, ban reading bulgakov? it is forbidden to mention bulgakov, whether it is left to the discretion of each person, you can take it and read it, but maybe you can’t talk about it, you can’t love it, maybe you can’t, i, for example, love bulgakov, despite his imperialism, i have other opinions on this matter, and experts, my friends, acquaintances told me that he was not like that, but in literature he was an imperialist. it's true, you won't get anywhere here, what do you say about bulgakov, mr. kakatyukha, good evening, i am very careful about the word "banned, although this word is very media-related, and it is a word that immediately entails a bunch of different informational excuses, let's talk about banning something in a free country, in fact, this story is not new, about the ban , the so-called ban. they spoke, i think , two years ago, when they talked about books, about the removal of russian books from bookstores, and it is impossible to ban something in the age of the internet, in the age when access

, because bulgakov was an emperor. andrew? well, in the part about monuments and names, i completely agree with the conclusions of the institute, because when we talk about... monuments, we are not talking about the literary work of this writer, we are talking about just the imperial symbols, and when we see how the monument is demolished "pushkin's monuments, then they are demolishing the putin's monument, in fact, or the monuments there to catherine, stalin, that is, this a symbol of the empire, primarily not given to the memory and creativity of this poet, and the same can be said about bugakov and about other things. russian cultural imperial writers. i myself was born in sevastopol, i lived there for 22 years, and you know, there was not as much bulgakov there as in kyiv, but, for example, pushkin, there was also a pushkin gymnasium, and , of course, a pushkin street, and what only pushkin was not there, although pushkin had a very indirect meaning in the history of sevastopol, he may have been there once somewher

the emperor, bulgakov a xenophobe, he is not just a ukrainophobe, bulgakov is a xenophobe, he is a chauvinistates everything that is not russian, and when these manipulations take place, they say that you cannot identify the author with... his hero, but you cannot, this is from the standpoint of literary studies, it is not very correct , but all the same, the characters speak partly from the author, besides, take, take his works of art, take his caucasian diaries, fierce hatred for the caucasus, for what wonder, he practically did not live there, he hardly knew that caucasus, but he he is hated, and absolutely a xenophobic, chauvinistic and characteristic position for russians, it is the same today, towards the caucasus, towards ukraine, towards moldova. to the baltic countries and further and further, so if you distinguish bulgakov is not just not our writer, he is a russian writer and he is a very dangerous writer, and precisely because he is a talented writer, there are no questions, yes, he is even more dangerous, but there are two moments, when they talk about bolgakov, what drives me, l

, because bulgakov was an emperor. andrew? well, in the part about monuments and names, i fully agree with the conclusions of the institute, because when we talk about monuments, we are not talking about the literary work of this writer, we are talking about just imperial symbols, and when we see how they are demolished memory. pushkin, then the monument to putin, in fact, or the monuments there to catherine, stalin, is being demolished, that is, it is a symbol of the empire, primarily not, a tribute to the work of this poet, and the same about bugakovo, you can say about other russian cultural imperial writers. i myself was born in sevastopol, lived there for 22 years, and you know, there was not as much bulgakov there as in kyiv, but there was, for example, pushkin. there was also a pushkin gymnasium, and pushkin’s street, of course, and there was no pushkin, although before the history of sevastopol, pushkin had a very indirect meaning, maybe he was somewhere nearby, but even when these names were assigned to school

, because bulgakov was an emperor. well, in the part about monuments and names, i completely agree with the conclusions of the institute, because when we talk about monuments, we are not talking about the literary work of this writer, we are talking about precisely imperial symbols, and when we see how monuments are being demolished "pushkin's monuments, then they are demolishing the putin's monument, in fact, or the monuments there catherine, stalin, that is... i myself was born in sevastopol, lived there for 22 years, and you know, there was not as much bulgakov there as in kyiv, but for example, the pushkin gymnasium was also pushkin, and the street, of course, pushkin, and there was no pushkin, although before the history of sevastopol , pushkin had a very indirect meaning, maybe he was somewhere nearby, but when these names were assigned to schools, streets, squares. then, of course, it was not about yevgeny onegin, but it was about the fact that this is the stamp of the russian world, the empire, and such an auth

bulgakov is an emperor.t important thing, as far as i'm concerned, is if take his portrait, this is an imperial writer, and, and, and we are not an empire. and, we, we, don't claim to be an empire, we claim to be a liberal democracy, i hope so, after all, well, that's how i see our country and what we're fighting for in the end, but we don't want to to be neither... part of an empire nor the center of an empire. bulgakov is an imperialist, bulgakov is a xenophobe, he is not just a ukrainophobe. bulgak is a xenophobe, he is a chauvinist, he hates everything that is not russian, and when these manipulations take place, they say, you cannot to identify the author with his hero, yes, you can’t, this is from the position of literary studies, it’s not very correct, but all the same, the heroes speak partly from the author, besides, take, take his works of art, take him to... the caucasus, what a miracle, he practically did not live there, he hardly knew that caucasus, but he hates it, and this is an absolutely xen

