yes, even if the budapest memorandum is no longer relevant, bill clinton raised the most acute problem of today after the 14th year, unfortunately, we cannot talk about the effectiveness of the budapest memorandum because the agreement did not work and in which its basic principles were violated well it can already be considered invalid because it was well refuted by objective international reality just now after clinton's statement in we have a moment when we can do this. that is, you want to breathe out from the consequences of the budapest memorandum, from the consequences of your geopolitical weakness, we are ready to help you , so let's invent now guarantees that ensure the security of ukraine. it is clear that today ukraine's attempts to regain its nuclear status would meet with a negative reaction from world powers, but they need to be reminded of their promises that they gave us almost 30 years ago. therefore, we need non-nuclear weapons and nuclear security guarantees, and today we can only be given them by membership in nato. that's why it is necessary to fight and everything

they were recorded in the budapest memorandum of december 5, 1994, the leaders of the powers promisedhat weapons would never be used against its territorial integrity and political independence, and did not guarantee that they would refrain from economic coercion aimed at subordinating belarus to their own interests. today, almost 30 years later. we see that loud promises and statements turned out to be a soap bubble. but if there were nuclear warheads, belarus would retain the emotional tone of western politicians towards us. over the years it would have been completely different. yes, this is a terrible weapon, a weapon that brings catastrophic consequences for the ecology of infrastructure. and, of course, people, but when it comes to the threat to the existence of the state, its territorial integrity , the sovereignty of independence, then you need to protect it by all possible means. and this is especially true when your closest neighbors are sending bayonets and duos of guns towards the border, it is important to add to the expense of our military and weapons the honor of belaru

countries do not comply with the agreements with a security guarantee, which were given under budapest memorandum in exchange for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons. after the last talks with vladimir vladimirovich, we agreed that both of you would come to belarus with specialists and we would sit down with you to discuss security issues in belarus. well, you are at the vgs. you know, i already raised this issue, but before that, we discussed vladimirovich somewhere after 114 years of the famous budapest memorandum, where, uh , all the western and russian powers swore to kazakhstan, ukraine and belarus were provided with complete security. naturally. you know what the western the state trampled on all these treaties, agreements and statements and in no way economic security if they impose sanctions on russia against us, so i raised this issue in negotiations with the president of russia, he absolutely supported me in all areas and says we need to talk about all our treaties and agreements in belarus and russia and see what legal act of an interstate nature should be adopted now in order to ensure

, we in ukraine we constantly state this in general in belarus, the topic of the budapest memorandum, is, they remember what it is, and to what extent this topic is generally discussed , the guarantees he provided, i do not know, by the way , whether belarus signed any budapest memorandum at all regarding the provision of guarantees in exchange on the surrender of nuclear weapons, how did ukraine do it then, in what year of 94, it seems, i am asking yes, yes, shushkevich, release 19 , it was only natural, and for us it was the same defining gateway as it was for you. lukashenko theoretically mentioned eight during what is it for nothing handed over the weapon, he just hoped to run fast, i had him at hand and even that is not russian remote control of the minovita, but what kind of ion can be disposed of, they say, uh, in relation to deploying it is much different than today, it has one aspect so что память there is a permanent and democratic society if the belarusian community constantly mentioned, er, this is the very right of the bukharezhsky memorandum, and i’m afraid that in gener

, these missiles, these carriers simply left , the question is already with you in another budapest memorandumdocument a normal document we had a treaty of friendship with the russian federation do you remember how it is there petro oleksiiovich oleksandr let's not try the excursion the past interests me more the future and you what prevented them from violating it the truth is in the 14th year and annexing crimea and occupying donbas, you don't understand anything. it seems to me that the issue of nuclear security for ukraine and the fact that we have withdrawn and not withdrawn from the budapest memorandum is no longer working, so it is no longer a relevant issue, as you say correctly . the question is what to do next we won't be able to make nuclear ones, it's just that for us, first of all, it's unreal right now. first of all, it costs a lot of money, and secondly , why should we be part of that company that destroys the world order, we don't need it, and in general, you should also understand that if we let's even start some of these work procedures, well , let's imagine this idiotic situ

