really flights off to rwanda. so really the is for keir starmer the question is for keir starmer and don't they? >> damian green has said overall ming laws is akin to putin in russia . russia. >> this is not about overruling laws. this is about us meeting the concerns of the supreme court with our new treaty that we have been working on for a while in anticipation that this might our new laws might happen. but our new laws will make it crystal clear that parliament's view is that because of those arrangements, rwanda country for us rwanda is a safe country for us to be able to run this programme and that there should be no more challenges domestically to that. i what the british i think that's what the british people want. they're patience has mine . has worn thin, as has mine. everyone's frustrated with this problem

and then it just the briti go, well, just fed up upon.e fed up upon. and then it just the briti go, well, where areed up upon. and then it just the briti go, well, where are myp upon. and then it just the briti go, well, where are my taxes going? >> well, indeed , common sense >> well, indeed, common sense crusader alex armstrong , always crusader alex armstrong, always a pleasure. thank you very much crusader alex armstrong, always a pyour|re. thank you very much crusader alex armstrong, always a pyour time. ank you very much crusader alex armstrong, always a pyour time. christianyery much crusader alex armstrong, always a pyour time. christian khalji,|ch for your time. christian khalji, i want to come to the wet in the room and i want to ask you, you must be you are a big fan of david cameron, right? do you support him on this? >> i wouldn't say i'm a fan. i certainly miss out. what was six years of vague , quiet, competent years of vague, quiet, competent government , right. that's what government, right. that's what he was good on com

the briti don't want to antagonize japan. they feel the u.s. has no more business in manchuria than the u.s. has in britain's dealings with india. besides, the.s. is unreliabl able. it cannot keep its word. it hadn't even joined the league of nations. as i quoted prime minister, you get nothing out of washington but words. and as i said, the french privately assure stimson of their complete accord. but they no public statement, even the chinese. the press was unappreciative of the claim the american protest had failed to restrain japan. but stimson is pleased he had taken a morally correct position, comparing himself to george washington century before he wrote in diary, he had raised a standard into which theise and honest may repair. indeed, that they speaking through of state wilam castle hoover sought to take credit for an recognition as the hoover doctrine, whereas it was increasing to as the stimson doctrine. and when stimson laid down this famous document of non-recognition, the policy that hagone down in the history books as the stimson

now, as soon as the second world war began, the briti began moving to reinstitute the system.w, karl doenitz, looking back, the first world war had come up with what he viewed as the antidote to this british tactic. this was the idea of the wolf pack. the idea was that the german submarines would be, well equipped with communations equipment if. one german submarine happed to find a convoy proceeding across e atlantic it would maintain a safe and radio bacto germany to its headquarters which was either in france or germany. and then he would begin aleing other u-boats to converge on convoy at an opportune point. but then other german u-boats uld descend and, they could attack in mass disrupting the convoy, an overwhelming convoy escort and keep in mind at the beginning of the war, the british had nowhere near vessels to prote these these convoys as we'll s in a moment. some would transit the atlantic with only one or two really capable ips. so a wolf pack of five or six submarines could absolutely overwhelm and and devastate a convoy very rapidly. now, this ea, this tactic of

do you think we would have come t any differently if the programas given a briti to artists or mkeng to artists? >> i don't thinko. that was a court, they called it a highly selective competitive program. it is a scarce resource. it is funbl. justice scalia made that point in hispion. >> i don't wt to badger you or ything, but you can find thin aut each ofhese cases that may be slightly dfent from yr case, but what you cannot finds a case that supports your proposition that when it is notiewpoint base, government cannot make distinctions when government is only given out a benefit and not restricting any speech. >> i'm certainly happy to emac the forum analogy that has been the subject of some of these questions. at the end of the day it ends up in the samexact place. two things are important about th limited public forum reasonableness test. it is not rional basis. there is something more going on there. if you lk at the opinions on bothid i don't think anyone on the crt thought there was anyone engaging i rational basis. some assessment of whether it is appropat and some likent int

. >> well, the problem is that the british government have >> well, the problem is that the briti some the briti some vernmethat have >> well, the problem is that the britisomevernmethat ha and had some say in that speech and they thought it they would have thought it necessary to have some kind of nod the atrocities which nod to the atrocities which happened odd years ago, £20 happened 60 odd years ago, £20 million compensation, ten years ago. notice that he said ago. and notice that he said sorrow, not sorry . yeah. which sorrow, not sorry. yeah. which is two very, very different things from from my understanding , the british understanding, the british government's stance is that a modern day administration is not liable for what a colonial government did 60 odd years ago . government did 60 odd years ago. so the king would never say i, a full apology, give a full apology unless the british government gave the go ahead. so that's what we saw here. as you said, £20 million was paid out by the british government to around elderly kenyans in around 5000 elderly kenyans in 2013. as far