five hundred and c.s.i. world index by up to forty percent since ending their executives up to dabble it's now why could that possibly be but i think it's pretty obvious what out of smith talked about when you put a bunch of businessmen and.

five hundred and c.s.i. world index by up to forty percent since ending their executives up to dabble it's now why could that possibly be why i think it's pretty obvious is what out of smith talked about when you put a bunch of businessmen into a room they will collude to fix prices and so when you go to basically stop being competitive they're made to be competitive so the stocks underperform because it no longer being competitive enterprises they do side deals they do balance off balance sheet deals they collude they rig markets they pay norma's bonuses so there are stocks start to become less compelling because there's a place or build a burger similar where executives go to collude so they're competitive ability collapses look at microsoft microsoft you know one of the great underperformers for years and years because it has a twice convicted pro tory monopolist to go to these con fabs on an annual basis but they don't compete they just predatory monopoly and that's not the same as capitalism the other thing o

five hundred and c.s.i. world index by up to forty percent since ending their executives up to dabble it's now why could that possibly be well i think it's pretty obvious is what i.