remember this conversation. who writes next december 8, 1991 writes bush yeltsin called me to announceis meeting with leonid kravchuk and stanislav shushkevich, the president of ukraine and belarus in fact. he was still with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today - yeltsin said a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you know him about this express, yeltsin seems to have read something like a prepared statement. it seemed to me that he set out the provisions of the signed agreement, as if specifically worded in such a way as to get the support of the united states they directly stated the conditions for recognition that we advocated i did not want to prematurely express our approval or not approval, so i just said, i understand this is very important reacted there mr. president he added to tell you in confidence that gorbachev is not aware of these results. we hope for your understanding, dear. george i will finish, established between us by tradition and i couldn't wait 10 minutes without calling you. so the country

president of the united states of america who writes the following on december 8, 1991, writes bush yeltsinalled me to inform me of his meeting with leonid kravchuk and stanislav shushkevich , the president of ukraine and belarus, in fact. he was still with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today - yeltsin said a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you know about it from the press yeltsin seems to read something like a prepared statement. it seemed to me that he set out the provisions of the signed agreement, as if they were specifically formulated in such a way as to obtain the support of the united states, they directly set out the conditions for recognition that we advocated. i did not want to prematurely express our approval or disapproval, so i simply said, i i understand that it is very important to react. mr. president added he must tell you in confidence that gorbachev does not know about these results. we we hope for your understanding, dear. george i 'll finish, it's a tradition between us and couldn't wait 10

also, the transcript of another meeting between yeltsin and bush sr. inety-second year, cheaper from the gosik, became public. baker, a telegram from the us embassy in moscow and a recording of a conversation with the main reformer yegor gaidar, yeltsin's economic team, having studied all these documents , the national security archive notes that, in general, the topic of relations with ukraine was touched upon in almost all conversations between representatives of the us and russian leadership, the fateful visit of charles degulya in the ussr today they remembered in moscow at a round table on the preservation of historical memory of the sixty -sixth year, the cold war, moscow's contacts with western countries are at a minimum. however, the visit of the generals who headed at that moment, which laid the foundation for the most important program of cooperation between the soviet union and france, in this photo de golf in the ussr , the head of the foreign intelligence service, sergei naryshkin , presented this picture to the grandson of the ex-president

this was confirmed in washington and yeltsin warned about the ukrainian threat of bush sr., poroshenkon 2014 today, openly says kiev was simply given a truck alexander khristenko will continue. boris yeltsin in a striped sweater george w. bush sr. in a personalized sweatshirt , everything is as if it were a cam residence at home. david february 1992 another president another level relations between countries and a completely different era but even then it comes to ukraine from the declassified transcript of the conversation it follows that yeltsin tells bush about sharp and deep contradictions in relations with kiev in ukraine 11 million ethnic russians. they live in the east. ukraine on the border with russia russians are also the majority in crimea they could vote to join russia. so in regards to that fact. i do not think that ukraine will make any sharp turns not for the record, our main destabilizing factor is ukraine. yeltsin then proceeds from the fact that moscow and washington want the same stability in the post - soviet space. in turn, the question of control over nuclear weap

also, the transcripts of another meeting between yeltsin and bush sr. ninety-second year became public. telegrams from the us embassy in moscow and a recording of a conversation with yegor gaidar, the main reformer in yeltsin's economic team, having studied all these documents, the national security archive notes that, in general, the topic of relations with ukraine was touched upon in almost all conversations between representatives of the us and russian leadership today, the international currency fund improved its forecast for russian gdp in 2023 and even predicts a slight increase more business news the international monetary fund has become more optimistic about the prospects for the russian economy and instead of falling by 2.3% this year. he is now waiting for growth, though only by three tenths for the start of events in ukraine, the imf predicted that the russian economy will increase this year two and one tenth percent. it is interesting that this new forecast from the imf is more optimistic than the expectation of the russian authorities, the

was spent on bringing boris nikolayevich yeltsin to power, for what, in order to destroy the country in belovezhskaya pushcha and here report this to president bush 8, 1991, yeltsin's husband writes called me to inform about his meeting, if they are there kravchuk and stanislav shushkevich the president of ukraine and belarus in fact. he was still with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today - yeltsin said a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you know about it and ask 25 million of our compatriots found themselves outside our country helpless, but confused. and the divorce continues and the village dies agriculture. you know how many military educational institutions from 1992 to 2015 were put under the knife, 67, just like that, offhand offhand. look, i won’t talk about everyone, factories stop producing their own aircraft. everything is imported. some factories stopped at other military factories, which make rumors, which make tamki, a controlling stake passes to foreign investors for a penny, light ships, destroyers, boats are sold for copies. and it all happens with a smi

