. >> byrd: order. all rise.508 on the calendar in the matter of taylor vs. martin. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. sir, have a seat please. >> judge judy: do me a favor, byrd. before i start with these people, would you take a look at our book and look up a 1998 lincoln town car. >> byrd: sure. >> judge judy: okay. so, this is what i gather from this ridiculousness. you bought a car from the defendant. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: the purchase price of the car was $1,500. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: you gave him 700. >> i gave him 43 hours labor at $11 a hour. >> judge judy: okay, shh. you gave him money. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: how much money? >> 300 cash. >> judge judy: and then you bartered for some. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: is that correct? >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: and how much did he barter for? >> $445. >> judge judy: 445. so, that's $745 so far that you gave him towards the $1,500 purchase price. >> yes, ma'am. >>

paul: green tutored, byrd learned the basics of coding.s second try, he passed the apprenticeship test. are you sorry you didn't go to college? >> no, not now. paul: and so a final question for philosopher and longtime professor martha nussbaum. do you think every young person in america should go to college? >> yes. well, everyone who wants to. going to college has three purposes -- one is to prepare you for a job. second is to prepare you for a life full of richness and meaning. the third is to prepare you to be a good citizen. paul: as she argues in her book, not for profit, without good citizens, democracy dies. but she adds -- >> the first thing is everyone should have the opportunity to do it without crushing burden of cost. paul that's why ibm's former : software apprentices could hardly believe their ears when ibm's kelli jordan told them: >> we've been partnering with the american council on education and they've actually determined that the software development apprenticeship program is worth up to forty five college credits, whi

thank you, byrd. >> byrd: no problem. >> judge judy: your first name is...?: okay. ms. brouwer, you know absolutely nothing about this case because you weren't present when the accident occurred with your car. is that correct? >> i know some of the details, just what i had to do afterwards. >> judge judy: you don't know any of the details of the accident because you weren't there. >> no. >> judge judy: the only two people that were in your car were your daughter and her maybe ex-boyfriend. so i'm gonna ask you to switch places with your daughter, because the only reason you're interested in this case at all and the only reason you brought it is because you're the registered owner of the car. >> yes. me and my husband. >> judge judy: okay. the accident occurred on what date? >> i believe it was march 27th. >> judge judy: is that right? >> yes, your honor. >> judge judy: i'd like you to keep your voice up. look like you're animated. look like you're in a courtroom. look like you're engaged. not engaged, but engaged in what's happening here. march 27th at what t

we also have a picture of michael byrd aiming his gun at this congressman on january 6th.ght there. just restate, the argument you are effectively making to the department of justice as a former police officer. >> i am a former county sheriff in texas, served as a sheriff for eight years and i've been in law enforcement for 30, so i know a little of what i'm talking about. this all started because leader mccarthy asked me to be one of his five picks to be on this select committee to look into january 6th. of course, that unraveled really quickly because nancy pelosi rejected us, but i did my due diligence and spent an enormous amount of time examining the documents on january 6th, the senate report which came out in march of this year, and what i uncovered, what i discovered was really, really disturbing to me. january 6th, quite honestly, the american people need to realize january 6th really should have never happened. the intelligence was there. the leadership within the capitol police had all of the intelligence, and it should have never happened, and then of course yo

the byrd rule. the two thing, the byrd rule and the privilege scrub. but that's what we have to do. we hope to do that. soon. but we again have to listen as the -- as the printed version goes out. there's some clarification that will come forth because it's always moving a bit. and that will happen in a manner of just a minute. we will get this done. for those who said they want to see text the text is there for you to review, for you to complain about, for you to add to. or subtract from. whatever it is. we'll see what consensus emerges from that. but we're very much on the path. we have the hearing today. we had the text out there. we're on a path to get this all done. reporter: we've been hearing from progressives who say they still won't vote on this. is it smart to must've forward? and do you trust senators manchin and sinema to vote for this? ms. pelosi: i trust the president. and if any house member, any senator has questions about it, we welcome that. i trust the president of the united states. all the things i name wefd agreement on most of those things. when people see the

. >> reporter: former safeway chief executive steve byrd said he was immediately interested when he heard elizabeth holmes pitch that her devices could run hundreds of blood test from one fingerstick of blood. he said the company formed plans to put them in stores and arranged a demonstration for his board of directors in which she drew blood from one of the board members and put it into her machine. it made noises, he said, but it never gave results. >> reporter: what this is doing is putting the focus back on elizabeth holmes. >> reporter: former prosecutor and political analyst steve mc large said the company went on to invest money in the company. >> when you hear about the devastation done in front of these people and that they invested anyway, thought it was important for the government to show, this is a highly persuasive and convincing individual who left a lot of carnage along the way. >> reporter: the day began with another setback for the jury. buddhist juror said she would be reluctant ntachelove forgiv the judge dismissed her analtert its al ti a juror has had to be dismissed

