, because he tried to find out who maks buzhanskyi was somewhere on google, but in this case andriyu, the minister of foreign internal affairs, forgive me, says that one and a half days after the murder, as a fait accompli , that is... the investigation has not yet been completed, there has not yet been a court, a trial, and the minister of internal affairs says that a day and a half after the murder, he was preparing the next possible action, nothing has been proven yet, that is, there are some records , some there in the computer statutes of the kgb or something, some methods, some photocopies, and yesterday we watched how a photo of this... suspect appeared in the mass media, which could not have happened without the ministry of internal affairs, as far as it corresponds practice and norms of journalistic ethics in this situation, because even yesterday someone wrote that this is a murderer already, and not a suspect, as far as the journalists here acted correctly and in a timely manner, well, i would also like to start with condolences to the relatives. to kill a loved one, terror

could have been there, because he tried to find out who maks buzhanskyi was on google, but in this case it was andriyu, the minister of foreign affairs, excuse me, says that one and a half days after the murder was committed as a fait accompli, that is...

could have been there, because he is somewhere google tried to find out who max buzhanskyi is, but inhis case andriyu, the minister of foreign affairs and internal affairs, forgive me, says that one and a half days after the murder was committed as a fait accompli, that is, the investigation has not yet been completed, there was no trial yet, and the minister of internal affairs says that , a day and a half after the murder, he was preparing the next possible action, nothing has been proven yet, that is, there are some records, some kgb statutes in the computer , or something there are some methods photocopies, and yesterday we observed... how the photo of this suspect appeared in the mass media, which could not have happened without the ministry of internal affairs, as far as it corresponds to the practice and norms of journalistic ethics in this situation, therefore that even yesterday someone wrote that this is a murderer already, and not a suspect, to what extent did the journalists here work correctly and on time? well, i would also like to start with sympathy for the relatives o

iryna farion became a victim, precisely because of her ideological murders, then what is maksym buzhanskying here, that is? there is a suspect who does not look like any a special agent who quietly carried out his task of destabilizing the situation in ukraine, so i still do not have a clear answer to what it was and, in the end, what were the motives of those people who committed this crime, well, for me something else is important, even the context of that as i put it, the second event is something more for social networks, this is what the social networks were saying now about this baomaister, more precisely, a ukrainian, i don’t know, a philosophy teacher, say, a blogger who is popular in certain circles, she just that this discussion showed for me personally, i, for example, do not know anything about him, i live in some other ukraine, in another information, information bubble, and let 's put it this way, yes, where in principle there are no such people, i do not hear their voices , and natalia vlashchenko, the best. and nataliya vlashchenko hardly knows anything, i don’t know about

buzhanskyi could become a servant of the people, i am quoting her now klymenko, she was the most defenseless among all, we showed you his search plate, i can reveal one last name to you, the next person he looked at was max buzhanskyi, well, also because of the flow of information, regarding the probable suspect in the murder of irena farion, aa was discovered. well, the matter is, they will find out who leaked the information to the media, because actually, as the spokeswoman of the ministry of internal affairs, maryana reva, said on the air of the telethon, that there was definitely a leak, unfortunately, it is no longer the first case, immediately everyone tries to find out as much information as possible through their sources in law enforcement agencies, for our part, we always make sure that all information is isolated before the judicial investigation and only those data that the investigation allows are provided, the leakage of information is monitored. by the way, we will talk about this a little later, about how the media talked about it yesterday, how the law enforcement officers t

last name, i wonder why only buzhanskyi was called, yes, well, accordingly, maybe there are peoplesimply be guarded, if it wasn’t this or that, you know, individual initiative, if it was very clearly a plan was planned with someone, where these or other killers will be used, well , accordingly, some countermeasures must be applied there on the part of these or other units of ours. well, look, once again he was just looking for buzhansky on the internet, i don’t know, maybe he liked him, he just wanted to see what he tells there, there is no word that it was a whole list. secondly, to set up security for how much, for what period of time, for six months, for a year. do not forget that this is, well, separately, this is an item of state budget expenditure, secondly, it is about spending resources, and thirdly, it is a limitation of a person's private activity, if he is a politician there, he has security, of course, there are cases when it is like to a person that he is with security, but usually this is a burden, you will not go anywhere, you will not go anywhere, someone is after y