uh, yeltsin's negotiations with bush sr. but the fact that brzezinski believed that ukraine is important from the point of view of the consolidation of eurasia, the russian empire of a big russia, certainly leads to this conclusion. he came to the pre-trial detention center strongly, uh, much in advance, yes, well, and in words , the bush administration actually in the ninety-first year, it seems, as you didn’t support, you will personally, his senior speech in kiev did not support the collapse of the soviet union. but as soon as the soviet union collapsed, the politics of the administration already. bush began to fix a new status quo to fix geopolitical pluralism in the post-soviet space, and the clinton administration that came to power in 1993 even began to consider ukraine as a key element. in its policy of fragmentation, and fragmentation of the post-soviet space from the ninety-fourth year, ukraine has become the main recipient american assistance in the post-soviet space. we're now handing over the floor to the news a

the us national security archive declassified the transcript of the negotiations between yeltsin and george w. bushussian president then called ukraine the main destabilizing factor in the post-soviet space, saying that there were 11 million russians in ukraine and, for example, in crimea they could vote for joining russia speech. it also talked about the enormous pressure that ukrainian radicals put on the government, as well as the danger that these nationalists can pose to the russian population. well, for the regional stability, if they have power , the situation changed a lot in the middle of the 2000s , the nationalists appeared and the influence and power under the administration of viktor yushchenko began to be rewritten. history textbooks pursue an openly discriminatory policy and even withdrew all regular military units from the donbass so that in case of emergency they could not go over to the side of the local population. well , 10 years later there was a second maidan what happened next is a well-known question now. are there any options for overcoming the current crisis, the proposal

americans the us archive with us security declassified the transcript of the talks between yeltsin and george w. bushin kemed. the russian president then called ukraine the main destabilizing factor in the post-soviet space, saying that there are 11 million russians in ukraine, for example in the crimea , they could vote for joining russia. it also talked about the enormous pressure that ukrainian radicals are putting on the government, as well as the danger that these nationalists can pose to the russian population and to the regional stability, if they gain power, well, after 25 years there was a maidan and just radical nationalists, with the help of the united states , seized power in the country . now the question is whether it is possible to get out of the current crisis. on the ukrainian theme, for example, the grandson of charles de gaulle, public figure pierre de gaulle according to him , only the united states is interested in continuing the conflict in ukraine to achieve a sustainable peace with russia, an interesting statement was made by brazilian president lula da sila, firstly, said tha

that it was unacceptable to indulge them , as evidenced by the transcripts of boris yeltsin's conversations with george bushfied by the american national security archive. he warned that if the nationalists take over in kiev, then 11 million russian eastern regions, including crimea, could vote for reunification with russia, then the states seemed to listen, but in fact they did everything to play this card for the modern leadership. nationalism in kyiv. the basis of power and excellent business zelensky and his team earn hundreds of millions of dollars on the conflict with russia points to this is al-abi, and there are many corruption stories associated with the president of ukraine , the channel notes how to circumvent the laws zelensky and his team learned long before he came to power . according to the docs. from the pandora dossier zelensky since 2012 has been the beneficiary of a number of foreign firms, which he jointly managed with his old friends, who helped him make the film servant of the peoples 2015, among zelensky's partners were also zelensky's first assistant sergei shefir and former head of

meeting boris nikolaevich yeltsin with us president bush. t the origins. he knew everything too. in ukraine there are 11 million ethnic russians they live in the east on the border with the russian federation russians are also the majority in crimea they could vote to join russia so in connection with this fact. i don't think that ukraine will make any sharp turns off the record, our main destabilizing factor is ukraine as for relations with the states of the former soviet union, yeltsin assures his ears that russia has no imperial ambitions and will be clear about the problems of others states, the russian president describes his relations with ukraine and personally with leonid kravchuk as very good, but admits that the main destabilizing factor for us is ukraine, noting the nationalist pressure on kravchuk, the main destabilizing factor is ukraine 90 second year yeltsin well, here i want more mark. uh, firstly, why boris nikolaevich says that there are only 11 million russians on the territory of ukraine, with the exception of the crimea o

