ever that it is so important to live your healthiest life, just maybe not quite to the extent of bryan johnsonlong as we can. hello. quite a marked change to come in our weather for the start of the new week. through the weekend, most of us have seen some cloud and rain at times. it is actually looking drier, more settled to start the new week, but it will be turning markedly colder. this area of low pressure that brought the weekend's unsettled weather heads off towards the continent for monday. as it pulls out of the way, we engage a northerly airstream and arctic air floods all the way south across the uk through monday and it will stick around for tuesday and wednesday as well. winds gusting a5, 55 mph around the coasts of northern and eastern scotland into the small hours of monday, the cold air pushing in, turning showers here increasingly to snow. further south, some rain for wales and the south—west of england overnight. a frost for scotland. elsewhere we should see temperatures holding up in the mid range of single figures. and there we are again, monday daytime with that arctic air g

johnson wanted a yes. and that's the way as yes as fred, fred and frankie and another did and bryan and others have written. i mean, that was what was expected. so if you have as the as the management ethos, i don't think you're going to get good decisions. and i think kissinger was much the same way, except had a hold on. kissinger yes, sure. going with this other with mcnamara, one of the great advantages we all now is if you want to know what they were talking, we can listen to the tapes and hear what they were talking about. and there's a powerful it's clear that johnson was not interested in hearing points of view that might differ from his own. and you can see in magnum hear it in mcnamara's voice. and the question is, how did he reconcile that at the time worked with peter and produced in retrospect, which a very brave and important publication, which in some ways changed everything about how we understand what government officials think. but prior to that moment, he was on the ground acquiescing to these these from johnson. have you did you talk to him about that and have a sense of how he lived wi

johnson. >> if i didn't let him rape me, he would have killed me. >> like kristin, misty reported her attack to the bryanlp police in the investigation. >> it was probably within a week, i quit my job and left up to. i was scared. >> she now regrets that decision. her attack happened first. months before jamie was murdered. >> i feel like if i would have stayed and fought him through the police department that possibly he wouldn't have been able to go on to hurt anyone else. >> and kristin, is left with the memory of an assault, that, according to the law, never really happened. >> i was so angry that two people had to die in order for someone to believe me. >> did the system fail? >> it failed me. it failed carolyn. it failed jamie. >> you think about them a lot? they were total strangers to you. >> but they're my alternative future. i mean, they're what could've happened to me. i mean, they're what could've happened to any of us. >> a jury convicted ynobe matthews of carolyn's murder and sentenced him to death. he also pleaded guilty to jamie's murder. kristin faced him in court during the penalty phas

johnson wanted a yes. and that's the way as yes as fred, fred and frankie and another did and bryan and others have written. i mean, that was what was expected. so if you have as the as the management ethos, i don't think you're going to get good decisions. and i think kissinger was much the same way, except had a hold on. kissinger yes, sure. going with this other with mcnamara, one of the great advantages we all now is if you want to know what they were talking, we can listen to the tapes and hear what they were talking about. and there's a powerful it's clear that johnson was not interested in hearing points of view that might differ from his own. and you can see in magnum hear it in mcnamara's voice. and the question is, how did he reconcile that at the time worked with peter and produced in retrospect, which a very brave and important publication, which in some ways changed everything about how we understand what government officials think. but prior to that moment, he was on the ground acquiescing to these these from johnson. have you did you talk to him about that and have a sense of how he lived wi