cal c.c.a. it would designate an existing state agencies as a central buyer, procuring energy, including c.c.a.s, like clean power s.f. last week the bill failed enough to get votes, which makes it a two-year bill, meaning it will then carry over to next year's legislative session, but will not pass this year. the author has indicated he is interested on working on different proposals. we plan on engaging on this issue, via cal c.c.a., as well as on our own. the next bill is sp155. this concerns p.u.c.'s review of renewable portfolio standards and integrated resource plan requirements for low-serving entities such as c.c.a.s cal c.c. as has been opposed to this bill, and we have shared their concerns. it would reduce c.c.a.s flecks abilitc.c.a.sflexibility. cal c.c.a. has worked to negotiate compromised amendments, and the author has agreed to put those into the bill. they address those concerns we had with p.u.c. procurement. we are expecting to see the amendment in print very soon and we'll co