medvedev is safe today, we still have such a document called the budapest memorandum, and guarantees and so on were written in black and white. are there any prospects for using this mechanism now, because the difficult intervention of the russian federation is already underway, not a simple conventional one the war is the largest in the history of europe since the end of the second world war . it is about the possible use of nuclear weapons against a country that voluntarily transferred its existing arsenal under the guarantees of the international community. well, you you know, you and i have already made sure that the budapest memorandum turned out to be such a fig leaf, in fact, the consultation mechanism provided for by it was applied back in early march 2014, but it did not have any serious consequences as part of this mechanism and of those countries that were signatories of the budapest memorandum. russia then simply did not appear at this consultation. well, accordingly, we and you have no reason to believe that russia will now decide to participate in any consultations. wit

the final result, and here the main thing is not to repeat the mistakes, including the same budapest memorandum, in any legal international legal document, the status of the document plays a role in the same way. well, because a memorandum from the point of view of international law has a much weaker position, a weaker status than an international legal treaty so is the memorandum. it is more like that. if so, in simple words, to say this is to promise does not mean to get married, and that is precisely why the guarantee mechanism of this memorandum, which was laid down in the budapest memorandum, was in the same ephemeral country, the countries promised us as guarantees only two two practical steps in fact, it is to gather for consultations once and the second time is to bring the issue of ukraine's security to the consideration of the un-2 security council, because these countries were, well, in fact, the backbone of this budapest memorandum on our western partners who signed it, they were, in fact, permanent members of the arabez, more and more, no mechanisms were fixed there. well, the ques

and they are again following the path of the budapest memorandum, which they pushed for signature, soa mistake, we need to talk about something else now with our allies nuclear states, the first position, what will we do after the deoccupation of the territory, what kind of security umbrella will there be in ukraine, well, we can talk about it for a long time there. i believe that there should be a system of collective defense, not self-defense with the help of how we are currently promoting collective self-defense - this is the entry into the organization of the north atlantic agreement in europe well, the second thing that needs to be said is maybe about other mechanisms, which others are the signing of a bilateral agreement with britain, which can be done in principle already during the visit to the forest once of the prime minister of britain in the coming weeks to ukraine. i say, i don't know the dates, but i know that a visit is being prepared, which means that the usa would also like it. what should the agreement be ? we stand on the defense, as it would not sound strange befor

ukraine’s nuclear status not since february, when zelensky spoke about withdrawing from the budapest memorandumirting with this topic is a common move of ukrainian populists and, in this regard, the president. the current one is no different from the previous one, let's be honest. ukraine was not. the nuclear powers were the soviet union. well, this is a fixed idea, uh, of the ukrainian political elite, not uh, today, uh, this idea is actively exploited by the political class of ukraine that came to power as a result of the 2014 coup d'état. so, as a legacy from soviet science ukraine got, including the rovno khmelnytsky npp, the institute for nuclear research in kiev and the kharkiv polytechnic university, it is precisely these objects that another ukrainian telegram channel calls as scientific bases capable of creating a dirty bomb, which in fact is not nuclear, the authors even explain that nuclear power plants should not be shelled they will be, and that means they are safe, and the institute for nuclear research was engaged in the elimination of the consequences of the chernobyl accident.

well, i will remind you that the budapest memorandum was then calculated to remove such a threat to our country in general, therefore the two security guarantees will rather be related to the fact that there will be a clear algorithm that the guarantor countries undertake and what they will be ready to do in the event of any further aggression. this is what we need and it will actually partially restore the security architecture in europe itself because what if we say more widely and will notice that volodymyr zelenskyi also spoke about this in the context of pseudo-referendums at the general assembly, speaking before the security council. well , now the architecture of the world and the architecture that has been formed for many years, decades, it is essentially being violated. and even more so, there is a violation in a region in europe where for a long time it seemed impossible, but now it is happening before our eyes because the biggest war in europe after 1945 is taking place, so it turns out that we will be able to get these guarantees only after victory i think that it is necessa