sometime after the ninety -fourth year of the famous budapest memorandum, where, uh, all western and russia powers kazakhstan ukraine and belarus to provide complete security. naturally. you know that the western state has trampled on all these agreements and declarations and no security. no, i meant economic security, including , well, what kind of economic security if they introduce against it, she absolutely supported me in all areas and says, we need to cut through all our treaties and agreements between belarus and russia and see what legal interstate character. it must be accepted now in order to ensure the complete security of belarus in general, this e sounded at the negotiations. so in case of aggression against belarus , the russian federation defends belarus as its own. oh nishatka nevalka talked about it. uh, now, in connection with the actions and trends in the west, all this has been forgotten. well , what kind of security guarantees can america give us? yes, none, except for pulling up aggression against us. as you can see, we now need full security guarantees from our

on these things, it is interesting that zelensky reminded this conversation that it was in budapest memorandum no one knows, he came, he joined, and he guaranteed us, therefore, we can start with capital letters of some institutions and truths that we have about on paper. others perceive their mentality until now, the concept of tian-si tianshi tian-si a -a heavenly that they are in the center , they have been civilized for 5,000 years around them are barbarians who are in conflict, and they are spreading light , which means, er, conflicts are decreasing spreading its influence, they will spread their influence on russia, it will not fight, it will all come under the light of many things that er well, they won't say, but there are er on confucianism why is the philosophy of today being built at all - it's marxism and confucianism two things if you know on which legs today's china stands and you will dig into what confucianism is, it is a balance, harmony there, marxism is different. then you will understand why they act like this and not otherwise, and you can predict the steps that will be ta

they were recorded in the budapest memorandum of december 5, 1994, the leaders of the powers promised belarus that weapons would never be used against its territorial integrity and political independence, and did not guarantee that they would refrain from economic coercion aimed at subordinating belarus to their own interests. today, almost 30 years. we see that loud promises and statements turned out to be a soap bubble. but if there were nuclear warheads, belarus would retain the emotional tone of western politicians towards us. over the years it would have been completely different. yes, this is a terrible weapon, a weapon that brings catastrophic consequences for the ecology of infrastructure. and, of course, people, but when it comes to the threat to the existence of the state, its territorial integrity , the sovereignty of independence, then you need to protect it by all possible means. and especially this relevant, when your closest neighbors are sending bayonets and dual guns towards the border, it is important to add to the expense of our military and weapons part of the bela

the withdrawal of nuclear weapons sometime after the ninety- fourth year of the well-known budapest memorandume provided with complete security. naturally. you know that the western state has trampled on all these treaties, agreements and statements, and there is no security and nice economic security, including, well, what kind of economic security if they introduce russia against us. therefore, i raised this issue in negotiations with the president of russia, he absolutely me supported in all areas and says we need to cut through all our treaties and agreements between belarus and russia and see what normative law from an interstate nature must be adopted now in order to ensure the complete security of belarus, and in general, this was voiced at the negotiations. so in case of aggression against belarus, the russian federation defends belarus as its own territory. this is the kind of security we need , in principle, somehow in the nineties, nishatka not valka spoke about this during the meeting, issues of combat training and the coordination of a joint allied group were also discussed. the s

countries are not fulfilling the security agreements that were given in the framework of the budapest memorandumn the withdrawal of nuclear weapons

countries do not comply with the agreements on security guarantees, which were given under the budapest memorandum in exchange for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons. after the last negotiations with vladimir vladimirovich, we agreed that you would come to belarus with specialists and we would sit down with you to discuss security issues in belarus. well, you are at the vgs. you know, i already raised this question, but before that we discussed with vladimir vladimirovich somewhere lenten and russian powers to kazakhstan, ukraine and belarus to provide complete security. naturally. you know that the western state has trampled on all these treaties, agreements and statements and there is no security and nice economic security , including, well, what kind of economic security if they impose sanctions on russia against us, that’s why the direction says we need to cut through all our agreements and agreements between belarus and russia and see which normative legal. an interstate character must be adopted now in order to ensure the complete security of belarus in general, this was heard at the negotiat

