to buckley bolero, that looks like it may cast some doubt on and politicibili applicability of those. >> this is something you all may weigh in on. historically, the court has held very little -- they have respected directions in the congress when it came in the form of a law. they have not ordinarily given standing and senator lee said that in his testimony in a q & a. in the case in which the house of representatives has not granted the senate the right to adjourn, does in your opinion, the house of representatives have a separate action, separate from law, but as a body of government, constitutionally specifically given a right/obligation, do you believe that we have potentially standing? >> i'll just say first, i'm skeptical, but i don't think it matters, there's going to be a challenge, there's going to be a ripe case that we'll follow and what you say will be taken very, very seriously. >> i think we do have a standing to vindicate a financial authority. and as much as i respect my former boss and mr. gray, i think that it is essential for you to look at the powers issues of 200