. >> byrd: order! all rise! this is case number 555 on the calendar in the matter of vick vs.y: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. folks, have a seat. >> judge judy: ms. vick, you and the defendant are neighbors. >> yes. >> judge judy: and you've been neighbors for how long? >> one year. >> judge judy: how long have you lived in your house? >> since 2001. >> judge judy: so you're new to the neighborhood? >> correct. >> judge judy: and you had a dog, puppy. what kind of puppy? >> it was a chihuahua. >> judge judy: a chihuahua. >> yeah, and it was approximately eight weeks old. >> judge judy: well, you say "was." do you still have the dog? >> correct. >> judge judy: you still have the dog, so it is a chihuahua. you brought it home when it was eight weeks old. tell me when that was that you brought the dog home. >> i got the dog in... i believe it was september of 2015. >> judge judy: now, at some point, ms. vick, your statement is that you and your daughter -- but i'm concentrating on you because i may or may not have her te

. >> byrd: order! all rise!your honor, it's case number 510 on the calendar in the matter of bartl vs. burke. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. judge judy: ms. b,ieshave at,as ouecsenna start you reav mr. bartl about it, who worked in the same place, so you know each other for a period of time. and mr. bartl gave you some money. how much? >> $1,500. >> judge judy: when did he give you the $1,500? >> december of 2014. >> judge judy: and what did you need the $1,500 for? >> i had had a storage unit that contained all my personal belongings. and i had fallen behind in the payments. and all my important items that were my mother's. and she passed away when i was 14, so sentimental stuff was in there. and they were gonna sell it if i couldn't make a payment on it. so i told him about my problem, and he said he could help me. >> judge judy: now, you paid him back some of the money. >> yes. >> judge judy: because he's not suing you for $1,500. he's only suing you for

. >> byrd: order! all rise!the calendar in the matter of calhoun vs. peoples. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. folks, have a seat. >> judge judy: mr. calhoun, you run a gym. is that correct? >> correct. >> judge judy: where is it located? >> cincinnati, ohio. >> judge judy: how many gyms are there in cincinnati? >> at least 20 or 30 gyms in the entire city. >> judge judy: between 20 and 30. and how many are there in a >> 1k radiybe fi.f where you >> judge judy: because i assume that before you started your business, which is a relatively new business, you did a survey of the area and said, you know, "is there room for another business similar to mine?" >> correct. >> judge judy: so there are four or five relatively close by. >> the ones that are similar to mine, they're on the outskirts, so they're at least 20 miles outside of the facility. >> judge judy: 20 miles? >> exactly. >> judge judy: when you say similar to yours, in what respect? >>

. >> byrd: order! all rise! quiet in the courtroom.ndar in the matter of rodgers vs. gallegos-chatman. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. sir, have a seat. >> judge judy: mr. rodgers, you saw a car advertised on craigslist? >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: and it was a non-running car. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: 2007 hyundai sonata. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: and you purchased it from the defendants for $500. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: according to you, you towed it... >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: ...because you do mechanical work. >> yes, ma'am. i've been doing it for 30 years. >> judge judy: and you figured that you could put it back into working condition and it would be fine. was the body good on it? >> all except for a scape on the passenger side. >> judge judy: but everything else looked okay. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: and you paid them the $500. and according to you, which one of the defendants told you that they would get you the title in a week, i

labreche/willmes. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome. parties have been sworn in.ase. >> judge judy: mr. labreche, this is your former wife. >> yes. >> judge judy: and i assume you're her mother. >> correct. >> judge judy: and you are suing both of them because, from what i read, after your divorce, your former wife was arrested and you bailed her out, it is your claim, at the request of both her mother and herself, and that both of them agreed that they would be responsible for the bail if you posted the initial bail, which i think you said was $1,000. is that right? >> mostly. >> judge judy: tell me where it's mistaken. >> just a slight mistake. juanita willmes did specify that she would not pay the bill, but she would talk to me, keep in communication, so that we could make sure that molly paid the bill, and molly promised that she would pay the bill. >> judge judy: molly is your former wife? >> molly is my former wife, yes. >> judge judy: okay. first, let's backtrack a bit. ms. labreche, what were you arrested for and when? >> petty theft in 2008. >> judge judy

