thank yol the your time on business _e m..- buzzfeed.wer than if it was trading at wto rules. the government makes it clear, they say this analysis does not take into account the brexit option that it prefers, but nonetheless, concerns too about whether that stewedy shows the fate of the uk economy after brexit. the past decade has been good to middle eastern airlines, particularly those in the gulf. they've been the biggest buyers of new planes, they've been building bigger and bigger airports and passenger numbers have soared. but the last 18 months have been much tougher — blamed on economic uncertainty and worries over security and global terrorism. and also some froksist actions in the us. —— protectionist actions in the us. the biggest airline in the region is emirates. it's based in dubai — and operates more than 3,600 flights a week. those flights go to more than 150 destinations around the globe. and last year they carried more than 59 million passengers. i caught up with company's president, sir tim clark in los angeles. and i

david davis, and has been seen by the online news service buzzfeed. the online news service buzzfeed.wed. their cases reviewed. they were unfair to people with mental health conditions. the right things for people who are vulnerable and who need our support. carried out seven violent raids with military—style planning. and location of safes. while being threatened with a sawn—off shotgun. on liberalising the country's abortion laws, at the end of may. having to go abroad for terminations. the republic of ireland currently has a near—total ban on abortion. when they raised the subject of equal pay. for a pay cap on its news presenters. restructuring of pay. than a century. litres of water per person per day. to queue for water at collection points. it is time again to talk about david beckham. beckham. not that we talk about david beckham everyday. david beckham everyday. i like talking about david beckham. talking about david beckham. now the owner of a football team over in the states. over in the states. he says it is a dream come true. dream come true. battles and he finally announ

>> i looked at some of those buzzfeed articles and have looked at the root articles. most part they are attacking the wealthy people that move people out of brooklyn, not the working-class person in alabama. >> tucker: you can see where this would lead to resentment. we don't need any more resentment in america from anybody i would think. >> absolutely not. >> tucker: let's just make itme super simple and say probably a bad idea to make generalizations about people based on their skin color, because it's not the most important thing about people, actually. >> again, i think you need to look at these articles where in many cases it's not just about race. class is in there as well and again, if you're looking at it intelligently and with nuance, you will see that they are actually lampooning racism. they're trying to say how ridiculous racism is. people know, they are not. they are attacking a group. of course they are. you can't see about any other group. there's only one group you can attack. o i hate even to say this out loud because it sounds like whining, and i hat

believe it or not, it was a yeab ago today that buzzfeed released the now infamous trauma dossier.a year later, they are being sued for defamation by the president's lawyer. veteran chief ben smith of buzzfeed news will join us later in the show to defend his decision to publish that dossier. first, president trump has suggested,um he did yesterday, that he's willing to sign any deal on daca that congress is able to hammer out. an actual deal does at this point seem a long way off but may be getting a little closer today, house republicans outlined a bill that would allow would allow a daca beneficiary is to remain in the united states, critically, though, it would deny them a path citizenship. democrats don't seem to favor, but they know that amnesty for illegal immigrants is crucial to their own electoral strategy of importing new voters from abroad. democratic congressman from texas represents the border city of el paso. he is seeking the democratic nomination to challenge senator ted cruz this fall. he sponsored legislation that would provide illegal immigration with taxpayer-f

when you got it or buzzfeed highlighting?nt to talk about anything near sourcing. >> thought i'd try. tell me about how difficult it's been to deal with the legal fallout of publishing? you're dealing with a lot of lawsuits. >> yeah. you know, nobody would tell you that you welcome litigation but obviously we feel very confident then, we feel very confident now that it was -- this document was very, very much in the public interest. that -- and i think then it's briefed to the president of the united states, top united states senators were fighting over it. the extent to which the fbi was looking at it and talking to steele we know even more now and this was -- i think when you think about was this thing in the public interest, i think it was very clear then, incredibly clear now and what happened even this week and imagine trying to tell the story of this hearing and this conflict of grassley and feinstein and everything else that happened. w the dossier as a piece of dark matter not allowed to talk about. >> projecting what

