long time not to do this in the united states, moreover, after how i was invited to be a father, bush jrlace on the ocean, for a visit, and there a very serious conversation took place with president bush, with his team, and i proposed that - the united states, russia and europe jointly create a missile defense system, which, as we believe, created unilaterally, threatens our security, despite the fact that it was officially discussed with the united states that it was being created against missile threats from outside iran, this was also the basis for its creation, i suggested that the three of them work together, russia, the usa, europe. we will radically change the situation in the world, probably economically, even politically, but the world will change, we will probably have disputes, he says, yes, i asked, are you serious, i i say, of course, we need to think , they told me, i say, please, then here, in this office where we are talking, secretary of defense gates, the former director of the cia, and the secretary of state came. systems that will certainly overcome the pro system. h

know who won exactly, but... the supreme court still sided with the republicans, so they appointed bush jrhe winner of that election, well, of course , i think that pretty much undermined faith many americans into their electoral system , this, of course, was far from the first such scandalous elections, and there, if we go back into history in the 19th century, for example, almost every election was not without scandals about fraud, and even in the 20th century there were such cases more than once scandals surfaced, the matter republicans were continued by democrat barack obama, and his... there were significant problems in the obama election in 2008. at that time , a number of osce members openly spoke about preventing observers from allowing voters to enter polling stations, errors in counting ballots, and other very strange things not typical of an ideal democracy. however, the osce odihr is known for the mobility of its musculoskeletal system, and already at the end of that campaign , observers reported that everything was in the best standards of democracy. even this fades before ame

who won exactly, well, but the supreme court still sided with the republicans, so they appointed bush jrer of that election, but of course, i think that’s pretty strong undermined the faith of many americans in their electoral system, these were certainly not the first such scandalous elections, yes, if we go back into history in the 19th century, for example, almost every election was not without scandals about fraud, even in the 20th century. such scandals surfaced more than once; the work of the republicans was continued by democrat barack obama and his supporters. obama's 2008 election was not without significant problems . at that time, a number of osce members openly announced the obstruction of voter observers from entering the polling station, errors in ballot counting, and other very strange and not typical for an ideal democracy things. however, the osce/odihr is known for the mobility of its musculoskeletal system already. at the end of that campaign , observers reported that everything was in the best standards of democracy, but even this pales in comparison to american-style

but every time during this century it gets worse and worse, you know, i thought that bush is like bush jrto everyone else, i now realized that i was deeply mistaken, the younger one was an acquaintance, he was talking, he was talking to the americans, this american one. now, if you just imagine that the supreme court, friend, stood up and turned around a little, that’s it, a big mess is starting in america, it will start anyway, but if we remove it, biden, as you can see, is a wonderful president , yes, he will go to a debate with trump, to a televised debate, and he will win, i think maybe, but in general there is no doubt, no, if it’s a hologram, then he will win, no, that’s it the dead of america will vote yes about the elections they said. and i say then, when it should be on tv, i think that it won’t reach tv at all, it will be two times tv, just if, so to speak, we remove the hypothetical, why don’t you respect the right of the dead to watch tv and vote for biden, he is being removed in different ways they are removing, well, biden too, but who comes to the fore, nicky haley and kam

romnik when he ran for president, matthew krelnik, the posts that he held in the administration of bush jrk you knew skakrov, he was also very worthy and very reasonable. a very careful person, now the center named after him, steve hadley, is giving their names to calls not only to destroy the creep bridge, they do not understand why it has not yet been destroyed. dmitry, well, first of all , you know, as the classics of marxism and linism said, being is determined by consciousness, since they, so to speak, work in a magazine, or rather not in a magazine at the atlantic council, hadley does not work there, he is there. ok, but i don’t know, well , he probably gets some money there, being honorable, non -honorable, therefore atlantic money, i will tell you honestly , this is where i think we disagree, i believe that these are people who value their reputations, these are people who want to be taken seriously, these are the things that can be done now speak calmly in america, without any fear. for your reputation, and things of the opposite order, let's sit down and talk with putin, these ar

at one time, an employee of the state department, a senior adviser, appointed first by president bush, jr., then appointed by trump, now christian is involved in business, works in a prominent... he's like- then joined in, jake salevan, this should be taken as a serious manifestation of concern about some major military programs of russia, or is it more within the framework of a political struggle, an attempt to block the efforts of the republicans, stop aid to ukraine. very, very strange, i don’t understand it myself. what it is? reports appear, for example, the new york times writes that russia has some new capabilities, some nuclear weapons in outer space, some tests are being carried out, and something else. and that of course, the use of weapons in outer space is not something new. before the treaty signed by president kennedy came into force, which prohibited this kind of testing. were actively working in this direction, naturally, now, if nuclear weapons were actually used in space, this would lead to much more serious consequences, since there are many more satellites in orbit tod