stout-corriveau. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge.ated. >> judge judy: your last name is...? >> hay. >> judge judy: mr. hay, how long do you know the defendant? >> probably close to 30 years. >> judge judy: and what was your relationship with her? rlfriend?dy: this isr >> that's correct. >>in0. >> judge judy: there was a period recently when you were not together, you and your girlfriend? >> we had rough times, yes. >> judge judy: recently. i'm talking about the recent past. >> if recent is within the last two years, yes. >> judge judy: yes. tell me when that period was. >> i wanna say -- what year are we in? >> judge judy: no, no, no, don't. >> oh. >> judge judy: don't ask her any questions, especially if you have to ask her what year we're in. [ laughter ] give me a month and year. >> 2013. >> judge judy: so, since 2013, you and your girlfriend have not had any breakups? >> since 2013, we have not. >> judge judy: do you live together? >> we do. and we had during that time, as well. >> judge judy: there came a time, according to you

ward. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome. parties have been sworn in. judy: ms. croot, it is your claim that the defendant's dog, while playing in a dog park, bit your dog. >> that is correct. >> judge judy: and you want the defendant to be responsible for the vet bills. >> correct. >> judge judy: ms. ward is counterclaiming for harassment. she says that sometimes these dog kerfuffles happen in a dog park and when you go to a dog park and you unleash your dogs for them to romp around sometimes things happen and you sort of accept that as a liability of letting your dogs free in a park. and there may be some merit to that. i assume this is your dog... >> yes. >> judge judy: the offending dog. >> yes. >> judge judy: how long have you had the dog? >> i've had her for about a year and a half. >> judge judy: has she ever bitten anyone? >> no. >> judge judy: has she ever bitten another animal? >> no. >> judge judy: were you ever cited in any way for having an aggressive dog? >> only when this issue happened. >> judge judy: how many dogs do you have? >> two. >

soto. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. seat, please. >> judge judy: ms. hill, you own a condominium. >> yes. >> judge judy: how long have you owned the condo? >> since 1996. like almost 20 years. >> judge judy: did you ever reside there yourself? >> yes, i did. >> judge judy: from when to when? >> when i purchased it till 2013. >> judge judy: and what happened in 2013? >> 2013 i moved out and i moved with my sister. and i rented it out prior before i rented it to penny. >> judge judy: in 2013 you rented it to someone? >> mm-hmm. >> judge judy: okay. and when did ms. soto begin renting the condo? >> december of 2014. >> judge judy: and you evicted her when? >> i didn't evict her. i gave her a 90-day notice. >> judge judy: when? >> it was three months before i evicted her -- i mean, had her move out. it was three months before then. i gave her a 90-day notice. and then -- >> judge judy: then she moved out. >> yeah, she wanted to move out in june, so i allowed her to move out in june because she was supposed to move out in ju

rios. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: parties have been sworn in. you may be seated.e. >> judge judy: all right, ms. hawkes. this was your former boyfriend, and there came a period of time when he, according to you, moved into an apartment that you had rented. he moved into your apartment on what date? >> he moved in on 7 august, 2015. >> judge judy: and where had he been living? >> he had been residing at an apartment in san antonio, texas. >> judge judy: and what was the reason that he moved into your apartment and left his apartment? >> he left his apartment because he had been evicted. he had fallen behind on bills, had had a hard time keeping a job, and so he was evicted. he had a note from the constable, and he ended up working something out with his management office to keep the eviction off of his record. and, at that time, he had contacted me. we were still talking at the time. and he had asked me, "can i temporarily stay with you?" >> judge judy: but you mean you were still talking... he was your boyfriend? >> he was. >> judge judy: he was your boyfriend. it

spring. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in.ve a seat, please. >> judge judy: ms. beeson, the defendant is your former husband. >> correct. >> judge judy: and while you were still married, you bought a car. >> yes. >> judge judy: and he was the primary on the loan, and you were the cosigner? >> yeah. >> judge judy: or were you... was it a jointly held car? >> it was a joint thing. >> that's not true. she is the primary owner. i'm the secondary owner on the car. >> judge judy: what does the title say? >> the title says that she's the primary owner. >> the title says sandra spring or calvin spring. >> she is the primary owner. >> judge judy: no, that's not right, sir. i mean, i know the fact you keep saying it. it really, actually, it doesn't make any difference to me because while you were married, you jointly bought a car. then you got divorced. and i assume you didn't make arrangements in the divorce to deal with the car. >> we bought the car at the very end of our marriage. >> judge judy: i don't care. i don't care. >> yeah. >