this comes nearly a year after buzzfeed published the dossier. a year after 300 pages of transcripts were revealed, from the cofounder of the company that actually created the dossier and in that report glenn simpson's attorney said someone already had been killed as a result of the dossier's publication but gave no further information whatsoever. simpson also went on to say he and former british spy christopher steele brought the documents to the fbi in july of 2016 because he was worried about trump being blackmailed and that the fbi pursued the investigation because the agency already had a source within the trump am pain. joining me with his reaction to all of it, attorney david bruno. good to see you, david. >> hello. trish: does michael cohen have something here, first of all the publication of this thing? i found it bizarre that buzzfeed did that, such as i guess the world in which we live now where you don't need to actually double-check, let alone triple check your sources, or confirm a sorry. but they put this out. it has been largely d

president trump's lawyer filing a defamation suit against buzzfeed for publishing the infamous trump dossier that included salacious details. that as senator feinstein releases closed-door testimony of a man whose firm paid for the dossier. he testified that the former british spy who wrote the dossier worked at the fbi because -- wrote to the fbi because he believed there was a crime in progress. so much for the strategy of the president and republicans who have tried to paint it as a partisan political attack. let's bring in laura coats, ken cuccinelli and john flannery. good to have all of you on. thanks so much. laura, you first. cnn is learning tonight that the president's personal attorney, michael cohen, has filed a defamation suit against buzzfeed for publishing the dossier. buzzfeed says, it's the subject of active investigations by congress and intelligence agencies. what, if any, impact could that have the investigation? >> this is a very strong claim. in the sense that donald trump is a public figure. and the reason they had an extensive citation about all the people who

one of the most interesting things is that now buzzfeed gets discovery. michael cohen is going to have to produce documentation, potentially communications with the president. >>> new developments in morning in the ongoing odyssey of steve bannon. the president's one-time chief strategist -- oh, that feels like a long time ago, pushed out, stepped down from his post at breitbart after the public feud, the rift with the president. >> the relationship has been unraveling for a while but it really unravelled last week with the release of the book "fire and fury," and then quoted as saying he lost it, and taking aim at the president's family members. look, i mean, this shows us, right, what happens, can happen when you cross the president. >> right. i don't think that bannon quite realized exactly what he had done when he made those comments to wolff. i told you last week there were three things bannon had going for him, and one was his proximity to the president, and he lost that. the other one was the backing of the mercer family, mega donors, who were fund

buzzfeed has a first amendment right to publish this. it's nut a classified document. it has no sort of protections in that respect. if the contents of the document are liablest, if that's what he thinks, then he can sue the authors of the report. but i think buzzfeed as a news organization is pretty well insulated from that sort of lawsuit. but it is the type of luster we have seen in the administration with the threatening of lawsuits or lawsuits that don't actually go anywhere as a means of expressing conversation, which is obviously problematic. can i add one thing, though, don, about this? fusion gps testimony which struck me is that in the dossier one of the theories that underlie how did the collusion theory come to arise was between the trump business organization and, you know, former soviet union states of the world. and bannon said remember in the "fire and fury" book this is all about money laundering. and this dossier and this testimony of simpson gives further credence to the thought there is a financial connection between the trump organization and russi

if you go back a couple of years ago, i remember this interview that marco rubio gave to buzzfeed. he went into the buzzfeed offices, obviously this is marco rubio post-2012, setting up his, oh i'm the new hip thing. - nascent. - i have opinions about rap, talk to me about that, that sort of thing. i can connect with the children. - i'm the young candidate. yesterday's gone, tomorrow is going, (crosstalk). - exactly, he goes into the buzzfeed offices and within a few questions of the beginning of the interview, they start asking him questions about christianity and creationism and evolution and all these other things. rubio being the polite guy that he is, is sort of trying to be nice about things. they're trying to get him to say things that basically dis his supporters. i remember sending that around to a group of friends and having a comment from someone that said, you know, i wish that his response to this would have been yes, i believe in a god who created the world, was born of a virgin, and died for my sins. do you have a problem with that? that's the kind of thing that i th

. >> tucker: but you know that nobody -- if you were at buzzfeed. for a piece, 30,000 reasons that mexicans are wrecking america. you would be canned. why is it okay to say that about another race? if we really believe it's wrong to attack people on the basis of race, why isn't it wrong to attack people on the basis of race? >> if you put out this article are one of those articles and black people or mexican people or whomever said that about white people. let's say 80% of the black outlets and latino outlets said these things about white people. it would not affect white people in terms of their socioeconomic status, their health outcomes, their housing, their education, or incarceration. none of that would be affected. that's the big difference. there are bigger consequences. >> tucker: you are living in a world that doesn't exist anymore. you're living in a world where all the which people are white and all the poor people are nonwhite. in modern america, the one group of americans whose life expectancy is declining as working-class white people.

