brodsky suggested a contest idea.ith drew. >> i'll do a dating game with you. >> me? >> i'll have to ask the lawyer. >> why not? >> he looked like a crumb and a heel. it didn't play well. >> didn't play well but peterson would have far bigger problems, like when his own stepbrother claimed to have helped him carry a large container out of the peterson home. >> i have no idea what anybody is talking about like that. >> he said that he believes he helped you dispose of your wife's body. >> and also that he helped peterson set up a call from stacy's cell phone to drew's, placing stacy near the airport around the time of her disappearance. >> everything is invented. none of that's true. >> stacy's disappearance was a still a mystery but kathleen's death was not. february 21, 2008, her accident was reclassified a homicide. and a little more than a year later, drew peterson was arrested for and charged with murder. >> former bolingbrook police officer drew peterson now under arrest for the murder -- >> peterson was arrested

. >> joe brodsky was one of the attorneys. >> it seemed like we were taking a serious situation and making which i guess we were. >> peterson's team thought it was an open and shut case. defense attorney steve greenberg. >> they had nothing except for, well, they were getting divorced and we don't have any other suspects so he must have done it. >> there was no physical evidence, no sign of forced entry, there was no fingerprints, no dna, no eyewitnesses, simply nothing to prove it wasn't an accident. >> but ledge gary prosecutor james glasgow completely disagreed. >> with 29 years of experience, there was no doubt in my mine wasn't an accident. that was clear. >> glasgow had one of the highest conviction rates in the state and he didn't intend to lose this time. his opening statements were powerful, claiming peterson carried out his constant threats to kill savio and staged to it look like an accident. then glasgow attacked the police force and the investigation. >> drew was treated unlike a civilian would have been treated. they let him be questioned in the break room of his own police d

robert: prior to the debates there was a brodsky -- agronski.out at the interchange like that. one would speak at a time. much less confrontational, much more sedate. kind of boring. here, i'm not sure -- we did not see nothing gauge the content. there's a lot of back-and-forth sort of like they do in the wwf when they throw everybody in the rain. it feels kind of like that. morgan: i think the debates between buckley and that all definitely open doors for those things. i don't want to put all the credit or blame at their doorstep. it was actually one of those moments that led to this landscape we have today. robert: it cannot be emphasized enough that when they were doing it, the fire that burns was rich old one. they brought a command of history and philosophy and politics and language to bear on the dialogue. i think the flames may reach the same height today, but it's flash paper. you don't learn the same thing. you just see the fireworks. brian: i want to run one more clip. this is from the best of enemies. before we do that, what surprised

alexander brodsky is a well known activist and she's all of -- so they're pretty turbo and they put together this collection, we know what we don't believe and what we're mad about. and then in november we're doing a literary chef memoir. she's so worth cutting to. she's hilarious, the work is poignant, and the way she writes about food is so pretentious. i feel like i'm part of it, but there's a way in which it's kind of elitist. she learned to cook using processed foods, and when we cook for people and when we make food for people, it's expressing love and she wants there to be more love in the world. and her food is amazing. i have to say they've been very popular. >> host: jennifer baumgartner, what's your connection to city university? >> we're very fortunate because we're affiliated, but we're not -- we're not really part of them. they give us our office space and they support us in a variety of ways. and, you know it's 34th and fifth eave in manhattan office space, so i don't think we could afford it otherwise. they want to demonstrate part of their values as the city university of ne

jonathan brodsky, good to see you again. we've had a couple of up days in shanghai and shenzhen after a terrible rout since mid-june. number of government fixes are out there like freezing the trading of shares. but are these just short-term fixes just a band-aid? >> you have to keep in mind that about 50% of the a-share market is still frozen. i want to differentiate the a-share market from the h-share market or hong kong listed market. the h-share market is not really available to foreign investors. it is much more of a local market. we've seen a lot of volatility. we've seen an element of complicit with the government involved in the a-share market. we're not invested in the a-share market. we're concerned about the heavy-handed approach from the government. though we're not all that surprised by it. given concerns i think that the market may be missing related to social instability, given the 90 million retail investors, 40 million or so are relatively new. this heavy-handed approach i think is as much a social issue as