well, in my opinion, it is not necessary to react referring, of course, to the budapest memorandum, butning it. look, if we initiate the convening of the referendum, then why don't we initiate just such a format of nuclear countries regarding listening to russian intentions, because it is even the world affects me. it seems to me that this is also an important issue, so diplomacy can be used, but protocols for deterrence. by the way, i read one of the analysts and professors of an american university, he says that there is a widespread discussion among the military now of the idea of ​​retaliating by one of the nato countries on military bases, for example in belarusians, well, if that is the case, yes , because this is not russia, there are russian military there, it is not known why they are there. that is, you will deliver these blows, mr. vadim, from these options after that, after the disk, it is such that such blows should not be allowed as soon as they see the preparation , the protocols should be used, or for neutralization, or if it was inflicted before that, the answer can hap

there must be some kind of joint statement by the countries participating in the budapest memorandum,hey, but although would these things that nuclear threats are impossible, i.e. against ukraine, because there are such obligations on the part of russia. well, although all this is the first, the second, we must put before them, put this document political, although it is unfortunately political well, they really didn't have the right to write down the guarantees . but it's all the same to the people who didn't. and now they offered us neutrality. and now oleksandr chalyy and the whole group are offering some guarantees. they pushed for a signature, that's not making a mistake, we need to talk about something else now with our allies, the nuclear states, position one, what will we do after the de-occupation of the territory, what kind of security umbrella will there be in ukraine, well, it can take a long time there i believe that there should be a system of collective defense and not self-defense with the help of how we are currently promoting collective self-defense - this is the ent

have not even been going on since february, when zelensky spoke about withdrawing from the budapest memorandum flirting with this topic is a common move of ukrainian populists and, in this regard, the president. the current one is no different from the previous one, let's be honest. ukraine was not nuclei. rusty ah, nuclear powers was the soviet union well, this is a fixed idea, uh, of the ukrainian political elite, not uh, today, uh, this idea is actively exploited by the political class of ukraine that came to power as a result of the 2014 coup d'état. so, ukraine inherited from soviet science , including rovenka and khmelnytsky npp the institute for nuclear research in kiev and the kharkiv polytechnic university, it is these objects that another ukrainian telegram channel calls as scientific bases capable of creating a dirty bomb, which in fact is not a nuclear bomb, the authors even explain that nuclear power plants will not be shelled, which means they are safe. and if here nuclear research was engaged in the elimination of the consequences of the chernobyl accident. and now the important

it is clear that it was the budapest memorandum, which also does not work according to yours.ho and how can ensure the security guarantees of ukraine, or ukraine, after all, should take care of these security guarantees for its future, a secure future is with its own forces, in particular with the armed forces of ukraine, well, first of all, we actually have the power to do this. i think well, it just won't work because well, if you take and compare our capabilities with, well, with the russian federation, let's say there with eh, with similar, similar and smoke these eh, well, eh, potency eh, even in case of ending means hostilities under the best conditions for ukraine. well , you can predict that russia will pose a threat to ukraine, but economically, economically, we simply will not be able to cope with the russian federation one-on-one. this is obvious and, in general, there are experiments. i don't think it's necessary to carry out . well, as far as i'm concerned, another option would be participation in the north atlantic alliance , because it's already such a guarantee

it is clear that there was a budapest memorandum, which also does not work according to your opinion. who and how can guarantee the security of ukraine, or ukraine, after all, should take care of these security guarantees about the future of its own secure future with its own forces, in particular with armed forces by the forces of ukraine, well, first of all, we actually have the power to do this, i think well, it just won't work because well, if you take and compare our capabilities with, well, with the russian federation, let's say there with uh-uh, with similar , similar, and smoke these uh-uh, uh- e potency e-e even in the event of the end of a-a means hostilities in the best conditions for ukraine uh-uh well, it is possible to predict that russia will pose a threat to ukraine, but economically economically, we simply will not be able to cope with the russian federation one-on-one. this is obvious and uh-uh in in general, there are experiments. i think it is not necessary to carry out experiments. well , in my opinion, another option that is not ideal would be to participate in t

