i'd like to address the closure of twin peaks boulevard at burnett avenue.at okay for me to talk about that for two minutes? >> president buell: please. [please stand by] >> our neighbor had a gun pulled on them for accidentally blocking a burglar's get-away car. and we've almost been hit by cyclist speeding down the boulevard. there is parking on bernett, and increased police presence hasn't worked. simply put, it doesn't have to be this way. one simple action can fix all of these problems. please show compassion to us. open the gate and take down the no parking signs on bernett, and thank you for allowing me to address the commissioners. >> thank you very much. >> chairwoman: thank you. that is our last caller, and so now public comment is closed. we're now on item 10, closed session, conference with legal counsel. is there any public comment on this item? please dial star 3 to be comment on this item? okay. thank you. seeing no further callers, public comment is now closed. we will need to vote to go into closed session, so i'll need a motion and a second

at night, young people gather on burnette avenue, zero masks, zero social distancing. no net benefit from closing twin peaks boulevard. closing twin peaks boulevard has driven crime, late night, noisy, alcohol and drug-fuelled partying, and hundreds and hundreds of pounds of trash on our street and private property. none of this existed before closing twin peaks boulevard. >> clerk: thank you for your comments, sir. >> yep. >> clerk: okay. operations, do we have another caller, please? >> thank you. can i be heard? >> clerk: yes, you're providing public comment on the continuance of the -- >> yes. >> clerk: thank you. please proceed. >> yes, i am. mary miles. i represent coalition for representation of adequate review. we have submitted requests for continuance in order to provide the public and the appellant adequate time to inform the board of facts and legal authority supporting this appeal. our request asks for specific dates that are beyond the september 29 proposed date, and we have no idea who submitted a proposal for that, but it wasn't appellant. we did have d