budget appropriations.members, members of the public, i have a brief presentation just to frame what you will be hearing from the departments in the coming days and what is proposed in the mayor's budget. so, budget overview. you saw a few departments in may. so the budget before you now incorporates all city departments, next year's budget is $15.9 billion. nine 1 billion of this is our non-general fund budget and 6.9 billion is the general fund. the budget makes significant new investments largely in employee wages. and we ultimately balanced a $789 million deficit using a combination of revenues, expenditure reductions. however, significant future deficits are still projected. and so why did the budget grow so much, given we're in some very serious deficit years? we just want to highlight that most of the top line budget growth is in our major enterprise departments. there's still some revenue growth happening citywide. it just has not kept up with the expected expenditure growth. so this meant that we h

wree need to fund the people's budget. fund the people's budget, not the mayor's budget. fund the people's budget because it saves san francisco. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi, supervisors. my name is [indiscernible] here with glide center for social justice. please do not cut the funding for soda tax funded programs. including glides policy system and environment grabts. grant. the grant is insuring black communities have a voice resolving the health issues that impact them. glide is planning a program using soda tax funding to empower black communities to engage in research and advocees for improved nutrition is a key issue in the tenderloin with significant hunger and food insecurity. this improve community health of communities neglected. we must do better for communities of color by providing a better quality of life by reducing chronic health despair ezta. we ask you to continue the essential funding for soda tax grants so glide can run our black pse grant in fy24-twove. 25. thank you. >> thank you speaker. next speaker, please. >> hello super

thank you, budget chair. so yesterday we had a conversation that we would, go back to rec and park and figure out what could be a policy change or how do we change the system, but keep the fee in place. we are still having conversations with the department. we could potentially bring that back today or at one of next week's meetings, so that we can be within the 30 days, so i'd respectfully request to continue this item to the next budget committee meeting and provide you with an update as soon as possible. sorry if you're continuing it. so because the agenda is set so it's either continuing it to the call chair. so then it's actually continuing it and it will be outside of this conversation, meaning like outside of this agenda as has agendized and published or, or what you're saying is let's not act on it right now. is that which one is your request? i think i'm saying let's not act on it right now. okay i'm okay with that. like, i think we can act on it properly. like, if we can have some decision, we have

budget year.e know how challenging your job is and very much appreciate your work. and hopefully the presentation is up . all right. so as you know, we are your attorneys. our office provides a wide range of civil legal services to over 100 plus city clients, including the board, from advising counsel to drafting countless contracts and ordinances, defending thousands of matters, affirmative litigation and public integrity work. since our work touches every aspect of the city, our expertise spans 25 legal teams, alphabetically from the airport to worker protection. we're in the midst of everything hard and messy in the city, working to solve the most complicated issues facing us. much of our work comes to us from clients or in lawsuits filed against the city. we don't, unfortunately, control the spigot, but we handle the ever increasing inflow of work, and our resources are constantly stretched. now, with only a few minutes, i'm going to touch on a few topics that are relevant to this year's budge

to our budget.thank you. and would you like to also speak on item seven, the accept and expand grant? certainly, in we regularly receive grants from the department of homeland security, tragically, our, our security director passed away on the job, back in 2021. and due to some staff error, we did not catch this particular item that needed to be appropriated. and, we have since staffed up and now have a full time security manager who noticed the discrepancy. and so we're asking your permission to now appropriate these funds so we can deploy them along the waterfront for the security items that were mentioned. thank you. and, let's go to public comments on item seven. yes. if we have any members in the chamber who wish to address this committee regarding this item number seven, now's your opportunity to approach the lectern. madam chair, we have no speakers seeing no speaker for seeing no public comments for item seven. now that public comment is closed for item seven. and with that, colleagues , i w