whether it is strategic on the territory of belarus, it is written and they also called it the budapest memorandumn kazakhstan and belarus, you understand, but this document is actually and kazakhstan and belarus also signed in budapest or in another place, i just somehow aha writes to the fourth year, and the position of china. i would like you to clarify these appeals to focus on diplomacy china believes that a nuclear war should never be unleashed and calls on the parties to focus on the diplomatic settlement of the ukrainian crisis, as they call it, and about it, the official representative of the chinese foreign ministry, maunin, said at a briefing there , commenting on russia's decision to place the weapons of mass destruction in belarus. why is the role of china and its position here, it is a very difficult question to ask it for 1-2 minutes, uh , try to comment on it, you know , scan the answers, that is, what do they want to say, what is their vision, yes, considering what they still call the ukrainian crisis there is also a position, here you answer all the questions yourself, you know t

the grodno region, the withdrawal of the last topol missiles, this was the condition of the budapest memorandumly gave guarantees for a nuclear-free belarus , the republic was the most armed in the soviet union, dozens of secret facilities , alexander lukashenko now ordered to restore some of these storages, and on these frames from the ministry of defense the latest iskander m. declared range up to 500 km. experts suggest that these complexes can be equipped with nuclear warheads, one way or another, this is an absolute guarantee of our security. we have always lagged behind the united states in the development of nuclear weapons. today, for the first time in history, we're far ahead of the curve. by all accounts. you must clearly understand this, and this is due to the fact that in new russia we have created something new on the basis of the old, absolutely new breakthrough results obtained that fly. crawls and walks a lot. and that's all today, unlike the previous one is actively moving into the national economy in a broad sense, improving the life of each of us speech, of course, i am a pea

what reaction did they expect, those who trampled on the budapest memorandum in case of aggression against the russian federation defends belarus as its own territory , aggressive rhetoric, the west will force us to have strategic nuclear weapons, we are already engaged in preparations, we act on the basis of the unpredictability of neighbors, when hostility is on the face of gullible citizens. fraudsters from ukraine are looking for profit, where is my money. maxim tell me. we will tell criminal call centers on the air. instead of fences, we will add bridges in agriculture, construction and tourism by sane eu members. by the way, in woodworking, our hungarian partners are, well, kind of lobbyists in order to at least break through the quotas for pellets, we set up flows through economic overpasses from budapest and petersburg, in addition to the growth in food supplies to st. petersburg, increased the purchase of equipment and evaluate the quality of roads, we are going to catch a taxi in a randomly selected belarusian city, buckle up a little shock. news insiders and current interviews,

uh, regardless of the budapest memorandum. yes, these are all basic in fact.ay, an agreement is an agreement to ensure the security of countries that have renounced nuclear weapons, a and the president of the russian federation unambiguously ordered this if something is still under-regulated somewhere , or we have concerns from the belarusian side. this part. this should be done immediately in an accelerated mode and, uh, the security councils must literally finalize all this work in the near future so that we have clear guarantees of our security, uh, from the russian federation in the event of, well, some kind of military attack on our republic, the work is absolutely synchronized and this level interactions. we have never had exactly in recent years, but now and the time the challenges are completely different. dmitry nikolayevich 180 percent of the measures have already been completed for them , these 20 percent. these are some difficult questions, or they are planned, let's say such a more distant prospect for implementation . absolutely right. these are

do they remember in great britain or the usa about the budapest memorandum, which provided security guarantees republic in exchange for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons, these agreements. as lukashenka said today , the leaders of russia and belarus discussed this issue with security guarantees long ago. at a long-standing meeting in moscow, vladimir putin and alexander lukashenko agreed that moscow and minsk would prepare for the concept of the security of the union state counterweight to the growing tension in the world. we need to cut through all our treaties and agreements between belarus and russia and see. hmm , what kind of legal and interstate character should be adopted now in order to ensure the complete security of belarus in general, it sounded at the negotiations. so in case of aggression against belarus, the russian federation protects the belarusians own territory. these are the kind of security guarantees we need sergei shoigu and alexander lukashenko today also discussed combat training and coordination of the allied groups and russian military personnel who are on the territo

uh, in this area, uh, moreover, i would refer the critics to the well-known budapest memorandum, whenhe republic of belarus withdrew from its territory. uh, nuclear weapons without any conditions, belarus was given very serious guarantees, primarily in the field of security. and today we see how its border is changing, so we are first of all the head. the kingdom cannot help but react to the changed situation, but i emphasize once again that the republic of belarus does not violate its international obligations by these actions. this step is a very serious deterrent for those who are the real integrity of the republic of belarus, we must ensure our sovereignty independence and above all, territorial with our country, this situation will be affected by the deployment of russian tactical nuclear weapons in belarus. this is a reflection of the global process of destruction. e of the world that we used to know, e of globalization, which was created according to recipes. uh, the countries of the collective west are now going word system. and all countries are trying to find their new zones