pihl. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in.gman, you, according to what i read, live in the cape. and for several years since 2012, you were renting a house in california from the defendant for the winter months. how many months during the winter did you rent the house? from when to when? >> in the first year, in 2012, we rented it for 2 months. >> judge judy: 2013? >> well, it started actually in, uh, december of 2012 and went through april 30th of 2013. >> judge judy: december 1st? >> correct. >> judge judy: 2012 to? >> april 30, 2013. >> judge judy: fine. the next year? >> the next year was from november 1, 2013, until april 30, 2014. >> judge judy: great. next year? >> well, the next year, the defendant decided to sell the house or put it under a long-term lease. and we had to look for another place. >> judge judy: okay. when did she advise you of that? >> she advised me of that in... ll

whisenhunt. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome. parties have been sworn in. a seat. >> judge judy: mr. boyd, how long did you and the defendant live together as a couple? >> roughly about 4 or 5 months. but we were dating for 2 years. >> judge judy: from when to... what i want you to tell me is, from when to when did you live together? >> from november 27th until december 7th. >> judge judy: well, more than a year ago now, according to your complaint, you lent the defendant some money to buy a car. >> yes. she was running into trouble with... >> judge judy: right. that was, now, 13 months ago. is that right? >> yes. >> judge judy: that was in...? >> february. >> judge judy: february of 2015. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: and then, you continued to date, continued to have a close, intimate relationship, and then moved into together in november... >> yes, your honor. >> judge judy: ...of 2015. >> yes. >> judge judy: now, from february of 2015 until november of 2015, how much of this $1,000 that you gave to her to buy a car did she pay back? >> your honor, she h

white. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. you're welcome, judge. >> judge judy: ms. hernandez, do you own your home? >> yes, i do, your honor. >> judge judy: and you share a common driveway with the defendant. is that -- >> no, we do not. >> judge judy: do you have a photograph -- >> yes, i do. >> judge judy: of where she lives as opposed to where you are? >> yes, i do. >> judge judy: i'd like to take a look at it. >> this is my house, and that's their house with their driveway. >> judge judy: so you're next door to each other? >> correct. that's how close we are. >> judge judy: and it is your claim that the defendant backed into your iron gate. >> she ran into it forward. >> judge judy: forward. and damaged it. >> and damaged it. >> judge judy: you want her to pay for the damage. and ms. white says she never did that, and she's got a counterclaim for harassment and for filing a restraining order against her. >> correct. >> judge judy: how long have you been neighbors? >> they moved in in april, so it's only been a couple mon

. >> byrd: order! all rise!matter of haughton/austin vs. del rio. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. sir, have a seat. >> judge judy: ms. austin, it is your claim that the defendants' minor son, i assume this young man right here, was responsible for an automobile accident. >> correct. >> judge judy: and you want his parents to be responsible for the damage that was done to your car. >> correct. >> judge judy: and you both own the car? >> i own the car. my daughter was driving at the time. >> judge judy: were you in the car? >> i was not in the car. >> judge judy: okay. so why don't you have a seat? >> have a seat. >> judge judy: perfect. how old is your son? >> 17, your honor. >> judge judy: does he have a driver's license? >> he does, your honor. >> judge judy: so he can drive by himself. >> that is correct, your honor. >> judge judy: and do you have insurance on the car? >> that is correct. >> judge judy: were you in the car with him? >> i

. >> byrd: order! all rise!s case number 26 on the calendar in the matter of barghout vs. nowlin. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. gentlemen, have a seat. >> judge judy: mr. barghout, your car was towed by a company that is owned by the defendants. d aim that it was aa result of that illegal tow, you and the defendants got into sort of a kerfuffle, and you were arrested not once, but twice -- the first time when you went to retrieve your car, and the second time when the defendants alleged that you threatened them on the phone? >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: okay. so, let's first find out where and when your car was parked when it was towed. >> yes, your honor. on the night of november 29th, i went to downtown, and i stopped -- >> judge judy: downtown where? >> downtown denver, your honor. and i stopped at a neighborhood hangout called charlie's. i played one game of billiards with someone. they invited me to go back to their place. they said

