the evening of that tragic day president bush addresses america on the world. today our fellow citizens our way of life are very freedom came under attack. we will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them. we will make no distinction this essentially detail was inspired by a key figure in the pentagon richard powell. on the afternoon of 911 places a call to the president's speech writer. i was on the telephone with david frum and i said to david. on the afternoon of $911.00 whatever else the president says he should say that we will hold responsible the states that support terrorists safeguard it is a strategic break from the more modest policies of bush's pre-disaster. i believe it represented a recognition that we would never succeed against the terrorists if we went after them one at a time and as long as governments were facilitating the organization training equipping and financing of terrorist organizations we were never going to get it under control. and ambitious program for all out war a goal in line

but in private bush confirms to franks the order to attack iraq. this change in priority worries the general who on february 19th 2002 confides in bob graham florida senator and chairman of the senate intelligence committee. after a briefing which was quite upbeat with the progress that was being made the general asked me to meet privately in his office and the 1st thing he said was we're no longer fighting a war in afghanistan i was stunned by that and i asked him what that he mean and he said that some of the important personnel. such as special operations units were being moved from afghanistan to get ready for a war in iraq. bush's decision is fraught with consequences the fight against terrorism is put on the back burner in favor of a conventional war in the middle east not the most predictable region in the world . in early 2002 the military machine is set in motion all the trimmings is to convince the public of the need to go to war with a country that seems far removed from the tragedy that struck america. under base of each former army col

it will be 3 years before bush admits that saddam did not have w m d's. the main reason we went into iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction turns out he didn't but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass but also talked about the human suffering in iraq. bush brushes aside the stated reason for a war that has destroyed an entire country. in iraq the invasion turns into a bloody occupation. the downward spiral. started with the occupation the coalition specially the americans lost the moral high ground and they became the jailers of that if you people the bedlam the chaos the violence in iraq now it's a natural consequence of what bush and cheney did in invading iraq. iraq is quickly torn to shreds ripped apart by religious and ethnic violence. i think the most convincing argument was that in order to enhance israel's position in the middle east and its security the nation surrounding it that formed an anti israel a bloc had to be broken up into smaller confessional a homo genius nation states so in the case of iraq a kurdis

the war to liberate iraq whether it's for bush a crucial barrier remains to be overcome before he can go to war congress the american president must ask congress for the green light before launching the country into a war. in august and september the drum beats of war in iraq started to get louder and louder and there were some indications that the president would soon be calling on congress for an authorization of war against iraq. a mere formality as bush holds the majority but bob graham will try to stall this race too. and one of the questions was we'd like to review the national intelligence estimate on possible war with iraq and the answer was there isn't a national intelligence estimate. what graham is asking for is a top secret document an estimate of what every intelligence agency knows about a particular threat. to be told that here we are about to go to war and no national intelligence estimate has been done it was astounding and we ask that it be done what happened was they kept their heads way down you know it want to do an estimate on weapons of mass destruction in iraq

bush: the academic world moves at its own pacace. in the commercial world, we're--it moves at its own pace, but there are momements and there are projectsts that bring everyonene into the f fold and lelet the is kind of flow. it's s very organ. it's the way that thihinking works,s, the way that problem-m-solving woworks, the y that y you approacach a problelm a a different t perspective sometimes, takake a step b back. when you''re working on aa project, youou develop the cocommunity ththat helps you moe forward.d. swezey: : now we are at this p t where the knowleledge that's ben accumulalated here o on abalonee farms like thihis is actuauallya valuluable resouource, and it'sa criticical step in conservininge species in many ways, not only from a technical standpoint, but also from what was achieved, starting the farm m in the first place and getttting these animas to persist, anand so, in that sense,e, it is a valuable rerese from the y years and years of effort to build this place. russo: i t think that t the timr divevers to be p