no, bulgakov is obviously not our character, bulgakov precisely because i said that we need to de-imperializeiousness and our culture. bulgakov is an emperor, the most important thing, as far as i am concerned, is that if you take his portrait, he is an imperial writer, and, and, we are not an empire, and no, we, we, do not claim to be to be an empire, we pretend to be a liberal democracy, i hope so, after all, well, that's how i see our country and what the struggle is for in the end, but we don't want to be either part of the empire or the center of the empire, bulgakov the emperor , bulgakov is a xenophobe, he is not just a ukrainophobe. bulgak is a xenophobe, he is a chauvinist, he hates everything that is not russian, and when these manipulations take place, they say, you cannot identify the author with his hero, but you cannot, this is from the standpoint of literary studies, it is not very correct, but the heroes still speak partly from the author, besides, take, take his works of art, take his caucasian diaries, fiercely not even to the caucasus, which is a miracle, he did not live th

ukrainophobe bulgakov. russian writer from it is recognized as a symbol of kyiv. imperial policy, why does not everyone agree with this decision? friends, we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us live on youtube, please take part in our survey, today we ask you about whether you consider mikhail bulgakov a ukrainophobe , yes no if you watch us on tv you can vote on the relevant numbers if you think... no 0800 211 382 all calls to these numbers are free please vote at the end of the program, we will sum up the results of our voting, and we already have my colleague andrii yanitsky on the air, andrii, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today, congratulations, good evening, and oleksiy should still join our air. mustafin, historian, publicist, media manager to discuss with us this evening. well, let's start our conversation with a quick quiz. andriy, do you consider mykhailo bolgakov a ukrainophobe? i can't say

, bulgakov himself because i said i said that it is necessary to...v the emperor, the most important thing, as far as i'm concerned, his, well, if you take his portrait, he's an imperial writer, and, and, we're not an empire, and we're not, we don't claim to be an empire, we claim to be a liberal democracy , i hope so, after all, well, this is how i see our country and what the struggle is for , in the end, but we do not want to be either part of the empire or the center of the empire, bulgakov is an emperor, a xenophobe, he is not just a ukrainophobe, bulgakov is a xenophobe, he is a chauvinist , he hates everything non-russian, and when these manipulations take place, they say, it is not possible to identify the author with his hero, but you can’t, this is from the position of literary studies, it’s not very correct, but all the same, the heroes speak partly from the author, besides, take, take his works of art, take his caucasian diaries, fierce hatred for the caucasus, what a miracle, he did not live there practically, he... he hardly knew the cau

, because bulgakov was an emperor.rei, well, in the part about monuments and names, i fully agree with the conclusions of the institute, because when we talk about monuments, we are not talking about literary works. for this writer, we are talking about precisely imperial symbols, and when we see pushkin's monuments being demolished, they are actually demolishing the putin monument, or the monuments to catherine, stalin, that is, it is a symbol of the empire, primarily not a tribute to the memory of the work of this poet, and the same can be said about bogakovo and about other imperial writers of russian culture. i myself was born in sevastopol, lived there for 22 years, and you know, well, there there were not as many bulgakovs there as in kyiv, but for example, the pushkin gymnasium was also pushkin, and the street, of course, was pushkin, and what if there was no pushkin, although pushkin had a very indirect meaning in the history of sevastopol, maybe somewhere nearby was, but when these names were assigned to schoo

how do you think the story with bulgakov in ukraine will end?s, night ones, especially, yes, with fatal processions, may still not exist. but there will be confiscation, confiscation of books - this is basically a circular that is sent to libraries, cultural centers, of course, schools, bookstores, the confiscation will be quiet, but it will happen, well, they are trying to do it with bulgakov in the spirit of cancel culture, it will be completely erased, it will not be referenced, it will be removed from textbooks, it will be removed from cristomatics, it will be removed from methodological manuals, from literary studies. and from the education system, thank you very much, all the best to you, look, books will not be burned, books will be handed over to waste paper, since the twenty- second year, throughout ukraine there has been a program for handing over russian books for waste paper, and , moreover, money from recycling this waste paper go to the aid of the ssu, this is an official program, moreover, it is connected to it police, and i would

bulgakov spoke, wrote, thought in russian, but the current russophobic ukraine does not need this.point of view, this simply shouldn’t happen. therefore, as he was recently announced as a ukrainian writer, he was quickly turned into a fierce ukrainian hater and spokesman. once again confirm the relevance of the tasks of a special military operation to denazify, demilitarize ukraine, eliminate threats rising from its territory, as the russian leadership has said repeatedly, they will be implemented, now we briefly touched upon, now i would like to dwell in more detail on the ruling of the un international court of justice on temporary measures, the fact is that on april 2 , a meeting of western countries took place in gaga under the amazing name: restoration justice for ukraine, i don’t know from what year they count the need to restore justice for ukraine, well, since they decided to talk about justice for ukraine, we are ready to support this topic. of course, the political declaration adopted at the mentioned meeting, it was called that, was filled to the brim with outright lies,

