like martine there or brzezinski, soviet union was direct continuation and to elevation of the land power opposite to see power. so in that sense that was kind of realization of that. and wayne jo politico contradiction. that is the core of human history according to my kinder. so if we consider that fall of the soviet union and this joe political aspect, the meaning called that was a kind of defeat of the land power and front o c power. that was a good 8 catastrophe. off of these a hot land. and are the big achievements all of the sea power, or global western liberal solution. in that sense, we could imagine a condemnation over all soviet union during cluster 3 decades alike, some euros eunice, the thinkers presumes eat, or can or would be or could be the ant over the ideology of communism. it was almost inevitable unavoidably neat to get a read off these sir. exhaust that's soviet or a dogmatism. but that could not mean directly the fall of the soviet union undisturbed disappearance of unity of this job political entity. and if for soviet union would survive a, this, a catastrophe eat a

mika brzezinski. ms. elizabeth shuler and mr. david herbst. mr. avram glazer and ms. jill glazer. ms. mary quinn delaney and mr. wayne jordan. announcer: ms. lisa blunt rochester, house of representatives, and ms. hannah carter. [indiscernible] >> we don't know what to expect walking in. we weren't sure what to expect but exciting to meet -- [indiscernible] -- [inaudible] >> i don't know how -- from the very beginning -- >> ms. robin roberts and ms. gayla [indiscernible]. >> the honorable wendy sherman and mr. bruce [indiscernible]. the honorable kevin mccarthy, house of representatives, and mrs. roberta mccarthy. >> i think security -- [inaudible] >> you're going to be at a dinner --? >> i am having dinner with my mom. >> mr. timothy cook and the honorable lisa jackson. host: the honorable john thune, and mrs. kimberly thune, united states senate. >> the honorable ruth greene and mrs. bonnie -- the honorable thomas harper, united states senate, and mrs. martha harper. >> happy holidays. the honorable deb haaland, secretary of the interior. the honorable ryan mckeown, and ms. k ki

the land mass, and the reason over the classic gross oh, for geo politics are like mac kinder or brzezinski. soviet union was direct continuation and to realization of the lent power opposite to or see power. so in that sense that was kind of realization over their main job politico contradiction. that is the core all who human history according to my kinder. so if we consider that full all the soviet union and this geopolitical aspect, the meaning called that was a kind of defeat or the land power and frond, oh, that see power. that was a great catastrophe. off of these a hot land and the big achievements, all of the see power or global western, a liberal serialization, and that sense, we could imagine a condemnation old fall soviet union. during cluster 3 decades alike, some euros eunice, the thinkers presumes eat a can or would be or could be the ants over the ideology of communism. it was almost inevitable. unavoidable. we need to get a read off the cert exhaust, that's soviet r o dogmatism. but that could not mean directly the fall of the soviet union on destroy disappearance of unity

from a great, i mean 9097 brzezinski wrote a book, patterns of book guns as part of the purpose of that book was how to avoid the americans having to face the situation in which europe moscow and china. we'll have a united appraisal exit, and i, we've run out of time gentlemen, but i think that's why we have the answer. that's why ukraine happened in the 1st place to, to address what we just heard in london. that's all the time we have gentlemen. many thanks. so my guess in london, prague and in north florida. and thanks to our viewers for watching us here at ortiz, see you next time. remember, cross top ah, ah, ah, ah . a high level prisoner for russia business on the return home off the wall, the decade in us custody. exchange, american basketball player, brittany, growing up 15 years ago the us government devised a plot, if you will, to create a crime of this retired russian citizen in moscow. committing no crime against any one of his lawyers. his exclusive take on the journey he made to see in flight 3 of them.

you read the land mass and division over the classic gus of g o. politics, like martine there, or brzezinski, soviet union was direct continuation and through l as a.

here is the evil genius, er, the deceased brzezinski. in my opinion, he was right. ukraine, hmm, russia probably doesn’t have the importance that we would have if we controlled this space in one form or another, so talk about some minsks three doesn’t make any sense to us at all, ukraine there let it be determined the top leadership of russia in what form is our leadership, let's say in minsk we are indirectly participating in this special operation. these goals were set before the start. e fighting. we must return ukraine to the bosom of our slavs in this regard. especially taking into account poroshenko’s recent confessions to merkel, that the position that the president of belarus lukashenka projected as a dirty vile one, that is, you understand, they agreed with us then in minsk, you can, so to speak, that the russian army then held the armed forces of ukraine by the throat. and they initially deceived us , so if we don’t want to hear in 10 years in the memoirs of some schmolz macron, someone else out there, it means, uh, these u now existing european leaders, w