bush was no longer the party of bush. this was amalgamation of perot and buchanan, and i think it still is. >> i covered that 1992 race for news day and here's another lesson among the others that steve mentioned from that that apply today and apply to trump's surprise win in 2016. i don't think we took perot seriously enough as a credible candidate in 1992. it took a while for i think the news media to understand that if it was conceivable he could win, unlikely, conceivable he led for a while in june of 1992 and he represented something important we needed to pay attention to, and i do think it started a lot of the politics we see unfolding today. the populism, the concern about trade, the dissatisfaction and suspicion of the washington establishment. it wasn't new wu it got a lot more intense with -- new, it got a lot more intense with ross perot. he managed to tap it in a way that should have told us a lot about the coming days of donald trump. >> steve perot got 19% in 1992. the bush family have long contended that r

the evening of that tragedy president bush addresses america and the world. today our fellow citizens our way of life are very freedom came under attack. we will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them. we will make no distinction this essential detail was inspired by a key figure in the pentagon richard powell. on the afternoon of 911 places a call to the president's speech writer. i was on the telephone with david frum and i said to david. on the afternoon of 911 whatever else the president says he should say that we will hold. responsible the states that support terrorists say it is a strategic break from the more modest policy so bush is pretty sessoms. i believe it represented a recognition. that we would never succeed against the terrorists if we went after them one at a time and as long as governments were facilitating the organization training equipping and financing of terrorist organizations we were never going to get it under control. and ambitious program from all out war a goal in line with ne

right to date, up to date, is bush worse than trump? >> as a human being, no. in terms of public policy and where we -- and the effects of that publipolicy, i would say no. >> no -- >> no, that trump is not as bad as bush. >> as you look to 2020, what gives you hope? >> what gives me hope is that -- is 2018, and what we saw happen in 2018 was the biggest turnout we've had for democrats and the biggest margin of victorof any midterm, in a repudiation of donald trump. and i'm hoping that we can ride that to the next step 2020, because i don't think -- two things i think need to happen. one is -- he has to be defeated, but he has to be defeated by a large margin -- not just by 3 million votes, but by 9, 10, whatever it is -- a lot of votes and a big electoral win. and then we have to see him held accountable in some way other than the ballot box. if it is determined that he committed crimes, i'd ke to see him convicted, because if that doesn't happen, it basically paves the way for anybody to take stuff from foreign governments, hostile foreign governments, to lin

bush. that is throwing out a lot quickly. to see thatwe have this kind of fear of the outside, islamophobia, deep xenophobia that takes hold later was starting to be reduced -- immediatelya after the cold war. it is along with anthony lake's idea with a rogue state. once people are commie list -- communist, now they are out law states that have decided to be outside the family of nations, slowlywing an enemy that gains traction and could get picked up both after 9/11 and by donald trump. i said the name. [applause] danielle: this is our longest panel, so we will take a moment to shake out a little bit, breathe, and let the nutrients from all the information sink in. we are going to hear from andrew preston, a professor of american history and a fellow at cambridge university. he is the author and editor of seven books including "sort of spirit, shield of faith," and" american foreign relations." please give him a round of applause. [applause] andrew: thank you for that introduction, thank you david and dani for the invitation

bush gave a wonderful speech. at one very powerful moment in the speech president bush told the soon to be american citizens quote, in a few moments the we will share the same title. a title that is meant more to me than any other. and i've had a lot. that would be citizen of the united states. citizenship is an important part of the foundation of our democracy. and we should all work to ensure that our naturalization process is plred fairly efficiently and reasonably. thank you very much for letting me speak today. and i look forward to taking your questions. >> thank you very much. ms. vaughan we'd be happy to hear from you. >> thank you. every single day uscis officers face the challenge of balancing their responsibility to make the correct decision on sometimes complicated applications with the need to do so within a reasonable time frame. it's something i did on a daily basis when i was a counselor officers jude indicating visa applications officer have to be on the look out for fraud which is sometimes rampa