>> jesse: it's got a lot of buzz in the buzzfeed article.a, wrap it up with class. >> dana: senator grassley, counterpart to feinstein come his complaint was that he wasn't concerned -- he wasn't concerned about what it might say about the president. he was concerned it would dampen the possibility that other witnesses would come forward and testify. help me out here, people. that would include in his words jared kushner. "the wall street journal" reporter has written a lot of this, supercritical of fusion gps. she said this is silly. what we should try to do is have anything they can be declassified in the dossier released so the leaking back-and-forth stops. >> jesse: with that. >> kimberly: that's how "the five" cleans it up. >> jesse: actor robert de niro lost it again last night. mom and dad got a new car... with the extra third row of seats. they think it's theirs. look at them, they have no idea! it's not theirs. it's mine. mine. mine. mine. the new lexus rx 350l with three rows for seven passengers. are you excited about your baby si

alberto nardelli, buzzfeed's europe editor, is with us — he received the leaked document.igration in the analysis is that it shines the light on one of the other conundrums this government is facing. it shows that under different potential policy scenarios, on the one hand the number of people from the eu arriving in the uk would be reduced from about 90,000 to 40,000 a year. but it provides a hit on the economy, and the problem the government has is that the upsides of brexit, such as the trade deal with the united states, the value to gdp that this would provide, is far smaller than that hit. this issue cuts across this document. we knew the general economic effect was negative, but specifically, the benefit of going off and saying we can trade with the us, because we're not in the customs union or the single market, is offset by the fact that the immigration control you have the freedom to impose is going to more than wipe out the benefit? exactly. if you look at this document, there is no scenario in which nontariff barriers, even if the uk were to stay in the single m

by the news website buzzfeed. or world trade organization rules. a route taken by countries including norway. and claimed the leak had been used to damage the case for brexit. analysis. it is an attempt to undermine our exit from the european union. brexiteers argued don't believe long—term forecasts. immediate recession if we chose to leave. 5%. both were made to look extremely foolish. they felt that brexit wasn't working. embarrassment. this is a cover—up, mr speaker, pure and simple. and it stinks. over the report, or try to with the help of conservative rebels. in confidence if necessary. but we need to be able to do ourjob here. the way to brexit. months to come. no—one knows how brexit will turn out. the plan by the government is still a work in progress. negotiations have barely begun. and in parliament, and anyway, there is no rival organised campaign. on with what they see as a lack of direction much longer. i am told some party donors are feeling just as unhappy. a new crisis and the wheels could come off mrs may's leadership. brexit unravelling. bad results in may's local

dire times indeed. we move on to buzzfeed, this is potentially explosive. potentially explosive.s a huge story. huge story. kudos to them for breaking it. breaking it. the most striking line, you take out... you take out... analysis, they've got their hands on it. it. one of the government's own brexit analysis. it does finally exist. exactly. we have been told maybe it does or doesn't. exactly. assessment due to be shown to cabinet this week. it says? no scenario that does not leave the country worse off. country worse off. scariest part of the story, the whole story. whole story. scenario leaves the country still a lower growth by 2%. lower growth by 2%. comprehensive deal, it's still 5% lower growth rates. lower growth rates. scenario, leaves you with an 8% less growth over that period. growth over that period. so it's very dire. very dire. far and the reason is it's embarrassing, according to sources. embarrassing, according to sources. concluded and that it would benefit gdp by about 0. 2% in the long—term. south—east asia, would add in total a further 0. south—east asia, wo