they know that for many years they predicted the conflict between russia and ukraine brzezinski wrotessia without ukraine, in isolation from ukraine, cannot is a superpower. all sorts of think tank shingenki wrote that russia needs to be drawn into the conflict in ukraine as the second, afghanistan after all two coups in this country. they carried out and victoria nurlansa openly admitted that what was invested was. democracy 5 billion dollars, and remember, when it was said that it is necessary to take into account the interests of the european union, what was said is fact for it, that is, we will not translate everything and so it is clear, let's say. so let's go again not verbatim, but simply to hell with the european union, agree, as an economist you understand, by investing 60 or 65 billion there, get a trillion. this is an excellent return on investment. actually. we are not an economist, but we understand something in economics. you can still see it here. here we take a calculator. you understand that life is just anglo-american in general. uh, the value model, uh, the american

first, sbigney brzezinski was a very intelligent man.really, and i fully admit it. this is one of the greatest thinkers of recent times, and in the united states, of course, after henry kissinger, but uh, nevertheless , i completely agree. i myself read, but that zhizinsky was afraid of just such a development of events. we are now really watching about ukrainian propagandists, like andrei piontkovsky. they even said that he sold out, that you sold out the last year of your life. to putin excuse me, but we are really witnessing now the renaissance and the russian idea the revival of russian identity the revival of russia as a great power takes place before the assembly, if you want, russia is in many ways sobering up and understanding what i am, who russia should be in this world, and who can can't trust communism ? what are our real relations with western countries, who are our friends, and who are our opponents in the international arena and really happening, and an even closer association, and those citizens who live with russia in ru

invented by brzezinski, reagan succeeded.earned this lesson, and this is exactly what putin is talking about at a meeting of the collegium of the ministry of defense. we will not repeat the mistakes of the past. when, in the interests of increasing defense capability, where it was necessary, and where it was not necessary, in fact , we destroyed our economy. we will not engage in the militarization of the country and the militarization of the economy, first of all, because the level of development achieved today, the structure of the economy, and so on, do not require this. we just don't necessary, but to do something unnecessary to the detriment of the country to the detriment of our people and the economy of the social sphere. i want to emphasize. once again, we do not intend to and will not do this. we will improve the armed forces and carry out the entire military component of the state . it's calmly rhythmic, without any fuss of sequencing. we will solve problems in the field of strengthening defense capabilities in gene

you have shown here, from bigniwo brzezinski, one of the e, idiologists of operation cyclone, developedng the soviet union into the long-term conflict in afghanistan e. why do they now obsessively recall this successful experience of theirs, they hope to repeat it again. you see, even in some long-term conflict, it will now pull. what factors are they so? what factors uh are not accepted and how uhm well pushes to a successful solution. you see, e, look how favorable it seems. if he said that it was not so, why do we now have completely different conditions and such dangers? their points of view, look, look what they see reminding them cyclone operation. successfully. yeah, uh, they don't wage war directly. e with russia, as they could not wage war directly with the soviet union, it is clear that they are fighting by proxy on foreign territory. simply by supplying weapons endlessly and maintaining this hearth for so long. how can they see everything in this. this is where the similarities will show. well, perhaps there are some other ideas , but this is the main thing, they are there fo

brzezinski. >> she'll do it too.there. welcome back to "morning joe," it's tuesday, november 6th. elise jordan is still with us, and joining the conversation, cohost of show time's "the circus" and his name is john heilemann, and eddie glaude jr. who's in big trouble today, and pulitzer prize winning columnist at "the washington post," eugene robinson. eugene, have you gotten your flu shot. >> yes, indeed, i have had my flu shot. >> i got my flu shot and booster on the same day, one in each arm, and i feel fine. >> me too. >> we have confusion about third or fourth booster, we'll be asking a doctor about that. we've got a lot of work to do this morning. >> i thought you were a doctor, mika. i want to start with georgia today. big night tonight. john heilemann, what are your thoughts, how it looks, early voting, day of voting, it's raining in georgia. does herschel walker have a chance of pulling this off? >> in the last few years, one is not in the position of giving definitive judgments. the walker campaign should b

i know you heard me in the tease and thinking, brzezinski, get it right. it's hassan!oth with me this morning. >> nice to be here. >> curious. start with senator hassan. what is the punishment or the burden that these changes would impose on the state of new hampshire? >> let's just take a step back, mika, and thanks for having us on. ever since pushing the nominating process out of back rooms and into neighborhoods new hampshire has gone first and really vetted candidates on an equal basis regardless of war chests or name recognition. right? and we have a state law that says we will go before any other state's primaries. so the concerns that we have raised in our letter to the dnc is simply that they are telling new hampshire that in order to comply with their proposal, our officials have to break state law, and we agree with the goal of, that the dnc has articulating, increasing geographic diversity in the primary but including new hampshire as the first in the nation state and increasing diversity aren't mutually exclusive. end of the day, this is about making sure