little desire to treat russia as a serious power. former national security assistant to president bush jry should immediately provide tauras missiles to the us army tactical atakom missile system with a firing range of 190 miles. we are not confident that this approach will lead to peace or even a formal ceasefire agreement. however, he can create a deadlock by stabilizing the front and reducing the number of hostilities, which will save lives and give ukraine a break. this is the approach: why is the crimean bridge still standing? and let's think about it, what is destruction? was organized by authoritative non-governmental organizations in moscow and washington, and they had just met with foreign minister sergei lavrov, and steve headley told me what good news, moscow is not worried about american plans to deploy defensive systems in europe, i say, where does this come from? when one country feels its superiority, believes that they are the hegemon, and another country is thinking about how to get american grants, and be in favor in wahington and london, this is my long, sort of introdu

dresden, but in any case , no one can afford even such a thing now, and even since the time of george bush jrtion has changed , and that's why it's been a year, on the other hand , afghanistan. that was and was for a long time, well, it was the next stage of military operations, then there was still, yes, no, i agree that there cannot be such a war as it was before, we can talk in the other direction, we can discuss with you the question of whether there will be an outflow of the population after the end of the hot phase of the war, because end, you mean the lifting of martial law, the lifting of martial law, the freedom to leave the country. we are now also in a rather artificial situation, like in a test tube. well, to be honest, i rather think that it should be kept for the time being, because, well, let's put it this way, the fervor that was in the year 22, when the queues were huge until military commissariat and everything else is no longer observed. and poll after poll , well, i am skeptical of most polls, but less so, in ukraine there is not such a high proportion of people who say th

merkel is here, of course, and obama's predecessor, bush, ah, jr., and sarkozy, and berlusconi, and so a whole bunch of these people who treated putin's identity with great respect and piety. kyiv launched international activities to form a coalition in support of ukraine. the prime minister with a reputation as a pro-western politician had good contacts in western capitals. forming a coalition of countries that would help ukraine was one of the most important tasks for the diplomatic service. this is one thing, and the second is opposition to russia, and although russia officially... at that time did not want to talk with arseniy yatsenyuk's government, no wanted to talk to ukraine in general , they did not want to recognize us, they believed that this was a coup, and they would not talk to this new government, then there was no question of such sending, for example, of weapons, we did not talk about it yet, just they did not understand what, how, how, what kind of help, but actually, to form, public opinion, form... support among the political elite of the eu and nato countries to fo

the pro systems treaty, signed by brezhnev and nixon, was denounced by president bush jr.ly, the treaty prevented the united states from defending itself against terrorist threats. in fact, the states wanted to tighten the missile defense ring tighter around russia, and this was in 2001, when relations between the west and moscow remained quite warm. further, the agreement on conventional armed forces in europe, which implied the preservation of a certain parity in the number of troops, lost all meaning after the unbridled expansion of nato. not a single inch to the east, we were told, in the nineties. so what? they cheated, they just blatantly deceived. five waves. russia, supposedly the russians have somewhere a 9m rocket capable of flying further than 500 km, despite the fact that the americans themselves have already quietly rebuilt their factories, recruited thousands of additional workers and churned out tamagaft cruise missiles and ground launchers for them. contrary to the agreement. russia has been violating this agreement for many years. i don't know why presiden

bush, jr. got excited about the idea of ​​cooperation in the security sphere, but his team again killedon’s attempt to get closer. in the same way, the west escalated the issue of nato expansion. coup in ukraine. it was maidan that launched the entire further chain of events 10 years ago. putin calls this a colossal political mistake by washington. well, the question arose about association with the european union. yanukovych began to count how much ukraine would win and how much it would lose. i announced to my counterparties in europe. i have to think again before sign. as soon as he spoke, the destructive actions of the opposition, supported by the west, began. everything came to the maidan and the coup in ukraine, how do we understand this, who are you anyway? i wanted to ask the then leadership of the united? with the support of the cia, of course, the organization in which, as i understand, you once wanted to work, maybe, thank god, they didn’t take you, the same organization that was behind the ukrainian maidan staged a terrorist attack on... ona's ears, which obviously stick out