. >> byrd: order! all rise!f van der zee vs. berhane. >> judge judy: thank you. >> byrd: you're welcome, judge. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. >> judge judy: mr. and mrs. van der zee, it is your claim that the defendant, who owns a car-wash/detail place, is responsible for damage to a piece of artwork that was in the trunk of your car that you had brought in to be detailed. >> correct. >> judge judy: who brought the car into the garage? >> we both brought the car in. i drove it. >> judge judy: okay on what date? >> on october 31st. >> judge judy: what time? >> uh, it was in the morning sometime, maybe around 11:00. >> judge judy: what day of the week was the 31st? >> it was a saturday.udge neith of you were rkinat day? wh youughe whdriving? >> i was driving. >> judge judy: did you see mr. berhane? >> no, i did not. >> actually, i took the key from her. >> judge judy: hmm? >> tk be true, your honor. i don't remember seeing him. >> judge judy: so then you have to say, "i don't remember." you took t

byrd and. but it was previously unknown that the two men spoke that day, . and that their contact came just before the brother-in-law begin the process of dumping stock himself. in these findings the sec also revealed that there was an ongoing insider trading investigation into both senator burr and his brother-in-law. and it's filing the sec alleges that her had material non public information about the economic impact of the upcoming coronavirus crisis. based on his role at the time as chairman of the intelligence committee, as a member of the health committee, and through his former staffers who were directing key aspects of the government response to the virus. on the day senator burr called his brother-in-law, the brother sold between 97,000 and $280,000 worth of shares in six different companies. including several companies that were hit particularly hard in the market soon an economic downturn that would start within days. the week after the trade, the market began its crash. in his role

byrd rule and privilege jeb.ore on the subject you ever want to know. that is what we have to do. we hope to do that soon but we again, have to listen as the printed version goes out. there is some clarifications that will come forth because there is, it is always moving a bit and that will happen in a manner of amendments. we're on path to get this done. for those who said i want to see text, the text is there for you to review. for you to complain about it. for you to add to subtract from, whatever it is. we'll see what consensus emerges from that but we're really very much on a path. that is where we are. we have the bif. the hearing today. we have the text out there. we're on a path to get this all done. reporter: thank you, madam speaker. we've been hearing from a lot of progress serves who say they would still not vote for this package. so is it premature to move forward with a vote on the bipartisan package today? do you trust senators manchin and sinema will vote based on what is outlined in the framework

former safeway chief executive steve byrd said he was immediately interested in theranos when he heard elizabeth holmes' pitch that her desktop devices could run hundreds of blood tests from one fingerstick of blood. he said the company formed plans to put them in stores and arranged a demonstration for his board of directors in which homes through for one of the board members and put into her machine. it made noises, he said, but it never gave results. >> what this is doing is putting the focus back on elizabeth holmes. >> reporter: steve clark says the fact that safeway went on to invest $85 million in theranos is significant. >> when you hear about the demonstration that was done in front of these people and that they invested anyway, i thought that was important for the government to show, this is a highly persuasive, convincing individual who left a lot of carnage along the way. >> reporter: the day began with another setback for the juror, a buddhist juror said she would be reluctant to send elizabeth holmes to prison for a long time because her legend teaches love and forgivenes

. >> byrd: order! all rise! this is case number 521 on the calendar in the matter of belke vs. in. you may be seated. folks, have a seat. >> judge judy: ms. belke, you purchased a doll. and you ordered this doll from the defendant, who made it for you. she sent the doll to you, and you paid for it by credit card? >> yes. >> judge judy: and then,d said, i t think like the dol card charge. >> yes. >> judge judy: and the doll was over $2,000. so now you have the doll and ms. ziegra doesn't have any money. so far, that's correct? >> correct. >> judge judy: and then, according to you, sometime later, you changed your mind. so you told the credit card company you were no longer disputing the charge. >> correct. >> judge judy: how much later? >> maybe 2 to 3 weeks later. >> judge judy: that's outrageous! let's start out with, "that's outrageous," that 2 to 3 weeks later, you said, "well, now, i'm not gonna dispute the charge