uh, regardless of the budapest memorandum. yes, these are all trampled, in fact for today.h, an agreement to ensure the security of a country that has renounced nuclear weapons, and belarus should have a 100% guarantee and security, and in the event of an attack on our territory and the president of the russian federation, he unambiguously ordered this if now there is still something normative somewhere - then it is under-tuned, under-settled, or with us the belarusian side has concerns. this part. this should be done immediately on a fast track, and uh, the safety tips should literally be finalized soon. all this work so that we have clear guarantees of our security, e.g. from the russian federation in the event of, well, some kind of military attack on our republic, the work is absolutely synchronized and of such a level of interaction. we have never had exactly past. dmitry nikolaevich here are 28 union programs at the supreme state council were it is stated that 80% of the activities have already been completed on them, these 20% are some kind of complex issues, or they

normal reason that we we can use it in the future because russia, we remember, according to the budapest memorandums also the guarantor of ukrainian security, so nato can give it, so we'll see how it will be in the future. is trying to intimidate someone else, but no one is afraid of him anymore, in reality, we have seen it, obviously sweden will be the 32nd member of the north atlantic alliance well, we hope that the 33rd will still be ukraine and we know that the summit of the north atlantic alliance will be held in vilnius in the summer, well, at least the representatives ukrainian states are already talking about the fact that at this summit they still hope to receive some kind of action plan or cooperation plan or joint venture. of the atlantic alliance. this history of the udp with the movement towards nato still has a long history. in ukraine, this topic gradually took a second or third place, now ukraine has actually rearmed the army, we are already on nato standards, that is, most of the units are also, as far as i know, switching to nato standards, well, at least the azov regiment was def

we can we remember that russia was also the guarantor of ukrainian security according to the budapest memorandum nato can give it, so we'll see how it will be in the future. but i'm sure that putin is just trying to intimidate someone else by providing weapons, but no one is afraid of him anymore i really see, obviously the 32nd member country of the north atlantic alliance will be sweden. well, we hope that ukraine will be the 33rd after all, and we know that the summit of the north atlantic alliance will not be held in vilnius in the summer, well at least representatives of the ukrainian state are already talking about the fact that at this summit they still hope to receive some kind of action plan or cooperation plan or a plan of cooperation. nato still has old days. let’s say that from the old days, since 1997, even during kuchma’s time. they talked about this about the pdc, nato, then a lot of events took place in ukraine, and gradually this topic took a back seat . or on the third plan now ukraine has actually already rearmed the army, we are already on nato standards, that is, most of the

eh, as if the main idea that sounded eh, despite the budapest memorandum., these are all trampled, in fact for today. uh, an agreement agreement to ensure the security of a country that has renounced nuclear weapons, and belarus should have a 100% guarantee of security, and in the event of an attack on our territory, and the president of the russian federation, we unequivocally ordered this, if now there is still a standard. somewhere something is not set up, under-settled, or we from the belarusian side have a fear in this part. this should be done immediately in an accelerated mode and, uh, the security councils should literally finalize all this work in the near future so that we have clear guarantees of our security, uh , from the russian federation in case, well, some kind of military attack on our republic , the work is absolutely synchronized and of such a level of interaction. we have never been exactly in recent years, but now and the time to call completely different. dmitry nikolayevich here are 28 union programs at the supreme state council , it

they were recorded in the budapest memorandum of december 5, 1994, the leaders of the powers promised belarus that weapons would never be used against its territorial integrity and political independence, and did not guarantee that they would refrain from economic coercion aimed at subordinating belarus to their own interests. today, almost 30 years of warhead. belarus has kept the emotional tone of western politicians towards us throughout these years would have been completely different. yes, this is a terrible weapon, a weapon that brings catastrophic consequences for the ecology of infrastructure. and, of course, people, but when it comes to a threat, the existence of a state of its territorial integrity, the sovereignty of independence, that is, must be protected by all possible means. and this is especially true when your closest neighbors direct bayonets and muzzles of guns to the side it is important to add borders to the expense of our military and weapons, the honor of belarusian aircraft has already been converted to the use of ammunition with a nuclear warhead by trained p

