buckley sucker punched jorado. jorado fell, hit his head on the pavement and died the next day. buckley had agreed to plead guilty to involuntary manslaughter. >>> today was the first day of testimony in the trial of two men accused of murder for the death of oakland journalist bailey. this man, a care giver said he heard two shot that is sounded like fire crackers. he said when he looked he saw a man fall to the ground. that man was bailey. the gunman in the case brusard pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter and will testify against the two men now on trial. prosecutors say yusef bay the fourth ordered the killers and that mackey drove the get away car. >> as i look at them i can't believe they are sitting there so calmly like nothing happened. >> brusard is expected to be the key witness. he agreed to testify in exchange for a lighter sentence. >>> after nightfall in libya, coalitions force has new air assaults. president obama says they're ready to transfer control of the air assaults to other countries. >> nato is meeting today as we speak to work out some of the mechanis

buckley sucker punched jorado. jorado fell, hit his head on the pavement and died the next day. buckley had agreed to plead guilty to involuntary manslaughter. >>> today was the first day of testimony in the trial of two men accused of murder for the death of oakland journalist bailey. this man, a care giver said he heard two shot that is sounded like fire crackers. he said when he looked he saw a man fall to the ground. that man was bailey. the gunman in the case brusard pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter and will testify against the two men now on trial. prosecutors say yusef bay the fourth ordered the killers and that mackey drove the get away car. >> as i look at them i can't believe they are sitting there so calmly like nothing happened. >> brusard is expected to be the key witness. he agreed to testify in exchange for a lighter sentence. >>> after nightfall in libya, coalitions force has new air assaults. president obama says they're ready to transfer control of the air assaults to other countries. >> nato is meeting today as we speak to work out some of the mechanis

which includes... >> rushdie: ...all of us, yes. >> buckley: yes.ust about everyone. >> rushdie: he would assume that everybody knew what he knew and... >> carter: yes. yes. >> rushdie: and nobody did. >> kroft: not everyone is so generous. as you might expect, hitchens has made a lot of enemies over the years, including many former comrades on the left who have heaped scorn upon him for supporting the invasion of iraq. hitchens responded by having himself sworn in as an american citizen by the chief of homeland security. when we spoke to him last month, he seemed to be basking in the venom of his detractors. alexander cockburn, a former friend of yours, called you "self-serving, fat-ass, chain- smoking, drunken, opportunistic cynical contrarian." >> hitchens: well, i don't see what's wrong with that, though he should see my ass now. >> kroft: hitchens says he nearly died in january, when the chemotherapy began to destroy his innards. he called it a bad dress rehearsal. he is now in an experimental program with a cutting edge drug that has shown som

how much to ask jeff buckley, brad bishop, and richard made to come up. thank you. >> supervisors, my name is jeff buckley, the director organizing with the tenderloin housing clinic. i will allow the members of the public to comment on a lot of the things that have been put forth by the department of public health, but i would like to say, without a doubt, we do not feel that two inspectors for five under 30 sro units could even remotely be called an adequate response to the level of bedbug infestations. there are other issues that i will address, but i wanted to summarize and describe what the working group is. once we learned there would be a public hearing on this issue, we convened a working group, which was really an informal group of people who have either experienced, a treat, work with, or collaborate with, from the property manager perspective, made its workers, pest control operators, tenant advocates, involve would bedbug issues intimately. the idea is, we want to cut through a lot of the russian valley that comes with this issue. i have seen,

i think justice kennedy's opinion in buckley is also instructive in this regard, because what that opinion says is that allowing only immunity for the trial would just allow individuals to constantly replead their allegations and focus only on the pretrial conduct and be an end run around absolute immunity. and, again, absolute immunity is important not for the prosecutor for his own sake or her own sake, but because ultimately that is what -- that causing -- damage liability will -- will make prosecutors flinch the performance of their duties more generally. >> you don't -- you don't think there's a reason to make prosecutors flinch against willy-nilly -- that's not what i'm -- i'm claiming happened here, but if you take the point that you're raising, then prosecutors can out of spite, out of pure investigative reasoning, out of whatever motive they have, just lock people up. >> justice sotomayor-- >> and you're -- you're basically saying-- >> -- making prosecutors flinch is -- is always a bad thing. what i'm referring to is this court's precedents that say damages liability on prosecutor

not only is that something that mark holbert doesn't agree with and chris buckley from alameda and oakland historic but neither did the planning commissioner at the hearing. i would like quickly to read a couple of things from what he said "is there really enough integrity left for this structure to continue to convey its historic significance? haven't the alterations severely reduced all or some of the seven aspebts of integrity"? why wasn't this carriage house compared with other carriage houses? the greater neighborhood? i don't believe the description of what would have been allowed -- of what would be allowed in this alternative would meet the reconstruction standards stating by the planning department. the planning department here is really in a minority in its opinions. chief frye and discussed earlier the likelihood that the preservation board priest to this one or the h.b.c. has ever turned down all the e.i.r. alternatives that were put before it. basically killing a project unprecedented. but it was done here. mr. frye said our building is false -- but take a look at the barn. th

