tell me about cade. $1.5 billion technology portfolio. it's important, because it is our core data base, not everything we do in technology. what i was told by overseers, we've made great progress and proven we can do system development, but they don't see a path to finishing c.a.d.e. internal projections were 2015, 2020. i believe technology projects, the way you get them done, you have leaders, people who run agencies focus on them and drive towards result. what we've done is refocus the effort. and we've split apart trying to do all of the application work at the same time we do the data base work. the core is getting the data base done. we'll get refunds out quicker and address material weaknesses and we will be able to use data for enforcement programs. it's the real business comes out of the data base. we're focused on getting that done now and we're slowing down application development and focusing on conversion of the database. the other thing that's important from the report that came out, the vast majority of $400 million is bei

we need to make sure there's a cade answer around those skices to use those and test the things we wantto use. as we go forward, we want to make sure those align with the incident, planning and response problems developing. and then have a cycle and what do we need? >> i'd like to ask members in the audience to start lining up for questions. you say what's in it for us. how do we share? how do we send information back to figure out framework? the last question for the panel.

she doesn't understand a kid that is 4-years-old or 5-years-old can in fact get erections, and the cade keeps putting blue and finger paint in his hair so she will have to give him shampoos. i'm getting a little excited [laughter] any way, something like that gets in your head when you're 4-years-old and it just never goes away. my wife gives the best shampoos in the desert. [laughter] l, lawyers. obviously i don't have to tell you where they stand on this scale. i have to mobs. one of them was in a room like this a long time ago. the first time i was never invited to speak at one of these things, it was a philadelphia inquirer literary luncheon. the room was this size but it was completely full of people mostly to hear margaret truman. margaret shows up, doesn't say

now, i recall reading use it will can resist taking campaign literature from a cade? what about your kids and how were you able to approach people? you were on known. did they say what are these kids with you for? did you have to spend time simply convincing them your campaign was serious because hear all these cute little things helping you out? >> guest: not really. i guess in a way that we certainly didn't anticipate is was a huge benefit because the press was enamor with these children, they were in love with them. they loved coming to the classroom and shooting and interviewing kids in the hallway to talk up the process and that was our goal was to stick to the process and not get into party politics. i wasn't trying to brainwash the children into becoming die-hard democrats and from a very conservative part of nevada, so i had to really be careful and very diligent about focusing on how to run for office and how that process works. and the kids were, you know, so good and charming with the press and so articulate they became the darlings, and so in many ways peo