brzezinski.was fascinating looking at lester holt's package, just fascinating that you had henry kissinger, madeleine albright, and dr. brzezinski, all three of their families chased out of europe by the rise of adolph of hitler. all three came to america just achieving towering heights in american foreign policy. >> good point. >> i do want to draw a distinction, though, not for purposes of legacy building or legacy smashing, but just draw some real distinctions to get more of an insight into who henry kissinger was. the contrast between kissen fwer and brzezinski. kissinger was a shape-shifter and could be what nixon wanted him to be, and often was, behind the scenes. if he was talking to hillary clinton or bill clinton, again, changed the iraq war. he supported the iraq war at the beginning and then moved in another direction. then, of course, he was -- jared kushner talked to him constantly, the trump administration. he could move politically. he was a master tactician politically. dr. brzezi

, much , brzezinski at least saw some place behind us, but richard hus doesn’t even see us, he doesn’, we take a book and say, in why do we already have everything written down, but we all understand that this could be exactly the case, why, well, this is the logic of the business-shmizness that we are, this is the logic of the education that was created in the nineties, you don’t need anything of your own, when everything has already been invented, well, why, let’s take the best examples, translate this, here’s our concept, the concept of polycentricity, what... there in eurasia, well, why, why , we still have, we still haven’t, haven’t understood, we have the middle east, the middle east, where did we get this from, we always have it in the soviet union , under brezhnev there was no such garbage, in the soviet union the coastal region was the middle east, the middle east, and then in smart books in a foreign language they read that there is only the middle east, aka midlyst, however, here, that means, actually, this... geographical things, in my opinion, this is where we are going,

from there they will distribute how to do what, and this center should have been led either by brzezinskiut maybe his son, who is now an ambassador, well, what a fuss, kaczynski, these people are absolutely uncontrollable, by and large they are not so interested in ukraine, when many of our experts say that poland will enter western ukraine, its goal is not this, it is an ambitious goal, the destruction of russia. i wonder if he is leonida, tell me, here you are with him we communicated personally and more than once with tosky, tell me, is he competent for the tasks that washington poses, will he be obedient, you know, i still think he will be obedient, this is simply shown by all the political practice and all his experience managerial, administrative, the entire political career, in personal communication before your political career , how did you communicate under what circumstances, well , i met him when tusk was, as far as i remember in parliament, all the leaders of the civil platform faction, this is somewhere 2000 probably the fourth or fifth year, as in any parliament, foreign jo

who was a man called brzezinski who was a man called brzezinski who was a national security adviserse. and they fabricated documents that he was anti—semitic. and they after a man called they went after a man called senator henry jackson, who was a very anti soviet anti communist. he was a democratic senator for and the kgb tried to investigate him, tried to get what they called kompromat on him. but actually, henry jackson was actually, henry jackson was actually very boring. they couldn't find anything on him . couldn't find anything on him. so literally fabricated so they literally fabricated that he was that he was gay and a member of a gay sex club. and in 1976, that was potentially damaging. but they literally would fabricate documents and they interfere in us they tried to interfere in us presidential elections. >> that's where it moves on >> and that's where it moves on to the future because they did it to kennedy. they very it to kennedy. they were very hostile then they hostile to reagan, but then they did hillary clinton and did it to hillary clinton and that's no longer

brzezinski, senior, led this conversation, and he gave the floor to our diplomat already at the end,er everyone had already spoken and told everything they knew about ukraine, and so the diplomat took advantage of this opportunity and asked the audience only one question, but it was very precise and very correct, he asked, dear friends , who among you has been to ukraine at least once, well, as they say, fell in love with movchenko, this is what leads me to the point that very often people who write articles that reflections on counterattacks that give advice, in fact, this very gunpowder has never been sniffed in practice, and therefore i would treat all these articles, all these things quite carefully, but on the other hand, i would very actively, insistently and aggressively my line regarding the fact that, dear friends, finally, if... that your eyes have not yet been opened, let us help you open them, and i would give the same data, which are not being talked about now, as they say, unless what a lazy person, that helping ukraine is helping the american military-industrial comple

brzezinski writing.as very nice to me and asked amy to play, and went to look for mika when she didn't show up for lunch." from dr. brzezinski about their respective 9-year-old girls at saint simon's island. >> we disappeared. >> always said, she was very motherly, very sweet. >> incredibly so. >> would wipe chocolate from your face with great regularity. >> she was remarkable and kind and warm and incredibly patient. i actually have my dad's book which really has a lot of his diaries in it, "powers and prin principle." i have nice stories i'll share in a moment. first, nbc "nightly news" anchor lester holt reports on her life and legacy. >> it's now my pleasure to introduce someone whom i love and respect and cherish, my wife, rosalynn. [ applause ] >> reporter: she was jimmy carter's partner, best friend, and closest adviser in and out of the white house from more than three quarters of a century. soft spoken, politically savvy, and fiercely determined, rosalynn carter was known as the steel magnolia.