me and i just do almost five clean runs i have will problems in the final after the steep part of buckley i got my bus back i got a slow start again against an awful start all night i like a little bit beat up. like a brit i get on the ice and just like they needed to get better starts and there was still everything to battle for the fourth and decisive stage in quebec so it tends fight to the finish between kill lining and cork so isn't dissipated on the nineteenth of march because they are cheap and that's always nice but this one isn't but i'll be back in a couple of hours see that. a team has been to the protean republic. center of russian defense production. now while she heads to central russia. the crops of become an industry. the harsh winter make schools even more enjoyable. and where everyone can train to be a scum. of the younger smugglers. russia close up on oxy. more news today violence is once again flared up. these are the images the world has been seeing from the streets of canada. shining corporations are the day. in india she's available in the grand central shirts in li

presence in the russian banking sector morgan stanley sold its russian mortgage business last year buckley says it's putting else while spain suntan there has left the retail market sector but analysts say the russian banking industry is becoming more competitive for international players. state controlled banks have become more aggressive in lending. in these more competitive for much more competitive market began to shift scale measure so work around. didn't have enough skill and could be seen in the knife skills so they decided to meet for for that reason but that does not mean that the russian market became an attractive for its two were attractive but it's more competitive and it's a lot happier at the moment but we're bringing you the latest update here on business i take it less than one. ily ily ily .

just out is freedom at risk by james buckley, senator james buckley. we've got a bunch of great, great titles coming out, so stop by our web site, www.encounter.com and see what you're missing. >> one more thing, can you tell us a little bit about why you decided to start the pamphlet series? >> yes. i saw -- in 2008 in that election cycle the internet had become an essential part of the metabolism of political debate and blogs and so on were absolutely essential to the way in which the messages were getting out, the the people were getting educated. but they had a couple of liabilities, i thought. one was that they were very ephemeral. i wrote a blog myself for pa pajamas media, so i know you can get thousands of hits, thousands of comments and then 17 hours later it's gone. they've moved on to the next thing. so i wanted something that had the meet -- immediacy of a blog, of the internet but could be a step back. i thought of common sense or the federalist papers, for that matter, where you had people commenting in a very forthright way about matters

presence in the russian banking sector morgan stanley sold its russian mortgage business last year buckley says it's pulling out while spain sometime there has left the retail market sector but i'd say the russian banking industry is becoming more competitive for international players. state controlled banks have become more aggressive and. more competitive for a much more competitive market branch of scale matter so what. do you make of. steel so. decided to be for that reason what. does not mean the russian market became an attractive stuber attractive but it's more competitive. and let's take a look at the markets now european stock markets again in yuki's footsie recovered from earlier losses helped by strong results run into their group while satellites communications for inmarsat dropped sharply after reporting its two thousand and ten results now mining stocks are mostly low in london including eight percent drop air for rio tinto and one point two percent for for vendetta resources here in russia the markets are closed for public holidays stocks finished their last trading session

definitely of course we have to also question why there is complete hypocrisy when it comes to places like buckley and in saudi arabia and then we have to look at. really who created and nurtured the political elites that rule in these places why are saudi arabia. the u.a.e. and britain supporting supporting quote unquote democracy activists in libya but fighting against democracy activists in saudi arabia doesn't really make sense loki on a personal note i guess i want to ask you to speak for your generation and for others like you you know second or third generation generation muslims living in the west you seem and you have seen for many months angry about what's going on do you think that this is the sentiment shared you know by your peers by people like you. i think it's important to also understand that one side of my family is english you know i had. a great aunt on one side of my family who was married to a man in the military that lived on the british military base in libya as a human being i don't believe it is right for britain or any other country in the world to have any type of milit

when american corporations began to push it in front of the supreme court with decisions like buckley versus vallejo and first national bank versus bloody decisions that essentially expanded the rights of corporations based on the idea that they were persons but it wasn't until january of two thousand and ten last year that the supreme court really blew the doors up granting far fewer freedom of speech rights to corporations in their citizens united decision and thus the final piece of the puzzle was fit in for the chamber of commerce in america's transnational corporations and billionaires now corporations as people critics planned it could expand their influence into the markets and into the government they now had unprecedented influence as a result of the supreme court decision about a year ago over our society and their intentions were not small the democratic with their new rights some of the wealthiest oligarchy in america dumped millions of dollars from their private or corporate coffers into republican political campaigns and a few actually and and a few corporate democrats a