is subject to the law, the figure of bulgakov belongs to the symbolism of russian imperial policy, since bolgako in his works publicly called for ukrainophobia, demonstrated and called for countryphobia, and no one can argue with this, because... in fact it is and it is subject to the restrictions of the law, thus ukraine, based on this expert opinion, the relevant authorities , who are authorized to make decisions and will make decisions regarding the renaming or removal from the public space of certain dedicated objects bearing the name of bolgakov, at the same time it is absolutely not in any way'. refers to the creative work that remains and should remain open, accessible so that anyone who wants to can read, get to know, understand, analyze bolgakov's work and figures, so there is no need to mix everything into one, because this is a frank manipulation and really an attempt to protect or defend with fabricated accusations , so that bulgakov would fill him with exactly ukrainophobic things in his work. mr. volodymyr, what do you think, why, well, this is the third time i've seen in t

writer mikhail bulgakov are symbols of russian-imperial policy, and their further stay in the public domain is simple. of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance and published the document at the beginning of april. here is a fragment from this conclusion: the writer, despite years of living in kyiv, addiction, spoke negatively about the formation of the ukrainian state and its leaders, was world-view in the positions of russian imperialism, white guardism, approved the expansion of russian communism. the bulgakov museum in kyiv received this conclusion. the director of the museum, lyudmila gubianuri, says that this conclusion is too emotional, and the figure of bolgakov should not be banned, but reconsidered, what the museum has been doing for the past two years, working on the topic of decolonization. bulgakov himself, as gubianuri says, became a victim of the regime and could not publish works through citizenship. in social networks, the opinions of users regarding the figure of bolgakov were divided, and a public debate again flared up, and what to do with this writer. su

cat be, how will the whale be, well, you know the whole story, but i will say that the epic with bulgakov not last once, firstly, in 2021 there was already, i dare to say that srach, because in the network began to spread... the idea that bulgakov and boris okunin were banned at that time, that the books were banned, you see, they keep saying this, they banned everything. then it turned out that there is no ban. it was simply about restricting the import from russia of the works of akunin and bulgakov, and even then not all of them, but only some editions with prefaces that touched on people who went to the occupied crimea, that is, it was all connected only with some editions, and then on bolhakov's defense and were outraged by bolhakov's ban, for example, natasha vlashchenko, tv presenter and blogger, andriy portnov, buzhanskyi. for example, this is the public, well, at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, there were rumors again that bolgakov would be banned, that the people who work in the bolgakov museum, which is located on andriivskyi uzvoz, were also very indignant, they talk

did not last... once, first of all, in 2021, i dare to say that shit, because the idea that bulgakovre banned on the network, that the books were banned, you see, they keep saying this, everything was banned, then it turned out that there was no ban at all, it was simply a matter of restricting imports from russia works of akunin and bulgakov and. then not all, but only some editions with prefaces, which touched on people who went to the occupied crimea, that is, it was all connected only with some publications, and then in defense of bulgakov and fell behind the defense of bolgakov, for example, natasha vlashchenko, tv presenter and blogger, andriy portnov, buzhansky, for example, here such an audience, and also already at the beginning of a full-scale invasion. there were rumors again that bolgakov would be banned, that the people who work in the bolgakov museum, which is located on andriivskyi uzvoz, were also very indignant. this topic was discussed talked a lot and closed it, and now we are opening it again, and we will talk about it with volodymyr terishchak, deputy head of the

is subject, the figure of bulgakov belongs to the symbolism of russian imperial policy, since bolhakcly called for ukraine in his works. phobia demonstrated and called for country phobia, and no one can argue with this, because in fact it is and it is subject to the limitations of the law, thus ukraine, on the basis of this expert opinion, the relevant bodies that are authorized to make decisions and will to make decisions about renaming there or removal of certain objects from the public space. dedicated, who bear the name of bolgakov. at the same time, this does not in any way concern the creative output, which remains and... remains open, accessible so that anyone who wants to can read, get to know, understand, analyze the work and character of bolgakov, so there is no need to mix everything into one, because this is an outright manipulation and really an attempt to protect or with fabricated accusations. to defend the fact that bulgakov, well, to fill him, exactly ukrainianophobic things in his creativity mr. volodymyr, what do you think, why, well, this is the third time, i have

that is, for them, mikhail bulgakov is something the pinnacle of world culture, despite the fact thattively, bulgakov outside the borders of the former soviet union is , in fact, very little known, even as a writer, and for those people, another aspect that plays on their sympathies is that this is a person who lived in kyiv, this is a person who... allegedly positions, shows a different kyiv, unfortunately, there are ukrainians in our country who like this kyiv because of this, will you remember how many such signs we had sometime before 2014 , it was used in the branding of otsi ti yati and so on, kyiv is supposed to be pre-bolshevik kyiv, pre-soviet, but absolutely imperial, russian, i.e. this is the kind of cultural little russianness that , unfortunately, is still present in ukrainian women. and even those ukrainians, educated ukrainians, yes, but in this case there are two problems here, well, the problem is so historical and aesthetic, eh, why is it... despite the white guard and many other ukrainophobic things, ukrainians, some, even smart and intellectual people, he is includ

some say that we don't need bulgakov because he is a bad writer. he is generally a bad writer, why are you dragging him? he is just a secondary writer, and you glorify him there, that he is lively there. so what, others say that bolga, that the question is not whether bolgakov is good or bad writer, he is our writer, we grew up on him, he is a kyiv writer, why are you giving him to the russians? the question, i believe that the question is not that, by the way, it started like this from the beginning of the war, whether this or that figure of russian culture is big or small, because we look like idiots in the world when we start giving assessments, evaluations. works of any writer, this question, i would say, is subjective, someone can consider tolstoy, dostoyevsky, bulgakov, anyone, rachmaninov, tchaikovsky, and others where levitan is, you can continue to list it for hours, in big letters, someone may, someone may not like them, the issue is that this is simply not ukrainian literature, and this... even a matter of language, i always suggest doin

