there is a letter that is bukharin.y very curious about the meeting of the central committee, but i apologize for this rude word. they write alexey maksimovich yes, returning, if you are from this europe, that you will live these beef men in general, well, look, everything is fine here. your beloved leningrad generally blooms and smells, and so on and uh, life was definitely getting better in the cities. at the very least, it can be imagined that gorky is completely sincerely enthusiastic and begins gorky on table, as you know. three monkeys stood like that. this is such an indian character, one closes its eyes, the other one closes its mouth, wipes its ears and does not see anything. can not hear anything. i won't tell anyone. gorky, of course, understood more than what he was saying at that time, especially in journalism in general journalism. that thirties is monstrous. here, true, it is monstrous, it is monstrously not even in content, because he praises stalin there, who did not praise him. guys who didn’t praise s

this was the lenin guard, inside, which against stalin was a specific opposition in the person of bukharinon. so , uh, stalin strangled the opposition, and it's all terrible of course, but it was a political struggle in which gorky a began to take part. here he again tried to be on the solution, and in fact, of course, he began to work for the opposition, because they were closer to him, they understood each other better. and so this, of course, was not to their liking. it's a guess. at that moment, three times these nightly visits began to the sick gorky, the doctors began to not let him in, because gorky was simply in a very bad condition there was a nurse, chirkova, who was there. well, excuse me, in general, the last woman, as if also gorky, but who looked after him directly, but they could not have killed him without her noticing it. well, in general, this remains such an educational question. i think not. he was really, really serious. sick bitter, and in general, he had compositions. thank you. paul for this wonderful conversation. it was a podcast of the lives of the wonderful, we

nikolai bukharin had been at the very top. he was he was a lead bolshevik. he worked with both lenin and stalin and that, quote says it all. well, leon trotsky. yes. was another yes leader. what to him? yes, he was. that was a masterful stroke on stalin's part to turn leon trotsky into an enemy of the from behind the scenes. he goes into exile. and then eventually he is assassinated by the communists. after he had had to move around a bit and ended up mexico. well, let's get into the other gallery here and let's see what's in there. so elizabeth spalding, we're going into gallery three. what's in here? this is the gallery that covers from the end of world war two to the present. among other things, it shows how much communism goes global after world war two. it doesn't that there weren't intimations of it world war two, but really get bigger. we have to in order to cover ground, we have to go more geographic rather than timeline in this gallery. yeah. and you have a geographical map. we do video wall. yes. yes. so we have what we call our map. film it differ

there is a letter that bukharin.very curious about the meeting of the central committee, but i apologize for this rude word. they write to aleksey maksimovich yes, when you return from this europe , that you will live as goveniks, in general, you look, everything is fine here. your loved ones leningrad in general blooms and smells, and so on and uh, she certainly established life in the cities. at least one can imagine that the bitter, completely sincere, is experiencing the enthusiasm of the gorky man on the table, as you know. three monkeys stood like that. it's like this indian characters one closes his eyes, another mouth, open his ears and see nothing. can not hear anything. i won't tell anyone. gorky, of course, understood more than what he was saying at that time, especially in journalism in general journalism. that thirties is monstrous. here, true, it is monstrous, it is monstrously not even in content, because he praises stalin there, who did not praise him. the guys who didn’t praise stalin, except for man

lenin trotsky is easier for the earthly bukharin, and then those ideas that conditionally embody theinistration. this is part of one e, in fact, the ideological direction of sures - this is today's course, and from which the bolsheviks finance the war with god, which was declared, then, at the end of the 19th century, in fact. those who sponsor these lgbt movements today. everything that is aimed at ousting the church from education to destroying the traditional family is often representatives of the same families, at least the spiritual state of those who financed the bolsheviks at the beginning of the 20th century, so it’s true that russia is belarus today and unfortunately, i hope , in the future , and ukraine but were able to return to their own with such a mission as a stronghold of traditional in the first place christian in fact and muslim jewish, because at their core, and these are all the same values, and this is the new ideological platform is reflected, for example, at the end of the new version of the concept of russian foreign policy at the end, i heard similar words in