great to have you with this on the broadca asell. sorry for the technical problems.ade as to do for your participation for a while. your reaction to first the cision, the pposition a deci today. then i want to get to the voting rights act as i have been talking with luthertrange of alabama. >> well, we are still digesting the opinion like people across the country are. what we can tell right now is that this is not going to have a foreseeable impact on sth carolina's definition of marriage. also, the committee reaffirmed that the feeeral gernment cannot interfere with the state's right to define what marria means. this does not have the foreseeable impact on a feature of south carolina as it relates to that issue. lou: how muc of a complication is that for the state's that have defined, as have thetate of alabama, as have thetate of south carolina, as both o you have pointed out, year two states have defined marrie as between a man and a woman, banning same-sex marriage. >> well, in my personal opinion, whh es back to, i think that the people of t state in his -espec