was out there, and god bless the bushes, they are nice people but when jeb bush was saying gibberishn immigration, act of love -- i mean, republicans -- they were a lot of us conservatives who said, we love you as a person, you did a great job as governor but you are so wrong on this. rise of the democrats have such a hard time going after their people who are never going to be president? he will never be president? why at the democrats criticize their own people? >> we heard about caravans, and that was a loser. >> laura: really? not now. immigration is a top issue in america! >> suburban woman who voted for a drop 16 abandon him in droves in '18 because they were nauseated about the kids in cages. >> laura: the obama cages? the obama cages? you didn't care about obama cages when obama had the but now that trump has them on the democrats want to do the asylum or form! okay. i guess we can try that. i don't think it is going to work! they'd like to vilify trump in 2016, horace, he's dumb criminal charges or had people who normally are not that political at the white house, no one cov

bush has essentially abandoned the principles of limited government conservatism.nd so when bush is preparing to leave office in 2008 obviously you have a republican primary-- and there is a great deal of infighting about what the post bush republican party is going to look like. and in fact none of the presidential candidates themselves wind up defining what that post bush party is going to look like nearly as much as the eventual vice presidential nominee sarah palin. and she more than any politician other than donald trump i think really exposes this fundamental disconnect between your upscale managerial country club republican elite and your downscale culturally conservative blue collar base. and there is a great deal of not just ideological friction between these wings but cultural friction. soledad: so let's move then into the trump era and i think it was may of 2016 trump goes after judge curio who's latino judge and sort of the mainstream republicans decry some of the things that he says that are clearly racist and i'll read some because it's in your book s

bush, worked for him, george w. bush put him on the appeal support now a donald trump nominee. what's that about? >> guest: an interesting dynamic that we learn, and we were hearing as we were interviewing people involved, that people would talk it this isn't some idea that bushies had -- >> guest: this was difficult because sometimes people telling us them were themselves bushies. in the bush administration. we had to scratch our head, who are the bushies? this person? they were really close with bush. finally we realized they were talking more about an attitude, not about a specific person sometimes, and it was really -- even at that final moment as he is going into this testimony, there were some people who were say, well, you need to just be a little more recognized where she is coming from, give hear lot of credit for it was hard to come forward and just talk about playing up sympathy and softer approach, and then you had white house counsel don mcgahn who there's a really amazing story in there about they had loved sports analogy and a movie they'd love called "the miracl

use as fuel some of the yuba visit schools to talk about the ovens importance after all trees and bushes hold the desert sand in place so this is about our behavior we have to change our behavior and our way of using raw materials we have to as you said correctly use clean energy and especially use power sources that allow us to reduce our use of wood. the pupils are allowed to test the oven at home for a week. how big my money bossa root tells his family how to use the appliance. when. you know we act and it seems easy to use it produces hardly any smoke and you don't need to use wood anymore that's good i want to try the oven out properly. the new oven costs about 15 euros and the in geo also gives credit to members of the ngo discuss the digital campaign the organization wants to plant trees and find people to take care of them the campaign begins in a village 2 hours upstream sunny are you bust says that after an initial hesitation the women were eager to take part. but are we calling it green new 0 or new share is going green it's about taking responsibility and making things public

i have to build up the military, and i have to do it with bush and obama. with bush, we were in these wars all over the place, and with obama, the same thing. they never ended. in afghanistan, we are spending $50 billion a year. $50 billion. i do not know if you know that, but we have pulled out more in there. we are working on a deal, as you have heard, and at some point we want to get out as quickly as we can, but afghanistan is one thing and with syria we are just about out. we defeated the caliphate and we are just about out. i want to get out of these crazy wars that we should have never been in. these wars are wars we could great damageh through intelligence and other things. at the same time, i want to have the strongest military on the planet earth, and we now do. when i got here, it was really in bad shape. i cannot even tell you how bad it was. now we have new fighter jets, we have new missiles. our nuclear has been renovated, fixed, and in some cases made brand-new. we have tremendous submarines we are building right now, tremendously powerful nu

