we've begun to discuss with cal d.o.j. on a weekly basis the initiatives that are nearly ready for submission. these meetings have provided an immense amount of clarity for our project managers and other team members. i believe a couple of our commanders may be speaking to that. in addition, after an assessment earlier this year of the outstanding recommendations, i'm confident that we have completed the vast majority of the work to implement recommendations? we just have to submit and compile the documentation to be evaluated. i'll talk a little bit more about that after the executive sponsors have the opportunity to brief you. with that, if we can go over to the next slide, and i'll turn it over to commander o'sullivan >> thank you, executive director mcguire. my name is robert o'sullivan. as of today, july 1, 28 of the 59 department of justice c.r.i. use of force recommendations have been completed and gained substantially compliant. of the 29 remaining recommendations, four have been submitted by the use of force to ca

we've begun to discuss with cal d.o.j. on a weekly basis the initiatives that are nearly ready for submission. these meetings have provided an immense amount of clarity for our project managers and other team members. i believe a couple of our commanders may be speaking to that. in addition, after an assessment earlier this year of the outstanding recommendations, i'm confident that we have completed the vast majority of the work to implement recommendations? we just have to submit and compile the documentation to be evaluated. i'll talk a little bit more about that after the executive sponsors have the opportunity to brief you. with that, if we can go over to the next slide, and i'll turn it over to commander o'sullivan >> thank you, executive director mcguire. my name is robert o'sullivan. as of today, july 1, 28 of the 59 department of justice c.r.i. use of force recommendations have been completed and gained substantially compliant. of the 29 remaining recommendations, four have been submitted by the use of force to ca

we've begun to discuss with cal d.o.j. on a weekly basis the initiatives that are nearly ready for submission. these meetings have provided an immense amount of clarity for our project managers and other team members. i believe a couple of our commanders may be speaking to that. in addition, after an assessment earlier this year of the outstanding recommendations, i'm confident that we have completed the vast majority of the work to implement recommendations? we just have to submit and compile the documentation to be evaluated. i'll talk a little bit more about that after the executive sponsors have the opportunity to brief you. with that, if we can go over to the next slide, and i'll turn it over to commander o'sullivan >> thank you, executive director mcguire. my name is robert o'sullivan. as of today, july 1, 28 of the 59 department of justice c.r.i. use of force recommendations have been completed and gained substantially compliant. of the 29 remaining recommendations, four have been submitted by the use of force to ca

cal d.o.j. and hilliard hines has made it clear that delay is what we're trying to address here. we're not required to do that under the charter, but we did that because we wanted to do that. so the idea that this needed to be posted as a supporting document as a commission resolution just makes no sense to me, and it's not something that we've done before that we as a commission can point to. i'm a little flummoxed here because we're trying to address the delay in the d.g.o. process. 3.01, it's a wonderful document, but there are issues with it, and we're just trying to fix a little piece so the issue moves quicker. 3. 3.01 -- let me finish. we're trying to do it quickly, so we don't want another few weeks' process, we want to be able to move it along. that's all we're trying to do. to me, this is all just a little bit more of why is this a delay? why do we need to incorporate d.g.a.s comments when we've already considered so many of them. we want to get through them as quickly as possible. >> commissioner dejesus: well, information is power. people who are calling in, they alre

we've seen the cal d.o.j. talk about how it's significantly slower than expected, and sfpd must implement the recommendations with a greater sense of urgency is what the cal d.o.j. says. so we talk regularly to the sfpd about this, and my question for the police commission, how can you help to increase the urgency at which these 272 cops' recommendations are fulfilled? >> trying. >> vice president taylor: thank you. next caller. >> clerk: good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> hi. i would also like to echo the concerns of other callers about length of this meeting and about item 7 being closed. i don't understand. you know, why is this -- this section, you know, closed to the public? it's sort of does -- does nothing to restore any of my faith in government, and also, why isn't that open to public? you know, like, why are these things happening behind closed doors, especially at this time? and i'm another person who had issues at the beginning of the meeting where, you know, i -- the first, like, 40 mi

we've seen the cal d.o.j. talk about how it's significantly slower than expected, and sfpd must implement the recommendations with a greater sense of urgency is what the cal d.o.j. says. so we talk regularly to the sfpd about this, and my question for the police commission, how can you help to increase the urgency at which these 272 cops' recommendations are fulfilled? >> trying. >> vice president taylor: thank you. next caller. >> clerk: good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> hi. i would also like to echo the concerns of other callers about length of this meeting and about item 7 being closed. i don't understand. you know, why is this -- this section, you know, closed to the public? it's sort of does -- does nothing to restore any of my faith in government, and also, why isn't that open to public? you know, like, why are these things happening behind closed doors, especially at this time? and i'm another person who had issues at the beginning of the meeting where, you know, i -- the first, like, 40 mi