budget cut. the project is not [indiscernible] to our community. it is a lifeline. it provides 24 hour integrated center that is instrumental in preventing homelessness. it is in the tenderloin and soma district. the center serves housed and unhoused residents, operates [indiscernible] >> speaker time concluded. thank you for sharing your time with committee. >> thank you. >> could we hear from the next speaker, please? >> good morning supervisors. my name is jean with the filipino community organization and--[indiscernible] urge the support of $350 thousand funding for the tenderloin center. 2024 up to 2026 budget. the board of supervisors approved this resource in budget but included in the mayor mid budget cut. not just crucial for our community, it is a lifeline. it provides 24 hour integrated center that is instrumental in preventing homelessness especially in the tenderloin and soma district. the center serves housed and unhoused residents. operates year-round and offer essential programs l

-26 budget and i'll go flow a overview of the changes to the budget since we last reviewed.or those who are new, it might not be the full picture but we are happy to brief on everything else in the budget after we go through this. starting out, this stable shows the full our city our home spending plan across all hsh authorities of the fund cht this includes both budget years and the outyears of the budget. overall as you can see, the fund has a structural short fall we are balancing each year using one time revenue sources. since last presented, our budget blan increased to support new multiyear investment in families and young adults. these investment allocate the remaining tay and family fund balance leaving us with a projected short fall across the fund starting in fy25-26 and growing significantly in the out years of the budget. this short fall is primarily represented by our general housing authority of the fund, which we spoke to a few months ago. that deficit hasn't changed. the mayor's two year budget makes significant investment in family and tay totaling $79.7 mil

our budget is a year budget. and we come back next year and do it all over again. so to say that these these are second year costs will come back to the table next year. and this thing will be baked and cooked and look different. so we don't budget two years in san francisco regardless of what we say, i beg to differ when it comes to people. i agree that when it comes to like, i should say when it comes to like employees and city workers, it is true that we don't budget for contracts and from time to time in grants that like by two years, sometimes actually wish that we do grants and some contract more than two years so that we have stable services and programing. the, the, the thing about i think when we start talking about structural deficits is that and it's really one thing that i really supervisor ronen and i had this like really back and forth about as well, is that at the end of the day, when you start allowing new ftes and upward substitution, for example, a cost of an individual when they are different classification, we're not we're not going to get rid o

about $90 million to balance, and the budget last year is approved, budget spent, none of that leaving 130 million to spend. so i think the logical next question would be of the mayor's proposed. and in the mayor's budget proposed last week, how much of that, if any, is being spent? this report is really only looking at the current year, so it doesn't speak to that. but we'll definitely be talking about that, in the coming days and weeks and can answer any questions about that. right. because i think we should be assuming that this reserve, what we're looking at is specifically for 24, 25 is that it's not in. i think you said that already at the beginning, but i just again, want to confirm that in in this slide six. it's not included like you do. you do not include how the mayor what the mayor actually just proposed, whether or not the mayor is potentially could be using some of these reserves in her proposed budget, correct. yeah, we'll talk about that, we're that'll be part of our revenue letter, which we're working on right now and which we'll publish either late this week or early

looking ahead to fiscal 2425 for the mayor's proposed budget, we see a total budget of approximately $192 million, which is a net increase of 1.7 million from the current year. and we get to that total with some key pluses and some key minuses that i'm going to summarize as the first plus is, is $20 million assumption of revenue from the residential vacancy tax. that's a new tax approved by the voters on the ballot. that revenue and spending of that revenue is just an estimate at this time. the tax will not be collected until the beginning of calendar 2025. and that revenue is also going to be on controller reserve, pending resolution of some litigation and some further verification of how much revenue is actually collected. but that's a placeholder for that new program in the first year of the budget, $3.5 million net increase in debt service. and that is primarily due to the debt service on the relatively new affordable housing and community facilities. cops, which were approved by the board in the fiscal 2122 budget, we see a 3.4 million increase in the lost work order, and that's