changes in policy that look like people are sold out as opposed to just you know the old william buckley oh well you know let's think this through and this is the constitutional one as opposed to a i'm a man i really respect as a writer and i mean i did too in fact and i used to love watching firing line when did you know that. but the it has become basically a free for all. bill simmons has died a year ago brilliant guy but. isn't that the essence of at least the wrecking crew that this is just become a free for all that it's the thing is that you have it there were there was in the air in the early reagan days especially yes there was a lot of principle the a lot of the people in the early reagan ministration were highly principled conservatives and what you saw happening in the by the way this is this is a parallel with the summer same thing happen in the conservative movement is that people discover that there's a lot of money to be made in both in the movement and in politics and the wrecking crew i used to use jack aber moffett's my as my character as a sort of what would you say t

and i think that's the teaching of buckley. take two witness interviews. they're the same act, but the prosecutor clearly can be engaged in interviews for different reasons. in buckley, it happened to be on those facts the court believed it was investigative, based on the allegations in the complaint. but what if it were 2 days before the presentment to the grand jury? it's likely the prosecutor would have assumed he had probable cause at that point and was prepping the witnesses. those are two acts, but you have to look behind them. i think there's no way around looking behind. the alternative, the flip side of what the government's asking, is -- rigidly categorize every single act a prosecutor may undertake in this country and say it's either wholly investigatory or wholly prosecutorial. and i think that's a very difficult test. i think there's no reason why district courts can't make an initial determination. i think here in particular, judge -- was in a unique position to make the determination. he sat at the underlying trial of al-hussayen, so he knew

william buckley fans voted for barack obama because he was such a gifted word search. i thought everyone would be asking these questions. but as i discovered, i was the only one asking these questions. this is a lonely, replaced to be. switching gears a little bit, as anyone who has seen the play can at times, i am not a particularly good golfer. in fact, i would consider myself a double bogey golfer. on a par four i was shooting six. i would shoot up five. for me a favor break 100. for me a favor break 100. for me a favor break 100, something celebrate. and there are two reasons i've been able to achieve this level of success. one is a natural of talent and second that combine that. the combination together design is good golfer which is 100 plus. to achieve true superiority, say take your word. one is an extraordinary natural talent. and secondly, total dedication, eight deep, deep commitment to do the best you can do. in his book, the authors by malcolm gladwell, he talks about what he calls the 10,000 hour rule. and what they say it was a college essay is to achiev

single disputing head on either side of the iowa including on the right side of the aisle and william buckley's some voted for barack obama because he was a gifted words meant. i'm not going to disabuse you of your notions tonight. i thought everyone would be asking these questions but as i discovered i was the only one asking these questions. this is a weird place to be which i will tell you about. switching gears a little that as anyone who's seen me play can attest i am not a particularly good golfer. and i would consider myself a double bogey golfer, on a par-4 i would shoot six. a pro what should a three in on would shoot a five commesso for me if i ever break 100 miller time it's just something to celebrate. i would achieve this level of success is the lack of natural talent and secondly and i combined that with an absolute failure to practice and its accommodation together that makes me as good if a golfer as i can which is 100 plus in the average day. now to achieve the true superiority with say tiger woods it takes two of them one is an extraordinary natural talent and secondly total d

one is the case of buckley versus vallejo. individuals can spend as much money on their own behalf as they want. now it has been extended to corporations. i like the virginia law where everything is disclosed. you have millions of dollars of attack ads and we don't know who is paying for it. you know who it is. at least you could go to the voters and say look who is behind these voters. now he cannot even do that. the candidates do not control their own campaigns. it has gone off the cliff at this point. going back to full disclosure is the best way to go. >> i have nothing else to add except i feel like the genie is out of the bottle. it is hard to put it back together again. how do we make our conversation more civil? eliminate half of cable television and the internet. it will just not happen. i agree that making the party is stronger, giving candidates more control over their message, and it would be helpful but i don't think it will happen. >> another question on political reform. would you favor redistricting for congres

buckley thought he was funny. a parody he wrote led to a job at "national review" at the "new york times" his columnist in is a moderate brand of conservatism founded on thinkers of the british enlightenment. some like to call him the liberals' favorite conservative. he says being the conservative of the times is like being the chief rabbi of mecca. he's also the author of books that tell us things we don't know about ourselves and culture. about "bobos in paradise, the new upper class and how they got there. " in recent years, his interest in neuroscience has crept into his columns. we know the feeling that when we begin to open the paper and see that today david brooks is writing about what really interests him. what he calls the enchanted realm of the unconscious mind. he has a new book out that reflect this is passion. it is called "the social animal: the hidden sources of love, character, and achievement." i am very pleased to have david brooks back at this table. welcome. >> great to be with you again. >> ro