bush presidency.hey felt like we had elected one of our own, a guy famously said in that debate that jesus was his role model, a guy who sits in the pews with us but didn't do a lot for us. on the social issues, a lot of conservatives felt that george w. bush was weak in the knees. by the time 2016 rolls around and these people feel like they've been trampled under barack obama and the left for the last eight years. they're looking for somebody to get into the arena and start throwing haymakerers. trump, he's prescient. he goes to them and basically says, look, you know that i'm not one of you. i can't speak your language. i don't agree with you probably on half these issues, but i'm willing to go to war for you guys in a way that none of the rest of these republican patsies are willing to. they may talk a good game, but when the going gets tough, they're going to fold because they're creatures of political convention. i am not. i'm beholden to no one. it is impossible to articulate just how appealing

there's no set pattern as to when we are in the bush or where. the animals that natalie rogers rescue center were all rescued from the hands of poachers some of the penguins need medical help because they haven't even for weeks . poachers don't kill penguins immediately preferring to trade life specimens some animals are still so young that natalie rogers has to feed the milk from a syringe. needs to gain weight they weigh her every day. today she is 4.8 kilograms. since she arrived at the animal sanctuary 5 months ago she's gained about one kilogram one more and she can be released. on her whites but she. usually still be in the mother's terror dependent. for they became efficient enough to find their own food and find their own territory. a special team of rangers is fighting the poachers glen thompson leads them he shows us traces of an antelope traces of penguin leans however he says are hard to find in the wilderness over the course of many years observing animals in the bush he and his colleagues have only seen one. if you look at the botto

he did not mean president bush, he met the president in the 21st century, whoever it is. truman would go days and days if not on occasion weeks without giving a speech. well, i would like to go back to that. [laughter] they would have these weekly radio addresses, the weekly speedbump in the speechwriter's to talk about get anything? no, we have a radio address. terrific. [laughter] factoint is that given the that it is the presidency and we live in an age where you can go on all of these different forms of media, it is going to be used by the president and by the white house staff, and i think speeches are very important. reason thather there are moments where you need to find exactly what you want to say and you say it in the best way you know how. the only way to do that is through concentrated discipline effort. that does not mean we cannot do all these other things, but this will always be important. just because of the posture of the office, we will always kind of have outside influence. are about to take questions, so lineup at the mic. we will do a lightning round

george bush who'd been with darwin and the state of a lot of them. who died well i can no hole no hoof and. no no. so what if the guy threw a shoe at me. and there me. my. going to be made a few. that's for you to come sell some. make. known just said the. movement. i'm going to reach is a sourcing of the l a times report paragraph one of us authorities say column one still u.s. officials say said one u.s. justice department counterterrorism official column 2 officials said u.s. authorities say u.s. official said those officials said the officials confirmed american officials complained and they said that u.s. officials. u.s. officials stressed column 3 u.s. authorities said jordanian officials said we're going to strike. no laughter please we haven't finished yet several u.s. officials said column 4 u.s. officials said several american official said officials say say u.s. officials but u.s. officials said one u.s. counterterrorism official said i'm not joking there it is that is the journalism you're getting fed i sometimes think the l a times the n

i have to build it up from both the bush and obama. with bush, we were in wars over the place. the wars never ended. you look at afghanistan, spending $50 billion a year. we pulled back a lot. >> to pull out? >> we are working on negotiating a deal as you are probably heard. at some point, we want to get out, as quickly as we can. afghanistan is one thing. with syria, we are just about out. we defeated the caliphate and we are just about out. i want to get out of these crazy wars that we should have never been in. these wars are worse we could have done great damage to intelligence. at the same time, i want to have military on planet earth and now we do. was in badhere, it shape. now, we have new fighter jets, new missiles, our nuclear has been renovated, in some cases made brand-new. we have submarines we are building right now and a lot of good things are happening. i think we will make a deal with russia where we have arms control because we are adding on to what we don't need and china is trying to catch us. china is way behind. they're trying to catch us and china had the