possible, but i want to remind you that china is among those countries that also signed the budapest memorandum of those security assurances - for today they are these the assurances were not broadcast in any way, they were not rebroadcast in aid of ukraine, and even the neutrality that china receives at the moment is conditional neutrality. well, it remains conditional, sorry for the tautology , and uh, so today, it still seems to me that i need to look for uh those the ways in which the reform of international organizations can be carried out, you and i know that we are now facing this challenge when russia began to preside over the un security council despite the fact that it completely violates the charter of the united nations and actually abuses his place in this highest body of the largest single global organization, which is called to actually protect peace, so there are a lot of tasks, but i don't think that this division on the axis of democracy and autocracy is untrue, unfortunately, this is the reality of today's world and us it is important, fighting in this war and defending our i

clinton says that he regrets, regrets and apologizes for the fact that he forced us to sign the budapest memorandumve up nuclear weapons, and here the usa says no, we do not even allow you to create a road map in order for you to become a member of nato in the future. me too i don't fully understand it i guess again i read what the americans said and the optimistic interpretation is that they are temporary at this point we don't necessarily want to do that we are willing to wait so let there be a victory, and besides, there is a certain logic here, because in the end, the most important thing in ukraine now is to win, but i agree with you, it is somehow a little illogical, the americans should , well, in the best case, they should be neutral and say well, let's see how it all turns out, and not to express my dissatisfaction. so, i share your concern here , not too much. however, not too much, because it personally seems to me that the most important thing is america's further support for ukraine, but america supports ukraine, provides some kind of weapons judged readiness to provide even more finan

but then again, then the whole world civilized, we were in the inertia of the illusion of the budapest memorandumhe un of some security guarantees and the like and what is most interesting about those international legal aspects is extremely important the obviousness of the proof, i emphasize the obviousness proof, if everything was more or less clear in crimea, then in donbas, especially for our western partners , it was obvious that these are russians, we were not there, they are not there, there are no militias there, you can buy weapons at the military market and the like, and it happened only on february 24 of last year what is called obviousness. and in jurisprudence, anyone who knows a little bit about me understands that it is incredibly difficult that this happened 9 years ago in the very east, the same thing that is happening now. one by one, they already made it clear to the whole world and to us that they will restore the empire and in my opinion, putin made it clear that he will restore the empire, whether it was 2005 or the 7th year , forgive me, i may be wrong on a specific date, w

still joined there in the form of a letter to the guarantee of nuclear e-e safety, well, in the budapest memorandum.e., many questions where we counted on and we are now hearing not only us , but the countries of the former soviet union there are hearing a completely different position. and you are a guarantee that this position will not become the basis for china's decisions tomorrow. that is, it is a very dangerous thing. therefore, we must call things by their names. by name, the official representative of china called into question the sovereignty of the countries with which china, in principle, has signed agreements, as well as with ukraine . partnerships in which it is possible to speak of a strategic partnership if we do not clarify the position in this situation, so in fact i think that well, you are right to ask, there will not be such, uh , some quick tributes, but after a while we will still clarify the position of china, not because of any a brief statement by the spokeswoman, and this somewhat twisted one. and more clearly, because china’s actions are clear . valeriy , look, we talked

proves its ineffectiveness from afghanistan, we unfortunately, we have already seen with the budapest memorandum, we have felt it on our own skin, there is a very clear norm that ukraine should achieve membership of the north atlantic defense alliance, and finland has shown this . i am convinced that in july we will receive a decision on sweden's membership in nato. therefore, we ukrainians need to think about what exactly is necessary to do i think that the option is about that please write the specific steps that need to be taken this is the right option ukraine acted like this when we sought a visa-free regime from the european union then president poroshenko will put write everything you think is necessary, but this should be an excluded list, if we agree on this list for membership in nato, well, in essence , this action plan will begin in nato very clearly, what needs to be done, and we will then understand how quickly we can do it. i am convinced that we can do it, the question of ukrainian diplomacy today is to agree on all these options as soon as possible, not just uh, big challenges,