, again, good writer bulgakov, damn the writer bulgakov, well, to put it briefly, bolgakov is a bolgakove that ukrainians for 30 years cannot understand. what their what strange, but well said by a british colonel, glen grant, who lives in ukraine, well lives more, it seems, in ukraine than in britain, he said that people, think about the soldiers who are suffering now at the front, and not about the dead writers, but to those ukrainians who say, we also know ukrainian writers, but here is bulgakov or there, and here is pushkin, it's like in this interview. brother, older brother shafir, who worked in the office of the president and former, former partner of volodymyr zelenskyi, when asked by journalists, if you are so worried about pushkin's monuments, who are they removing, what about you, who do you know from ukrainian literature, he said, well, here is the one who wrote neydu, and he couldn't even remember his last name, and then he says, well and this poetess is, like her, ustenko, that is, he did not even know her last name. lina kostenko, and when people talk, ukrainians talk abou

in iran , bulgakov is read; in his homeland, kiev, it was banned.ational memory of ukraine declared the use of mikhail bulgakov’s name as propaganda of russian imperial policy. according to the conclusion of experts, he was ideologically in favor of russian imperialism, white guardism, and approved of the expansion of russian communism. quite a motley worldview, i must say, but most importantly, bulgakov, of all the russian writers of that time... i propose to change the passenger’s call sign to rebin’s call sign, no, my brother’s call sign, you remain a passenger, that’s right, my passenger. let's return to the situation in orsk, where the dam broke, to the flood zone, more than 4 thousand houses were affected there. almost 11 thousand people, such footage from the flooded city is now appearing online, it shows that the water is rising, the streets are already under it, fortunately there are no casualties, residents of two districts of the city are being urgently evacuated, at the moment 12 temporary points are in readiness placement, this was repo

fob, adequate literature vedas, historians clearly do not agree, here is the reaction of the bulgakovin kiev, they say that the judgments of the commission of the institute of national remembrance are overly categorical, fight first with bulgakov, then before with pushkin, now with sikorsky, and you know, here the most paradoxical thing the fact that many of the people listed, well , absolutely everything, they were not enemies of the young russians, they did not experience any absolutely... negativity towards this territory, yes, and moreover, all these people are the heritage of world culture, mind you, in our country now relations with the collective west are strained , it’s simply impossible, but for some reason it doesn’t occur to anyone to suggest, it’s even funny for me to say this, to demolish the monument to himinguey in the ryazan city of sasovo, for some reason it doesn’t come to mind, because himinguey is a world heritage. red-hot with iron, everything connected with russia, in kiev, for example, tchaikovsky street, has either already been renamed, or is about to be rename

because bulgakov, despite his alleged anti-bolshevism and anti-communism, is inscribed in the russianl canon, absolutely entered, or rather he sought to be entered, that is why he writes about stalin, batum, and, he, he, he, a sycophant who tries to fit into this new communist canon, and does not fit in, and, by the way, interestingly, bulgakov on the 21st, it will happen, well, correct me if i'm wrong, on the 21st. when he flees, he flees to moscow, although the white emigration he sings of does not flee to moscow, the white emigration flees, and he has a play about the white emigration was not stalin's favorite, and it flees to where, it flees to paris, to europe, and nikrasov, 70s years, when it was much more difficult to leave the soviet union, he leaves and lives out his life in exile in paris, not in the soviet union. given, because he did not fit into this imperial canon, bulgakov fits perfectly into the imperial canon, as a chauvinist, as a xenophobe, and he has a place there, so here is the problem we started talking about, bulgakov is clearly a russian writer, and this is un

let the ukrainians who say that bulgakov is theirs look at the to what extent his work corresponds toview and their family and national world, and everything, and no, you cannot give rosi bolgakov to the russians, because they already have him, that's all, the question is, the question is not what to do with bolgakov's books, the question is what to do with perpetuation. bolgakov in a country that should be, so to speak, ukrainian-centric, just as poland is polish-centric, and the czech republic is czech-centric, and now another question will arise. and why do we have a monument to aleichom's helmet then? and i will tell why? the question is not even that sholom aleikh lived most of his life in ukraine, wrote on ukrainian, i would say, ukrainian-jewish topics, ukraine is at the center of his work. it is obvious that for ukrainians sholom alekhan is a jewish writer, no one considers him ukrainian. but the monument is a tribute to the jewish people who lived on these lands, which is a part, if you will. cultural and demographic context, that is why there were monuments to pushkin, no on