bush gave a wonderful speech. at one very powerful moment in his speech, president bush told the soon to be american citizens quote "in a few moments, we will share the same title. a title that has meant more to me than any other, and i have had a lot. that would be citizen of the united states ". citizenship is an important part of the foundation of our democracy and we should all work to ensure that our naturalization process is administrated fairly, efficiently and reasonably. thank you very much for letting me speak today, and i look forward to taking your questions. >> thank you very much. ms. vaughan, we would be happy to hear from you. >> thank you. every single day uscis officers face the challenge of balancing their responsibility to make the correct decision on sometimes complicated applications, with the need to do so within a reasonable timeframe. it is something i did on a daily basis when i was an officer adjudicating visa applications. officers always have to be on the lookout for fraud, which is so

bush gave a wonderful speech. at one very powerful moment in the speech president bush told the soon to be american citizens quote, in a few moments, we will share the same title, a title that's meant more to me than any other, and i've had a lot. that would be citizen of the united states. citizenship is important part of the foundation of our democracy and we should make sure that our naturalization process is fairly, efficiently and reasonably. thank you for letting me speak today and i look forward to taking your questions. >> thank you very much. ms. vaughan, we'd be happy to hear from you. >> thank you, every single day uscis officers face the balance of their responsibility to make the correct decision on sometimes complicated applications with the need to do so within a reasonable time frame. it's something i did on a daily basis when i was a counsellor officer. officers have to be on the lookout for fraud which is sometimes rampant depending on the category or for people who are safety or security risks a

or i mean from bush? i think he did. that there were 4 million republicans -- they would have voted for the chairman of the party, either one. it wasn't ross perot voters, per se. he gave some time for clinton to get his campaign together. at the end of the day, he did not cost him the election. >> sandra: we just got word that ross perot has passed away at the age of 89. they have confirmed that after five month battle with leukemia, he has passed away. he was diagnosed just in february. he had a massive infection the next month that nearly killed him according to his family. he showed up at the office most days with the omnipresent american flag on his lapel. >> he was a tough little man. >> bill: he was a very successful businessman, did a good deal with ibm. that really catapulted his business career. his personal fortune as well. why did he make the decision in the late 1980s -- she thought i need to be president because? >> he didn't think bush was doing the right things on the economy. he clearly thought that the

the evening of that tragedy president bush addresses america and the world. today our fellow citizens our way of life are very freedom came under attack. we will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them. we will make no distinction this essential detail was inspired by a key figure in the pentagon richard powell. on the afternoon of 911 places a call to the president's speech writer. i was on the telephone with david frum and i said to david. on the afternoon of 911 whatever else the president says he should say that we will hold. responsible the states that support terrorism say it is a strategic break from the more modest policy so bush is pretty sessoms. i believe it represented a recognition. that we would never succeed against the terrorists if we went after them one at a time and as long as governments were facilitating the organization training equipping and financing of terrorist organizations we were never going to get it under control. and ambitious program for all out war a goal in line with neoc

bush couldn't deliver. he's filling top to bottom with conservative young judges who will be there shaping the country for many years to come. he cut taxes and the most republican way imaginable. aggressive deregulation. i understand the rhetoric and trade and immigration, but has he really changed the republican party that much? he rammed through an agenda. >> to the first point, that is right. it's in the book to explain, i quote a couple of people, some christians conservative leaders, who told me in their first four or five months, they were at the white house for four meetings than they were at the white house during all eight years of bush's presidency. when it's on religious liberty or abortion or any number of causes near and dear to conservatives, pence has been off idle voice nudging trump in that direction. without question, one can make the argument, that i have to remain quiet publicly to retain my influence over this man. if i were to begin feuding with him, i would lose my seat at the table.