published it, though simpson didn't mention buzzfeed, after that happened, there appeared to be a purge in the kremlin. simpson said he didn't think anything of his sources were part of that purge, but he did believe some folks who were sources for the united states intelligence community were actually purged, as a response the kremlin had to this dossier. and by purging, simpson meant folks were arrested and some folks were even killed. we have focused a lot on how the trump/russia story affects the united states, how it affects our politics, our system of governance. one of the things that hasn't gotten a lot of focus is the impact this story has had in russia and we got a new image into what may have been happening in the aftermath from this testimony. >> one of the other things that jumped out to me was his talking about money laundering. something you've done some reporting on is the way money moves in and out of the trump businesses. and this is him going back with representative schiff. i want to read this to you and get your response. if the russians were laundering money throug

they say they didn't want the dossier published when buzzfeed published it. they said they did help get it into the hands of senator john mccain. they said they did not meet themselves with the fbi. and then there's this one last thing. quote, "we don't believe the steele dossier was the trigger for the fbi's investigation into russian meddling." as we told the senate judiciary committee in august, our sources say the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the fbi had received from other sources, including one inside the trump camp. now, that last claim, from this, again, op-ed place, weird place to break news, but that's where it's breaking tonight, that last claim, that the steele dossier wasn't what started the fbi's counter intelligence investigation into whether or not the trump campaign colluded with russia, we are now learning, tonight, that the guys behind the dossier told the senate that in august, maybe that's why the republican s in the senate don't want to release those transcripts. but we had a big new piece of public repo

in new york state, he's filed a suit against buzzfeed for publishing some of the dossier.eed has put out a statement tonight saying that "the interest of the public is obvious and that is why they published it and they will aggressively defend their first amendment rights." meanwhile, that is in state court in new york, a federal lawsuit filed by michael come on, the personal attorney for the president as well against glenn simpson and fusion gps, this firm that put together the dossier with the former british spy come across diverse deal. this is breaking in the last few moments, sean, and it shows that the trump camp is really fighting back here over all of this. >> sean: grade report tonight. we appreciated. joining us now, with reaction from a fox news contributor sara carter and fox news legal analyst greg gregg jarrett. this is the salacious details that were never true. >> one of the most interesting points that has been brought up today is that glenn simpson testified that the fbi had a source within the trump campaign and by the way, that story, a colleague of min

buzzfeed published it last january and says it plans to fight the lawsuit.he editor-in-chief will speak live with joe and mika later this morning. >>> the fallout from steve bannon's comments in a new book exposing the chaos inside the trump presidency is worried that he's leaving his post at breitbart news. >> it's the twist in a stunning week of what has caused the president to get elected. hallie jackson has more. >> reporter: a breitbart bombshell for steve bannon, stepping down less than 48 hours after trying to defuse his verbal grenades published in a tell-all book. his explosive comments slamming the president and president's son-in-law, igniting responses from donors and from his former boss, the president himself nicknaming him sloppy steve. >> who breitbart part ways with steve bannon after the comments in the books? >> i certainly think it's something they should look at. >> reporter: bannon left the white house in a sudden shake-up this summer, resumed his role as the breitbart chairman said i'm proud of what the breitbart team has accomplished

"buzzfeed" released it to the public without verifying a thing in it. and to this date not a thing tonight has been verified. it alleged mr. trump went to moscow and paid prostitutes to urinate on a hotel bed once slept on by president obama. what mass been corroborated is that hillary clinton paid for the russian dirt on trump. fast forward to this week. investigative reporter sarah carter has sources who confirm the fake dossier was used by the fbi to get a warrant to spy on the trump campaign. trump's personal attorney sued "buzzfeed" and the does years creator, fusion gps, saying they defamed him. joining me, sarah carter and dan bongino. tell us about what you know about the dossier and how it was used as a justification to get the warrant. >> this is the most of interesting part. here we have a dossier. april, 2016, the hillary clinton campaign hired fusion gps to dig up dirt on president trump and his relationship with the russians. way found out from my sources is the dossier was used in part to justify a warrant to surveil president trump and m