the budget. hsh has general fund cuts gigi will get into we have exciting new investments proposed especially for young adults and families. the budget is far complete at this point. the budget is now with the board of supervisors and hsh will have two budget hearings in june before deliberations and decisions are made by july 1. i encourage everyone to stay engaged in the process as the budget makes its way through the board phase. just wanted to give a update on the bipoc equity fund. as you know, we have been working on grant opportunities to support serving marginalized communities in san francisco. due to legal limitations in state law, hsh required to revise and reissue the solicitation of interest and cancel the preliminary funding notification. we are working diligently the city attorney office to revise the language in the solicitation of interest, to comply with all state and federal laws, including prop 209 and determine elgation to prioritize the organizations. once the solicitation o

we have continuing resolutions if the budget committees are supposed to each come budgets, reconcile the differences, and the weekly to the appropriations process found the portion of the siscretionary. none of things happening more. we do not have an actual budget that we do and it's hard to remember when we last didn't, years ago it doesn't have fiscal requirement. ther much borrowing you can put in your budget. the l called the debt ceiling where viewers have heard about the heard about it is recently we keep having huge dramas around with a massive fights over whether and how to fix it. you have to lift the debtry would default ando that would create huge crisis not just you but around the the debt ceilingng serves as the only reminder weor had that we're much and we really need to think about ways, this has happened in the past every time you liftt the debt ceiling you improve the situation. the last time we lifted the debt ceiling tha did happen. we have fiscal responsibility act of put that in place and that generated what would be one to $2 trillion if cards would stick to it

overall use plan between the two years of the budget cycle. this slide shows you a comparison between the prop c committee recommendation and the hsh proposal presented to you in march and the mayor's budget proposal. the mayor's budge increase the number of rapid rehousing subsidies from 85 to 130 for $23.8 million and added 35 shally rental subsidies for $4.8 million. there is additional $8.7 million for 80 new urgent accommodation vouchers. moving on to shelter. there is slide adjustments made to shelter and hygiene authority in order to add the new 80 urgent accommodation vouchers i was speaking of previously. that adjustment can be seen here. we are fully funding those vouchers with the proposed interest revenue reallocation i spoke to and so that expansion has no impact on the overall deficit for the shelter authority because we are reallocating interest to match investment over the next two years. this slide walks through the components of our tay investments included in the update to our ocoh budget in total the investment covers 235 r

to our budget.thank you. and would you like to also speak on item seven, the accept and expand grant? certainly, in we regularly receive grants from the department of homeland security, tragically, our, our security director passed away on the job, back in 2021. and due to some staff error, we did not catch this particular item that needed to be appropriated. and, we have since staffed up and now have a full time security manager who noticed the discrepancy. and so we're asking your permission to now appropriate these funds so we can deploy them along the waterfront for the security items that were mentioned. thank you. and, let's go to public comments on item seven. yes. if we have any members in the chamber who wish to address this committee regarding this item number seven, now's your opportunity to approach the lectern. madam chair, we have no speakers seeing no speaker for seeing no public comments for item seven. now that public comment is closed for item seven. and with that, colleagues , i w

thank you, budget chair.sterday we had a conversation that we would, go back to rec and park and figure out what could be a policy change or how do we change the system, but keep the fee in place. we are still having conversations with the department. we could potentially bring that back today or at one of next week's meetings, so that we can be within the 30 days, so i'd respectfully request to continue this item to the next budget committee meeting and provide you with an update as soon as possible. sorry if you're continuing it. so because the agenda is set so it's either continuing it to the call chair. so then it's actually continuing it and it will be outside of this conversation, meaning like outside of this agenda as has agendized and published or, or what you're saying is let's not act on it right now. is that which one is your request? i think i'm saying let's not act on it right now. okay i'm okay with that. like, i think we can act on it properly. like, if we can have some decision, we have to by