that she spoke very zealously about the importance of the ukrainian language, and then what did buzhanskyi divide, he never did not talk about it, that is, you prove that these two things, as they say, are combined. incongruous, so is this, if it is combined with incongruous, then you have to forget about this guy and about his own views, yes, and think about the federal the security service of the russian federation, and how can it think, er, that if you kill radical some conventional radical politicians from different camps, then you create chaos in this way. in society, it is necessary to kill on the one hand to quarrel, say, ukrainian-speakers and russian-speakers, let some say that iryna farion is an icon and defender of the ukrainian language, and others say that she is a person who insulted, insulted even the people of azov, who defended her country , and after that, when all this brawl begins, you need to kill some representative. russian-speakers, so that the speakers of ukraine say: well , listen, what kind of person is this who did not even love ukraine, did not protect the ukra

this, recorded all this, how many people, i realized how many. people were on his list, maksym buzhanskyi and i just spoke, i understand that he was on his list, who else, how many were there, let's leave it somewhere for the investigation, but the minister of internal affairs, ihor yamenka, announced that he was maksym duzhanskyi, this is true, this is the following, where his address was searched for the crime to be charged, how much at least people were on his list, he would not have stopped if the law enforcement agencies did not... i also have a question about the prevention and prevention of this crime, you say, the crime was prepared very carefully, there are 20 days, you say, it is still possible before that for a certain time he learned to shoot somewhere, maybe for a certain time there he established contacts with these organizations that you mentioned, then he sat for several days under the house of iryna farion, his neighbors saw him, why the police did not... react, that is a question minister internal affairs ihor klymenko emphasized this, but if you really watch the broadca

first, to collect conventionally speaking, let’s be frank, farion had his own audience, but so did buzhanskyirtunately, which one is not, but... he had his own audience, and in order to demonstrate that in ukraine political murders, chaos, terror, their question is not even buzhan's, the question is that they need someone to demonstrate that ukraine, once again, is a fail state, that is, a state that did not happen, that ukraine is a state in which law enforcement agencies do not operate, the law does not apply , what is there, they want to say that it is a regime, they want to say that we have here... they want to prove it politically and informative that ukraine is supposedly somalia 2, this is their current rhetoric, if you go to their resources, they very often began to use the rhetoric that ukraine is like somalia, where everything happens , but not in a legal way, and they promote this rhetoric even through their mouths and minds. ukrainians themselves, as i understand it, if i'm wrong now, i apologize profusely, but in the last few days , andriy baumeister's interview with medusa, a ru

the next victim was to become people's deputy maksym buzhanskyi.friday, the halytsky district police of lviv chose a preventive measure for the suspect. the figure was sent to lviv sizo for 60 days without bail. the young man denies his involvement in the crime. we are checking his involvement in the do... movement, which center is in the country of the aggressors, his connections on the territory of ukraine and the motives for this crime, it is either religious non-arrival or national, i did nothing, i did nothing, it is possible well , more interesting, as the law on the prohibition of slavery, that is how the metropolitan of kyiv and all ukraine epiphany described the draft law on the prohibition. smp he believes that the only way to protect freedom of religion, however, are the people's elected officials of the same opinion about the thorny path of the draft law on the prohibition of moscow churches and the prospects of such an initiative will be told by our correspondents. a little more than a year ago, the russian peace was kicked out of the

was preparing the next action, well , this fragment did not enter here, where he says that maksym buzhanskyi have been there, because he googled it somewhere. tried to find out who max is buzhansky, but in this case, andriyu, the minister of foreign internal affairs, forgive me, says that a day and a half after the murder was committed, as a fait accompli, that is, the investigation has not yet been completed, there has not yet been a trial, and the minister of internal affairs says, that he was already preparing the next possible action a day and a half after the murder, nothing has been proven, i.e. some records, some kgb statutes in the computer or something, some methods, some photocopies, and yesterday we observed according to the photo of this the suspect appeared in the mass media, which could not have happened even without the ministry of internal affairs, as far as this corresponds to the practice and... norms of journalistic ethics in this situation, because even yesterday someone wrote that this is a murderer already, and not the suspect, as far as the journalists handled it corre