and others is that, in previous efforts to have immigration reform, during the bush administration, bush jr., and barack obama, these conservative type restrictions that are in your legislation were paired with things progressives wanted, a pathway to legal status for the dreamers, things along those lines, this time, the progressives did not get anything, it was honestly just more restrictions and the wall street journal calls this the most conservative, something along the lines of the most conservative immigration compromise they have seen in the last 20 years. i am wondering, what is your response to that when you hear people who voted for more previous more liberal immigration compromises, i am thinking of the gang of eight and marco rubio, lindsey graham , now opposing something that is more conservative? >> jake, this was not an immigration package, it is a border security package. the wall street journal was correct in saying this had the strictest migration policies they have seen in decades. that is accurate. because the crisis is so severe. in december, we saw thousands of indivi

bush jr. met there, i was then working in the united states and covered this visit as reporter, it wastogether at the elder’s ranch, talked, smiled, putin brought a business proposal that any person who was really in the mood for dialogue would be obliged to accept, he said, here you go, we have a friendly azerbaijan, it stands there. station, let’s use it together, let’s use it together, you will see everything that iran does, of course not,” bush said, quite rudely, at the same time, we have other plans, here we go, the czech republic, aegis systems, according to the whole world built their air defense system against russia, of course, of course, they did not at all expect that we would really give that very adequate response in the form of modern weapons, hypersound of all... main types of weapons, but accordingly, this is true, they always use it , and we're out of this warning pattern. uh work uh the beginning of the 2000s and in general what kind of proposals we made to them, including uh readiness to join nato, but strictly speaking , uh they obviously believed that the united s

at various times, the firm handled client affairs for michelle and barack obama, both clintons, bush jrwife laura, dick cheney and barbara streasant. the salary of a newbie lawyer started at $200,000. but pompeo is leaving for kansas, in the town of wichita, the center of american aircraft manufacturing, with three accomplices with no experience in the industry, they create their own company with the participation of the koch industries corporation, they buy up aerospace enterprises around kansas and mikey becomes a figurehead for the koch political lobbyists in aviation, the oil business, the high technology sector, then he uses their money to enter congress, and in his person they get their man in the committee. america is a force for good in the middle east. pompeo's entire political career is a creation hotbeds of tension in countries where there is oil or through which its traffic passes. the focus of efforts is the entire middle east. trump’s foreign policy intentions, which pompeo successfully ignored, forced him to actually break the inf treaty with russia. the russians are sowi

. >> president boma, president clinton, president bush senior president bush jr.. i don't know with three people makes it a common -- thing >> that's actually not true. officials from all administrations from the past half century or show have had that accidentally happen. >> but >> you are parsing two things, you asked about the fact, and the report states this clearly, it is likely the result of interest -- and, you asked exactly about the staff issue. and so i'm responding about the staff issue. >> and you can't say whether the staff still works for president biden? >> well i am saying that the question you are asking about the frequency and normalcy, unfortunately of mistakes like these being made, they happen. and what matters is how you respond to. it and when you file there was a mistake that was, made you give everything back, and that is exactly what was done. >> thank you. what does it say about merrick garland's judgment, that he appointed someone who ultimately put out a report that was so agree, just so inappropriate, and -- flouted department regulati

, but the soul and... it will not be possible to divide it, and many tried to divide it, the same bush jre saw the soul of the president, a promise not support separatism in the caucasus and terrorists were never restrained, i understood this question, he says, well, it can’t be, you have proof, yes, i was ready for this demon, i didn’t give him this proof, he looked, you know what he said , but i 'm sorry, yes, but so... russia, you may or may not like it, but the fact is that putin would start a nuclear war if it came to crimea. therefore, if you really think that putin will have to give up crimea as a condition for achieving peace, then you are crazy, they such, i mean they want weak leadership in russia, the question is why do you need it, how good is it for the united states, i'm not defending russia, i 'm defending my country. anton panomariov, results of the week, ntv television company. and then it’s clear that this is all about the fact that the superpowers do not admit to mistakes, but are looking for options. and the new york times already writes that without american support,