given on the territory of russia, they are obliged to the americans in accordance with the budapest memorandum, they must be in the trenches near us. they are the guarantor of our security, and therefore we do not care how they will get it, but it turned out like this, you know, the british and the americans also deceived us. well, first of all, the russians, that is, in otsia, there is talk that we cannot give weapons for that, far from it, it has absolutely no international legal basis, on the contrary, they are obliged to give it, because it is the guarantor of our of security americans, english, french well, i am talking about russians veteran of our security, why are ukrainians dying, why are we losing territory and you are talking that if you give the ukrainians such a weapon and it can be struck against russia, well, this is a tour without a legal point of view, this is absurd ukraine's position is wrong, you understand absolutely correctly and we should get these weapons, let them fulfill their international obligations, thank you, mr. petren, let's hope that, so to speak, the updated

there, we know that china is also the guarantor of the security of ukraine according to the budapest memorandume i signed it great britain, the united states russia-ukraine, but then france and china joined the poems. that's why it's actually these countries that are helping today, the only thing you know, i noticed that there are no countries in the list that at one time blocked our action plan regarding nato membership, er, they have been since 2008, if they were talking about ukraine becoming a member of nato but much later and under the influence of russia, it was such gray diplomacy, black diplomacy , and i would say russian pressure on these countries with the assurance that there will be business gas everything will be fine, just don't accept ukraine into nato and some european leaders were on that if they all are signing this kyiv security treaty, then what is the problem of accepting ukraine into the nation at all? that this is a big question, isn't it, or shouldn't it be worth starting with this? let's leave all these parallel processes behind. we invite you and what we ask for and th

stronger, from my perspective, and that's the only way, i don't believe in any fig leaves, as budapest memorandumsts that will be discussed at this particular moment. if you say that actually ukraine is intent on nato membership, itjust makes me feel that in the end what we have is an existential conflict with vladimir putin, which can only end in one or two ways, either he wins and ukraine as we know it is destroyed or you win and putin and his regime will be destroyed. woulf you agree with that analysis? ie, there is no room for negotiation any more. it seems that this is an existential struggle which will either see ukraine or putin finished? we've been saying that this is absolutely existential, if we stop fighting, we will cease to exist because russia has decided that we are nonexistent and they want to eradicate us. and erase us from the map of the world. and that means that there has to be russia's defeat, rush is weakening and russia's punishment for this absolutely russia's is weakening and russia's punishment russia's weakening and russia's punishment for this absolutely illegal aggress

secretary general anderson fogh rasmussen, the authors took into account the sad fate of the budapest memorandum, which did not protect ukraine from russian aggression, and therefore created a fundamentally excellent document for us, it is very important that this e-e document is legally e-e binding, therefore we assume that the e-e documents are of a safe structure, it provides not only a large framework agreement, but also the possibility of signing bilateral agreements that are more detailed, for example , this there may be a separate security agreement regarding the black sea. this is an agreement on air security in order to protect our skies and therefore it seems to me that it is very important that all these agreements are ratified by the relevant parliaments in the future automatic document in the allied states of ukraine to the coalition of security guarantees, they plan to involve , first of all, the usa, great britain, canada, poland , italy, germany, france, australia, turkey, as well as the countries of central and eastern europe, the authors emphasize that the kyiv security treaty

so now we have given up with the budapest memorandum , we have given up on the e strategy to nato, infact, in that communique, everything is already the opposite, you know so well for ukraine, it consists in the fact that the sanctions against russia have been presented, the signatory countries cannot cancel until reparations have been paid to all courts, until the troops are withdrawn, it is clear, and we are also obliged to provide and funds for the defense budget and to train our military and there are very, very many rules written there . in your opinion, this is realistic. in general, i think that the istanbul stonewall and this kyiv security one , what do they call it, a convention or some other word ? they were, to call a spade a spade , they just don't want to use the word memorandum so that there isn't some kind of comparison with the budapest one. well, it's mom, that's the essence of it, they're similar in that it's our wish, you and i don't know by the way, they did not know during this istanbul victory. and with someone else, you agreed on this. you can write from the wes