budget. congratulations. budget i survived. thank you. all right. not yet. you still have next week to go. sorry. my apologies very much. that you can only be survive. if mr. gonzales said you did. so, with that. thank you so much for your time. thank you so much for your team and your work, and everybody being here. and then. so next we're going to go to the pub to go to, public works. and just want to say that this is actually the because we already did planning. so then this is public works and then next we have human services agency and then we will be going to the board of supervisors. and then we'll be done for the day. i think. good afternoon, chair chan. supervisors carla short, san francisco public works i want to start by thanking the mayor's office and the board of supervisors for your continued support. i also want to thank the mayor's budget office, the comptroller's office, and the budget and legislative analyst, as well as my cfo, bruce robertson, and our finance budget staff i

in our total budget. so dcf total budget is equivalent is $345.8 million of that dcf operates. it's, almost 54% of that. so dcf is operating costs are operation oversight is for $188 million. there is $113 million. that is a pass through from our department over to the school district. we also have $35 million that comes into our department for us to administer the student success fund. and then there's $9.3 million for our free city college program. if we drill down on the dcf operating budget, you will you will see that 70% of the operating budget are comprised of children and youth fund. and then 43, 23, is general fund, and then the rest are state, federal and other grants. to give you another way to look at our budget, you can see that approximately 88% of dcf operating budget comes from property tax and general fund support. we have a small portion of our budget that's comprised of the state and federal grants, and then we also have a small portion of our budget that comes through work order recover

our total budget has grown by 11, while the city's total budget has grown by 17. and on the next slide, our city costs have increased more than our revenue over the past five years. we're not guaranteed any additional funding for city expenses that outpace our revenues. personnel pay growth has grown within our department by 19, and our work orders to organizations like the sfpuc city attorney's office, city administrator has grown by 28. and as an example, while our total work orders over the past five years have grown by $7.7 million, while our general fund support has grown by 4.6 million. and on the next slide, unfortunately, it doesn't really get better for us over the next two years. this is probably the most boring bar chart i've ever made, but it's done to show that overall, our revenue is increasing by about 1% over the next two years. that's in the open space fund, which is two and a half cents of every $100 of assessed value in san francisco, as well as our general fund support. on the next slide, i do want to talk about our earned revenue and how that

budget. so again, i was i was hoping to do this outside these chambers. but but here we are. so maybe through the chair to either director adams or or miss duncan. thank you. supervisor while i appreciate the that this prop ii conversation has been going on for some years, i will admit that i am new to the prop ii conversation, so i, i, i, i don't believe there's anything missing, to your to answer your specific question, so i'll, i'll just respond in that in that manner and just to give as an opportunity since we discussed it and i know you were going to go back and look and see supervisor perez, if you wouldn't mind repeating or clarifying the question you're asking, if any of the priorities for programmatic expenditures that, are recommended in your letter are funded in most city. is that the question? correct. these are the these are the recommendations of the housing stability fund oversight board that we receive annually that recommend and in this case, funds for site acquisition, funds

basically, we, the mayor's proposed budget, gives us no budget. and so going into this budget year, we are we budgeted to receive, funding for my position in our, in the, in the administrative assistance position. you can go to the next slide. and so we had two but we had three positions that were originally budgeted. they have now, been taken away. so our two, our three investigator positions have been, sliced. and you know, the charter says that we should have one investigator per 100 deputies. and i believe that sheriff miyamoto indicated their current staff is at 713 deputies. so we are we would technically, under the charter, be entitled to seven investigators, as you can go to the next slide. but we understood that, you know, we were in a tough budget year. so the budget that we did submit was a very, a budget that that would meet our basic our minimum required requirements, understanding that there just wasn't the money, to do it. but what? so what position are we in now with the with the mayor cutting our budget to basically two people? we

