ltad to earlier, bto 2008evels or even 2006 you know, we hadnough goverenthen. th wernot a lot of complaints, b, my gos we don't he enough government. we need to spend more on government. swe couldake snding back to 2006 or 2008levels, and i don't believthamerican people, other tn those o ha bitedpecifically by being empyed by those federal agenes a federal programs, would notice the absence o that money. and in fac ty would probably befit mightily because it would smuch mo. that inst payments onhe a the defit wld be reduced, and we would notave toorrosouch ney. a couple weeks a here i washisome.streasuries re sued. they are is every day, but are workingony through frida tre's aale of the u.. treasu bondbecaus w are going into so mh debt at we tsell treasuries every da this particular purchase was undersubscribed. at means thereasot enoh buyers for the ney that we atempted to sell and the reason is thator the sk that theuyers were takig, they wanted a higher rate oterest, they wanted a better turn when you take morri on he investment youe purchasing, y want high

my office every single week would be enoous we reduced and i think we owe it to everyone to do our bto try to prevent a recurrence of this. i think that politically the time to do this is actually now. what we are trying to do is put into place a mechanism that removes the punch bowlthe next time the party gets rolling, and th is advantage of a formula. you agree on the formula aead of time and then it kicks in automatically, and right now if you put it into place it would do nothing in all market in the united states, because if you ok at the four year differences in prices or the three-year difference i price it is negative in all markets. actually an answer toyour question that is why i did not ever let it go below the 10%, the fixed number that i took in there. i thought about it and went back-a-forth. advantage of letting it go negati is that the feedback loop stays closed in engineering speak. if you allowed to go negative but the reason to not let it go negative is just the risk of having at some point it will drive the down payment to zero or below oh, whter that means them i g

rnding to ese record tes long-te uemployment, our firstriority st bto maintain theurre erg feral umploymentgrams that have psed two wee ago. peope have been waiting for two eks. these programa ng time ago, t the senate has to car thlegiaton if the senate fails to ctin edal unempyment progras ve milong-te unemployed americans will theiextendeds befo the enof this yith 1.2 million of them sing the benefs by the end of this month, j ev with e of thesfacthat feraunemploymentrogrs, are projected texhat l ple benefits available before th end othe year. need to provide more he these long-term ded wokers, could range from addial extd unemployment benetsn gh unemplment benetsn gh unemplment states tfederally-funded jobs

a very important princie that has been to some eent and shou bto the full exnt ameran law in this area which is pluter pa. that should be e -- tat has beenheasis of the superfund program. that sh bthebas fo the oil liabily leslation. b.p.as said they will py reasonable costand that of thing. we shouldn't have to take r word for it. e shupet have take the word of-- we shouldn't have to take e rd of a company thatas flaant corne in the past uge co te and naraenvironment. whether you'rtalkinout the texas cityefinery, whher you're talking about the blowouts on the north -- on the noh ore the north slope of alaska, where y're talking about blowouts the pipeline in alaa, wheer you'realking aboutailure to level with the american public and evethhe coast guard and the eerts on h mucil was escing from well. yonow, the number keeps shifting and the oil compy, i think,as not been fully forthcoming. sthisompany as us to ta their wordor it that they ill y, that they pay will -- ey wpafor the cleanup, pay for the dislocation. want that established in law. th suld be the liability limit shoulbe raise

our hh skorce le by congresswoma donna christian sen whfought every day mak we expaed mmuny clics and bto close health disparitie communities of color thaare mirity medical schools, finally reive eqty ites of thebility ttrai me nority mical pfessionals. and ts s a big de. t's going to kick invethe years, up until , but i think thic peoe ll sewhy this wel worth fighting. on again, it don't maer whether you are a democrat, republican or teaarty activist or tea party, u wl benefit or not. ymeerot for it ankso the congressional ack feingtrong advocates forlth care refor ms. fudg wwould li to k u. thk ther no one in this ccus who fo harder to get thisl passed. our air,seative e, isne of the hst worki memberof this eire body shhaand leadership anshe s coage. and we want to thank y f beinour leader. we thanyou veryuc mr. speaker, i d now like to yield to my frnd who has joed us and has been constentor the peoe of this uny, the gentl from texas,heila jacksee. msjackson lee: ihanky colleague fromveuc and i'm delighted to be able to oin her and asel my chawoman theonession ack causnd other mbe w kn