in iran, bulgakov is read, but in his homeland, kiev, it was banned. remembrance of ukraine declared the use of mikhail bulgakov’s name as propaganda of russian imperial policy. according to the conclusion of experts, he was ideologically in the position of russian imperialism, white guardism, and approved of the expansion of russian communism. quite a motley worldview, i must say. but most importantly, bulgakov, of all the russian writers of that time, stands closest to to the current ideologists putinism. mikhailach really did not like ukrainian nationalism. in this, the kiev institute is absolutely right. we won't argue with the ratings. bulgakov himself most likely would not have done it either, if only for the reason that, based on the example of his own very tragic life, he knew very well that assessments change very quickly, sometimes diametrically, but manuscripts do not burn. this was an international review, see you later. pain in the knee, pain in the back, pain in the neck maybe. fintalgin extragel contains the maximum dose of a substance f

similarly , bulgakov is for ukrainians, he is an example of just such a colonialist culture, for which ukrainians remained second-class people. tell me what, from your point of view, should be done now with the bolgakov museum, because it is one of the most popular museums, every time i was there there were an incredible number of... people , and i must say that the workers who gave tours, everyone once, i was there several times, maybe again, every time they talked about this author with admiration, as it is observed in many museums, when the employees love their ward very much, and as far as i understand, it is planned that the museum change its name and that about pulgakov was told objectively there, that he necessarily this museum. remained, it should not be closed under any circumstances, do you think it is possible to somehow stimulate people who love and respect this writer with all their hearts, to talk about him more objectively, or how it should all happen, in fact, the question is with the bolgakov museum , it actually appeared and gave impetus in 2022, and now the museum re

pushkin, bulgakov, glinka, sekorsky are almost enemies of ukraine.merican senators run out, then the streets of kiev will have to be named after the names of the armed forces of ukraine, or what? the concept of ukrainianness as anti-russia shows its complete absolute failure. and this, in fact, is the cause of all those troubles. it seems that official kiev, with the tenacity of a sick maniac, is trying to cut off part of itself, the russian part of itself. this is what political suicide looks like. evgeniy petrukhin, and unlearned lessons of history. the white house announced a new agreement between the united states and japan in the field of defense and security. this one of the results of negotiations between biden and japanese prime minister kishida. after a break of 9 years, he came to washington on a state visit and will speak to congress tomorrow. kishida himself has already announced that he is going to send some signals to the whole world in the future about what to expect from the american-japanese alliance in a report by our staff correspo

khin from roman bulgakov, master margarita. suddenly he sees the cast-iron figure of a man who indifferently looks ahead of him, looks at him and pronounces these very words: he was lucky, he was lucky, this... white guard shot at him, shattered his hip, ensured his immortality, no matter what he did, no matter what step he took, all this led to his glory, the impression is that this thought... not only ryokhin himself, but also bulgakov, who certainly cannot be called mediocre, but the riddle of pushkin, the mystery of pushkin, bulgakov was also very attracted, it is no coincidence, by the way, in the thirties bulgakov would write a play by alexander pushkin, in he will not dare to bring pushkin to the stage in this play, it will be everything is dedicated to pushkin, the tsar will be there, benkendor will be there, zhukovsky will be there, of course natalya nikolaevna will be there. dantes, danzas, but pushkin himself will not be there, there will not be a single pushkin replica, because bulgakov simply will not dare to say a

it is noteworthy that 3 years ago the terrorist zelensky called bulgakov a ukrainian writer, and thespapers. after bulgakov turned into an enemy of the ukrainian nation , the verkhovna rada proposed to deal with aircraft designer igor sikorsky. he was born and raised in kiev, created the world's first four-engine aircraft, and his russian vitez was awarded a gold medal at the moscow aeronautics exhibition; emperor nicholas ii himself inspected the ship. the piquant thing is that the dzhulyany airport in kiev is now named after imperial sikorsky polytechnic university, where the designer studied, as well as the street where the us embassy is located. taking into account sekorsky’s clear position, he should not be called a ukrainian either. all this is reminiscent of the ukrainian battle around nikolai gogol, which has been going on for many years, the writer was born and raised in... at its source lies the zaporozhye sich, that’s what they are, they, in fact, preserved the principles that were inherent in this sich, now the next one moment, what makes a nation today, at least, of cour

coming up with this thing, because what’s the difficulty is that we still wanted to cover all of bulgakovpatriarchal ponds, where volenda actually met our two muscovites, ivan and berlioz. the novel consists of three: yeshua and levi matthew, light forces, then dark forces and muscovites, moscow and muscovites, but by muscovites we had. real living mescovites who would go and look at everything, well , we decided to do this, it means making an extended composition, or something, which would represent bulgakov sitting on a bench, there is still a paved area in the corner of the pond for this figure, a bench so broken there, which speaks of the general devastation in those years , on the whole... the complexity of this figure of the departing yeshuv is that the audience had to perceive it mainly from above, yes, walking along the upper part of the park. so i did the first option distorted proportions, he’s so elongated there. i already have the second option, when we inevitably changed it, when the whole scandal and dump began, we already changed it, i had to make another one, divine biblic