. >> byrd: order! all rise!is case number 542 on the calendar in the matter of shattuck/merryman vs. duplessis. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. >> judge judy: were you in the car? >> no. >> judge judy: sit. thank you. you are? >> i am beau shattuck. >> judge judy: okay. duplessis. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: mr. shattuck, it is your claim that the defendant, subsequent to what i consider a road-rage incident, damaged your car by kicking it. mr. duplessis tells a different story, so i'm gonna start with him. >> okay. >> judge judy: mr. duplessis, on what date did this incident happen? >> oh, i don't know the exact date. hold on, ma'am. i have the police report right here. looks like november 6, 2013. >> judge judy: what time, mr. duplessis? >> it was about 11:30, quarter to 12:00. >> judge judy: morning? >> morning. yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: where were you going to or coming from? >> i was coming from school, heading home for a lunch break. >> judge judy: whose school? >> i'm a student at south

former safeway ceo stephen byrd talked about a deal with theranos that fell through when are the those could not deliver test results. he is supposed to return to the stand as the trial continues this week. >>> school enrollment in one part of the bay area is down. next on "today in the bay," what school leaders say is leading to the decrease in students. >> and jon gru den is gone. the raiders head coach facing backlash over resurfaced controversial emails. how he is responding. >>> but first, catch selma blair this afternoon on the kelly clarkson show. be sure to watch and find out one thing she was revealing about her best friend sarah michelle gellar. that's coming up for you on the "kelly clarkson show" on nbc bay area at 3:00 thismiss it. be right back. somebody in there? [ scream ] micheal myers is still alive. tonight, our family will kill him. i want to take his mask off and see the life leave his eyes. ♪ ♪ comprehensive dental coverage. so you can enjoy movie night to the fullest. one of many cost-saving medicare advantage benefits from scan health plan for 2022. call today,

. >> byrd: order! all rise.er of diamond, pendleton vs. diamond. parties have been sworn in. you may be seated. ma'am, have a seat, please. >> judge judy: you are brother and sister? >> yes. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: and your father passed away in may of last year. how old was he? >> 78. >> judge judy: and how long did he live with the defendant? >> approximately five years. >> judge judy: and where did they live together? >> in st. louis. >> judge judy: st. louis, missouri. >> yes. >> judge judy: and where do you live? >> i live in denver, colorado. >> judge judy: and you? >> i live in st. louis, missouri. >> judge judy: your last name is? >> pendleton. >> judge judy: in 2015, how many times did you see your father? >> i was there in january for a visit, and then he passed in may. >> judge judy: right. so you were there in january. >> mm-hmm. >> judge judy: prior to that, when were you there to visit your father? >> the prior year. >> judge judy: what month, the prior year, 2014? >> march. >> judge judy: ok

campaign the mob, the media ever reported on joe biden's partnership with the former klansman robert kkk byrdhe integration of public schools and busing. that is when joe biden say he didn't want schools if they became integrated to become racial jungles, his words here this is now an opportunity for republican candidates all over the world to step up and run on principles that will benefit alp americans. one of those candidates are stepping up, herschel walker who is running for senate in the great state of georgia against incumbent rafael raphael warnock. and laying out just what is at stake. take a look at this for the first time. >> agents in washington caused runawaynt inflation searching violent crime. rising gas prices, border crisis and business banking for workers. raphael warnock remained silent on what matters to georgians. >> we deserve a senator that looks out for us. what georgia needs is a bulldog. >> sean:n: 20 us now herschel walker. all right, i see you chuckling. you haven't seen the ad before i guess, right? or did you? >> that was my first time seeing the ad but the ad is

senator byrd was a traditionalist when it came to senate and decorum. steve: the byrd rule.ng pressure on me i'm not going to be able to stop the flood gates. they are saying we are going to default for the first time ever on our debt and gives an excuse to blow up the senate. eventually republicans would win on that because they are going to get the power back and make the democrats pay. in the short-term, this would be agree with kyrsten sinema. so many people seeing it here in new york are moving out of this state because they are sick of the high taxes. so many people have pulled their kids out of certain schools because they are tired of crt and the messages. and we see that in loudoun county and we have seen it all over new york city. during covid, that was an opportunity for people to go to another place and work via zoom and they enjoyed their livelihoods down in florida or texas. that's what elon musk was doing. yesterday he had this big meeting. definite from california pal alto. tough for people to people have come in from far away. no limit to how big you can --

same guy who was a protege of senator robert byrd who was a self professed member of the kkk when heclose to joe biden because he actuallyed asked joe to do his eulogy. after obama was elected and asked himd to be his vp only to appeal to the racists in the democratic party, he offended barack obama for saying he was clean. his record is abysmal and it's actually laughable that somehow he's trying to picture himself as the great white hope of african-americans. it's sad and unfortunately a lot of blm, the black lying marxists, they are actually falling for that. i'm not falling for it and i think the majority of americans are waking up as well. >> jesse: thank you for your thoughts. >> great job filling in for tucker this evening. >> jesse: appreciate it. after alec bought an accidentally shot and killed a crewmember on the set of his new movie, another person was seriously injured too. just obtain the 911 call from the scene. that is straight ahead. i had t. ♪ ♪ this halloween, xfinity rewards is offering up some spooky-good perks. like the chance to win a universal parks & resorts

