bulgak is not in this...y in himself, whether he was a ukrainophobe or not, but russia itself trampled on respect for its own cultural heritage, not ukrainians, not ukrainian patriots, not supporters of russian culture in ukraine, russia itself and its people , who accepts, by the way, this war, if the russians hundreds of thousands went to anti-war demonstrations, i assure you that no one here would talk about bolgakov, this is an absolutely logical reaction. you see, it's like the absence of wagner streets in tel aviv, that wagner is a bad composer, well, it's just somehow strange to call streets in an independent jewish state after a person who was anti-semitic, well , even though i lived 200 years ago, well, here you go all that can be said on this matter, it seems to me, is that we simply see that in reality, once again, both in ukraine and outside its borders, there are people, here you are. spoke really correctly about the fact that those people who feel themselves in the context of their certain ident

bulgak is a xenophobe, he is a chauvinist, he hates everything that is not russian, and when these manipulationse, they say, you cannot identify the author with his hero, but you cannot, this is from the standpoint of literary studies, it is not very correct, but the heroes still speak partly from the author, besides, take, take his works of art, take his caucasian diaries, fiercely not even to the caucasus, which is a miracle, he did not live there practically, he hardly knew that caucasus, but he did not... will see, and this is an absolutely xenophobic, chauvinistic and typical position for russians, it is the same today, to the caucasus, to ukraine, to moldova, to the baltic countries and further, further, further, therefore, if you distinguish bulgakov is not just not our writer, he is a russian writer and he is a very dangerous writer, and precisely because he is a talented writer, there are no questions, yes, then he is even more dangerous, but here are two points, when they talk about bolgakov, me me... what the hell, let's say, why are we fighting with the authors of the white guard, wh

bulgak is a xenophobe, he is a chauvinist, he hates everything that is not russian, and when these manipulationsace, they say, you cannot to identify the author with his hero, yes, you can’t, this is from the position of literary studies, it’s not very correct, but all the same, the heroes speak partly from the author, besides, take, take his works of art, take him to... the caucasus, what a miracle, he practically did not live there, he hardly knew that caucasus, but he hates it, and this is an absolutely xenophobic, chauvinistic and characteristic position for russians, it is the same today for the caucasus, for ukraine, for moldova, for the baltic countries countries and on, on, on, that's why if you distinguish bulgakov is not just not our writer, he is a russian writer and he is a very dangerous writer, and precisely because he is talented. writer, there are no questions, then he is even more dangerous, but here are two points, when they talk about bolgakov, what is driving me, let’s say why we are fighting with the authors of the white guard, which is obvious to me ukrainophobic, and so th