our budget is less than 4% of the combined criminal legal system budget. when you include adult and juvenile probation, the da, sheriff, probation and police, this is something i'm going to continue to push back against this year. we're 59% of the da's budget, and that's incredibly far from a place of equity, the national workload study was conducted by a team of national experts and the rand corporation , that's why we're asking for the additional 16 attorneys and four paralegals. now, the good news is, you're not going to find a staff that's more dedicated, compassionate, hardworking, skilled. so every dime spent on our office has a huge impact on our most vulnerable populations, it's not fair. and our community suffer tremendously when the public defender is funded so poorly compared to the other, players in the criminal legal system. we're also trusted connectors. our clients trust us, and we're in the best position to connect people with those services that are going to enhance their life, we're a vital part of the ecosystem, but the ecosystem is out

only a two year budget. so what you're saying, it sounds to me on the floor that you're agreeing to recommendation two and three kind of i'm what i'm saying is i'm saying supervisor, i know this is complicated pushing it out a year. so items two and three, you have two point something in budget year push that to budget year plus one recommendation. number three is three point something. in the second year that would just go away. thank you, but budget and legislative analyst i think you stood up. meaning you have something to add. so i'm going to let you add to that because let's also resort reserve resolve, recommendation one and one is separate from the debt financing, which is why i want to talk about that. yes. in isolation. thanks i think the confusion is that there's going to be there's proposed two issuances of debt service. one was to be started this next year and then one the second year. so, i think if the department feels that they need funding in budget year plus one, you would reject h.s.a three

and i spoke to kind of what's embedded in this budget, in this project budget. asked some questions. we wanted to know precisely what is the plan here? what is this? what is going to be funded? what could the outcomes be with this project? and, you know, it seemed like on a cake that's not fully baked to us. so there are buckets of monies for different things, but we didn't get a whole lot of specifics. so there's a bucket of 4.5 million for 24 over seven patrols in union square and yerba buena. and by the way, i got word from my colleague nicholas menard that that that this money does not include police patrols. i believe it's other security contracts, but my understanding is that if the board were to reduce that amount , that would not affect police patrols. then there is a bucket of $3 million for free parking on nights and weekends to attract visitors. 1 million bucket for union square activation of the square again. 2.04 million for powell street activations, 3 million for vacant, vibrant, citywide storefront improvements and citywide storefront opportunity

the budget isn't a done deal. we are recommending something that will be used in the consideration of the budget. the mayor's budget has been presented, the board of supervisors have not taken a final vote. i dont feel the budget question is completely settled, and if it is settled for 24-25, a lot of elections coming up. a lot of things can change. iq believeq theqqqqq qqqqq i believe the role of leadership is take action and recommend the legislation with inclusion of 6 percent increase for across the board for outreach education and community organizing models for code enforcement. >> there is a motion on the floor. go ahead. >> i want to comment on that. i would like us to consider something maybe a little less precise and give maybe the board and the mayor the opportunity to make that decision, so recommending that we move this forward with the recommendation that they make the assessment to make whatever changes they see necessary in order to fund these programs. yeah, that is what we are talking about is ho

good evening, budget and appropriations committee. my name is marco, and i'm with the central american resource center, or garrison. our policy, systems and environment, or psc and oral health task force work, which is funded by the soda tax, aims to aims to address and decrease the high rates of chronic diseases in the latinx community, including diabetes, cavities, heart disease, and so much more. to do this, we utilize a promotora model to conduct one on one engagement with community members to connect them to essential resources and information during the height of the pandemic, our promotora team reached out and supported community members that were left behind, and they did this work with the highest professionalism, empathy and kindness. promotoras empower community members to thrive, prosper and advocate for community based policy that that will help improve health outcomes in the latinx community. due to these budget cuts, the work is at risk of being discontinued. i'm requesting the board of supervisors to follow the soda ta