i have to build it up from both the bush and obama. because with bush, we were in this wars all over the place. and with obama it's the same thing, they just never ended. you look at afghanistan, we're spending $50 billion a year. $50 billion. now, we pulled back a lot. i mean, i don't know if you know that, but we have. >> are you going to pull out? >> we are working on negotiating a deal as you are probably heard. you know, at some point we want to get out as quickly as we can. but aufing is one thing. with syria, we're just about out as you know. we defeated the cal fate and we're just about out. no, i want to get out of these crazy wars that we should have never been in. these wars are wars that could have done great damage through intelligence and other things and not having gone in. at the same time, i want to have the strongest military on the planet earth. and we do. we now do. when i got here, it was really in bad shape. it was -- i can't even tell you how bad it was. and now we have new fighter jets, new missiles. our nuclear

bush. what's he saying?by tim alberta of politico who had an oval office interview with president trump for his book which looks at how the republican party has changed, what caused an opening for trump and what the president is doing with it. in a surprise, the president attacked all of his recent predecessors, he went after obama, he went after mccain. he went after the top republicans, romney. here's what he said about george w. bush, he said george w. bush in pursuing nation building over the economy at home caused tremendous monetary loss and he said tremendous debt. george w. bush caused tremendous debt, something that bush 43 people already skeptical of this president, this is going to catch fire for sure. >> mike allen, sit tight, you're going to be joining "morning joe" in just a moment. >> happy 4th. >> that does it for us on this wednesday morning, i'm yasmin vossoughian alongside geoff bennett. "morning joe" starts right now. bennett. "morning joe" starts right now >>> good morning to welcome to

if we had problems under president bush in coping with urges. president obama had a terrible problem coping with the surge of central americans. he was the first president who begin to deal with the kind of crisis we have today, that is to say not single men coming up from mexico or south america or central america looking for jobs, but families, large numbers of families in large numbers of children coming to this country, and he had to deal with them. i don't remember the outrage of democrats and maybe it was because she was still tending bar at that point, but if she wants to be clear about this, the letter attack president obama for having constructed walls. letter attack president obama for having detained people. but her attack president obama's secretary of homeland security judge johnson, who has spoken out so i think courageously about how this is a real crisis that ought to be dealt with in a bipartisan way. she views the world through a left-wing prism, so she can't deal with the reality that we face as a country that we are in grave

he did not mean president bush. he meant a 20th century president. he said truman go days and days, sometimes weeks, without giving a speech. said, i would like to go back to that. [laughter] there is the weekly radio address, the weekly speed bump in the speechwriter's office. [laughter] is, just given the it is theis -- that presidency and we lived in an age where you can go on all forms of media, it is going to be used by the president had white house staff, and i think speeches are very important, if for no other reason that there are moments where you need to find exactly what you want to say and say it in the best way you know how. and the only way to do that is through concentrated discipline, effort, and it does not mean you cannot do the other things, but this will always be important, just because of the posture of the office, will always have an outsized influence. ms. sams: we are about to take questions, so line up at the microphone. we will do a lightning round. we are heading into 2020 campaign and a lot of the students are interested

they see a comparison not to jeb bush but to h.w. bush.tinuation of president obama, a steady hand, go with vp biden. >> who will you be watching and why? >> i will be watching kamala and cory, because they've been talking about reform. trying to recreate that moment from the other day is going to be really tough. julian castro, i think, is also very interesting. he's on the stage with bill de blasio and this is what i'm interested in because only castro has been very good at talking about the border crisis and policing. he had a moment where he talked about his son who is african-american and mixed race and policing, but there is controversy here in new york because he hasn't done anything with respect to the officer, officer pantaleo and eric garner and his death. everybody is going to be ready for each other. >> robert, quick, ten seconds. which one are you watching? >> mike bullock, his first time on the stage. >> boyd, quickly, which one are you watching? >> i think criminal reform will take place. his teaming with basil was a good de