unfriendly act, the ukrainian foreign ministry initiated the consultations provided for in the budapest memorandum end, president kuchma and putin met on october 23, 2003, the construction of the dam was stopped 100 m from the state border. and already in december, the leaders signed an agreement on cooperation in the use of the sea of ​​azov and the kerch strait. however, even after that, moscow refused to recognize tuzla as ukrainian territory, so let's return to our airwaves and continue the actual topic that's where it all started, it all started with tuzla, the first such trial ball of probing and er then kuchma probably understood for the first time er where i am and what kind of country i 'm building then before that the distance got confusing but enough then it is necessary to recognize the behavior of the ukrainian-tatar people refata gaw we congratulate you glory to ukraine glory to the heroes good day i think you can don't remind me about this tuzli like that 19 years ago and why in your opinion and at what expense was it possible to stop the otaku creeping russian aggression, then we k

in to that blackmail, the roughly 70 broke the budapest memorandum of $994.00 on the which ukraine gave up. what was the 3rd largest stockpile of nuclear warheads in return for guarantees of independence and border a guarantees from russia from the united states, u. k, france and china. so these countries in russia has broken it's have a duty to help you crane by the way, china is the country that could really help which in to get out of ukraine or else but yes, this is. a actually not from nature because nature as an alliance doesn't have stockpiles of, of equipment. it's members, space and numbers. they should be assessed on that pair. capital contribution to that ukrainian defense. and on this, as i've mentioned before, eastern europe looks good. the united states look good, the u. k. ok, but, but, but some of the largest countries in the european union and nato didn't look so good. but my bind is rarely that all president putin had to do was to wave his nuclear missiles at nato, from a distance, and implicitly threatened to escalate to a nuclear war. and nato back down. that is cons

well, you're right, pansy. even after the budapest memorandum turned out to be a piece of paper, thism that you are talking about has already been put under a big question mark. well, because the nuclear countries guaranteed the non-nuclear countries that against them never in nuclear weapons cannot be used in life, and it is under such a guarantee, including that ukraine has given its nuclear er-er er-er stand weapons. if it comes to the point that these weapons will also be used against a non-nuclear country, well then - well , this nuclear non-proliferation treaty and so on . the result of the operation of this station was not loyal to no hero was put under the control of the rich or use it in order to enrich him now it is quite a realistic program and very quickly get perhaps even a dirty nuclear bomb, well, that is, at least in order to be able to threaten his near or far to the neighbors is such a dirty bomb but which , nevertheless, in its negative consequences is not much different from the number so that this will really mean the end of all this on what is the whole post-war

now, unfortunately, nothing can except the clear articulation of uh, the signatories of the budapest memorandum, i'm sorry to use it again, a lot of people are annoyed by this phrase, but in fact, the budapest morandum is quite a powerful document that uh, the signatories of this document still take responsibility and declare that they take responsibility, i mean the united states of great britain first of all, that they take responsibility and guarantee nuclear safety that is, they close ukraine with their nuclear umbrella from any nuclear threats, and then putin will not be able to play in advance, because if the usa and great britain do not say exactly such a legal construction, they will not declare guarantees for ukraine, putin will choose when he makes the first move , that is, he will e-e nuclear strike tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of ukraine and further for the united states of great britain is a very difficult dilemma how they can react or strike on the territory of russia, but russia did not strike on their territory and on the united states of great britain or on the ter