here i, olesya, have two options: either the fictional character of bulgakov sharik still managed to give birth, or professor preobrazhensky is still alive and successfully continues to operate in kiev, because literally a year ago zelensky with bulgakov’s books said in one of his regular speeches: this is all a lie, we will not ban bulgakov, this is all you need to know about the ukrainian government and zelensky personally. the question arises, where will i eat, that’s it? understandable, but you see, in ukraine they always want to start from the opposite, but every time they face down in ignorance, these are the guys who live like this, news on the first channel, hello, news on the first channel, andrey ukharev is with you. governor of the murmansk region andrei chibis, wounded as a result of the assassination attempt, remains in intensive care. his condition is stable and serious, but there is no longer a threat to life, doctors said. the head of the region posted a video from the hospital in which he thanked everyone for their support. the attack took place in the evening apatit

year old, came out on stage and played this performance, so i am grateful, well , firstly, this is bulgakoveme and pain, and who played the main character? nikolovich, what is the colossal success of this performance, it’s big, boris nikolaevich doesn’t think so, but you don’t know, but really, i’m imposing my opinion, what do you say, yes, that a great success is beyond any doubt, here here there’s no need to even argue about the performance, about the work of evgeniy vladimirovich, i think that this is one of, so to speak, the keys to this success, such a one hundred percent fit into the image of the old prince, right? i have a more restrained attitude towards the performance, to be honest, well, nevertheless, that i have the right to disagree with the audience, with the opinion of some of the critics , and so on, and as a participant in this performance, i cannot talk about the performance itself, but there is something in this performance that makes the auditorium is being implemented. into the fabric of this performance, and firstly into tolstoy, then into myself, i myself love watchin

this is mikhail bulgakov. quote in original language. don't read soviet newspapers before dinner.ort, the news about bulgakov’s delusion in ukraine is, as a professor would say, preobrazhensky delirium on a cosmic scale. and you may ask why i’m suddenly so actively spouting his quotes today, you know, i just remembered. leafing through the book, you will ask what book, this book, this book, this book, this book, this book, here are some unopened ones, here this bookishness and so on, here are the books, here with checks, by the way, all these books, dear friends, you won’t believe, they were all published in russian, and by the way, published as in ukraine. both from us and from them, they were bought yesterday, by the way, they were bought not under the counter, but freely and in the very center of kiev, here are the chicks, absolutely, not last year, not before the war, here is the master of margarita, i also made a bookmark yesterday, yesterday’s purchases, not before the war, bought this year, bought yesterday, so the question arises... the logical question is, why then some m

style is not in honor of bulgakov? prize, for example, then it would be written with a capital letter, with a capital letter, but in this case everything was correct, since this is bulgakov’s style, it is impossible to create a phrase here, honor or in the name. well, then, let’s give a little rule so that it is more or less clear, and we can consolidate all this. adjectives denoting individual affiliation are capitalized if they are formed from proper names using the suffix of or in. yulina's skirt, olga's coat, tanina's varishka. if the corresponding adjectives contain the suffix sk, they are written with a lowercase letter, pushkin’s poems, for example. uranus, neptune, so, let's stop, which of them does not have rings, as far as i remember, neptune and uranus. love thinks differently, but i hope, yes, i believe that this is a correct statement, taking this opportunity, i would like to say hello to my physics and astronomy teacher gennady viktorovich and say thank you very much to him, since i remember that in astro

bulgakov, anyone else, rachmaninov, tchaikovsky, and other livitans, you can continue to list them for, in big letters, someone may, someone may not like them, the issue is that this is simply not ukrainian literature, and it is not even a matter of language, i always suggest making this simple. an experiment: translate this or that work into ukrainian and read it as if you did not know that it was written in russian, and i wonder if you will perceive bulgakov, let's say master margarita as a ukrainian novel, well, hardly, if, if we talk about the context, if we talk about the ideologues, who are the guards, well, of course not, there are certain ideologues, but we are dead souls... i'm not talking about the discussion , i say just read the books, you will see that goguly 90% of his work is a russian writer, maybe you will read myrhorod and see him as ukrainian, but this is what happens with writers who often... a person considers the culture his own, i have no problems with bulgak, because he is a writer for another culture, and it is not a question of whether i understand the russian

the buinicheskoe field memorial, the bulgakov palace and the alexandria festival gathers friends. the tourism potential of the mogilev region is presented in the belarusian pavilion at vdnh. this eastern region of belarus borders bryansk and smolensk. in this regard, recently the flow of russian tourists has increased several times, so our pavilion in moscow these days serves as an information bridge for historical places of the mogilev region. during the first world war , the royal headquarters of the russian empire was located in mogilev. emperor nicholas ii and his family, the honor of the court, and senior officers from the embassies of european countries moved to the city for a year and a half. part of the exhibition is dedicated to the defense of mogilev during the great patriotic war, in particular to the tank battle on the buynichi field. in addition, visitors to the pavilion can see. the restored bulgakov courtyard, an architectural monument of the 16th-19th centuries, and also get acquainted with ancient technology quality of wicker weaving. the main contingent is intere