bush and democratic challenger bill clinton. >> i was not pthe ballot by either of the two parties. this is a movement that came from the people. >> woodruff: mixing hness with charm, the political outsider pitched himself as a fighter for everyday americans. >> the party is over. it's time for e clean-up crew. woodruff: and, he lambasted lawmakers in washington as out of touch, paramount being president bush. >> i'd say it's experience at this level. >> you're right. i don'have any experience in running up a $4 trillion debt.f: >> woodrerot kept up his attacks, nearly squarely on mr. bush, in the '92 presidential debates, moderated in part by the newshour's jim lehrer. >> free and fair trade is the answer, not protection. >> woodruff: while president bush pushed free trade deals like nafta, perot pushed back. >> we have got to stop sending jobs overseas. there will be a giant suckg sound going south. so, if the people send me to washington, the firss thing i'll doudy that 2,000-page agreement and make sure it's a two-way street

human hope under george bush. and the washington side and the minute i see them coming to school. who are con. 90 general and how the man who wanted. peace that's what we want freedom and peace no not. a few of those who feel who were left who want to see. what the who the less and i want it to her feel and i just push them into the kind of became better because i did good luck and how they could but in the shop at up to say something will never do it but i can him if you want too much coffee that i want to t'other can even be full. damage how about a lead up to a silo let me allow to be a diamond how i met up how well it had he did you let your color do to bush and then tell us all in there not be a circle let me come to what i can x. amount that we had the end and then take out it but if you so you can do what i feel it to john then add up dean let me say that you know we're george bush who'd been with darwin and the u.k.'s statement. on how they just. died well i can now hold the hoof and. know. so what if the guy threw a shoe at. and there me. my. going to be made a few. that'

if they just replace bush it because bush you for them was a liability actually a head to the head of a political ambitions and then when they removed him and they took power and they supported actually that moment of revolution which of us actually could i would buy the danish people a peaceful demonstrators but this took forget that you know if there is any doubt with that is that his people are not going to get action in their demands and aspiration for a democratic transformation civilian rule actually yesterday there was a clear answer to anyone who doubted that allen you mentioned the internet how could well the protesters the demonstrators when that was blocked. well clearly it took them a while of course the the crackdown was on june 3rd these these protests happened yesterday so it took several weeks but they have managed to find a number of ways of of continuing to communicate of course they're still s.m.s. and phone network where they can communicate and then others have found ways of using international roaming phone networks basically to continue using internet and they'v

bush.heatlatic.com. jeff, stronger or weaker on the issue of legal immigration? raise a few i'ma points. if you look at our history, a few presidents had the foresight moratorium to where there is no immigration for a set number of years. in order for the people who are to be counted, to be identified, and to assimilate. that's an important ingredient in the melting pot defense of immigration. you have to have assimilation and you have to stop it because of the abuse. we have had so much abuse of our immigration that we all have to millionhere are 20 minimum illegals in our country. to be honest, take stock of your own home, your own country. get everybody identified and nobody can come in for 10 years. 20 years. whatever they decide. need to stop the leak. then we can fix the illegal problem by having nobody come in . eventually weed out the illegals and get them identified. and then reestablish a quota where we have the wall up. of you don't have millions people on identified. yes, immigr

you're bush insists she's no fashion expert. on do those shoes match this shirt. but 7 years ago she took heart and founded her online fashion service out fishery which helps people choose their clothes. and because i'm not too lazy kelly women founders are seen as somewhat exotic i had no idea of that before hand from the beginning we were constantly being asked what it's like to be a female falling quite honestly i thought the question was simply awful because i didn't want to be of women found out i wanted to be a founder it took a while for me to grasp that it also offers me the chance to be a role model to say to other young women just do it have faith in yourselves. outfitter has already dressed a 1000000 customers and employees 450 people most in berlin but unusually this primarily women run company focuses entirely on men. behavior and profit because we simply saw greater demand with the men in as far as in most shops the men's department is out the back door down in the cellar and so there was simply a giant market potential for us with women of course it