was going to destroy the castle and among them number two on the list was the attention of maksym buzhanskyie's deputy , a former servant of the people, so he was already out , he was expelled, so it seems to me that there was some such story, in a word, very not unexpected, let's say so extreme extremes, i.e., on the one hand, iryna farion, ex-people's deputy. from fairly right-wing views, and on the other hand, max bozhansky, who was not accused of a pro-russian position, well, we will follow this story, of course, its development, what is happening, and well, as the minister of internal affairs said, some new details will be revealed in a few months, because now at this stage they can hinder the investigation if they are disclosed, and we will, of course, inform you. you too, dear friends, lesya vakulyuk, andriy saichuk, v in this studio, we worked for you today, thank you for your activity, thank you for being particularly active today in commenting on everything we talked about, and thank you also for the fact that you contributed well today, but you still have a few minutes to take adv

representatives is yuriy boyka, a hero. of ukraine, the so-called, well, we understand that there is also buzhanskyi closely connected with dubinskyi, who already sits suspiciously in the state council, that is, we have a nucleus in parliament, which is elected from the banned opz party, well, it is clear that there will not be a monolithic vote, and the servants of the people also have several dozen deputies who defend this moscow patriarchy, and this is the fsb in ryaz, this... this it has nothing to do with religion, it is a matter of national security, the question is why we, in the third year of a full-scale war, in the 11th year of the war, have not cleansed ourselves and cleansed neither the local level nor the national level of such politicians, if god forbid, not will be voted on in the second reading, what then? well i believe that one should not give up, one should press on, because if you remember even the same introduction of censors... buttons, when everyone was against the deputies voting in person, and now they are already voting, it took nine ten years, unfortunately, these are some

she spoke very zealously about the importance of the ukrainian language, and then what separated buzhanskyi, he never spoke zealously about it, that is you prove that these two things are said to be compatible with the incompatible, so it is if it is compatible with the incompatible. then you should forget about this guy and his own views, yes, and think about the federal security service of the russian federation, and how it can to think that if you kill radical, some conditional radical politicians from different camps, then you thus create chaos in society, you need to kill from one side. to quarrel, let's say, ukrainian speakers and russian speakers, let some say that iryna farion is an icon and defender of the ukrainian language, and others say that she is a person who insulted, insulted even the people of azov who defended her country, and after that, how will the whole this brawl, you need to kill some russian representative, they told the ukrainian, they said, well, listen, what what kind of person is this who didn't even love ukraine? did not protect the ukrainian language, but the

she spoke very zealously about the importance of the ukrainian language, and then what separated buzhanskyi, he never spoke zealously about it, that is, you prove that that these two things, as they say, combine the incompatible, yes, and this is when, if it is combined with the incompatible, then you should forget about this guy and about his own views, yes, and think about the federal security service of the russian federation. and how can she think that if you kill radical, some conditional radical politicians from different camps, then in this way you create chaos in society, you need to kill one side in order to quarrel, let's say ukrainian-speaking and russian-speaking, let them speak alone... farion she is an icon and protector of the ukrainian language, and this is a person who insulted, insulted even the people of azov, who defended her country, and after. this, how will all this brawling begin, it is necessary to kill some representative in russian, they, so that in ukrainian they say: well, listen, what kind of person is this who did not even love ukraine, did not protect the ukr