destroyed by lukashenko at the time, and he did not fulfill the corresponding agreements after the budapest memorandumhis infrastructure remained. i think that uh , in the conditions of russia, russia is losing in the conventional war and actually has no chance, and uh, fulfill the tasks that they themselves have designated for themselves there, the only option for them is this try to bring everything to the level of nuclear blackmail and nuclear escalation, so the weapons will cause them to be aggressive, and i don't even exclude that they may try to use it as an epitaph , in addition to nuclear weapons, there are also conventional weapons the belarusian district reports that on the night of april 6, at least 10-15 tanks and other armored vehicles were transferred to the border with lithuania . what is this? what do you understand? putin is trying to bring the west to the negotiating table on his own terms . that for all he is a criminal , especially a criminal wanted by the international criminal court, the only way to try to get them to sit down at the table is to organize a provocation that may ha

uh, in this area, uh, moreover, uh, i would refer critics to the well-known budapest memorandum, when republic of belarus withdrew from its territory. uh, nuclear weapons without any conditions, then belarus was given very serious guarantees, primarily in the field of security. and today we see how the geopolitical and overall strategic situation in the world and around the republic is changing. belarus and its borders. uh, the situation, but once again emphasized that the republic. russia by these actions does not violate its international obligations. this step is a very serious deterrent for those who have any thoughts about the territorial integrity of the republic of belarus, we must ensure our sovereignty. independence and , above all, the territorial integrity of our country. andrei vladimirovich what do you think? what is the reason for international tension on the borders of the republic of belarus and how to destroy this situation, uh, that’s the world that we used to know, e.g., globalization, which was created according to recipes, e.e., the countries of the collective wes

the security guarantees of kazakhstan, ukraine and belarus, which were given as part of the budapest memorandumwe meant economic security, including what economic security, if russia imposes sanctions against us, that is why i raised this issue in negotiations with the president of russia . he absolutely supported me in all directions and says that we need to revise all our treaties and agreements, that is, belarus and russia , see what normative legal act of a state nature should be adopted now in order to ensure the complete security of belarus, that is , lukashenko is discussing with shoigu security guarantees for belarus, so that this protection from the russian federation would be, well, you know, like its own territories and this will mean that most likely russia will use belarus as a military base not only against ukraine and in the future yes, but also possibly against the states of the european union and i want to strengthen the legal component of this process, so to speak, we understand that they are preparing, so to speak, for cases serious well, in any case, this will mean that in t

its international obligations in this area, uh, moreover, i would refer critics to the famous budapest memorandumhe republic belarus withdrew from its territory. uh, nuclear weapons, without any conditions, belarus was given very serious guarantees, primarily in the field of security. and today we see how the geopolitical and, in general, the strategic situation in the world and the circle of the republic of belarus and its borders, therefore, we , and above all the head of state, cannot but respond to the changed situation, but i emphasize once again that the republic of belarus does not violate its international obligations by these actions. this step is a very serious deterrent for those who have any thoughts about the territorial integrity of the republic of belarus we must ensure our sovereignty independence and above all, uh, territorial integrity our country. andrei vladimirovich what do you think? what is the reason for the international tension on the borders of the white republic of the battle of the global process of destruction, uh, that's the world that we used to know , globalizatio

this and the possible return of ukraine's weapons within the framework of the non -observed budapest memorandum, i remind you that its signed by kazakhstan and belarus and ukraine, if russia supplies to belarus, then it can be supplied to others, so that means the contract has not been observed, and i think that there is also a lot of symbolism here, we demonstrate that ukraine and poland today is a point of gravity. well, it is precisely the presence of the united states in this partnership and the support of the united states and the common value base. together with the united states, it creates by and large today the most important point of gravity. those who quote klatsov are right. that is, it is the point of gravity that changes today europe and you started with the words that this is a historic visit. i would tell you even more that this war is a ukrainian victory . the counteroffensive is something comparable, for example, to the fall of the berlin wall. he spoke last time in poland when he was from the first time in ukraine, then he was in warsaw and here is this speech by biden. he wa