kyiv security agreement, according to which the document will differ significantly from the budapest memorandum should provide us with weapons , help financially, introduce sanctions against the aggressor, our partners should also undertake to steadily invest in the defense industrial base of ukraine, provide intelligence support, conduct intensive training missions and joint exercises, the kyiv security agreement will not become as an alternative to ukraine's accession to nato, and should only help our country on the way to the north atlantic alliance, among the guarantor states, the united states is called the united kingdom, canada australia, turkey, as well as poland, germany, france and other european states in this document clearly, well, any potential future aggressor understood that he did this within 24 hours there in the 40s-82s, this will happen and this will happen. the kyiv security agreement is a clear convention to putin we will support ukraine as long as necessary and the second message to putin you will never win in this war the ammunition that left the russians behind on ukrai

well, everything else is the greatness of britain well, isn’t there a connection here with the budapest memorandumsent during the signing i was not present they were them now the usa they russia and later yes and later perhaps you know such rehabilitation for the fact that they did not save, i would not use in principle and in our community, in particular, such words as dam give it was that it was that now there is a different situation and other reasons and other circumstances i think that we will stop on our borders, and then all other work must be done by the citizens of russia, not without help, now it will not help, now two forms of free peoples have arrived, where representatives of different peoples inhabiting russia gather and they talk about the independence of the subjects themselves, so the state of the river blows bashkovi and and others and such conversations are already there , russian oppositionists and liberals in particular are also coming, and here i spoke with pavel klimkin and i asked him a question . yes, because there, in fact, there is a discussion of how a split can be call

medical academy was closed, they said there would be no war, nato would protect us, there is a budapest memorandumwell, if you want to make god laugh, tell me about your plans, half of the medical staff left the city under fire, says the chief doctor of the third city hospital, so those who remained worked around the clock and simply all the girls who stayed here lived at work. they lived here and they went to all the operations, that is, the operating nurses here, no surgeon can do without them. marina is also our operating nurse, these are girls who did not run, who showed real heroism. well, they didn’t give us zahandrits either, because as an operating room nurse, you won’t do anything in the operating room. it was probably the worst when a lot of people were brought to us and there were such very serious injuries and we wanted to save them. well, in 17 in march, when as many as 16 people arrived at once, they gave the operating room, then closed the windows, then closed them with sandbags, and covered them with plywood, and the operating tables were taken out into the central corridor so that

same nuclear five , and by the way, on the basis of this agreement, the so-called infamous budapest memorandumas signed, that is, which lavrov said once again at this geo-assembly that russia did not violate anything at all, this is a piece of paper that there is no legal force. that's all for you russia's attitude to international law and, in general, to the existing order in the world, that is, this country is gradually turning into, well, you know, a giant north korea that ignores any international laws and simply does what it wants, and these things were first heard on general assembly well, first of all, to the fact that behind the scenes there were processes that we did not know about and did not see yet. but we will find out. i think that not much time will pass and we will begin to see and hear the things that were agreed on during these assembly games. one more concrete example of the practicality of this , for example. during this assembly, there were no urgent meetings in connection with putin's announcement on this infamous referendum. in some parts of ukraine occupied by russia, t

well, within the framework of the same budapest memorandum that was given to us.course, you can talk a lot about it in any way . we are a country which was given and which countries signed it, there is no interpretation of this process because i told the americans, look, if the whole world just closes its eyes now, god forbid, russia will use any amount of these weapons, there is one artillery projectile, it will be used if the world is silent, then this will change the schedule of all geopolitics, every small country will understand after that no one will be able to protect it and defend itself. it can only have nuclear weapons . our partners understand this, so i think that it will be much cheaper to oppose the complex russian federation than then to oppose the appearance of nuclear countries there, and then it is not clear where the world will go. our partners agree, but of course the decision will be made on the basis of the fact. let's say that we have to think about it already now, you are saying that russia can take such a step in the event of a retreat of