brzezinski sr. led this conversation, and he gave the floor to our diplomat already at the end, after everyone had already spoken and told everything they know about ukraine. and so the diplomat took advantage of this opportunity and asked the audience only one question, but a very precise one and very correct. he asked: "dear friends, who are you?" i was in ukraine at least once , well, as they say, movchenko fell in love . , in fact, this very gunpowder has never been sniffed, and therefore i would approach all these articles, all these things , quite cautiously, but on the other hand, i would very actively, persistently and aggressively pursue my line regarding the fact that dear friends , finally, if your eyes haven't opened yet, let us help you open them, and i would provide the same data, which are not being talked about now, as they say, except for the lazy, that aid to ukraine is aid to the american military complex, it is aid to the american budget, it is aid in including the european budget, because if we receive outdated soviet equipment or something more or less normal, bu

americans in the mid -90s and started with the fact that when i was invited to the group headed by brzezinski henry kissinger, not the last of the americans americans in the history of american diplomacy, i spent several years there, i studied there, i know well how to talk to americans, and this is definitely not what yermak does, well, first of all, for the american establishment, the head of the administration, or the chief there , the president's office, the head of the president's staff, this is absolutely not a public person who can travel abroad at all, in which delegations, lead some delegations, the vice president can do this, and yermak is trying to position himself as the vice president, but he doesn't have any of those there is no authority, no such experience of specialization, that is, he does not really extract the things he is striving for, well, and the way he does it causes, well, just deep disapproval, so if we want to improve cooperation, and the americans speak frankly about it , and at my meetings they told me directly that advise zelsky not to do this, they meet with di

much of which was laid out by former the jimmy carter's national security advisor as being your brzezinski. so that strategy, i think, is still the ideal strategy for the united states. that of creating and as well as pushing put it an anti rush uh right under right it rushes doorstep and making sure that it is a well armed, an access to detroit to russia. so that's going to continue. so the 1st step is of course to, to get rid of zalinski was proving to be someone not up to the task. yeah. well you're, you're being very gentle in your language, but because this is television, i won't express my exact opinion, sarah lemming. there's a new sense. let's say it at least these that okay, these the pan handler. okay. um, sarah, but i mean, you know, it for a lot of us, it's been a parent that you claim is never going to win this conflict. it actually, i think for most of us that we, we're, we're looking at how nato is going to react to it. not ukraine, because nato doesn't give a hoot about ukraine, really? certainly not about its people. okay. but sarah, that doesn't preclude of some kind of p

and the united states ambassador to poland, mark brzezinski.onathan lemire, you have the first question. >> mister ambassador, good to see you. i don't know how you got by security. i do want to ask you about a number of pressing world affair issues in a moment but let's just talk a little bit about this affair here and why google and others are being honored. >> jonathan, this award falls under the rubric of collective response is the most effective response. it is important for the private sector to be involved in americas challenges and advancing our values abroad. that is why, google poland has been doing in poland. it has been helping ukrainian women who are refugees in poland develop skills to reengage their professional lives. they have generally embraced the refugee community in poland which amounts to millions of people embraced by that country. that is the kind of thing the secretary of state blinken's sucker hitting -- the ward for corporate excellence. frankly, it is a model that is being advanced by so many companies. american and

and a.k.a. 11 sentences for felonies released prison june 21st becomes inspector of police janez brzezinski's professional thief, serving three years and six months is made chief of the red guard cpa good man is a felon, serving three years and six months moves up to prefect. the second police district. august kalman's burglars serving two years and one month was promoted to chief of police of dog appeal. matisse britannicus thief's serving two years and one month is the new chief of police of la appia. the new constitution moscow guarantees freedom from arrest previous. respected citizens now labeled enemies of the people, herded into trains and deported slave labor camps while parents are persecuted had great care and attention is immediately focused on the children. a red scarf of communism is supposed to give the character representing the spirit of childhood control the world a true meaning of the red scarf of communism, as evidenced this list of 78 latvians from all walks of life. in the says politically unreliable shoot them to death. there are no trials, appeals, a mass grave. the cou

, much, brzezinski at least saw some place behind us, but richard hus doesn’t see us, even they don’tn’t need anything of your own when everything has already been invented, why, let’s take the best examples, translate , here is our concept, centricity, what kind of eurasia is there, why, why, we still don’t, we still don’t understand, we have the middle east, the middle east , where did we get this from, we always had it in the soviet union, under brezhnev, there was no such bullshit, in the soviet union there was a coastal the middle east, the middle east, and then in smart books in a foreign language, we read that there is only the middle east, aka middlest, right? here, then, actually, these are geographical things, in my opinion, this is where we are going, indeed, i really liked today’s performance, but under this speech, the conceptual , political speech of our minister, of course, is necessary, it is necessary to lay down a truly methodological, scientific basis, a scientific and practical basis, and it must be our own, and not borrowed. now he’s starting to get nervous, we ha

brzezinski, i'm sure of it. >> i was going to say sometimes dr.the secretary of state on the phone in the case of jake sullivan. this is so interesting. he writes cabinet memos in his own name to the cabinet because the president has told the cabinet by the way -- >> right. >> you make sure that you listen, that jake sullivan is kind of command central on this. i've done 16 national security advisers. >> i would say this, bob. if dr. brzezinski were here, he would say, yeah, and i outlasted cy vance. >> that's exactly true. >> let's talk about jake sullivan for a second. i want to follow up on this. i've heard from world leaders. i've heard from their aides. i've heard from from ambassadors across europe and the middle east, the same thing. how's blinken doing? they go, oh my god. he's so great. he know what is to say. he knows what to do. what about jake sullivan? they just say, the guy's incredible. he calls up. he says, here are the five things that need to get done. tell me, what do we need to do to get these five things done? he ticks down th