, let's see how lukashenka and shoigu talked today in the ninety-fourth year of the famous budapest memorandum, where, uh, tennis all western and russian powers, kazakhstan , ukraine and belarusians were provided with complete security. naturally. you know that the western state has trampled on all these treaties, agreements and declarations, and there is no security and nice economic security, including come on. what kind of economic security if they impose sanctions against us in russia, so i raised this issue in the verdict with the president of russia, he absolutely supported me in all areas and says we need to cut through all our treaties and agreements in belarus and russia and see what kind of normative-legal interstate characteristic should be adopted now in order to ensure complete. the danger of belarus in general, it sounded at the negotiations. so in case of aggression against belarus, the russian federation defends belarus as its own territory. these are the kind of security guarantees we need, in principle, somehow in the nineties , nishatka. it was not valka who spoke about this

she shows all the nuances and recalls the budapest , in my opinion, memorandum of 1994.as, and a whole generation has already grown up, which , probably, has not even heard of it. in my opinion. in any case, the budapest memorandum is the kind of document that many want to forget today, it is small there, god forbid, if my memory serves me right, only six points. uh-huh and it's made in three languages, of which belarusian english russian belarusian is fine and that's just six points, what was in these six points, then the first point is a declarative strange signatories, and it is the united states, great britain and russia that guarantee the republic of belarus the second point. it was a long time ago. but, if i'm not mistaken, it sounded something like this. the signatory countries guarantee that no military means will be used against our country, the republic of belarus, to solve any problems, and in addition, there was one more point. so i always emphasized it, when i had to talk about this topic, i won’t to use their military means to solve our problem. that is, th

in any case, the budapest memorandum. this is the kind of document that many want to forget today.s small there. god bless the russians. english russian from russian-belarusian english is fine, and here are just six points, what was in these six points, so the first point is a declarative strange signer. and this is the united states great britain and russia guarantee the republic of belarus respect for its territorial integrity. independence and the constitutional order, the second point was long ago, but if i'm not mistaken, it sounded with the motive of our country, the republic of belarus will not use military means to solve any problems, and in addition, there was one more point. so i always uh emphasized it, when i had to talk about this topic , their military means will not be used to solve our problem. that is , these are tanks, aircraft produced by these states. and the third point is generally an amazing thing, because it has been crossed out for a very long time and, probably, those people who want to hear us simply and simply. they will say this was not, he sounded as f

defense of our country, how did those partners who became known under the documents called the budapest memorandum take it upon themselves ? die every day at the front for our freedom for our independence but such a life we ​​have to realize for ourselves that next time we will definitely study much more carefully all documents so that they sound the same for all countries a-a returning to today's visit of the president to poland and before a full-scale invasion, but when there was already a lot of talk about the high probability of this russian invasion , it was about the possibility of forming new security alliances. in fact, the launch of such a tripartite format between ukraine , poland and great britain was announced just on february 17, a few days later before a full -scale invasion, how effective is it now ? this format, this format of cooperation, and whether it actually came in handy already after the open aggression of the russian federation , you know that we have defenses in our apparatus evaluating my own project and my name, it is open, we emphasize this, we believe that it must be i

of ukraine and the issue of the fact that we left and did not leave the budapest memorandum , it is no longer working, it is no longer a relevant issue, as you say correctly, the question is what to do next, we will not be able to do nuclear , well, it is simple, this is the first thing for us now unreal this costs a lot of money, first of all, and secondly, why should we be a part of that company that destroys the world order, we don't need it, and in general, you should also understand that if we start even some of these work procedures, well, let's imagine this as an idiotic situation, so just don't we will have normal communication with the states with britain with normal developed light with japan by the way and so on i only made a mistake i admit the mistake of the 1997 treaty and it was ratified in our country in 1998 ukraine and russia in 1999 the 97th year of signing with us there was a lot treaties and that they gave nothing if we even sign a new one. this must also be understood. well, when will we sign our new treaty with russia there? well, sooner or later , it will happen

recalled western countries do not fulfill the security guarantees that were given under the budapest memorandumhange for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons. this is also the reason why the protection of the borders of the union state is now provided by both belarusian and russian military personnel. i thank you for all the difficulties. you, uh, keep several thousand russian servicemen here. we are as far as it takes. uh, we have joined this process and are preparing together with our officers. uh, these guys and combat coordination are carried out ready as expected, because we should not relax here to see that the poles or the fat people have begun to stir here in ours. therefore, the direction is such a good help and support for the belarusian army, which protects the union state on the western flank, so belarus is already preparing sites for the possible deployment of strategic nuclear weapons. this statement was made by the minister of defense of our country during a conversation with journalists. victor khrenen visited a military training ground in the brest region, where, on behalf of the