i read the buzzfeed report and what the young women said, one particular statement of a young woman who said she felt she needed to quit because she felt she wasn't strong enough or tough enough to work in politics because she couldn't endure sexual harassment and the idea that bern strider made her feel like she was the one that something was wrong with, like she was inadequate is just really infuriating. but having said that, brianna, i want to say this about hillary. look, people are complicated. and hillary is no exception. and she definitely made a wrong call here. but i worked for her for 17 years. and i feel like i know the totality of her as a person, as a politician, as a public servant. and this is a woman who allowed me to put a crib in my office, in the white house, and bring my 3-month-old baby to work every day because she knew i was struggling with balancing my early motherhood with a rising career, this is a woman who hires women at the highest levels in her orbit, promotes women, gives them raises, who is dogged in her advocacy for the issues that she cares about, and i

at buzzfeed, katie, in new york.took this down after one strike, but i think it raises questions. his fans are typically young teenagers, tweens, kids, andi typically young teenagers, tweens, kids, and i think it has left a lot of people wondering, what are these young people seeing? what are they doing, youtube to shake this. he makes a lot of money with youtube and they make a lot of money with them —— to shape this. what policy protocols are being put in place to make sure completely tasteless video like this is no longer posted?” guess the popularity of some of these youtubers is that they are seen as these youtubers is that they are seen as not being monitored by youtube or indeed by anybody else? seen as not being monitored by youtube or indeed by anybody else ?|j think that is certainly true. youtube is not like a television network. they don't own logan paul. he is free to upload videos, as are you or i, as much as he wants. he shot videos for their premium products but that was in 2016, and i think itjust pr

they would have to show that buzzfeed published this document with strong -- either outright knowing or strongly believing that anything in the document, everything in the document was false. they clearly didn't. they thought there was a public value in publishing it. and they did. i don't think a new york court is going to give him much hearing. >> he knows this is a hopeless lawsuit. he's got enough experience even with trump's idiotic lawsuits with you to know that. did he do this today in reaction to this testimony being released? did you think he was sitting there waiting timing, deciding i'm going to have my lawsuit ready to file when we need a counterstory? >> i don't know. there is an extraordinary amount of stars lining on this. ben smith, the editor of buzzfeed wrote an op-ed in "the new york times" published tonight that said he was glad they published the transcript. you had the simpson document released and michael cohen suing over all of this. i doubt he knew any of this was coming. i think one of the things we see in the trump family so to speak is that they're all wil

we begin with buzzfeed.urnalist carrie gracie‘s resignation letter. she quit her role as china editor over equal pay, saying management are breaking the law. the la times covers the golden globes. stars wore black at the event to take a stand against sexual harassment — it's the first big award ceremony since the scandal broke. let's turn to the washington post now. it's one of many papers covering steve bannon clarifying this quotes in a new book about the trump presidency. the paper says he's apologised but the white house is still furious. die welt looks at germany's election crisis. it reports the two sides that could form a coalition to rule are growing in confidence with each other, and says it's good news for angela merkel who lost her majority in september and has been locked in a stalemate since. and the daily telegraph reports on video refereeing coming to football. a trial starts in the english fa cup tonight. recordings can be used to see if the officials on the pitch have made a mistake. what wi

by the news website buzzfeed. or world trade organisation rules. a route taken by countries includingway. and claimed the leak had been used to damage the case for brexit. preliminary analysis. it is an attempt to undermine our exit from the european union. brexiteers argued don't believe long—term forecasts. immediate recession if we chose to leave. 5%. both were made to look extremely foolish. they felt that brexit wasn't working. political embarrassment. this is a cover—up, mr speaker, pure and simple. and it stinks. of conservative rebels. over these documents, in confidence if necessary. but we need to be able to do ourjob here. bridging the way to brexit. for weeks, months to come. no one knows how brexit will turn out. the plan by the government is still a work in progress. negotiations have barely begun. organised campaign. on with what they see as a lack of direction much longer. i am told some party donors are feeling just as unhappy. a new crisis and the wheels could come off mrs may's leadership. brexit unravelling. bad results in may's local elections. tonight she is head

