>> io not believe the function iseadily buildable. >> do you believe it is notable or not?i do not. you certainly can organize -- >> you just another headquartered 90s that private commission. that's not the word that i use. assume it is delegated to a public properly appointed commission that is exercising delegated appointed legal authority. >> appointments clause? >> that would make a huge difference. the president appoints a people, no. if you could configure commission in the way that makes an extension of an article one branch, i wld not have fundamental problems. i don't see how that's practicable or possible. and you can call it public but i don't see how you can delegate your oversight responsibilities. but consider another question. if the real intent, and again, i hate to sound tri, but walk psychedelic, blocks like a duck, whether it's a policy or not, even today we have virtual times about the need to come up with criminal prosecution. with this commission is basically this comes up with a bunch of files, the kind of things at republican attorney's office does,