but he said think of how much broodier it would be if they had a nuclear weapon.he is portraying this deal for the middle east but also particularly for the g.c.c. it is quite a difficult sell, how will we know if this has proven to be successful for obama. >> well, i think it is already slightly diminished that two heads of the state are here. he is talking to the saudi defense minister, the saudi foreign minister, so they are not insignificant but we will get a clearer indication of how things have gone, not from the statement that will be put out because we will see all the usual things, great cooperation, the trust and respect we have heard that before, what is important is how barack obama appears in the media briefing afterwards. is he there just to get a statement, will he take questions, will he appear with someone with the g.c.c., if he is there on his own we can assume that things are not going well, if he is with someone from the g.c.c. that's putting a face on the discussions and perhaps we will get a better unctioning in the coming days when these sta

watch, for example put out a report, and they were encouraging her to open up her investigation broodier, into what they say are current war crimes taking place in the lick yeah right now, so far resisted that, she says she is focusing mostly narrowly on the crimes from 2011 yob heard her mention gaddafi there she says that because of the bad security situation in libya and lack of resources she is unable to get in there and open up a broodier investigation, but human rights watch says that's not necessarily an excuse. they are enganged couraging her to do that, so far though, a lot of what she is saying just in the first few minutes or so, is very skim to what she said last november, which is that the situation is very bad on the ground, and it is preventing her teams from really being able to expand any sort of inquiry into crimes happening in libya. >> we mentioned the bad security situation, do we expect her to bring up the situation with the migrants which is also in part linked to that? it is, i don't know if she will print up the migrants issue specifically, bethe whole security a

where you concerned about the broodier narrative here with global powers. to control the story so to siege? i think one thing we take a look from this is recognizing that wikipedia is incredibly popular. it is one of the top. most popular in the world. so of course a platform as powerful of that is something that people are interested in in bringing their own viewpoints. the way that wikipedia has worked is that because of the basis on reliable sources and the core tenant or core policy of mutual point of view is that our editors have ways of working this out, and when for an issue is hotly contended for example, last summer's incursion in crimea, those can be locked by more senior editors. >> you mentioned that wikipedia thrives based on it's community, and even on twitter now you have congress edits. that tweets anonymous so we have an audit happening there, also an automobiled kit of parliament. made from parliamentary i.p.es. thousands are being edited from these government addresses. i think it is time for wikipedia to activate a regional expertise gro