britain and the united states of america are especially two as guarantors in accordance with the budapest memorandumraine surrendered the world's third nuclear potential , that is, they should have taken the lead. negotiations in order to stop that is, we also understand that putin is now using nuclear blackmail bluff - is it bluff or not we should not lead to the situation then let's check, but inside ukraine it is obvious that the government is not as we say before the invasion and celebrated unity day instead to make direct appeals, let's all take off, buy vests, night vision devices, and so on, that is, it's obvious here. society no, it's just that society needs to be warned to make an explanatory e-e company that in such cases it should all be done on the one hand by the ukrainian government on the other hand by diplomacy, but now during the general assembly , all meetings that see to convene a separate un red base meeting and speak to receive a tough position of the answer not to say that we, depending on the application of one uh-uh tactic there, i to or two in one city or two and so on. this

concerns since february, when at the conference in munich, zelinski threatened to reject the budapest memorandum of 1994. the agreement expressly said ukraine will not become a new clear state. zelinski stated that ukraine must be made a full number of nato, otherwise it would acquire nuclear weapons. former us pentagon official, michael maloof, says nato expansion and offer of membership to ukraine were red lines for russia. mr. zelinski has threatened to go back to a new killer posture through production. they probably have the industrial capability or they did it, but they certainly have the know how, because they used to have nukes stored in in ukraine. this kind of talk just accelerates and causes greater escalation of tensions, which is totally unnecessary. this is far greater than just ukraine. nato has like 8 or 10 different expansion periods from the end of the cold war 2. now, in which the west gave assurances and a group and made agreements not to expand nato. and this is what mr. put was referring to. and then once they started coming in to ukraine and offering nato membership, that'

international community in a strategic partnership the authors took into account the sad fate of the budapest memorandumin the future it will be promoted for signing by the allied countries of ukraine in the kyiv security document guarantors take on the obligation to provide such weapons for ukrainian intelligence to conduct joint military exercises to support the military industry, the security structure includes not only a large framework agreement, but also the possibility of signing bilateral agreements that are more detailed, for example, it can be a separate security agreement regarding the black sea. this is an agreement regarding er air safety in order to protect our skies and er therefore er it seems to me that it is very important that all these agreements have ratification by the respective parliaments from washington today have many messages about new military aid for ukraine and about s announcing another military package , even writing that the usa is studying the possibility of providing ukraine with fighter jets, which until recently was not even discussed, what exactly and when will our

before that, we know that russia absolutely uh-uh hated all the agreements in the format of the budapest memorandum because they guaranteed us which after the ukrainian state gave uh nuclear weapons uh russia absolutely uh quietly violated this agreement russia violates all the agreements it concluded with ukraine and denounces all agreements however , it is obvious uh and the reaction to these words of zelenskyi is indicative that were made regarding the impossibility of conducting negotiations with the russian federation, and dmitry medvedev, the deputy chairman of the security council of the russian federation, says that no one zelensky said that he will not conduct a dialogue on the topic of who issues ultimatums, current ultimatums, children's warm-up before the demands of the future and he knows the total capitulation of the kiev regime on the conditions of russia. well, this is medvedev's quote. we are in touch again. andrii illenko, an officer of the freedom battalion in the national guard of ukraine, a politician is currently a fighter of the freedom battalion, which is located in donetsk

these guarantees act differently at each historical moment and, for example, so that in the budapest memorandum we understand what is hoped for in general so that i am actually a supporter of using the current moment for the maximum deployment of the armed forces to deploy the deployment of the capabilities of the defense-industrial complex in cooperation with powerful european american partners and this is what the main emphasis should be on in the political strategies of our leadership, mr. sergiyuch. please comment on the next announced new package of defense aid for ukraine from the states announced by the coordinator of strategic communications of the national security council of the white house, john kirpi, reported on the new package of defense aid for ukraine, well, i'm right i don't see the numbers here, but they said that we are in daily contact with ukraine and that we will find out what needs to be done and will help. how do you estimate the amount of this assistance program under this program? what is it yet? next week at the most, and when i was talking about the fact that the min