read it: as if you don’t know that it is written in russian, and i’m curious, but you will perceive bulgakovt’s say master margarita, as a ukrainian novel, well, hardly, if we talk about the context , if we talk about the ideologues that were sewn up by the white guard, well, of course not, there are certain ideologues sewn up there, but they are dead. the souls of mykhola gogol, although it was written by a person, leaving the country, it is a ukrainian novel, because people wrote it, i am not sure, i think, here here quite debatable, but, at least, conditionally speaking, according to gogol, i see that there is such a debate, i’m not talking about the discussion, i’m saying just read the books, you will see that gogol is a russian writer, maybe 90% of his work you will read myrhorod and you will see that it is ukrainian, but that's how it is with writing... i don't think that the problem is bulgakov at all, i think that the problem is what cult culture a person considers his own. i have no problems with bulgakov, because he is a writer of a different culture for me, and it is not a questio

another extremely toxic topic in recent days has been the ban of bulgakov in ukraine.mperials, and at the same time a champion of both the white guard and communism. mikhail afanasyevich was not any imperial writer, he was a writer, he was the keeper of the russian language. yes, in general, he was leaning towards that strongly. nevertheless, they took action and accused the experts of the institute of national memory of ukraine of incompetence, who, quote: attribute to bulgakov the views of his characters. in the context of the writer’s cancellation, another surname. taking into account sekorsky’s clear position, he should not be called a ukrainian either. although until now igor sekorsky, an aircraft designer, inventor, philosopher, was considered the hero of ukraine just as unconditionally as bulgakov. kiev airport, since 2018, is an air harbor . appropriated sekorsky, like bulgakov , simply by the fact of his birth in kiev, but sekorsky himself in the year thirty-six said this: my family is of purely ukrainian origin from a village in the kiev province, where my gr

the steppe wolf, the wolf must be read in the german original, this, otherwise, believe me. but bulgakov is a masterful writer, there is no question, but he is not a genius of mankind, and he is very overrated in our country, because he is not so well known in the west, but tell me, please, why does he trigger so much, why does he trigger so much , why such storms, now was the conclusion of the institute of national remembrance, yes regarding the inadmissibility of glorification, which screams started again, as you say, the bulgakov museum immediately reacted, immediately all the networks, this one this one. this document could have provoked, i read it before going on the air, it is written in a terrible language, such a cando on i.e. according to the message i agree, but how it is done and in the same place mostly the reaction, how it is done, but also the response of the museum you can find a lot of internal contradictions there, i say again, we are a democratic country despite the terrible war that which russia is leading... against us, and which russia is leading against us, and we c

, but given that i read vladimir vladimovich kornilov, i’m afraid that it is mikhail afananovich bulgakovat should be in your head, so i’ll just read out a quote, this is how, how could bulgakov be ideologically positions of russian imperialism, the white guard and approved the expansion of russian communism, so vladimir vladimirovich said, sharikov gave offspring, that’s why, unfortunately, well, the ukrainian madness of demolishing monuments and renaming streets continues, now all this has affected bulgagov throughout the territory. active veterans of the submarine forces of the soviet union and russia. this is how our officers talked about admiral moiseev. to the territory of ukraine, if we analyze today very quickly, today is information day in ukraine, the topic number one, the most important topic is that the ukrainian armed forces have switched to new technologies, military technologies, yeah, there is a bridge, there is a bridge, it is small, although vladislav says that it was no longer working, where a ukrainian robot entered and blew up this bridge moved away, it all exploded,

so, mikhail bulgakov, imperialist, putinist, ukraineof.conclusion was made by the ukrainian so-called institute of national memory, the activities of which are directed and supervised by the cabinet of ministers, that is, this is a conclusion at the level of the official authorities of ukraine. it says. that bulgakov despised ukrainians, ukrainian culture, disrespected the desire of the ukrainian people to gain independence and build a sovereign state, and also that of all the russian writers of that time, mikhail afanasyich stands closest to the current ideology of putinism, in fact, quotes. now in ukraine, all monuments and names associated with the writer are considered russian propaganda, and accordingly they are planning to be dismantled, under the threat of closure. and the bulgakov house museum in kiev on andreevsky spusk, where the writer was born and raised. the museum staff have already stated that they will fight to cancel the decision to ban bulgakov, but under the current regime we understand that this is sisyphus’s trumpet. m

i can’t answer for sure, but i’ll assume it’s bulgakov. bulgakov?with the famous artist, later the husband of frida kala. and this is what diego rivera left in the moscow museum. correct answer: mayakovsky. alexander, let it be physics. name the unit of measurement of electrical capacitance in si. the answer is farat and this is the correct answer, yes farad , i think he caught up with sophia, he just caught up with everything, sophia, you choose, let it be chemistry, the basis of which is esters of trihydric alcohol, glycerin and carboxylic acids, glycerols carboxylic acids, no, i have no assumptions, alexander, but... after an erroneously printed obituary, this scientist thought about the legacy he would leave after myself. name this scientist. well, let it be einstein. no, it is not him. alexander, let there be darwin? alas, it’s not him either. maybe they will help us in the staff room and leave, so to speak, a legacy for us. what option do we have? we have the nobel prize option, nobel, that means. alfred nobel. that's what we were talking abou