buckley said, a point is reached when tenacity is not steadfastness of purpose but misapplication of pride. president karzai told abc news he wanted us to stay there another 15 or 20 more years. that's because he wants our money this war is more about money and power. every gigantic bureaucracy always wants more money but this war has gone too far and too long and i support this resolution. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman reserves the plans of his time. the gentleman from ohio. mr. kucinich: the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from florida. ms. ros-lehtinen: i ask unanimous consent that all members have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on house cohn resolution 28. -- house con resolution 28. with that i yield two minutes to mr. chabot. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, so ordered. mr. chabot: thank you, madam chair. thank you for your steadfast commitment to the men and women who gallantly serve our country on the battlefield. i rise in opposition to the resolution. first,

buckley for 30 years. we have had david brooks, tucker carlson. we have a full range of opinion on both public television and radio. i would like to see more and i think that in the fullness of time we will see more. i think that it is important that public broadcasting be recognized as the place where all kinds of opinions are considered and valued and respect respected. back to by days with senator baker, his mantra was a decent respect for differing point of views and that is the standard to which public broadcasting ought to be held. host: we have this do others get government tax breaks? guest: no, we are all non propr. host: cnn, msnbc and fox get tax breaks looking at government subsidies from another direction is the point. guest: i see. i don't know the answer to that. i'm sorry. host: upper marlboro, maryland, dennis is a democrat. we are discussing public broadcasting. caller: thank you for the opportunity and i just would say god bless c-span and public television. i want to say right off the top, i don't want to embarrass mr. butler,

division between contributions and expenditures that has been part of constitutional law ever since buckley. and certainly, you know, part of a lot of lawsuits that have already been filed is challenged as saying corporate contribution bans cannot be sustained of citizens united and it's something the supreme court will have to decide but it will have to be bubbling up through all of your states and all through the federal courts as well. i think the political committee cases that we've certainly seen so far. and i guess the other thing -- you know, doe v. reed harassment is the other big issue we're looking at. doe v. reed said no to the facial challenge but as you can speech too much more than any of us could, you know, it's now getting -- it sounds like a fairly onus litigation stage in which people are trying to show there is or there isn't burden. there isn't a risk of harassment and i think that, you know, those sort of very fact-specific and time-consuming litigations around disclosure is probably the next phase of that type of challenge. >> yeah. >> but you can't foreclose a challen

in an attempt to example -- and five issues, buckley's 1970 run for the senate estate, in the antiballistic missile treaty and vote in 1969. the failed supreme court nomination of appellate -- federal appellate court judge clip meant haynesworth, and president nixon's decision to mine the harbor. and they concluded with the new standards of the times more broadly emulated. particularly by magazines and networks, the nation would be far better informed and more honorably served. that's was clear lay tribute to the journalism practiced and upsell by abe rosenthal, then executive editor of the new york time, from 1969 to 1986. a journalism based on professional detachment as much as possible, impartiality. rosen tall was termed to keep the paper straight. he once said it was personality to keep a firm right handotiller because the news room would naturally drift to the left. he believed t there should be no editorial needles in which reporters used their personal political opinions to go after anybody. he believed there should be no pejorative quotes that were either unattributed or made someb

express advocacy has generally been defined as advertisements that use the words in buckley, voting for and things like that. is very easy to avoid those that and run ann ad doesn't say "vote for obama," but "we love obama." it is easy to get around that. election year communications have to be clear now you want a timeline for election, you want to -- requirements that the ad is being targeted to develop a constituency. you want to have the kinds of things sketched out in the federal law reform act. we think those kinds of requirements will expand the law to capture more political of rising, political communications, at -- political advertising, political communications, and as long as it is done with the necessary clarity, it ought to be upheld. >> i mean, i am reluctant to extend this era of good feelings we have on the panel. he basically said what i believe. our concern would be more strongly on people recalling that electioneering communications, and to the extent that the court has said anything about what the classification is and what the regulatory appropriateness is, close in

i think justice kennedy's opinion in buckley is also instructive in this regard, because what that opinion says is that allowing only immunity for the trial would just allow individuals to constantly replead their allegations and focus only on the pretrial conduct and be an end run around absolute immunity. and, again, absolute immunity is important not for the prosecutor for his own sake or her own sake, but because ultimately that is what -- that causing -- damage liability will make prosecutors flinch the performance of their duties more generally. >> you don't -- you don't think there's a reason to make prosecutors flinch against willy-nilly -- that's not what i'm claiming happened here, but if you take the point that you're raising, then prosecutors can out of spite, out of pure investigative reasoning, out of whatever motive they have, just lock people up. >> justice sotomayor - >> and you're basically saying - >> making prosecutors flinch is always a bad thing. what i'm referring to is this court's precedents that say damages liability on prosecutors is the wrong way to go about it