committee for a responsible budget.out of west chester, ohio, line for i was thinking that our nation n t process. ke regular order, etc., we budgd budget but how we address the process. they can work out the details. but one of the things we neetodr to zero-based budgetingne at a . i will use one today as an the cost of diabetes. we spend $330 billion a diabeteh means that every single person in the united states is obligated to put aside thousand dollars per person to pay for the disease. 80% preventable. last time i medicalet down that costs are something like 18% of our gdp or some very high■j were changed snap and added suites and that promotes it diabetes and we heeducate people that the cost is too high and harmfuto politician is going to, we are gnghealthier as a nationy encouraging our citizens to eat healthier and this is how we are going to do it. d the snack industry, when you say them, -- when you make them compliant they can go back. guest:à was fabulous. ive. us. very good information in there. the budget

we will be this year for budget coverage. david pekoske is testifying on the president's 2025 budget request. budget coverage on c-span3 . >>> committee on homeland security and maritime security will come to order. without objection the chair may declare the subcommittee in rhesus at any point. the purpose is to examine the tsa budget request for fiscal year 2025. i would like to thank our witness administrator david pekoske for joining us today . without objection the german from louisiana, mr. carter is permitted to sit with the subcommittee and ask questions of the witnesses. so order. also want to welcome a new member of the subcommittee, mr. kennedy. thank you for joining us. i now recognize myself for an opening statement. on behalf of the members of our subcommittee i'm pleased to welcome administrator pekoske to discuss tsa fiscal year 2025 budget request. it has been two decades since the establishment after the terrorist attacks on september 11, 2001. while tsa has grown and evolved as an agency, its mandate from t

, budget. there any speaker cards that we missed? there are none. okay, so at this point i will call on superintendent wayne to introduce, the superintendent's budget. all right. thank you. the presentation. all right. okay, for our budget workshop, we heard the lcap, and we want to first start off by sharing just how our we're aligning our budget to our goals and guardrails, and then we'll get into the details of the budget, and then talk about our fiscal stabilization plan that's required to go along with the budget, i shared this at our may 7th board meeting. we have a little bit more detail attached to it through the council of great city schools framework. one of the expectations is that we align our goals and our expenditures to our goals and guardrails. now, there's a lot of expenditures that are ongoing expenditures. so what we have done is identify what our new expenditures. that's what the framework calls for that we're doing to meet our goals or guardrails. now, the new expenditures

please standby) really what the budget is going to do is make adjustments tomorrow to the budget in theommittee as well. but this way is allowing the public can raetd through in a less technical manner in the motion. we heard about the sugary drink tax, we seek to restore those funding. we have heard that there is, a reduction in drinking keeper initiative. we want to figure out what we can do to also restore that, we have conversations about workrs right, specific engagement and so on that, is particularly is funded by the city of city administration, through grants tlut grants, office of immigration, immigrant affairs and arts commission and enforcement. so we hope to through this process, through this motion to restore funding as well. we have heard time and time again and thank you to supervisor preston is really championed op this issue to see what we can do and advocate for our community ambassadors who really been a longstanding program, and longstanding ambassadors for neighborhood out of downtown in bay view, visitation valley, mission, sunset, mid-market tenderloin and china t

unfortunately, there are no budget changes in the draft budget yet.ext budget cycle, money will be allocated for this experiment. the deputies were also interested in issues of control over government procurement, increasing consumer demand and increasing payments from the budget to oil refineries. you propose to increase the dotir. amendments to the budget code provide for the accumulation in the federal budget of funds that will be received from the introduction of a progressive tax scale. it is assumed that the center will redistribute them to low-income regions. also introduced writing off 2/3 of the debt on budget loans to the regions, provided that they use the freed up funds. implementation of infrastructure projects and investment support. we are talking about an impressive amount of more than 1 trillion rubles. it is very important that the subjects of the russian federation will be able to use the released funds to create industrial parks, the infrastructure of areas in need of development, to update housing and communal services systems, bu