today we are asking you about whether you consider bulgakov a ukrainophobe. yes, no, please write your answer in the comments. if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote if you think bulgakov is a ukrainophobe (0800-211). 381 no (0800-211-382). all calls to these numbers are free. at the end of the program, we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we will be in touch with oleg rybachuk, head of the center for joint actions, former deputy prime minister for european affairs of integration and former head of yushchenko's presidential administration. mr. oleg, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. congratulations. well, first of all, let's talk about the results. meeting of the ukraine-nato council, the main issue is air defense systems for ukraine, and nato member states agreed that they should redouble their efforts to find air defense equipment, artillery and ammunition for ukraine. this was stated by the secretary of state of the united states of america , anthony blinken. according to him, the partners of the nor

whether bulgakov is a symbol of russian imperial policy or not. important news, statements, exclusive comments, all this is in our morning broadcast, join on weekdays from 9:00 a.m. on youtube on the radio liberty channel and on the air of the espressoo tv channel. as a result of a night attack by russian forces with drones in zhytomyr oblast, a hit to an infrastructure object was recorded, there is a direct threat of air pollution, so local people are advised to stay indoors with closed windows. in particular, they write about it on facebook page of the zvyahil city council. according to the decision of the commission on man-made environmental safety and emergency situations, schoolchildren will study remotely. it is not specified exactly what kind of objects from nafataka. also according to the defense forces of pivnia during the night attack of the shaheds. a logistics and transport facility and gas station in odesa region were damaged. in total, ukrainian air defense forces shot down 17 out of 24 attack drones at night, the general staff repor

not yours, but bulgakov's.nsate for losses. tinkov investments are just tinkov. on easter, russian lotto unites people. and when we are together, our help is greater. in the easter charity draw, 10 rubles from each ticket sold. will be transferred to works of mercy. we'll be giving away thousands of cash prizes. magnet - the price is what you need, buy a ring with falcon topaz at a 77% discount or polaris equipment at a discount. up to 70% ; get an ozone card and pay anywhere, everything tastes better when you have two, coupon crazy wednesday, two big maestro burgers for the price of one, can we go faster? i can’t, my hair is bad, and i took a risk. scooters are now part of the nts ecosystem, so with mts premium trips have become even more profitable. add up to three loved ones to mts premium for free and ride scooters together. free rental start and increased cashback of 7%. nail fungus can deprive you of many joys, so you need to fight it with the triple power of pungaril. penetrating deeply into the structur

kiev propagandists distorted bulgakov's biography so much that they instantly turned him into an enemyy finally started reading books. and exclusive, in our studio, fighters who have captured a german marder, outdated equipment, are sent here as if they are being written off, they are given to the ukranazi. and the story of how ukrainian civilization emerged in the second millennium bc. antifake, premiere, tomorrow on the first. this is my friend. alyosha, just recently his arm was completely paralyzed and didn’t work, but now, and now i can move it in different ways, and the kids at school like it, like this, of course, now in all directions, a unique development of russian scientists, exoskeletons, and not only in the program, live healthy, tomorrow is first. chanson. and he wears a hat on nam, he wears boots on remon, three chords, the new season from april 14 on the first. we’ll get to irkutsk, we’ll get passports, i have an address, you know, but i can’t have children, i was 16, they were building a pig farm for my grandfather. the winter is cold, there was an operation, it got co

came out on stage and performed this performance, so i am grateful, well , firstly, this is both bulgakovd maxim sukhanov played amethyst, i played balyanin, seryozha, i saw, i didn’t see shchukin, zhenya saw you, here are three more such great names of russian literature, and the works are on the stage of the theater pushkin, lermontov and tolstoy, and the queen of spades , masquerade and of course war, i play in all of them, and you play in all of them, that’s why i that's why i'm asking, let's do it. now we’ll also look at the screen, this is war and peace, boris nikolaevich, what is the colossal success of this performance, he’s such a big nikolaevich doesn’t think so, but you don’t know, but i’m really imposing my opinion, what do you say, yes, what a great success - this is beyond any doubt, there is no need to even argue here, the performance, the work of evgeniy vladimirovich, i believe that this is one of - one of, so to speak, the keys to this success. causes the auditorium to become embedded in the tissue this performance, and firstly, in tolstoy, then in myself, i myself love

in iran, bulgakov is read; in his homeland, kiev, it was banned.emory of ukraine declared the use of mikhail bulgakov’s name as propaganda of russian imperial policy. according to the conclusion. look around, now the year is 20024, 100 years from now, everything will be different, moscow, moscow, where are the machines, the flying type is energetically unjustified, she brought a man from school, a young man, according to my data, he is 117 years old, but the main thing will remain unchanged. and i i know what it’s like to give your word, just look at me, when it’s all over, alice will return to her time, and you will have to return to yours, i mean, why, we will act here now, we will change the present, in the name of our common past , which is the future, as it were, we will save your parents, personal path and 13 galaxies of all, 100 years ago, delicious, very, because... made by your own soon. investment rating, economics, through specific stories, we can reach people. we often talk about money, the amounts are serious. in russia has a clear and