we gave the third in the world the third nuclear power in the world in accordance with the budapest memorandumountries through a separate convening of the security council of the united nations, the discussion of this issue must be played now in anticipation of the 30th, as much as possible tough position as it was strategic stability before during the cold war, that is, putin must understand from the position of the collective west that by using nuclear weapons he will receive a devastating blow in the flesh in response to not just the destruction of the black sea fleet in sevastopol, but actually a retaliatory strike on to specific objects let those objects be transferred there i don't know through non-public channels through there the pentagon will be transferred to the russians and so on with a clear list so that all americans clearly have the data will be and that is, then the entire military leadership, the political oligarchy in russia, everyone must be clearly aware that in response they, that is, the west, must say attack on ukraine - this attack on us will not be such a small one tha

no security guarantees can all security guarantees turn out to be the same guarantees as the budapest memorandum these two positions, please well, actually, when we talk about the drafts of this future security agreement which is of interest to the ukrainian side, to a large extent all of these first items listed are already being implemented on the one hand at the bilateral level in ukraine's negotiations with the united states they are partly reflected in nato's position regarding the strengthening of its capabilities on the eastern flank and the issue of long-term assistance to ukraine in the economic sphere, in the military-military sphere, in the military-technical sphere, they are now just beginning to acquire new features on the basis of the transformations that are currently being carried out in in the united states regarding the same defense-industrial complex and in european countries and in what way should we now look at the prospects of nato guarantees not a guarantee i think that from the point of view of political experts it the question is really interesting and important, but fro

that is, we have finally smoothly evolved from a repetition of the budapest memorandum to a seriouslyl-fledged document in which what i liked the most is provided for that these guarantees will be supported by the permanent financing of the ukrainian defense sector by the permanent exchange of technologies in ukraine and advanced modern high-precision weapons of any type, that is, in fact, now it will not be just political guarantees or guarantees to secure certain concessions or guarantees at the expense of certain services, these will be armed guarantees that there will be guarantees that in themselves will ensure this, first of all, secondly, it should still be noted that geographically they have become much better. well, the fact that they removed the aggressor country and its posipa has already mentioned this, but it is an important small but important detail in addition to the classic, as they say in the west, the classic suspects in the form of nato countries and permanent member states of the un, or rather the security council. we also have australia. do you understand interna

the budapest memorandum does not work, there are some ways to stop the russian federation through the un or through other international structures, including megate regarding nuclear facilities, were also not very effective. at the same time, ukraine is at the level of the yarmak group and has prepared a package of documents or proposals regarding security guarantees for ukraine, which should be president zelenskyi said that the main thing in these documents is the prevention of any war against ukraine well, of course, after our victory, we will hear from zelenskyi, we have the result of our work on security guarantees for our state, today a package of recommendations from an international group was presented under the leadership of andrii yermak and anders folgrafny, these recommendations should form the basis of the future system of security treaties that will give ukrainians peace of mind and will be able to guarantee the prevention of any war against ukraine. and at the bilateral level , it was determined in detail who should react, how and when, if there is any threat to the stat

and by the way, on the basis of this treaty, the so-called infamous budapest memorandum was signed, that is, which lavrov said once again at this geoassembly that but russia has not violated anything at all, this is a piece of paper that has no legal force. here is russia's attitude to international law and, in general, to the existing order in the world, that is, this country is gradually turning into a kind of, you know, giant north korea, which does not pay attention to any international laws and simply does what it wants, and these things were first heard at the general assembly. well , returning to the fact that behind the scenes there were processes that we did not know about, did not see , but we will find out i think that it is correct that it will take a long time and we will start to see and hear the things that were agreed upon at these equal assemblies, well, one more concrete example . putin on of this infamous referendum. in some parts of ukraine captured by russia , the ministers of foreign affairs of the european union immediately met and agreed on the next package of san

