. >> bruce klinger, thank you very much. let's go back to jonathan at the brookings institution.e with you earlier. what else have you found out? >> i think the most important thing to note here right now is political and it involves china. the chinese sunday in beijing are opening their one belt, one load summit. they have dozens of heads of state descending on beijing. this is a real loss of face for china because the north koreans whom the chinese did invite to the summit and supposedly the north korean minister of external economic relations was to arrive in beijing on saturday, participate in this event on sunday and monday against american objections, i might note, and here yet again at this moment when presumably things are going in directions that china wants to encourage, giving north korea yet again one more option to, you know, show a smiley face to the world and instead what we get is the next logical step in this development program that bruce klinger has accurately talked about. so, you know, here's a case where xi jinping despises kim jong-un. so in this case when

we had bruce klinger from the heritage foundation, and for a chong.omen ho i want to turn things over to john. for more information on the speakers, you have their bios. thank you very much. >> thank you. i also want to thank our panel for giving their valuable time today to come here and talk about south korea under moon jae-in. -- i willuestion is turn to you, scott first -- what won it what is it say about the social trends in korea? >> i think the major factor that shaped this election was the impeachment and public frustration and the corruption they saw in south korean leadership. it is a symptom of an underlying problem related to cozy, delete relations in south korean society that has become a flashpoint within south korea's -- within the society. was the firstand to face the protests. support for his party in south korea went up by about 10 to 15 points even before the election started. agenda for has an thisting transparency and is synced way to say it would be moving towards a more fair and equal opportunity society rather than one in which it feels like you really have to