in any case, the budapest memorandum is the kind of document that many want to forget today, it is smallly six points. uh-huh i it is made in three languages, of which belarusian english russian belarusian english is excellent and here are just six points, what was in these six points, so the first point is a declarative country. signatories. and it is the united states , great britain and russia that guarantees respect for the republic of belarus. her territorial integrity was not. but if i'm not mistaken, it sounded something like this. the signatory countries guarantee that military means will not be used against our country, the republic of belarus, for e, solving some problems and in addition, there was one more item. so i always emphasized it, when i had to talk about this topic, there would be no use of states. and the third point is generally an amazing thing, because it has been crossed out for a very long time and, probably, those people who want to hear us simply and simply. they will say this was not, he sounded as follows: strange signers will refrain from using it. economic

what reaction did those who trampled on the budapest memorandum expect in the event of aggression against belarus, the russian federation defends belarus as its own territory with aggressive rhetoric, the west is forcing us to have strategic nuclear weapons, and we are already preparing to act based on the unpredictability of our neighbors. what else will the baltic states do to please the usa when hostility is on the face of gullible citizens , scammers from ukraine are looking for profit, where is my money? maxim tell criminal call centers will tell on the air. who prefers bridges instead of fences, we will add in agriculture, construction and tourism with sane members of the eu by the way, our hungarian partners in woodworking are, well, a kind of lobbyists in order to at least break through the quotas for pellets , we set up flows along economic overpasses from budapest and st. petersburg, in addition to growth. food supplies, st. petersburg has increased purchases of equipment and we will evaluate the quality of roads in a randomly selected belarusian city , we will arrange a real te

in any case , the budapest memorandum.is a document that many people want to forget today, it is small there, god forbid, if my memory serves me right, only six points. uh-huh and it is made in three languages, of which belarusian english russian from russian belarusian and english is fine and that's just 6 points, what was in these six points, so the first point is a declarative country. the signatories, and these are the united states , great britain and russia, guarantee the republic of belarus respect for its territorial integrity, independence and constitutional order. the second point was a long time ago, but if i'm not mistaken, it sounded something like this. the signatory countries guarantee that no military means will be used against our country, the republic of belarus, to solve any problems . in addition, there was one more point. so i always emphasized it when i had to this subject to speak will not be used by their military means to solve our problem. that is , these are tanks and aircraft produced by these s

we should have been in 2014 utilizing budapest memorandum, doesn't have teeth but a a international treatyiolation with the russia, uk and northern ireland. this really impacts germany, and and italy who do this day does not pay 2% of gdp -- neil: i understand all of that, sir, i understand all of that, you're quite right, very accurate with those figures. i'm saying if it were some of your republican colleagues who are not keen on financing or at least financing as much without closely checking what is being financed would you feel the same way about punishment? if they were behind the release of some of this vital material? >> well i will be the first to tell you i'm not for funding a tremendous amount of money keeping an open checkbook to ukraine regardless if it is republicans, regardless if it is democrats, if it is an american they should be punished to the e greatest extent, violation of breach of our security and top secret documents should not be taken lightly. neil: got it. congressman, thank you for taking the time. we appreciate it as always. mick mulvaney joins us, former acti

uh, the budapest memorandum to renounce the nuclear weapons that she inherited from the soviet unionthem believe that russia would pull off this trick if ukraine still had its weapons. well, uh, this , i must say, completely coincides with the rhetoric of the kiev regime. but here i want ask andrey frantsevich. well, considering what the ukrainian state was and continues to be, total corruption. and, which means that ukrainian weapons of soviet soviet origin surfaced anywhere, including terrorists. that's from a military point of view. here, so that it would be and if ukraine really had and then what kind of trifles did belarus have and kazakhstan had left, the nuclear weapons that they inherited from soviet times, so that in general it would be for the world for security. and how you assess the degree of responsibility of such statements. former us president well , the scenario of some hollywood movie would be embodied, when some villain threatens the world with nuclear weapons, that is, the world would face nuclear terrorism when a small ammunition is a nuclear bomb. it would be la