again, c.f.r.8, c.f.r.1.3, it specifically says the decision not to pursue a removal proceeding does not render you lawfully present. so it matters. you know, the words that were used here, and the program being created, matters. it's not enough to have mere forbearance. you need this additional step to achieve what the executive wants to accomplish. justice sotomayor: so your position is that in 1989, when george h.w. bush granted deferred enforced departure for chinese residents after the tiananmen square situation, that he acted illegally? ms. murphy: no, because that program was justified on a different power than the power here. it was deferred that the deferred enforced departure in article ii -- justice sotomayor: but there was no statutory authority for him to do that. ms. murphy: it is a power that the executive has always grounded in article ii foreign affairs power. a nationality, country-based concern power. now, there's currently a statute on the books, the temporary protected status statute, that says it is the exclusive authority through which the executive can grant n

again, c.f.r.8, c.f.r.1.3, it specifically says the decision not to pursue a removal proceeding does not render you lawfully present. so it matters. you know, the words that were used here, and the program being created, matters. it's not enough to have mere forbearance. you need this additional step to achieve what the executive wants to accomplish. justice sotomayor: so your position is that in 1989, when george h.w. bush granted deferred enforced departure for chinese residents after the tiananmen square situation, that he acted illegally? ms. murphy: no, because that program was justified on a different power than the power here. it was deferred that the deferred enforced departure in article ii -- justice sotomayor: but there was no statutory authority for him to do that. ms. murphy: it is a power that the executive has always grounded in article ii foreign affairs power. a nationality, country-based concern power. now, there's currently a statute on the books, the temporary protected status statute, that says it is the exclusive authority through which the executive can grant n

again, c.f.r.8, c.f.r.1.3, it specifically says the decision not to pursue a removal proceeding does not render you lawfully present. so it matters. you know, the words that were used here, and the program being created, matters. it's not enough to have mere forbearance. you need this additional step to achieve what the executive wants to accomplish. justice sotomayor: so your position is that in 1989, when george h.w. bush granted deferred enforced departure for chinese residents after the tiananmen square situation, that he acted illegally? ms. murphy: no, because that program was justified on a different power than the power here. it was deferred that the deferred enforced departure in article ii -- justice sotomayor: but there was no statutory authority for him to do that. ms. murphy: it is a power that the executive has always grounded in article ii foreign affairs power. a nationality, country-based concern power. now, there's currently a statute on the books, the temporary protected status statute, that says it is the exclusive authority through which the executive can grant n

c.f.r. and author of ashley's war, the untold story of a team of women soldiers on the special ops battlefield. and she said that three of the women from the book are in the room. so we will be putting you on the spot later. d we also have agnes gereben shafer, at the rand corporation and done many studies on the issue at hand. the first t with question last december, secretary of defense ash carter, opened all dwat roles to women, can you give us an update where does it stand? >> sure. juliette: good morning, everyone. thank you for having meefment as kimberly said, the secretary announced in early december he was opening all remaining positions to women. and during that announcement he directed that the service develop detailed implementation plans to come back to him by the first of january explaining exactly, articulating the details how they would make this happen. we stood up and implementation group co-chaired by the deputy secretary of defense and vice chairman of the joint chiefs of