jr., george w. bushld reagan , and it was a moment in american history when we americans and the world wondered what the united states could achieve. by bombing countries, that's right, you are exporting democracy, this is to say that you asked about democracy in america. i 've seen this feature of foreign policy united states and worked for many years with the very people who started this crusade: this american crusade around the world. this truly leveled american values, the american image around the world, and, in fact, american security, and this is the most important thing. exactly then. in 2015, i said the united states and the world needed change. and it was then that i became an adviser to candidates who were supporters of patriotism, ending the endless wars of protecting american sovereignty. no longer be the police of the world, who the biden administration is trying to be today. we came out of a four-year peace with trump, where we didn't have foreign wars, we had stability, we had peace betwe

last year president bush jr. in the situation wrote an op-ed urging pepfor reauthorization which he quoted a late speech wrirp michael gish and his followers. what definition does not include saving millions of lives from preventable disease and death. bush went on to note, we're on the verge of ending the hiv-aids epidemic to abandon our commitment now would forfeit two decades of unimaginable progress and rather further questions about the worth of america's words. i agree. i call on my republican friends to help authorize this historic bipartisan blief saving effort without further delay. madam president, as a different topic. the senate passed a bipartisan aid package before the recess, notably to help ukraine defend itself against russia. ukraine has fought an historic battle, thwarting a full-scale russian invasion two years ago and showing the world how you stand up to a bully like vladimir putin. in fact, his resistance to russia has major security impacts and benefits for our large western security. ukra

the situation repeated itself when putin proposed to the next us president bush jr. to cooperate on aade the west from organizing a bloody coup in ukraine. it was maidan that launched the entire further chain of events 10 years ago. putin calls this a colossal political mistake by washington. well, the question arose about association with the european union. i began to count how much ukraine would win and how much it would lose, i told my, my counterparties in europe, i should think again before signing, as soon as he said, they started destructive actions in the opposition, supported by the west, everything reached the maidan and the coup in ukraine, how do we understand this, who are you anyway, i wanted to ask the then leadership of the united states? such evidence and you will not win in this war of propaganda, in the war of propaganda it is very difficult to defeat the united states, because the united states controls all the world's media, many european ones we can, we can simply expose our sources of information, but we will not achieve results, to the whole world and it's so

. >> president bush senior or jr., i don't know if three people make it a common -- >> officials from the past, you know, half century or so have had it happen. and the report states clearly, likely a result of inadvertent packing by staff and you asked exactly about the staff issue and so i'm responding about the staff issue. >> you can't say whether the staff still works for president biden. >> the question you are asking about, the frequency and normalcy unfortunately of mistakes like these being made, they happen. and what happens is how you respond toit and find out there was a mistake made, you give everything back. that's what was done. >> what does it say about merrick garland's judgment he appointed someone that put out a report so egregious, so inappropriate flauted department regulations and norms. >> i think the president answered the question last night. he talked about his views on the appointment of special prosecutor and i don't have anything beyond what he said. >> two things i was hoping you could quickly clarify. report says in 2017 the president told his ghostwrite

bush. - after leaving office, president ronald reagan appeared on the original "firing line" with william f. buckley, jr. in 1990 to discuss his memoir, "part of the exit package," as you say, "an american life." here's how buckley described the 700-page book. take a look. - it is the closest we are likely to get to the history of the 1980s in america, and the closest we will ever get to a portrait of someone who feels it unnatural to draw open the curtain on his private life, and yet succeeds in illuminating that life by giving his reactions to public situations to give him pain and pleasure. - reagan reportedly signed a $5 million contract with simon and schuster for his memoir. many presidents have had multimillion dollar book deals, and big speaking fees around the world. what is your analysis of the commoditization of the post-presidency? - so it's gotten normalized over time, right. i think the idea of presidents getting big book advances, we expect that the idea of presidents getting you know, big speaking fees, we expect that, and i think ex-presidents are a treasure of the republic. they're sym

jr. wrote a vote for mr. nader is a vote for mr. bush.ader was wrong when he dismisses his spoiler role arguing there is little distinction between the two major parties candidates. now, of course robert f. kennedy tells me that he intends to win this election here in 2024, but when we look back at that 2000 election, it was not just florida but new hampshire's, and many suggest it was ralph that caused al gore's loss. >>> there was a recent poll that shows kennedy would help trump. our nbc poll had him at 1%, other polls had him at hire. but, there are folks that argue, and vaughn just, you know, suggested this, that other candidates contributed to democratic losses, not just al gore's, but hillary clinton's as well. so historically, at least modern history, they're spoilers. but with the current level of dissatisfaction with trump and biden, is there any chance you see this year could be different? >> no, i think that third-party candidates are spoilers. history could potentially repeat itself again, and now more than ever, the idea of