the tweet that was labeled misleading, it said jessica byrd with no underlying health conditions passedmplications. she did t not want to get vaccinated. rest in peace. twitter has removed the misleading label. why do we let them get away with these rushes to judgment which are always one sided, joe? >> todd, they'll always get away with it. the problem is that twitter is a private company and they can't be told what to do in any way, shape or form. if they decide to censor anybody or call something misleading, they can go ahead and do that. because their stock is double id -- has doubled i believe in the past year. we can talk about breaking up the company or section 240 which gives them liability coverage but it's never going to happen, unfortunately. i feel horrible for the family. you have two kids there, 5 and 3. they lost their mom and the narrative appears to be that only trump supporters, only those living down south in rural areas don't want to get the vaccines but you see that african-americans are very hesitant to get the vaccine based on the numbers that we see, teachers in

when it comes to the environment but that's not where it stops in west virginia he looks at senator byrda mentor and he said i'm in a seat he liked to make deals and cared about the process i think he feels an allegiance to that. here's what i think is happening kyrsten sinema condenses and from a purple state, she's tougher than anyone thought, my bigger question mark kelly is up in a year end a purple state a lot of people believe it's a republican state, john mccain had that seat, if mark kelly wants to keep that is he making it easier for republicans to take him out because his silence says he's complicit with aoc's. larry: i think that's a really good point i am surprised that he's gotten a free pass, no one is focused on him. >> about the military background with the collapse of asking a stand a chance to show that he cares about his country more than his party. who will support him will the left wing of the party in the squad and company say i understand what you're up against nancy pelosi i'm in a put my agenda aside and vote for the one point to to not destroy the biden presiden

the gun free school zones impact that matthew shepard and james byrd jr.e crimes prevention act. of the conspiracy against race act. depth violent interference with federally protected -- in addition to calling on the united states postal service to intervene. it seems like there's a big snowstorm with a lot of snowflakes. >> a lot of snowflakes who are ready to recognized every act, every branch of this government, every military police force in terms of the fbi. to protect the system, protect themselves. z-uppercase-letter i come to this conversation as both a parent and an attorney. i also come to this conversation is just an extremely concerned american citizen. i think so many of us are guilty. republicans embraced the patriot act. there are many of those who look to expand the definition of domestic terrorism and many of us sat trusting school boards and educators to do what was right and here they are. first i was shocked over time with the condescension which they've treated so many people that spoke up into these meetings. but now they are ready t

one time robert byrd had one go on for over 100 calendar days. it is a jedi mind trick.elosi is pulling -- we will see if she ends the legislative day and says we need more time. when you talk to members, it is clear the president's visit was a huge morale boost and moreover, it provided clarity they need from him that he is still on board both of the bills moving at the same time, not one in front of the other. that was important clarity members did not have gd -- have. judy: we heard some democratic members expressing frustration ere that the president has not been as visible on this. what is your understanding of how involved he is? lisa: u.s. the white house where is the president. they said he has been involved. the white house has been involved all along. they point to senior advisers and staff that they say have been in close contact with every group and every faction of the democratic caucus. here is the group they point to. they are leading the charge on capitol hill. susan rice meets domestic policy. ron klain is the chief of staff. brian deese has the economic

chief angela byrd jaisol with cal fire. thank you so much for the time as well as that new information on the u.s. start a fire as well. right now on kron 4 dot com. you can find more information on how to prepare for fire season. use your mobile device to scan the qr code that you see right there in the middle of your screen and you'll be directed straight to our website at kron 4 dot com. pleasant hill. police tonight are hoping that a sketch can lead them to a man wanted in a brutal stabbing earlier this week that injured a man kron four's phillipe djegal picks up the story. >> a white man possibly in his late teens to early 20's standing 5, foot 8 with a husky build and shorter dirty blonde hair is believed to be the suspect pleasant hill. police say allegedly stabbed the 23 year-old man at around 1030 wednesday night. >> investigators with composite sketch of the man yields leads. i think we're dealing with a lot of young emotions. >> and i think that obviously big mistakes were made. but we're here to investigate it t