budget. in accordance with budget policy--for the board and also for the public hearing. we did not receive any public comments, so with that, we are seeking board adoption of the final budget as presented in may with miner adjustments that i will be presenting to you in this meeting. overall, there is no changes to the fiscal 24-25 final budget compared to what was presented in may draft budget. includes a operating budget of $26.6 million. capital budget of $99 million for tenant improvement, portal capital maintenance repair and replacement and debt service of $15.7 million. miner change, which happened to the operating revenue is $56 thousand decrease to the bridge toll revenue as a result of recent projection of mm2 and rm3 allocation. as shown in the slide there is no change to the overall total operating revenue. the second adjustment has to do not just the budget but the reserve. with one time transfer of $1.78 million, bring the o & m reserve to 5 percent of the operating budget, whi

please standby) really what the budget is going to do is make adjustments tomorrow to the budget in theommittee as well. but this way is allowing the public can raetd through in a less technical manner in the motion. we heard about the sugary drink tax, we seek to restore those funding. we have heard that there is, a reduction in drinking keeper initiative. we want to figure out what we can do to also restore that, we have conversations about workrs right, specific engagement and so on that, is particularly is funded by the city of city administration, through grants tlut grants, office of immigration, immigrant affairs and arts commission and enforcement. so we hope to through this process, through this motion to restore funding as well. we have heard time and time again and thank you to supervisor preston is really championed op this issue to see what we can do and advocate for our community ambassadors who really been a longstanding program, and longstanding ambassadors for neighborhood out of downtown in bay view, visitation valley, mission, sunset, mid-market tenderloin and china t

and then on friday at 130, debate on the actual budget begins. reporting live anser hassan abc seven news. >> all right. unser. thank you. so much. as mayor, tao works to try to clear her name following the fbi raid and fight the recall against her. her chief of communications has now resigned. francis zamora began working for the mayor back in october. his exit comes after the mayor parted ways with her personal attorney, tony brass. stay with abc seven news as we follow the latest on the fbi investigation and its impact on mayor shengtao and the city of oakland. we'll continue to update abc seven news.com and the abc seven bay area app. >> some businesses in san francisco's tenderloin neighborhood will soon be forced to close at midnight because of a newly passed curfew. today, the board of supervisors gave the final approval to an ordinance that requires markets selling retail items, prepackaged goods or tobacco to close from midnight to 5 a.m. think corner stores and liquor stores. san francisco mayor london breed says these stores are magnet

the 2024 budget. there is no way to sustain it without having an impact on our efforts on violet crime or child exportation. this is on the whole range of threats that we are responsible for protect the american people from. the request will allow us to continue that is being done in upstate new york and elsewhere, on gang violence and child exportation. cyber attacks. the cartels and organized crime. as i said before, it is not just a border problem that affects all 50 states. we are seizing huge amounts of fat in the will of the country. all of these things are incredibly important. violent crimes, for example, just last year, we were arresting through the task forces. 50 violent criminals and child predators per day, every day, all year long. this means more bad guys on the street. this means more gangs terrorizing neighborhoods. more kids are at risk. et cetera. >> i see that my time has expired. thank you for your continued service. i yield back. >> thank you, chairman rogers. as i am sure you kn

so, based on the mayor's budget instructions, we have we've slightly exceeded our 10% budget instructions, although there is trailing legislation, and there's the good news is that we are not reducing any services as you as our in our presentation earlier. we're actually in expansion mode. again, this is really historic in san francisco and in the nation of being able to provide unprecedented access to children and families, and, you know, we're doing this because we've been, again, very planful we've been resourceful, we've been able to think about this as how this looks like in, in future years, we're increasing access services for the early learning san francisco, we have been in this current programmatic year, providing subsidies for families up to 110. ami next year, we're expanding that to 150, we're asking very modestly for temporary fte again, to be able to manage the expansion, it is a lot of work behind the scenes to make sure that this goes flawlessly, and because we are expanding early learning san francisco, to approximately 6000 more children, and by this, we're offering sub