transcripts of the conversations from the first president of russia, boris yeltsin, with his american counterpart, george bushr., and now according to these documents , the russian leadership pointed out in washington in 1992 that the nationalists in ukraine pose a serious danger primarily to the russian-speaking population, and moscow warned if in kiev nationalists take over, then 11 million russians in the eastern regions, including crimea , can vote for reunification with russia areas with tulips are self-propelled mortars of the largest caliber in the world. thus, they ensure the advancement of our assault groups from the advanced report by aleksey baranova, the weather is clear, the weather is only to help the reconnaissance drone , which is working directly above the line of contact, its camera is now recording the advance of russian assault units in the zaporozhye direction of contact , we are passing the assembly point of the tank brigade before the start of combat work. on the zaporozhye direction in the vicinity of settlements gulyaipole is walnut-black and the line of contact is now very mobile. ru

declassified the transcripts of the conversations of the first president of russia boris yeltsin with his american colleague george bushr. washington that the nationalists in ukraine pose a serious danger primarily to the russian-speaking population. moscow then warned that if the nationalists took over in kiev, then 11 million russians in eastern regions, including crimea, may vote for reunification with russia russian special services seized more than 250 clandestine weapons they told the fsb of russia in two months they discovered almost a hundred illegal gunsmiths in 38 regions. they restored military weapons, including machine guns, machine guns, pistols, rifles, grenade launchers and flamethrowers, the operation to detain and seize weapons was carried out by the joint fsb of the ministry of internal affairs and the national guard. the international monetary fund changed its forecast for the dynamics of the russian economy in 2023, instead of falling by 2.3% , the imf predicts growth by 3/10%. experts note that the economic decline last year amounted to 2.2%, which turned out to be lower than forecast, this year t

yeltsin once again told bush, and said so, that ukraine is a destabilizing factor, a remarkable statement to yeltsin's quote. in ukraine there are 11 million ethnic russians they live in the east on the border with the russian federation russians are also the majority in crimea they could vote to join russia so in relation to this fact. i don't i think that ukraine will make some sharp turns off the record, our main destabilizing factor is ukraine as for relations with the states of the former soviet union yeltsin assures bush that russia has no imperial ambitions and will be clear about the problems of other states the russian president describes their relations with ukraine and personally with leonid kravchuk. as very good, but admits that our main destabilizing factor is ukraine, noting the nationalist pressure on kravchuk. let's leave out the fact that this national security archive released the facts and made public a dialogue that was off the record. yes, nevertheless he is devoted to publicity, but the essence is important. well, strictly speaking, let's remember that boris nikolae

the us declassified a recording of a conversation between boris yeltsin and george bush sr., in whichctor and explains why

george washington is a declassified transcript of boris nikolaevich yeltsin's talks with george. bushr russia to be ukraine. listen. in ukraine, 11 million ethnic russians live in the east on the border with russia. are the majority in crimea they could vote to join russia so that in connection with this fact. i do not think that ukraine will make any sharp turns not for the record, our main destabilizing factor is ukraine vladimir vladimirovich well, boris nikolayevich turned out to be wrong that the russian-speaking population of ukraine will keep kiev from a foreign policy turn, but that this destabilizing factor does not seem to you that it became a destabilizing factor precisely because of the policy of the united states in the first place. and that this statement by yeltsin was accepted by the united states, as a guide to action. well, in fact , the united states began, of course, to use this factor long before february. year ninety-two. moreover, even long before the ninety-first year before the referendum, as soon as perestroika began, uh, in the mid-late 80s, ukraine was fill

>> i think bush thought there will be a good partner and a continuation of yeltsin and he said that - a religious feeling from himself and bush would be on the team. he thought of the a junior unimportant partner until going into iraq. putin said i will fight back and show him you can't mess around in what he considered to be the outer boundary, iraq and the middle east. you see bush lose him badly in the olympics trying to convince putin to stop the incursion into georgia and putin basically says, no, i'm going the direction to build my empire. it is the same kind of story you see with obama who wasn't interested in putin and putin we say in the film was a hardcore racist about obama and didn't want to be in the room with him. you see what happens there. the relationship between the president and putin breaks down. obama hands it to biden. biden decides to get tough with putin and he knows now what that means is biden as vice president means he can go forward and test america. he thinks of biden weak. that's taking crimea and georgia and the united states had done nothing and not pus