to take the lead on this so our house don't have to vote on something that's not going to pass the byrde or get through the reconciliation process. that bipartisan legislation which passed the house back in august is ready to go. that's why some house democrats but not a lot of them want that to be passed. and to be able to have this dual track approach where the white house wants it and the democratic caucus, you need to have that legislation, a dollar amount, what programs do they actually want to do? how far? is there means testing? we still don't have all of the details. we have some from senator manchin, we don't have a whole lot from arizona's senator, sinema. they need to get to work on finalizing that thing to catch up with the diplomat infrastructure. >> you are taking the words out of my mouth because until you have some of the hard numbers here how -- the top line for example, it is tough to sort of craft something when you don't know where those crit senators are. thank you, basically my coanors for the last 45 minutes of television here. a reminder, we are going to be waiti

but generally in closing to make, people would listen to robert byrd on appropriations or he didn't give you long history lesson for store you know the leaders and sometimes you would ask people to come to the floor and we need to show support of the republican side and mitch would say we need to show support the voluntarily in their always urged to come. a lot of people in the got up to speak, that was a good time to go to the men's room or have lunch or maybe even take a vacation. >> has there ever been a situation where and family, the colleagues went to someone and said, look, the age for other reasons or the equivalent of an intervention. >> not giving the names but i never thought they were treated fairly. and today he would not have a problem. and there are others who had bad drinking problems that had to be escorted off the floor from time to time. and i didn't serve liquor in my office because they wanted to get drunk, they were not going to do it in my office pretty good downtown or somewhere else and we didn't but we did serve coke or whatever. but put in the old days the lead

and then the byrd rule which we're going to deal with later. a rule written by a senator dead 12 years, 28 years ago, where the parliamentarian holds a seance to figure out what can go in and not go into the bill. that's what we're dealing with. if we're going to make the investments that we need now infrastructure, and i don't think there's anybody on either side of the aisle that disagrees, when you see the ratings from the american society of civil engineers, when you see the water main blowing up and flooding streets. when you see the sewers backing up into people's houses orover flowing into the river or you know without the resilience we need because of climate change, them getting overrun in severe weather events. these are investments that america needs. and i'm still, still not hearing from the other side of the aisle their plan to make these needed investments, put millions of americans to work and -- in very good-paying, family wage jobs and to make america more competitive. yeah, i wish the senate bill had been different. i wish, fo

it's called the byrd rule, and it's a very arcane procedure, but i completely agree with what my colleaguere going to get this done. it's going to be enormously beneficial for it american people. it attacks climate change, early childhood education, and so many priorities of the american people. the combination of the two bills we're taking up with the rescue plan that we already passed that lifted half the kids out of poverty will be the biggest investment in the american people since the new deal. >> there was news this week that would not be a surprise to anyone, and that was donald trump endorsing brazilian president bolsonaro, the trump of the tropics. currently facing criminal charges for his handling of the pandemic. you write in your book that this authoritarian streak now runs through the whole republican party, but it is not unique to america. quote, all around the world there is a new competition between autocracy and democracy, and for more than a decade the autocrats have been on the rise. this trend toward authoritarian i am began before donald trump and will not have spent i

former safeway ceo steve byrd says holmes had promised the machines could perform 95% of blood tests. holmes kept delaying the launch and never told him that the machines were not working as she claimed. what the government's theme from day one of this case has been as beware of false prophets. under cross examination, the defense pointed out that bird either was or should have been aware of the risks and the relationship and their contract allowed to cancel the agreement at numerous points. the former cfo at walgreens also testified about a doomed partnership with theranos still to come in noon, a cross country adventure for two brothers from the bay area more on their mission to raise money for displaced restaurant workers hit hard. by the pandemic. and as we give you a live look outside, it is a cooler. definitely much cloudier day across much of the bay area, you can see san francisco in the distance there. ktvu meteorologist. mark tamayo will have the forecast for your neighborhood coming up. we're all ready for a real vacation. one where you can sip tropical drinks with fruity g

and of course we have to have it comply with the 51-vote rule, the byrd rule and the privilege scrub. is that more on the subject than you wanted to know? anyway, that's what we have to do. and we hope to do that soon. but we, again, have to listen as the printed version goes out. there are some clarifications that will come forth, because it's always a moving a bit, and that will happen with amendments. we're on a path to get this done. for those who said i want to see text, the text is there. for you to review, for you to complain about, for you to add to, to subtract from, whatever it is. and we'll see what consensus emerges from that. but we're really very much on the path. so that's where we are. we have the bif. we have the hearing today. we have the text out there. we're on a path to get this all done. >> reporter: madam speaker, thank you. we've been hearing from a lot of progressives who say they would still not vote for this package. so is it premature to move forward with a vote on the bipartisan package today and do you trust that senators manchin and sinema will vote base