. >> item 6,discussion of joint building inspection and planning commission meeting of october 2, 2014 and possible next steps in joint code enforcement efforts. >> >> and so, i am going to let my fellow commissioners talk and i know that there are commissioners who are happy with the meeting but with that, we start with commissioner walker that we should revisit and discuss the next steps. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> and at our october second meeting, we discussed a lot of about code enforcement, between planning and building, and there are many issues that come up for the city, i believe, around change of use, and the current issues are there are a number of them, but it is a pdr to the office and it is housing to short term rental. and how our departments work together to enforce the rules. once the rules have been established. so, nobody that our, and especially our housing division, around the short term rental, we heard from planning and we heard from dbi both, about the process. and there was a lot of of discussion back and forth and there was a commitment to have the departm

and in a manner that's consistent with conditional use in the planning code and the certification by the planning department in guidance with applicable building codes including the department of building inspection commission that have not been addressed a hard cap of 90 days per year for hosting and non-hosted for subletting clauses i hope you'll consider those modifications in our changes to the legislation. >> thank you, sir. >> i'm john w i'm on the list i want to speak to two primary issues as those a homeowner my concerns about the registry and the cap on 90 days i'm concerned about my name and address and private information on a public registry i have no problem you, you keeping that but it doesn't makes sense to give out my information when you asked about why is there low registration in portland perhaps that's an issue there you have to set back and see how am i able to do this it didn't makes sense to drive things underground which this do did it say better to have the registration but a privacy issue is the concern the other issue on the 90 day limit again, i hope i'm not in perjury by leaving my home 90 days a year but i go on vacationed to europe and gone more than that time it didn't makes

socioskoonlz is the zoning administrator representing the planning commission and jeff is the senior building representing the department of building inspection jean is from the department of public works and joined by sherry categorizing from the city attorney's office to advise the department of the public health mr. pacheco go over the board meetings guidelines and swear in. >> the board requests you turn off the cell phones and pager please carry on conversation in the halfway appellants and department representatives have 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for rebuttal participant affiliated must complete their opinion and to assist the board members of the public are asked not required to submit a speaker card or business card to board staff when you come up to the appointed pens are available on the left side of the pronounced customer staefgs survey forms on the left side of the podium if you need questions answered please speak to the board staff or call the board office tomorrow morning located pats 1650 anyone o on mission street broadcast live on sfgovtv cable 78 and dvds are available for purchase indirectly in sfgovt

planning commission a a matter of the backlog of progressing the applications. >> my next question is for dee dee young and come back to planning so for the department of building inspection if the discretionary review is approved for the bed-and-breakfast is there a different code with the dbi alongside the code or under the residential housing code. >> the whole building converts or if there's a change in use that's under our building code for the multiple unit from rh2 to become rh1 that will be enforced with the whole building converted. >> maybe not a whole building but let's say a single-family home it's something i've heard two weeks ago there were people that owned single-family homes were retired and renting out their home close to 3 hundred and 65 days a year basically running a business they got a conditional use authorization so if the home got the bed-and-breakfast conditional use is there a different set of codes that the dbi enforces or continue to enforce under the normal residential building code. >> it's still a single-family home under the r3 it's hard to say it's a hotel but that's more in planning only one unit. >> okay. so when the planning i'm sorry

department of building inspection commission we typically receive their recommendations and put them in the recommendation before you with the city attorney's office to integrate them i know that planning staff will glow the recommendations and i'll be happy to answer additional questions you have. >> commissioners tim frye planning staff as a couple of items in the draft resolution you'll see did mischievous at the last hearing issuing a letter but dealing with those mischievous we sort of stopped rethought everything and decided the resolution was a much cleaner way to express this staffs recommendation it's also in front of you if you turn to the back of the packet you'll see that 219.2 is expanded considerably and happy to walk through this 0 step by step from a process standpoint but average that i just leave it to you if you have very specific questions or topics you'd like to cover i'm available. >> commissioners? any items? commissioner johns >> well at the last meeting i expressed some concern about essentially voting for a to approve a stick and pope my concerns have been addressed and i think this is a recommendation that we could and i think should make. >> thank you and i'