the next victim, taking into account the surnames of farion, and , accordingly, buzhynsk, mak buzhanskyiand accordingly there is a deputy of the regional council, a former people's deputy, in my opinion, it is about him, oleksiy furman, again, well, let's put it this way, er, has to do with, well, representatives, in my opinion, of judaism of the nation, not... ukrainian, but mr. dmytro, well, shirina farion is ukrainian, here this concept, so to speak, is a bit conspiratorial in itself, it is translated from yiddish, i am neither a philologist nor a scholar of yiddish, well let's talk about the fact that this is a separate topic, but not by chance, this topic was raised with reference to national... let's say issues, and accordingly a quite interesting biography of his grandfather, the secretary of the vinnytsia regional committee of the communist party of ukraine, who in the 1940s exercised direct leadership over the organization of a mass famine, was formed accordingly on the territory of vinnytsia region, and therefore this, let's say, pandora's box, which has been opened by the secu

actually, about those who could still be investigated, this suspect, we were talking about maksym buzhanskyithe servant of the people party, who does not hide his love for the russian language, and actually there is, well, that's enough loyal to the russian federation, at least the theses that he promotes, testify to this. and here the diametrically opposite personality of iryna farion, who always defended everything ukrainian, although i must note here that there were certain circles that tried to mold her into a kind of undercover agent of the kremlin , and if we pay attention to the screenshot that was shown at the briefing, where those who supposedly have pro-russian sentiments were listed, then farion and... for some reason they ended up on the same list, could it be that this guy could become a victim of certain propaganda, let's say so, and that they could convey to him insufficiently reliable information. what iryna farion imagines, maybe he was convinced that this person, one way or another, if he believes russian propaganda, could be a conditional agent of the kremlin, although, we

first of all be guided by the constitution of ukraine. in any case, thank you very much, maksym buzhanskyieputy, servant of the people and representative of the law enforcement committee, we talked first of all about the attempted murder of iryna farion, where, according to the investigation, the next targets could be you, maxim, thank you very much, thank you, and therefore, among the motives that the law enforcement officers check, motives mean a guy who may be involved in the murder of iryna farion, religious or national hatred, as well as personal not... they are also checking the suspect's involvement in neo-nazi movements from russia, we already talked about this today, such versions actually appeared even before that , as the law enforcement officers now came out with a report, what kind of movements are these and why this version is being considered in principle, look: these footage two days ago, before the arrest of the suspect in the murder of farion in the dnipro, quickly spread on the network. we first spread them through russian telegram channels, as according to their adminis

zhan beleniuk, yevhen brahar, maksym buzhanskyi , danylo hetmantsev, pavlo halimon, georgy mazurashu, yuriy koryavchenko, serhiy kalchenko, oksana dmytrieva, yulia yatsyk, who recently left the servant of the people faction, maksym pavlyuk, artem kultenko, nataliya loktionova, maksym perebeynits, margarita shol, pavlo yakymenko and there are many other servants of the people, about 60, more than 60 deputies from the word of the people party, who did not put their signatures in support of this bill, dear friends, if you suddenly, it will at least affect someone, certainly not a cultenka, but someone. i mean , for us, for our ukrainians, for citizens, for voters, you have these surnames, and if you do not support the uoc mp, then look at your, for example, the elected official whom you voted for or whom you sympathized with in servant of the people, does not want to put his signature, then think for the future, what, what to do with it, i also wanted to ask, mrs. iryna, at the end of our conversation, this... a personal question, but uocp, i know that you live in virpen, if i am wrong,

the fact that the next probable victim of this criminal, possible criminal could be deputy maksym buzhanskyiscandalous person whose political views differed completely from those professed by iryna farion, what can connect these two controversial personalities into one whole and the desire to eliminate them, here it is. here the possibility of the real work of the special services is already entering the arena, the versions that i can build, unfortunately, i will not voice for two reasons: firstly, you will not like these versions, and secondly, well, there is no need to interfere with the work of our bodies , which are investigating these cases, so let these versions be left for the experts to consider, mr. colonel, well, of course, those versions that may harm the investigation we... will ask you to voice, and those that we may not like in march, then we somehow will not i know, let's grab a lemon, grit our teeth and endure, but so delicately in order not to shock our tv viewers, delicately, delicately, well somehow, well, for example, let's not get attached to these particular persons, ch