renounced nuclear weapons from a nuclear country and pledged here for us , let's say, signed the budapest memorandum these are big countries such as great britain, the united states, china, well , russia. in case of something, the answer will be from our countries of guarantees here, this is very important. by the way, we also talked about this at our meeting and talked about the fact that this is for you. another argument for your voters , because the voters are also in different constituencies republicans and democrats perceive the war in ukraine in different ways and thank the democrats themselves for explaining to them and still supporting us and financing and providing weapons in general. of ukraine, the secretary of the verkhovna rada committee on national security, defense and intelligence, as well as a colonel of the security service of ukraine, is a military man who took part in battles at the front and is participating. to fight and defend our country, great respect to mr. romanov, in fact, for his work on all fronts , so may god protect him and our other defenders , so now it's time to ta

nato much stronger from my perspective that's the only way, i don't believe many fig leaves budapest memorandums four if you say that actually ukraine is intent on nato membership, itjust makes me feel. nato membership, it 'ust makes me feel. ., , nato membership, it 'ust makes me feel. . , ., ., ., me feel. that will be out of an existential _ me feel. that will be out of an existential conflict _ me feel. that will be out of an existential conflict with - existential conflict with vladimir putin which can only end in one or two ways, either he wins and ukraine as we know it is destroyed or you win and putin and his regime will be destroyed. will you agree with that analysis? there is no room for negotiation any more. it seems that this is an existential struggle which will either see ukraine or putin finished. either see ukraine or putin finished-— either see ukraine or putin finished. ~ �* , finished. we've been saying that this is _ finished. we've been saying that this is absolutely - that this is absolutely existential, if we stop fighting, we will cease to exist because russia has decided

global security when, in the conditions of the non-working un security council, the aborted budapest memorandum on the impossibility of the non-existent system of rapid security decision-making in the world, he lays the foundation on which everything can be based, it must be said that this document is for the future, it is not that there is now a big war and it can have a significant impact on the future . that we are talking about the near future, we are talking about the period when we haven't joined nato yet, but we have to get security guarantees in the event that russia or the state that will be formed on the ruins of russia suddenly attacks ukraine again then ukraine has to receive guarantees at least as good as those we have now from other countries that are helping us now, and then these countries can also become guarantors in this collective security agreement. for the period until ukraine joins nato, that is, it does not say that this is some kind of alternative to nato, although the guarantees there are even a little more than this fifth article, which embarrassed mr. medvedev so muc

i am sure of this, because of the obligations that were under the budapest memorandum in 1991, when the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, you wrote there that if there are circumstances that pose a threat to ukraine, we can radically refuse it that is, we will not refuse the contract, but we will produce missiles or use them with a range from 500 to 100 kilometers to a thousand. i'm sorry, these are missiles with a shorter range or even an average range of up to 5.5, this will be our right. and what about up to 500 - that's it the obligation is external, we do not have to put forward any arguments. i 'm sorry, when we accepted this at the time and at least chose this niche for ourselves up to 500, so why do we have to listen now that it will lead to something, well , that is, there are no reasons. well, it is clear that the partners themselves make decisions to give or not to give. unfortunately, this program has been curtailed since the 19th year. well, it must be said honestly, it was curtailed. this is a mistake, a criminal mistake by someone, but now in the budget

let's say yes, then, after signing the budapest memorandum, ukraine gave us nuclear weapons for an amountill definitely not get. god willing, even until the end of this war, the fact that we then received 300 million dollars is one story. let's let's forget that we actually did a service by education by getting rid of the third nuclear potential in the world, that's why the states are doing it, understanding their responsibility to ukraine and to democracy in the world and to people's lives, that's why we thank them for this and will waiting for this help now about e-sports wartime ready to talk yevhen pastukhov yevhen good evening please good evening vasyl , i suggest that you take a little time away from the nuclear threats of the dictator from the kremlin and talk about football and for us there is such a serious reason for this the national team of ukraine on this next week , the nation will decide its fate in the national league, in which division petrakov's team will compete, and it is quite possible that petrakov's future as the head coach of the ukrainian national team will also b