they explained this was a document originally posted by buzzfeed in january '17.we were just discussing as the series of memos by buzzfeed and created by mr. steele? >> yes. >> does what does represent between june and october 2016? >> these are the memos that he created the engagement. to the best of my knowledge, as part of this engagement, this is it. is there another engagement? might there be more trump russia memos other than what we saw in the dossier? that lines up with a little piece of reporting in the know, this week. and if you look 26 paragraphs down, i'm not kiting, in little traeki traeking mr. simpson's specific area of focus and information about any current benefactors, that information is closely guarded. the work has not stopped. fusion gps is still now secretarying trump and russia. the publication of the original memos by buzz fooed, which -- you you know what, that night was the start of a whole new odyssey for buzz feed itself. since it's been fending of lawsuits of all kinds from all ieds. >> but editor in chief says he is proud of the dos

buzzfeed the fake sealed dossier on january 11th, 2017. are there text messages between the two parties here. page and strzok. answer those are missing. strzok interviews michael flynn. are their text messages between lisa page and strzok then? no they're missing. james comey is fired for his in competence by the president of the united states. on may et, 2017, are there text messages between the parties during that transaction. no. robert muller is appointed may 17th, 2017. any text messages there. no. the next day they start up again. the five months while the case is in the interesting serious probe, this is the russia collusion nonsense i will call it, the missing text messages are just gone. so what you have a s. a pattern of practice in the agencies. look i was a government lawyer, i worked for the chief council office as a government lawyer can you imagine going to the irs and say i lost my receipts. that doesn't work out too well in the it. >audit.>> yes. miss it would go years, deleted bleachbit, acid watch, destroying blackberrie

. —— buzzfeed. of the uk. of the model. they were wrong. to read, to 500 to 800,000. of the tariffs youe eu. trade with the uk. and so far, very inaccurate. the prime minister will be there to see us through brexit? at this time. we have to focus. what those models do, we can argue about the underlying basis. as a result of negotiation. than we are going to bike actually leaving in the first place. thank you both very much. of the french state between 1963 and 1982. of france where populations were in decline. more than five decades earlier. her first trip back in 52 years. marlene is in ill health after a difficult life. to reunion before. to her and 2000 others. since she was in her teens. before that she was in care in reunion. her mother had died of tb. marlene was persuaded to resettle across the world. did you ever see your sister again? overseas department in 19116. many of whom were not orphans at all. their families simply could not provide for them. he believed would solve the problem. where populations were in decline. and religious institutions. which portrays the children a

me are katy balls, political correspondent at the spectator and jim waterson political editor at buzzfeedady in. we have a new way of presenting them, look at this! the huffington post. the telegraph's top story. the guardian also shows doloreso' riordan and the rush to protect the jobs of carillion employees. so a new look to the papers. hope you like it. as we focus on what fleet street's finest are reporting, hopefully it will be even easier to see how the big stories are being covered. we are going to start with the financial times. carillion, the big story. we have been covering it all day. 20,000 jobs at risk. this isa all day. 20,000 jobs at risk. this is a company that had a market value of £2 billion, orders of £16 billion. what happened? this is very bad news, but particularly for the government bad news, lots of questions are being asked about why this company issued three profit warnings, kept being awarded all these contracts which has to a point these contracts which has to a point the government has insisted they're not going to do a bail out which is how we

remember, sean, today, the one-year anniversary anniversary from one buzzfeed published the dossier,nd jim comey testified and said it was, one year ago today that they printed it, year and a half ago it looks like they used it to go to the fisa courts. let's make that available to members of congress. >> sean: you look of the contents, what do you see? triple, double, quadruple hearsay, none of which is reliable or admissible in a court. but if that is -- if a hillary clinton bought and paid for russian propaganda dossier is used to obtain a fisa warrant, what happens then? >> there's three fundamental questions. did the fbi pay christopher steele, the author of the dossier? >> sean: i'm hearing from sources that neither comey nor mccabe paid. do you hear the same? >> i am hearing both stories. that is why we have to verify this. there is a possibility that they did pay. i'm hearing from other sources that they did not pay. we need to clarify that. that is a very important question. theas congress should be asking. >> sean: gym, port number two? >> sara is right. that is why we want

believe it or not, it was a yeab ago today that buzzfeed released the now infamous trauma dossier.er, they are being sued for defamation by the president's lawyer. veteran chief ben smith of buzzfeed news will join us later in the show to defend his decision to publish that dossier. first, president trump has suggested,um he did yesterday, that he's willing to sign any deal on daca that congress is able to hammer out. an actual deal does at this point seem a long way off but may be getting a little closer today, house republicans outlined a bill that would allow would allow a daca beneficiary is to remain in the united states, critically, though, it would deny them

moving to the daily express, and actually, we touched on this when talking about buzzfeed earlier.er she succeeds. she can talk about migrants all she wants but as we have seen so far in brexit negotiations, britain starts off with the proposition that the newspapers like the express like, and then in the end they have folded on the vast majority of things the eu want. the us is saying that people who moved here after leaving the eu during a transition period should have all the same rights as people are now. the government says, no, we do not agree. we will see where we end up after the next round of talks but from what we have seen so of talks but from what we have seen so far, the eu holds all the cards. businesses threatened to leave if we don't get the deal we need. the numbers have gone down in a last couple of years, quite significantly. the picture on the daily express leads us to our final story in the metro. formula i scraps the great girls. —— the grid girls. is this a good thing? it is a sign of the times, i would suggest. as a society, we seem to be moving away from th

liz: president trump's attorney firing back and suing the media website buzzfeed and fusion gps. that's the firm behind the so-called trump anti-trump file, the dossier by christopher steel was basically the author of that the president saying enough is enough we're going to tell you what also is happening next but first the president of south korea crediting president trump for the easing of tensions recently between north korea and south korea. former ambassador to the u.n. he is john boulton and he's here and next stay right there. mom's got this cold #stuffynose #nosleep #mouthbreather just put on a breathe right strip it instantly opens your nose... up to 38% more than cold medicine alone go to breatheright.com today to request a free sample. president trump: i think we're going to have because of strength, peace through strength we have certainly problems with north korea but a lot of good talks are going on right now. a lot of good energy i see a lot of good energy. i like it very much what i'm see ing i just spoke this morning with the president of south korea and he had

buzzfeed published the fake steele dossier on january 11th, 2017.s there any text messages between them? they are missing. strzok interviews michael flynn, are there text messages between lisa page and strzok then?si no. they are missing. james comey is fired for his incompetence by the president of the united states. may 9th, 2017.re are there text messages between theng parties during that transaction? no. special counsel robert mueller robert mueller is appointed on may 17th, 2017, at any text messages there? no. but the next day, theyhert starp again. so the five months while this case is and it's interesting serious probe, the russia collusion nonsense i will call it, the missing text messages are just gone. what you got is a pattern or practice within these agencies, i was a government lawyer, can you imagine going into the irs and saying, i'm sorry, i lost my receipts and see how that works out in your audit? not too well. >> sean: lois lerner, missing for two years. then you have hillary rodham clinton, bleach bit, acid wash, and destroying

just filed a defamation suit against buzzfeed news for publishing the lie-filled document. i'on potus and me. katie? >> katie: the document is defamatory however i think this lawsuit is going nowhere. the president of the united states has been a public figure. he has been a public figure essentially his entire life. his attorney, michael cohen is also a public figure. and the bar is very, very high for libel and defamation suits. so they can win maybe on the p.r. here. they can make a statement about the intimidation and don't publish this stuff because we will run you into court and rack up your legal fees in terms of actually winning the lawsuit, i don't think it's going to go very far. >> i'm also not sure that team trump wants to expose the full dossier to legal vetting. because there are parts of it that potentially are true. some of the most salacious stuff is probably not or possibly not but if they want a judge to bible to go through every part of the dossier as part of a discovery process, i actually don't think. >> chris: they could have hundred sealed it? >> may

attorney who was a friend of his who he talks to sued -- said he was suing or filed suit against buzzfeed and against fusion gps over the dossier. so clearly, this is something he's thinking about, that he is still very upset about and i had i you saw it a little bit in his demeanor today arms folded. a little bit more terse than he was yesterday when he seemed to be kind of reaching out on the table a little bit more relaxed. clearly, he's irritated about the dossier being back on the agenda and back on television. >> one of the things the white house pushed back forcefully recent reporting including in the michael wolff book how much time the president spends, axios had a thing of executive time put into his schedule, how much sometime he spends in the residence and the dining room off oval office watching cable television. the president talking about his performance yesterday. and saying he got great reviews but -- >> yesterday, we had a bipartisan meeting with house members and senators on immigration reform. something they've been talking about for many, many years. but we brought th

>> woodruff: so craig silverman, buzzfeed, you've done a lot of thinking over the last several years, and writing about fake news. you used the term a lot. what have you seen? we quoted president trump and his... he's using that term again, and what do you see today compared the what you originally thought when you started using the term a few years ago, fake news, how do you see the meaning of the term and what the distinctions are? >> originally for me, it was a term used to describe a very specific type of completely false, deceptive content that was spreading primarily on facebook by people who wanted to earn money from the traffic that went back to their web site that had the fake story. and so this was a specific kind of actor, a malicious actor out there, who was doing it for money. and yet now, here we are, roughly a year past the election or so, and the term has really been i think co-opted and it's almost like a jiujitsu move that donald trump has done where people were saying fake news was one of the things that got him elected and maybe people had been tricked by these sto

the paper published by buzzfeed knees shows a new study considering three most plausible scenarios atneeding a blog with a free trade deal single market access within a delightful. the government there tried to play down his own business it can assessment or brexit campaigners dismiss the paper as simply wrong. these local service angels is the rotten for costs right before that to the. treasure that point said long planned withdrawal history five hundred eight hundndred thoususand thihist the non since about four cost is probably bad for costs for you have to do. is to look back at the history of economics and make an educated guess on to walk hollis is you will implement will effect will be. saudi arabia's as any general says the kingdom has recovered one hundred and seven billion dollars say fight his own day crackdown on high level corruption. if he's also says authorities have completed inquires into three hundred and eighty one suspects that include prince is a ministers and have decided to keep fifty six of them. in custody and free the rest of those released include individual

. >> the president's lawyer filed a defamation against buzzfeed. today on twitter, the president blasted california senator diane feinstein for releasing the transcript of the interview with the firm that compiled the dossier writing, fact that sneaky diane feinstein who was on numerous stated collusion was not found and release testimony in such an under handed totally out authorization is a disgrace, must have tough primary >> the denial did not end there. the president was asked if he would agree to that interview with special counsel robert mueller. here's part of what the president said >> i can only say this, there was absolutely no collusion, everybody knows it. every committee. i've been in office now 11 months. for 11 months, they've had this phony cloud over this administration, over our government. and it has hurt our government. it does hurt our government >> the president said, you know, he doesn't think it's necessary for him to have that interview with robert mueller. we will see what happens. >> he did say at one point it was asked

you also formerly worked at was d and the-- buzzfee "washington free beacon." has there been any pushback? guest: they are popular among conservatives and among prosecutors. they give prosecutors immense leverage over defendants. press if it is really like these lost it when people try to roll them back, they tend to face the very registrable but effective rhetoric, which is look at state legislator so-and-so here who wants to make it easier for people to sell drugs to kids. that response has scuttled several reform efforts. there is a bipartisan growing group among republicans who sort of see the problem with this, so you are starting to see more momentum. but it has been a little tough to get more of the law and order conservatives on board with this . that is what killed the bill in tennessee last year. host: mary is calling from martinsville, virginia. think these laws are an effective tool in the toolbox for law enforcement or whomever. where a city park, paid for by taxes, but was next door it became just a drug land. run from onewere town and moved to th

buzzfeed originally published this piece of paper which now has been revealed as largely untrue and a of gossip. and indeed andrew steele is running away from it in his british libel lawsuit. what is the problem with the steele dossier and what is the core issue about the senior fbi issues peddling it and the department of justice official, bruce orr? >> the core problem with the steele dossier is former fbi director comey testified in a senate hearing in june 2017 that the dossier was salacious and unverified. and my point is if it was unverified in june of 2017, it had to have been unverified in september 2016 months earlier when credible reporting indicates that it was used in part to get a surveillance warrant from the fisa court. it's never a problem to take information, whether you're the fbi or the justice department from unsavory sources. in my past as a prosecutor, you know, i got information from terrorists, i got information from mafia guys, drug cartel guys. the thing is you can take information from anyplace. you have to vet it. you have to verify it, corroborate it befor